<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://motherjones.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Mother Jones - Comments for &quot;New Poll: Obama Inspirational But Can&amp;amp;#039;t Win&quot;</title>
 <link>http://motherjones.com/mojo/2007/10/new-poll-obama-inspirational-cant-win</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;New Poll: Obama Inspirational But Can&#039;t Win&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://motherjones.com/mojo/2007/10/new-poll-obama-inspirational-cant-win#comment-38470</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Mr. Obama may or may not win the presidency.  I just don&#039;t understand why he would want it.  The country is too far gone to save from itself.  The present regime, Democrats and Republicans, seem to be creating a sort of police state where all freedoms taken for granted in the early 50&#039;s are null and void.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate> <key>pubDate</key>
 <value>Sun, 07 Oct 2007 23:01:41 -0700</value>
</pubDate>
 <dc:creator> <key>dc:creator</key>
 <value>condi</value>
</dc:creator>
 <guid> <key>guid</key>
 <attributes> <isPermaLink>false</isPermaLink>
</attributes>
 <value>comment 38470 at http://motherjones.com</value>
</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://motherjones.com/mojo/2007/10/new-poll-obama-inspirational-cant-win#comment-38469</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;He will never be the U.S. President. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sorry people...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate> <key>pubDate</key>
 <value>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 19:00:57 -0700</value>
</pubDate>
 <dc:creator> <key>dc:creator</key>
 <value>Ames Tiedeman</value>
</dc:creator>
 <guid> <key>guid</key>
 <attributes> <isPermaLink>false</isPermaLink>
</attributes>
 <value>comment 38469 at http://motherjones.com</value>
</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://motherjones.com/mojo/2007/10/new-poll-obama-inspirational-cant-win#comment-38468</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I suggest that Obama continues to get substantial amounts of money because we collectively have decided we want him to assume the role that Barbara Jordan served in the Democratic Party: an unimpeachable gatekeeper of issues of our community who has an all-access pass to what used to be known as the &quot;smoke-filled room.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate> <key>pubDate</key>
 <value>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 14:09:21 -0700</value>
</pubDate>
 <dc:creator> <key>dc:creator</key>
 <value>Egalitare</value>
</dc:creator>
 <guid> <key>guid</key>
 <attributes> <isPermaLink>false</isPermaLink>
</attributes>
 <value>comment 38468 at http://motherjones.com</value>
</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://motherjones.com/mojo/2007/10/new-poll-obama-inspirational-cant-win#comment-38467</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;why the disparity for Obama?&lt;br /&gt;
the electability polls are unbiased (in theory at least), but donations are very biased.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate> <key>pubDate</key>
 <value>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 12:47:25 -0700</value>
</pubDate>
 <dc:creator> <key>dc:creator</key>
 <value>Clammy</value>
</dc:creator>
 <guid> <key>guid</key>
 <attributes> <isPermaLink>false</isPermaLink>
</attributes>
 <value>comment 38467 at http://motherjones.com</value>
</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://motherjones.com/mojo/2007/10/new-poll-obama-inspirational-cant-win#comment-38466</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;didn&#039;t the Dem party decide that Mike Dukakis was the guy who could unite the Dem party and win, and that was the most important thing?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;wasn&#039;t the story on Al Gore that he was the guy &#039;who could win&#039;, and that Bill Bradley couldn&#039;t?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;John Kerry... the same story 4 years later&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;i don&#039;t know why the &#039;party faithful&#039; don&#039;t grasp that they do their country and their party no service by trying to pick candidates based on who they think &#039;can win&#039; and consequently refuse to vote for the person they think is the best candidate in the field?&lt;br /&gt;
all that thinking achieves is a consistent failure to field the best candidate for the office, while proving that they are usually wrong in their &#039;can win&#039; evaluations anyway&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate> <key>pubDate</key>
 <value>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 10:25:33 -0700</value>
</pubDate>
 <dc:creator> <key>dc:creator</key>
 <value>jet</value>
</dc:creator>
 <guid> <key>guid</key>
 <attributes> <isPermaLink>false</isPermaLink>
</attributes>
 <value>comment 38466 at http://motherjones.com</value>
</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://motherjones.com/mojo/2007/10/new-poll-obama-inspirational-cant-win#comment-38465</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Claiming that someone &quot;can&#039;t&lt;br /&gt;
win&quot; this early only makes sense&lt;br /&gt;
if you&#039;re throwing in a&lt;br /&gt;
completely unelectable candidate, i.e., Foghorn Leghorn CAN&#039;T WIN. To wit, remember when Bush COULDN&#039;T POSSIBLY beat McCain to be the GOP candidate for PREZ?! It&#039;s NEVER (I said NEVUH!--f.l.)&lt;br /&gt;
wise to rule out a good candidate, in case Hillary has&lt;br /&gt;
her own campaign-wrecking &quot;Dean Scream&quot; moment.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate> <key>pubDate</key>
 <value>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 09:47:11 -0700</value>
</pubDate>
 <dc:creator> <key>dc:creator</key>
 <value>danby nickles</value>
</dc:creator>
 <guid> <key>guid</key>
 <attributes> <isPermaLink>false</isPermaLink>
</attributes>
 <value>comment 38465 at http://motherjones.com</value>
</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

