<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://motherjones.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Mother Jones - Comments for &quot;On Joss Whedon, Male Feminist&quot;</title>
 <link>http://motherjones.com/mojo/2008/04/joss-whedon-male-feminist</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;On Joss Whedon, Male Feminist&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://motherjones.com/mojo/2008/04/joss-whedon-male-feminist#comment-51020</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate> <key>pubDate</key>
 <value>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 13:34:02 -0700</value>
</pubDate>
 <dc:creator> <key>dc:creator</key>
 <value>Sharon</value>
</dc:creator>
 <guid> <key>guid</key>
 <attributes> <isPermaLink>false</isPermaLink>
</attributes>
 <value>comment 51020 at http://motherjones.com</value>
</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://motherjones.com/mojo/2008/04/joss-whedon-male-feminist#comment-51019</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Deborah, thanks for contributing to the destruction of the Imus program.  The phony &quot;aw shucks&quot; routine is positively awful.  Your solutions to racism which you apparently see everywhere are infantile and the just plain ponderous babbling is mind numbingly boring and uninspired.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate> <key>pubDate</key>
 <value>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 12:41:06 -0700</value>
</pubDate>
 <dc:creator> <key>dc:creator</key>
 <value>howard</value>
</dc:creator>
 <guid> <key>guid</key>
 <attributes> <isPermaLink>false</isPermaLink>
</attributes>
 <value>comment 51019 at http://motherjones.com</value>
</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://motherjones.com/mojo/2008/04/joss-whedon-male-feminist#comment-51018</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Zack, look deep within yourself.  You&#039;re a douchebag.  You know this to be true.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Just because one is on the left doesn&#039;t mean that she can&#039;t enjoy the simple pleasures in life. Don&#039;t be so god damned smug.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate> <key>pubDate</key>
 <value>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 17:24:49 -0700</value>
</pubDate>
 <dc:creator> <key>dc:creator</key>
 <value>Brock</value>
</dc:creator>
 <guid> <key>guid</key>
 <attributes> <isPermaLink>false</isPermaLink>
</attributes>
 <value>comment 51018 at http://motherjones.com</value>
</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://motherjones.com/mojo/2008/04/joss-whedon-male-feminist#comment-51017</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Pop culture is a waste of time.    Yes, even &quot;Buffy the Vampire Slayer.&quot;  Look deep within yourself; you know this to be true.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate> <key>pubDate</key>
 <value>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 17:28:45 -0700</value>
</pubDate>
 <dc:creator> <key>dc:creator</key>
 <value>Zack</value>
</dc:creator>
 <guid> <key>guid</key>
 <attributes> <isPermaLink>false</isPermaLink>
</attributes>
 <value>comment 51017 at http://motherjones.com</value>
</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://motherjones.com/mojo/2008/04/joss-whedon-male-feminist#comment-51016</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I was very impressed by the &quot;interconnectedness&quot; in Joss Whedon&#039;s response. First the fact that he realized the input of other people&#039;s influences in terms of his own mindset which allowed him to create those strong female characters: the influence of his mother, the influence of his father, the influence of his stepfather, the influence of his wife, the female friends in his entourage.  Second, equality being seen as the idea of equilibrium, the feet-on-the-ground ability &quot;to stand on the earth&quot; rather than some lofty ideal to aspire to ...or give lipservice to.  Impressive.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate> <key>pubDate</key>
 <value>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 05:36:35 -0700</value>
</pubDate>
 <dc:creator> <key>dc:creator</key>
 <value>Kathy Giannini</value>
</dc:creator>
 <guid> <key>guid</key>
 <attributes> <isPermaLink>false</isPermaLink>
</attributes>
 <value>comment 51016 at http://motherjones.com</value>
</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://motherjones.com/mojo/2008/04/joss-whedon-male-feminist#comment-51015</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;*swoon*&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;LOVE Joss Whedon!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate> <key>pubDate</key>
 <value>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 21:55:35 -0700</value>
</pubDate>
 <dc:creator> <key>dc:creator</key>
 <value>kelly g.</value>
</dc:creator>
 <guid> <key>guid</key>
 <attributes> <isPermaLink>false</isPermaLink>
</attributes>
 <value>comment 51015 at http://motherjones.com</value>
</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://motherjones.com/mojo/2008/04/joss-whedon-male-feminist#comment-51014</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Yep, that is a great follow up to the &#039;A Feminist Hears a Who&#039; editorial.  There really should be a way to protect the intent and integrity of a person&#039;s work so that when the message gets distorted or changed, those responsible have to answer for it in some way.  Can anyone imagine far into the future, when Buffy becomes part of the public domain and some Hollywood jerk does a remake, slightly tweaking the story so that Buffy is just a little dependent on her male friends, so that being pretty or having a nice figure is something she seems ate up about?  To be frank, I&#039;ve never seen the movie, assuming it would just be air, but now I&#039;m going to take a look.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate> <key>pubDate</key>
 <value>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 07:42:26 -0700</value>
</pubDate>
 <dc:creator> <key>dc:creator</key>
 <value>Paul Miller</value>
</dc:creator>
 <guid> <key>guid</key>
 <attributes> <isPermaLink>false</isPermaLink>
</attributes>
 <value>comment 51014 at http://motherjones.com</value>
</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

