<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://motherjones.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Mother Jones - Comments for &quot;Alice Doesn&amp;amp;#039;t Vote Here Anymore&quot;</title>
 <link>http://motherjones.com/politics/1998/03/alice-doesnt-vote-here-anymore</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Alice Doesn&#039;t Vote Here Anymore&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://motherjones.com/politics/1998/03/alice-doesnt-vote-here-anymore#comment-122396</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Range Voting is better than IRV for single-winner elections.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A good way to combat Gerrymandering, though, is to have proportional representation.  The STV method (IRV is just STV with a single winner) is pretty good getting proportionality when picking more than one candidate.  But newer methods like Reweighted Range Voting and Asset Voting are simpler and better.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Also, Warren Smith&#039;s shortest splitline algorithm is a way to draw districts to eliminate Gerrymandering cold.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Check out &lt;a href=&quot;http://rangevoting.org/&quot; title=&quot;http://rangevoting.org/&quot;&gt;http://rangevoting.org/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate> <key>pubDate</key>
 <value>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 18:10:19 -0800</value>
</pubDate>
 <dc:creator> <key>dc:creator</key>
 <value>Clay Shentrup</value>
</dc:creator>
 <guid> <key>guid</key>
 <attributes> <isPermaLink>false</isPermaLink>
</attributes>
 <value>comment 122396 at http://motherjones.com</value>
</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://motherjones.com/politics/1998/03/alice-doesnt-vote-here-anymore#comment-122395</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Be careful in supporting Instant Runoff; as I understand it often results in the least unfavored candidate being selected, not most favored.  Range voting is a better solution, where voters can rate as many candidates with a rank from 0 to 9, and the candidate with the highest average rating is selected as the representative.  The selection error is much lower than with instant runoff. (check out rangevoting.org for more info, I&#039;m shaky on the details)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate> <key>pubDate</key>
 <value>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 07:12:56 -0700</value>
</pubDate>
 <dc:creator> <key>dc:creator</key>
 <value>Stephen</value>
</dc:creator>
 <guid> <key>guid</key>
 <attributes> <isPermaLink>false</isPermaLink>
</attributes>
 <value>comment 122395 at http://motherjones.com</value>
</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

