MOTHER JONES BY E-MAIL

Film: The Dogs of War

NEWS: Can David Simon's Generation Kill save the Iraq War movie?

July/August 2008 Issue


TOOLS

EmailE-mail article
PrintPrint article




BACKTALK

E-mail the editor





Google


on february 26, Washington Post military correspondent Thomas Ricks logged on to an online chat to discuss the war in Iraq, only to find that the number of readers awaiting him had reached its lowest point since the war started. "Our little group of people who still care about the Iraq war appears to be dwindling," Ricks wrote. Surveying the nearly empty chat room, Ricks offered a self-mocking take on the quote from Shakespeare's Henry V that had inspired the title of Stephen Ambrose's book about World War II paratroopers and the popular hbo miniseries based on it. "We few, we (un)happy few," Ricks wrote. "We band of brothers."

America's profound disconnect from the Iraq War has been nowhere more evident than in Hollywood. Five years into the war, there has yet to be a truly memorable or defining movie about the conflict. The few major Iraq-themed movies—Stop-Loss, In the Valley of Elah, and Redacted—have tanked at the box office, and the indifferent reaction to these heavy-handed attempts at relevance seems to have soured the industry on the idea of trying to bring Iraq to the screen. The Lucky Ones, an upcoming film starring Tim Robbins as a recently returned vet, reportedly doesn't include a single mention of the I-word. "If most critics use the word 'Iraq' in the opening sentence of their reviews, we'll deal with it," an executive at Lionsgate, the movie's distributor, told the New York Times. "Do I wish they wouldn't? Sure. But more than anything, I want them to write that it's a good movie."

Is it even possible to make a good movie about a war that's still being fought? Americans' battle fatigue only partly explains why Iraq films have flopped. Another reason is the way they have awkwardly shoehorned political talking points into soldiers' stories. In Stop-Loss, an Army sergeant (Ryan Phillippe) returns from Iraq only to face an "involuntary extension" of his service. In the Valley of Elah was a meandering whodunit about a retired military policeman (Tommy Lee Jones) who tries to find his son, an Army specialist who goes awol after coming back from Iraq. Both were oddly hesitant about depicting the actual war, skirting battlefield images in favor of making statements. Director Brian De Palma's Redacted tackled a real-life atrocity—the rape and murder of a 14-year-old Iraqi girl by American soldiers—but its combat scenes were ruined by its didactic approach.

Thankfully, the new hbo miniseries Generation Kill, which begins July 13, is neither squeamish nor ham-fisted. That's not surprising, considering that its executive producers and writers are David Simon and Ed Burns, the creative team behind the acclaimed and sorely missed series The Wire. In seven one-hour episodes, Simon and Burns meticulously re-create journalist Evan Wright's 2004 firsthand account of the Marine Corps' 1st Reconnaissance Battalion's six-week march to Baghdad in 2003. As might be expected, Generation Kill is violent, profane, and thoroughly engrossing.

In classic Simon style, the narrative unfolds with a deliberate pace that will be familiar to Wire fans yet frustrate casual viewers. Nearly the entire first episode depicts the bored Marines biding their time in Kuwait before war is declared. Still, Generation Kill  has a shaky, nervous intensity; it feels as if you are in the Humvees with the Marines. There's lots of realistic dialogue, peppered with references to sitreps (situation reports) and other military jargon, and a vast cast of fully drawn characters.

The Marines are mostly twentysomethings raised on mtv, South Park, and Grand Theft Auto. Corporal Ray Person (James Ransone, who played the squirrelly dockworker Ziggy Sobotka in season two of The Wire) is a stimulant-chomping, Ice Cube-quoting Humvee driver. The hulking Sergeant Rudy Reyes' obsession with his appearance earns him the nickname "Fruity Rudy"; his buddies suggest that he become a gay porn star. (In a very Simon casting move, Reyes plays himself.) Towering above them all is the square-jawed Lt. Colonel Stephen Ferrando, a.k.a. "Godfather." When Wright, portrayed as an awkward reporter, asks Ferrando how his voice got so scratchy, he explains that he had throat cancer. "You a smoker?" asks Wright. "No, just lucky, I guess," croaks Ferrando.

What distinguishes Generation Kill from the Iraq films that came before it is its fearless portrayal of the Marines and the conflict itself. In the first episode, Person reads aloud from a letter that some schoolchildren back home have written to the 1st Recon, wishing for peace. To the delight of his fellow grunts, Person proclaims that "Peace appeals to tree-hugging bisexuals...War is the motherfucking answer." That gung-ho spirit drives the 1st Recon as it rolls into Iraq, then battles its way through Nasiriyah and onward to Baghdad. As the Marines cross the desert, one scans the night sky, lit up by air strikes, and says with an awestruck gasp, "I wish I had some 'shrooms." When the 1st Recon zooms past welcoming villagers, one Marine yells out the window, "Thank you, vote Republican!"

The Marines' chest-beating patriotism and video-game-bred detachment from humanity make Generation Kill more challenging to watch than The Wire, which gradually evoked viewers' sympathies for underdogs like drug slingers and the stickup maestro Omar. "What's cool about David is that he doesn't care if you like these guys," says Evan Wright, who contributed to the script. "But he does care if you understand them better." Likability, Simon told me in an interview, is irrelevant because the Marines "are doing what they're trained for. They're not asking for forgiveness, and none need be given." When they say something offensive, "there is no need for David Simon to get in there and start arguing with them."

Just as The Wire accepted its characters' flaws but not the flaws of the criminal justice, education, and political systems, Generation Kill is more interested in how the earliest days of the war revealed its fatal missteps, from the insufficient equipment to the blurry line between combatants and civilians. In an incredibly tense scene, an Iraqi boy is mistakenly shot during a pitched battle to take an airfield. When some Marines appeal to the Godfather to have him medevaced, he sternly rebukes them, saying that civilian casualties will get the same minimal treatment as wounded soldiers. "The standards here," he barks, "are fucking zero."

Simon insists he has downplayed his politics in Generation Kill. "I have very strong feelings about the war," he told me. "But they do not belong in this piece." Generation Kill's lack of overt political message sets it apart from the murky, message-driven, characterless plots of other Iraq films. The one belief that clearly comes through is Simon's single-minded belief in the power of a good narrative to transcend all other considerations, from messaging to marketing. "In the feature film world it's about, 'Who is our audience?' and 'What are we trying to say to our audience?'" Simon says. "I don't give a fuck about our audience. I believe in the story itself."

Ultimately, Simon says, the main audience he wants to reach is the soldiers themselves. "Do they think that our work is fair and accurate in capturing those first six weeks to Baghdad? I hope that the core values of the piece are reflective of what these guys experienced." When I spoke with him, he was preparing to screen Generation Kill  for a group of 1st Recon vets in Los Angeles.

Simon is right to be concerned about soldiers' reactions. Paul Rieckhoff, the founder of the Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America, blasted Stop-Loss for portraying soldiers as "pro-war, beer-swigging, handgun-toting, Toby Keith-singing super-patriots with flags tattooed on their arms." The movie, he noted, was loaded with "inaccuracies any vet could have spotted." From what I've seen, Generation Kill's attention to detail should trump any accusations of stereotyping or sensationalism.

The idea that vets are Generation Kill's test audience seems to confirm the notion that the viewership for films about the war is miniscule. Yet inside Simon's desire to make a war movie that warriors will recognize and hopefully embrace may be a formula for a movie that not only captures war's realities but has wide appeal to boot. Simon explains that his guiding principle is to "write for the people you are telling the story about, convince them that you've got the story right, and then everyone else will follow." If his faith in the journalistic "show, don't tell" ethos proves correct, then the first Iraq War movie to aspire to something close to documentary realism will resonate far beyond its airdate. And if he's wrong, a great war movie will go neglected. But more distressingly, so will the war that inspired it.

Ethan Brown is writing a book about a high-profile New Orleans homicide involving an Iraq veteran.

Illustration: Douglas Fraser


 

Post a Comment

Your Name: 

Your Comment: 
 
Please press "Submit" only once to avoid double-posting.
All HTML formatting is removed from comments.
Read the Mother Jones community rules here.

Comments:

When a district is financially dependent upon corporate overseas dominance & the military-industrial complex... who wants to admit they LIKE the war because it keeps their region solvent?

Try telling my desperate & deluded fellow Canadians, who have tied their wagons to the TarSands economic boom, that all that Southern US ReichWing & Abu Dhabi investment money isn't *simply wonderful* solutions...

out of sight, out of mind... nobody wants to consider that there is now 'we' in corruption...

┄┄┄┄&# 9476;┄┄┄^ 76;┄┄┄┄^ 76;┄┄┄┄┄
BlueBerry Pick'n
can be found @
ThisCanadian com
┄┄
"... tolerance of intolerance is cowardice" ~ Ayaan Hirsi Ali.
"We, two, form a Multitude" ~ Ovid.
┄┄
"Silent Freedom is Freedom Silenced"
┄┄┄┄&# 9476;┄┄┄^ 76;┄┄┄┄^ 76;┄┄┄┄┄
Posted by:BlueBerry Pick'nJuly 14, 2008 12:55:47 PMRespond ^
Having watched the first episode I concur with Ethan's analysis. Simon's genius seems to be his ability to position the characters in what seems to be perfectly the only situation they could possibly be in. Everything about them brought them to this point in their lives and there's no other choice for them. There's no blame in that, how could there be? but plenty of pathos and tragedy. Watch the scene in episode one, as the soldiers are forced to release the refugees rather than give them protection. Everybody is trapped; just like everyone in "The Wire". Watching his works is a great exercise in compassion. I would also like to mention the FX series "Over There" which also did a pretty good job of depicting the realities and avoiding the tendency to preach. This show also ran into the problem of a disinterested audience (or is it that people can't watch something that looks too much like a war that is on-going?) and was cancelled after the first season.
Posted by:tmoneyJuly 14, 2008 1:02:04 PMRespond ^
For a great film on Iraq, watch the recently released documentary "Full Battle Rattle". It's about a training village populated by Iraqis where the troops are sent for 2 weeks before depolying to Iraq. It follows one battalion for the 2 weeks they are there.

The objective is to teach the soldiers how to win hearts and minds. Without giving away too much, let's just say the soldiers fare about as well at the training camp as they do in Iraq. By showing their failure in a situation that is totally controlled by the US, it illustrates the futiility of their task in Iraq.

Watch it, it's a great film!
Posted by:JerryJuly 16, 2008 8:32:35 AMRespond ^
"They're not asking for forgiveness, and none need be given."

They aren't now. They will be later. Too much later.
Posted by:JBJuly 16, 2008 10:25:21 AMRespond ^
I don't agree with the assessment of "Stop Loss" as a ham-fisted message movie. Both the HBO series and "Stop Loss" show the soldiers without flinching and both are well done. However, "Stop Loss" is a character driven film (typically the more feminine way of telling a story). To dismiss such as a message movie strikes me as a values driven judgment -- and rather unexamined, mainstream, patriarchal values at that.

The the HBO show is offered up as the well-done version, in part because it doesn't shy from showing war images. While that is surely one side of a film about war, it is hardly the only story-- and perhaps not even the most important story. It is, after all, a war on humanity. War is a war on humanity.

It's a decidedly and disappointingly predictable masculine value to regard the actual war visuals as being the most important images and hence a version not showing them is criticized as shying away from those images. When we recall the Viet Nam war, there were compelling images of the vets after they returned home as well as the images of the actual war. It was after they returned home that we began to see, if we choose to look, the human cost of war as the answer.

The talented (female) director of "Boys Don't Cry" filled "Stop Loss" with frank portraits of soldiers, whom we might not like if we met IRL, as they deal with PTSS, problems readjusting on home visits, etc- these are all real issues facing the soldiers of this war more than any other, here demonstrated with almost cruel rawness. What makes this war any different? The tours are longer, they keep repeating, soldiers are stop-lossed -- all of which causes the family structure to break down, domestic violence in returning families rises. These are costs we as a society pay for war; a gradual erosion of humanity which reveals itself in the demise of marriages, families, etc.

"Stop Loss" begs the important question, what is the point of war? Who is paying and who is benefiting?
Posted by:Sarah JonesJuly 20, 2008 10:19:41 AMRespond ^
Thinly-Veiled War Mongering
Some thoughts...

"Simon insists he has downplayed his politics in Generation Kill. "I have very strong feelings about the war," he told me. "But they do not belong in this piece."

Overall thought - first of all, this isn't a war, rather a murder-spree parading around as a "war." And Simon's idea that politics doesn't belong in his narrative is silly - the entire Iraq slaughter (read: murder field) is a political act... from its core to its outer edges. Turning his camera on was his first political act - and that's okay - it's the lack of acknowledgment that's disingenuous. Hawks and doves abound - but what's boiler plate is this: the Iraq invasion is mass murder perpetrated by the Bush Crime Family, the cowardly Democrats, the mandarins of the corporate world, the CEOs, the bankers, the politicians, the judges, the generals, and of course, the soldiers. Which brings to mind Arundhati Roy's eloquent argument regarding the soldier's responsibility in ending war:

"Wars will be stopped only when soldiers refuse to fight, when workers refuse to load weapons onto ships and aircrafts, when people boycott the economic outposts of Empire that are strung across the globe."

Secondary thought - Brown and Simon seem to think it's important what the warriors (read: pawns and murderers) think of their first six weeks invading a sovereign nation, killing and maiming the "savages" at will. We already know what they think - they volunteered and pulled the triggers. Who cares about lack of armor, lack of support? It's the "warriors" murder-spree as much as it is the American government's. They're in it together, one in the same (albeit the volunteers in this war are pseudo-victims in a poverty draft from small towns and poor urban neighborhoods).

Final thought - Brown writes: "Simon explains that his guiding principle is to "write for the people you are telling the story about, convince them that you've got the story right, and then everyone else will follow." Except the real and "right" story of this murderous atrocity rests with the Iraqi people - hundreds of thousands of them crying from their graves for justice. Until Simon shifts his POV squarely on the true victims, this edgy piece of fiction is still an exercise in American propaganda.
Posted by:BerniewentboomJuly 20, 2008 11:27:07 AMRespond ^
I couldn't aree more. Calling the slaughter a war is like saying that Bruce Lee fighting a five year old girl is a fair fight. The Iraq war amounts to nothing more than high tech genocide.
Posted by:James ThompsonJuly 20, 2008 3:22:18 PMRespond ^
What about No End in Sight? that was a great Iraq war film.
Posted by:Devang ShahJuly 21, 2008 10:41:53 PMRespond ^
I won't watch any movie about war, even if it has a socially redeeming script. Real war is ugly, it's real, not a fictional reinactment. I find it offensive, and that it reinforces the fictional media as reality, video games, virtual reality mind set in the good ole USA way of life ...It's sad because the only reason there is so much emotional damage PTSD of the vets post Vietnam and Iraq is a matter of self justification and conscience. People need to know that what they worked lived, died or killed for was justified...To take over, occupy a country for oil is pretty evil, and the only justification for this is to lie to yourself, that you are there for a higher purpose. That your friends death, your own emotional or physical disabilities, kept Americans free, and so on....You must believe what you are told, apple pie, mom and USA, patriotism, you are not to think for yourself or have the possible thoughts that maybe you are just a pawn, fodder for the rich to gain more power..War should never be enacted unless we are directly attacked, and the attackers are not some mystical powerful terrorist that are hiding behind every Bush! I never voted for Bush, I was against the war, I have protested in a civil manner, and yet I am a citizen of an Evil Empire, which seems about to crumble...My life is much harder since the Bush Reich took hold, people are dieing in the US because of lack of health care, and homelessness...Why doesn't Burns and Simon make a documentary about the 911 lie, poverty and homelessness..How about a documentary on how the public is brainwashed via media to believe what ever the rich and powerful want us to believe..Orwell's 1984 wasn't just a piece of scifi, it was a prophetic warning..The only people who are coming out on top, richer more powerful are the global corporate giants, and their political cronies and puppets...Oh and the people who make a living off of the real life tragedy of war, like movie producers and documentarians , aren't doing that bad either...
Posted by:grangersmithAugust 3, 2008 5:30:44 PMRespond ^

Jail.org - Inmate Search
Criminal records, instant public records & people search & current court records. www.jail.org

U.S. Public Records Search
Search County & State Court Records, Criminal records, Vital and Adoption Records www.PublicRecordsInfo.com

Records.com - People Search
Public Records and Background Checks. Instantly Search Criminal Records, Addresses and Court Records www.Records.com

Court Records & County Records
Find Instant Public Records, Criminal Records as Well as County Property Records Search. www.PublicRecordsIndex.com
















Troopergate Finale

Banks

Dialing it Down

Friday Cat Blogging - 10 October 2008


More MoJo voices...



bookIN PRINT

CLICK HERE
for more great reading

headphones IN TUNE
New music every issue

CLICK TO LISTEN

Advertise Liberally

This article has been made possible by the Foundation for National Progress, the Investigative Fund of Mother Jones, and gifts from generous readers like you.

© 2008 The Foundation for National Progress

About Us   Support Us   Advertise   Ad Policy   Privacy Policy   Contact Us   Subscribe   RSS