What's Really Behind the Van Jones Attack

UPDATE: On Wednesday, Kerpen continued his effort to associate green jobs with progressive radicalism and cronyism, in this New York Post op-ed alleging a link between the Apollo Alliance and the Weathermen.
The political smear campaign against Van Jones didn't begin in the paranoid brain of Glenn Beck. The wildly distorted attacks that ultimately brought down President Obama's green jobs czar on Saturday were fed to Beck by Phil Kerpen, the little-known policy director for the polluter front group Americans for Prosperity. Taking credit for the effort in jubilant, surprisingly frank blogs and tweets, Kerpen describes Jones' resignation as the first blow in a new fight to derail the climate bill.
"The Van Jones affair could be an important turning point in the Obama administration," Kerpen gushed on the Fox website this Sunday. "It's also one of the most significant things I've had the honor of being involved in."
Kerpen goes on to recount sending Fox an article on Jones from the East Bay Express, an Oakland alt-weekly that covers Jones' hometown. "Please share with Glenn this article about green jobs czar Van Jones, a self-described communist who was radicalized in jail," Kerpen wrote in a note to Beck's producer, adding: "Confirms 'watermelon' hypothesis." (Kerpen claims this wasn't a reference to Jones' black skin, but rather a hypothesis that the climate bill is "Green on the outside but communist red to the core.")
"The rest is history," Kerpen boasts. He spent two weeks "researching everything I could find about Jones" before appearing on Beck's program several times last month to dish.
Beck clearly didn't care that Kerpen wasn't a journalist, that his allegations against Jones were wildly exaggerated, or that he had a clear conflict of interest: Americans for Prosperity was launched and funded by foundations and family members tied to Koch Holdings LLC, which has extensive oil and chemical holdings. In February, Americans for Prosperity began airing ads that described backers of the climate bill as "wealthy eco-hypocrites." (Nevermind that AFP founder Fred Koch has a net worth of roughly $17 billion). And it's behind this summer's Hot Air Tour, a traveling air show that is "exposing the ballooning costs of global warming hysteria." In his Fox blog post, Kerpen is completely frank about his motivation for appearing on Beck's show. ". . .I was glad to do it," he writes, "because exposing the green jobs scam is critical to fight cap-and-trade, my top legislative priority for the year."
In other words, it's no accident that Kerpen targeted Jones. Opponents of the climate bill hate the idea of "green jobs" because it undermines their central argument: that fixing the climate will wreck the economy. That's why Obama's speeches have glossed over climate science in favor of talking up energy independence and the coming clean tech boom. But if Kerpen and his ilk can reframe green jobs as "government" jobs, linking them to fears of pork, cronyism, and central planning, then they start winning again. So it helps immensely to call Jones a "self-described communist," or put forth, as Beck has, that "almost everyone who does believe in global warming is a socialist."
Kerpen makes no effort to conceal this agenda. He's even created a flow chart of progressive political groups in an effort to leverage his Jones narrative into one in which green jobs are primarily left-wing political patronage jobs. "[The] push for "green jobs" has everything to do with funding the far-left political activities that Van Jones so adamantly believed in," he writes.
Green jobs are not economic jobs but political jobs, designed to funnel vast sums of taxpayer money to left-wing labor unions, environmental groups, and social justice community organizers.
Now that Jones has resigned, we need to follow through with two critical policy victories. First, stop cap-and-trade, which could send these green groups trillions, and second repeal the unspent portion of the stimulus bill, which stands to give them billions. The Van Jones affair is, as President Obama likes to say, a "teachable moment," and we need to put not just him but the whole corrupt "green jobs" concept outside the bounds of the political mainstream.
As ridiculous as this idea sounds, it's clearly working for the time being, and it's not about to go away. Kerpen notes that many of his "findings" have yet to be published, including a forthcoming paper from the Capital Research Center, a group with past ties to tobacco money that "monitors" environmental and labor groups. Expect more of the same from a fossil fuel industry that's growing increasingly desperate to reframe the debate. Last week, Kerpen sent his 4,800 Twitter followers this call to arms: "All the Van Jones outrage in the world won't matter if we don't stop stimulus abuse and cap-and-trade."
Alternet's Addie Stan also reported on Americans for Prosperity in a story that we have crossposted here.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Comments
JP MORGAN
I didnt know that JP Morgan was a wealthy eco-hypocrite or even socialist...probably because they arent.
Kerpen, as with all things FOX, seems to have swallowed the alternative reality juice.
Wall street is a big player behind cap and trade legislation. As for Kerpens research on Van Jones, pffft, its easily found on the internet and ihas never been a secret by any means.
Express version of events
CLIMATE CHANGE HYSTERIA
The two problems with Cap and Trade are:
1. There is no "man made climate change"
and
2. If it were truly a desire for energy independence there are much better ways to achieve it without this monstrous Bill.
Try drill here, drill now, nuclear, clean coal, coal gassification, natural gas as a vehicle fuel, hydrogen as a vehicle fuel and on and on.
Cap and Trade is not about energy or climate just like Health Care is not about health OR insurance. They are both about power and control - nothing else!
climate change hysteria
How much do you get to contribute to this site......You are contributing to the warming,by bloviating, and spewing...obviously a plant by "clean coal"
No sir E, we are
No sir E, we are clear-cutting the forests we build 12 coal fired power plants a weak we drive 600 million cars and are working on doubling our population, nope we ain't changing nothing no way no how nope just ain't happening unh-unh nahnahnah I can't hear you.............
re: Climate Change Hysteria
Oh my, they keep crawling out of the woodwork like an infestation of termites. Mr. Hysteria, as we say, has no clue.
Drill here, drill now is a myth. Even Bush's energy secretary stated that by the time we actually locate any oil in said areas it would only be replacing the oil that is running out if that.
There is no such thing as clean coal. I'm not going to bother answering the rest of your nonsense.
Do us all a favor and take a swim in the coal slag that broke through it's containment area, killed people, destroyed homes and polluted miles of streams. All thanks to the Bush administration.
Oh, and how do you expect to develop hydrogen technology and natural gas when Kerpen and his minions are trying to stop it?
The meaning?
Do you even realize what an "astroturfer" is? It is someone who PAYS protesters to show up and demonstrate. You know, like ACORN and the SEIU. Convincing the rubes to march against the specter od socialism isn't astroturfing, it's good organization and propaganda. Don't be jealous, and don't confuse terms.
Butterfly net please
Yes, we have another escapee using the same tired wing-nut talking points.
It is laughable to listen to the quivering right-wingers and their irrational fear of something that isn't even happening. Like socialism?
Have you heard of Medicare and Social Security? Both VERY popular government programs. In fact if you want to get elected in this Country you don't talk about touching either.
And if you're a retiree, the Republicans are a party you should want to steer clear of. They want to privatize Social Security and Medicare so you too can watch your retirement savings drop by 40 or 50% and see your medical insurance premiums sky rocket. You want to see pain and suffering, limited services and mediocre care? Then the Republicans are your party.
What's Really Behind the Van Jones Attack
Excellent article Josh.
This fellow Kerpen is a mercenary propagandist.
He is a member of one of the largest businesses in the nation. They get away with lies like a baby gets away with dirtying its diaper.
Watermelon Hypothesis
do you really think that using a colorful euphemism like "watermelon hypothesis" has nothing to do with race, it has everything to do with race, espeicallly with a biracial prez and a militant former black green jobs czar in van jones
another source for spreading false rumours about jones was World Net Daily, which when combined with astroturf groups, and the right wing media which considers WND as their NY Times, it was quite a cabal of bullshit
I heard it from the very
I heard it from the very very top that the two people most responsible for the attacks on Van Jones were Van Jones and Barack Obama.
that all those videos of Van
that all those videos of Van Jones spewing hatred were bogus.
That really wasn't him claiming to be a Radical Communist!
It was really someone else in disquise.
You know this is a crazy world we live in!!!
Oh, heard all these Acorn scandal videos are bogus too!
Post new comment
MoJo Comments: Send Us Your Feedback
We changed our spam software to better filter comments. Should you encounter any issues, please let us know.



