<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://motherjones.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Mother Jones - Comments for &quot;Waxman: White House Politicization &amp;amp;quot;More Widespread Than Previously Known&amp;amp;quot;&quot;</title>
 <link>http://motherjones.com/mojo/2007/07/waxman-white-house-politicization-more-widespread-previously-known</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Waxman: White House Politicization &quot;More Widespread Than Previously Known&quot;&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://motherjones.com/mojo/2007/07/waxman-white-house-politicization-more-widespread-previously-known#comment-36360</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;Senator Clinton has no balls.&quot;  Uh, yeah.  Brilliant insight there.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate> <key>pubDate</key>
 <value>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 11:36:14 -0700</value>
</pubDate>
 <dc:creator> <key>dc:creator</key>
 <value>Howdy Doody</value>
</dc:creator>
 <guid> <key>guid</key>
 <attributes> <isPermaLink>false</isPermaLink>
</attributes>
 <value>comment 36360 at http://motherjones.com</value>
</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://motherjones.com/mojo/2007/07/waxman-white-house-politicization-more-widespread-previously-known#comment-36359</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The loyalty oath to Bush is nothing new. It was on TV within the last couple of years and I not only witnessed it but sent an email comment, probably to the Huffington Post, at the time. It was shocking because it is probably treasonous not only to agree to a loyalty oath to Bush but the administration of it as well.Of course, the MSM would not report this, but I shudder to think I was the only one to witness this event.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate> <key>pubDate</key>
 <value>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 08:39:13 -0700</value>
</pubDate>
 <dc:creator> <key>dc:creator</key>
 <value>bogi666</value>
</dc:creator>
 <guid> <key>guid</key>
 <attributes> <isPermaLink>false</isPermaLink>
</attributes>
 <value>comment 36359 at http://motherjones.com</value>
</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://motherjones.com/mojo/2007/07/waxman-white-house-politicization-more-widespread-previously-known#comment-36358</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Ron Paul has been outspoken against the Iraq war and has suffered greatly for it. Too bad Senator Clinton has no balls.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate> <key>pubDate</key>
 <value>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 16:51:05 -0700</value>
</pubDate>
 <dc:creator> <key>dc:creator</key>
 <value>Judy</value>
</dc:creator>
 <guid> <key>guid</key>
 <attributes> <isPermaLink>false</isPermaLink>
</attributes>
 <value>comment 36358 at http://motherjones.com</value>
</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://motherjones.com/mojo/2007/07/waxman-white-house-politicization-more-widespread-previously-known#comment-36357</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I know Ron Paul is like a breath of fresh air on the hill, but seriously guys, Ron Paul isn&#039;t a panacea. Chill out on the RP lovefest; the blogosphere is too saturated with RP fanatics.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate> <key>pubDate</key>
 <value>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 13:39:14 -0700</value>
</pubDate>
 <dc:creator> <key>dc:creator</key>
 <value>RealityCheck</value>
</dc:creator>
 <guid> <key>guid</key>
 <attributes> <isPermaLink>false</isPermaLink>
</attributes>
 <value>comment 36357 at http://motherjones.com</value>
</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://motherjones.com/mojo/2007/07/waxman-white-house-politicization-more-widespread-previously-known#comment-36356</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;As far as I&#039;ve been able to tell, there&#039;s only one politician or bureaucrat inside the DC Beltway who puts the oath to &quot;preserve, protect and defend the Constitution&quot; above all other motivations all the time, in every circumstance.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m talking, of course, about Congressman Ron Paul. The only TRUE Republican the party has left.&lt;br /&gt;
(He opposes the drug war as unconstitutional too, Tom)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate> <key>pubDate</key>
 <value>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 13:21:09 -0700</value>
</pubDate>
 <dc:creator> <key>dc:creator</key>
 <value>gvc</value>
</dc:creator>
 <guid> <key>guid</key>
 <attributes> <isPermaLink>false</isPermaLink>
</attributes>
 <value>comment 36356 at http://motherjones.com</value>
</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://motherjones.com/mojo/2007/07/waxman-white-house-politicization-more-widespread-previously-known#comment-36355</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Students for Sensible Drug Policy has set up an action alert where outraged citizens can send letters directly to the Drug Czar, demanding his resignation. And members of Congress - who control ONDCP&#039;s budget - will be copied on all the messages.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://daregeneration.blogspot.com/2007/07/partisan-republican-drug-czar-must.html&quot; title=&quot;http://daregeneration.blogspot.com/2007/07/partisan-republican-drug-czar-must.html&quot;&gt;http://daregeneration.blogspot.com/2007/07/partisan-republican-drug-czar...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate> <key>pubDate</key>
 <value>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 19:49:17 -0700</value>
</pubDate>
 <dc:creator> <key>dc:creator</key>
 <value>Tom</value>
</dc:creator>
 <guid> <key>guid</key>
 <attributes> <isPermaLink>false</isPermaLink>
</attributes>
 <value>comment 36355 at http://motherjones.com</value>
</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://motherjones.com/mojo/2007/07/waxman-white-house-politicization-more-widespread-previously-known#comment-36354</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Maybe they just feel so darn guilty about the criminal corruption that they&#039;re repressing their own personal part in the perversion of the public trust and they actually can&#039;t remember who said to fire whom, why all the emails were hastily deleted and what it was that was at stake when they swore to uphold the constitution.&lt;br /&gt;
I mean, that&#039;s a lot of stuff to think about, and all that thinking, is, like, haaaaard.&lt;br /&gt;
I feel so bad for them. I hope they all find really nice lucrative lobbying jobs where someone will finally appreciate all their hard work.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate> <key>pubDate</key>
 <value>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:07:48 -0700</value>
</pubDate>
 <dc:creator> <key>dc:creator</key>
 <value>Enisiv Veselka</value>
</dc:creator>
 <guid> <key>guid</key>
 <attributes> <isPermaLink>false</isPermaLink>
</attributes>
 <value>comment 36354 at http://motherjones.com</value>
</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://motherjones.com/mojo/2007/07/waxman-white-house-politicization-more-widespread-previously-known#comment-36353</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;TRUE Republicans know they own their loyalty to a higher power.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Question the Party?  Question Jesus.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate> <key>pubDate</key>
 <value>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 16:33:50 -0700</value>
</pubDate>
 <dc:creator> <key>dc:creator</key>
 <value>John</value>
</dc:creator>
 <guid> <key>guid</key>
 <attributes> <isPermaLink>false</isPermaLink>
</attributes>
 <value>comment 36353 at http://motherjones.com</value>
</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://motherjones.com/mojo/2007/07/waxman-white-house-politicization-more-widespread-previously-known#comment-36352</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Check this URL: It may be related. KW=&quot;email&quot;. I&#039;m thinking the politications is only one aspect: The memo outlines the audits that were done.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Note in the memo there are campaign funds mentioned. Yes, I realize it&#039;s not the same topic, but it appears to be related. The above memo discuss the political side; whiule the memo discusses the finances. The common link -- political office; recall, in the DOJ E-mails there were three offices: Political, legal, and public affairs.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Looking broadly, I would presume that the above memos in re Waxman&#039;s oversight issues; with the memoranda of the funding would be a subset of the larger issues which the WH legal office, and public affairs would know about, and would have been likely within the destroyed RNC e-mails.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Here&#039;s the memo, remember its part of a larger pattern, also link under &quot;anon&quot; below:&lt;br /&gt;
[ &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.citizensforethics.org/node/29445&quot; title=&quot;http://www.citizensforethics.org/node/29445&quot;&gt;http://www.citizensforethics.org/node/29445&lt;/a&gt; ]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate> <key>pubDate</key>
 <value>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 16:20:30 -0700</value>
</pubDate>
 <dc:creator> <key>dc:creator</key>
 <value>Anon</value>
</dc:creator>
 <guid> <key>guid</key>
 <attributes> <isPermaLink>false</isPermaLink>
</attributes>
 <value>comment 36352 at http://motherjones.com</value>
</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://motherjones.com/mojo/2007/07/waxman-white-house-politicization-more-widespread-previously-known#comment-36351</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Perhaps off topic, but relevant: If the likes of Taylor and Rove have a hard time understanding the rule of law: The Magna Carta puts man below law.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate> <key>pubDate</key>
 <value>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 16:15:22 -0700</value>
</pubDate>
 <dc:creator> <key>dc:creator</key>
 <value>Anon</value>
</dc:creator>
 <guid> <key>guid</key>
 <attributes> <isPermaLink>false</isPermaLink>
</attributes>
 <value>comment 36351 at http://motherjones.com</value>
</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://motherjones.com/mojo/2007/07/waxman-white-house-politicization-more-widespread-previously-known#comment-36350</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;All I can say is that nothing will change with these people in charge.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;IMPEACH, INDICT, CONVICT, IMPRISON.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate> <key>pubDate</key>
 <value>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 14:58:22 -0700</value>
</pubDate>
 <dc:creator> <key>dc:creator</key>
 <value>David</value>
</dc:creator>
 <guid> <key>guid</key>
 <attributes> <isPermaLink>false</isPermaLink>
</attributes>
 <value>comment 36350 at http://motherjones.com</value>
</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

