<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://motherjones.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Mother Jones - Comments for &quot;Does Obama Need a New Issue to Catch Clinton?&quot;</title>
 <link>http://motherjones.com/mojo/2007/10/does-obama-need-new-issue-catch-clinton</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Does Obama Need a New Issue to Catch Clinton?&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://motherjones.com/mojo/2007/10/does-obama-need-new-issue-catch-clinton#comment-39284</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;At this point I think its safe to say that Clinton gots it in the bag, even if Obama comes up with a New Issue Clinton would take his new issue and make it her owns ... I argee obama should accept his role as VP for 4/8 years then run again once he&#039;s done&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate> <key>pubDate</key>
 <value>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 15:44:46 -0700</value>
</pubDate>
 <dc:creator> <key>dc:creator</key>
 <value>D uN3T</value>
</dc:creator>
 <guid> <key>guid</key>
 <attributes> <isPermaLink>false</isPermaLink>
</attributes>
 <value>comment 39284 at http://motherjones.com</value>
</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://motherjones.com/mojo/2007/10/does-obama-need-new-issue-catch-clinton#comment-39283</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;It doesnt matter if Obama needs another issue I think that Obama does not have a chance against Clinton to win.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate> <key>pubDate</key>
 <value>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 15:27:04 -0700</value>
</pubDate>
 <dc:creator> <key>dc:creator</key>
 <value>bere</value>
</dc:creator>
 <guid> <key>guid</key>
 <attributes> <isPermaLink>false</isPermaLink>
</attributes>
 <value>comment 39283 at http://motherjones.com</value>
</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://motherjones.com/mojo/2007/10/does-obama-need-new-issue-catch-clinton#comment-39282</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;That should be &quot;looney toons&quot;, not &#039;tunes&#039;, of course.  Le duh.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate> <key>pubDate</key>
 <value>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 11:10:39 -0700</value>
</pubDate>
 <dc:creator> <key>dc:creator</key>
 <value>Brock</value>
</dc:creator>
 <guid> <key>guid</key>
 <attributes> <isPermaLink>false</isPermaLink>
</attributes>
 <value>comment 39282 at http://motherjones.com</value>
</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://motherjones.com/mojo/2007/10/does-obama-need-new-issue-catch-clinton#comment-39281</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I disagree.  The people who wouldn&#039;t vote for a black man/woman are solidly in the looney-tune camp of the republican party.  The majority of repubs could care less and I assume that virtually all democrats are fairly indifferent to it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If Clinton were not running Obama would be leading the polls.  He has fortunately/unfortunately come up against an institutionalized opponent who likely can&#039;t be stopped.  He would be wise to accept his position and be Veep for 4/8 years and then run for prez.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate> <key>pubDate</key>
 <value>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 11:09:20 -0700</value>
</pubDate>
 <dc:creator> <key>dc:creator</key>
 <value>Brock</value>
</dc:creator>
 <guid> <key>guid</key>
 <attributes> <isPermaLink>false</isPermaLink>
</attributes>
 <value>comment 39281 at http://motherjones.com</value>
</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://motherjones.com/mojo/2007/10/does-obama-need-new-issue-catch-clinton#comment-39280</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;One big reason Obama is where he is is the electability factor. The US is not ready for a black president. There is too much of the race thing in the US. It will be tough for a woman too, but a white woman would be preferable over a black man any day. Even if they were the same in every other way.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate> <key>pubDate</key>
 <value>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 10:51:32 -0700</value>
</pubDate>
 <dc:creator> <key>dc:creator</key>
 <value>Nick</value>
</dc:creator>
 <guid> <key>guid</key>
 <attributes> <isPermaLink>false</isPermaLink>
</attributes>
 <value>comment 39280 at http://motherjones.com</value>
</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://motherjones.com/mojo/2007/10/does-obama-need-new-issue-catch-clinton#comment-39279</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;He shouldn&#039;t hit Clinton too hard.  He might jeopardize his best chance at the White House, after 8 years of being VP.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate> <key>pubDate</key>
 <value>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 21:56:41 -0700</value>
</pubDate>
 <dc:creator> <key>dc:creator</key>
 <value>Brock</value>
</dc:creator>
 <guid> <key>guid</key>
 <attributes> <isPermaLink>false</isPermaLink>
</attributes>
 <value>comment 39279 at http://motherjones.com</value>
</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

