<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://motherjones.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Mother Jones - Comments for &quot;Hillary Clinton&amp;amp;#039;s NEW Plant Problem (It&amp;amp;#039;s CNN&amp;amp;#039;s Problem, Too)&quot;</title>
 <link>http://motherjones.com/mojo/2007/11/hillary-clintons-new-plant-problem-its-cnns-problem-too</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Hillary Clinton&#039;s NEW Plant Problem (It&#039;s CNN&#039;s Problem, Too)&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://motherjones.com/mojo/2007/11/hillary-clintons-new-plant-problem-its-cnns-problem-too#comment-41065</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;It should have been disclosed, but this guy isn&#039;t a political pro, just a campaign volunteer. Besides, did CNN disclose at the Democratic debate that Campbell Brown was married to a Romney staffer? And for crying out loud, one question came from Grover Nordquist, who gets interviewed somewhere daily! Why not just have useless pundits and lobbyists ask questions on a webcam?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate> <key>pubDate</key>
 <value>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 13:45:07 -0800</value>
</pubDate>
 <dc:creator> <key>dc:creator</key>
 <value>Eric Ferguson</value>
</dc:creator>
 <guid> <key>guid</key>
 <attributes> <isPermaLink>false</isPermaLink>
</attributes>
 <value>comment 41065 at http://motherjones.com</value>
</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://motherjones.com/mojo/2007/11/hillary-clintons-new-plant-problem-its-cnns-problem-too#comment-41064</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;yea, abny, i absolutely agree. sure, it&#039;s rotten and cynical, but that seems to be the way the game is played now.  when you&#039;ve got jeff gannon asking questions a presidential press conference there&#039;s nowhere to go but down. additonally, after the swift-boating fiasco democrats are more than willing to fight fire with fire.  for these reasons, i don&#039;t see any issue whatsoever with a planted questioner at a lousy debate.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate> <key>pubDate</key>
 <value>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 11:31:38 -0800</value>
</pubDate>
 <dc:creator> <key>dc:creator</key>
 <value>nmc</value>
</dc:creator>
 <guid> <key>guid</key>
 <attributes> <isPermaLink>false</isPermaLink>
</attributes>
 <value>comment 41064 at http://motherjones.com</value>
</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://motherjones.com/mojo/2007/11/hillary-clintons-new-plant-problem-its-cnns-problem-too#comment-41063</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Why does it matter that this questioner is a member of Hillary Clinton&#039;s steering committee. Is he not an American? Should he not have the right to ask a question just because he&#039;s a passionate activist? Or are you suggesting that the only people worthy of posing a question to the candidates for the presidency are the uninvolved? I thought Anderson Cooper and CNN handled this issue of &quot;disclosure&quot; terribly. Why should a questioner&#039;s background or political stance matter? All Americans deserve the chance to ask their questions and get answers. For the candidates to act as though they were &quot;blindsided&quot; is absurd. American citizens have been &quot;blindsided&quot; by the idiocy of George W. Bush for going on eight years now. I don&#039;t hear anyone apologizing and saying it should have been disclosed that Bush is a nitwit.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate> <key>pubDate</key>
 <value>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 07:45:37 -0800</value>
</pubDate>
 <dc:creator> <key>dc:creator</key>
 <value>Abny</value>
</dc:creator>
 <guid> <key>guid</key>
 <attributes> <isPermaLink>false</isPermaLink>
</attributes>
 <value>comment 41063 at http://motherjones.com</value>
</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

