Smart Growth

Why Biofuels Are the Rainforest's Worst Enemy

Forget petroleum. The next planet-destroying fuel is already here.

UPDATE: Join us for an expert-led reader forum April 13-17 on MotherJones.com around the question: Is organic and local so 2008?

nestled deep in the tropical rainforest on the island of Borneo, Pareh is a collection of about 60 weathered wooden houses perched on stilts and enfolded by coconut palms, banana trees, and the dappled green overhang of the towering forest. Pareh's inhabitants belong to the indigenous tribes of Borneo collectively identified as the Dayak. They have lived here for centuries, raising rubber trees, pumpkin, cassava, and rice, and harvesting wood for fuel and lumber.

In 2005, a group of village men went hunting in the forest several hours from Pareh and stumbled on a clearing in which the trees had recently been felled. That was how they discovered that Perseroan Terbatas Ledo Lestari, or ptll, a subsidiary of an Indonesian company named Duta Palma Nusantara, was seizing their ancestral land to establish a massive plantation of oil palms, a tree whose oil is rendered and refined into biodiesel. (One of Duta Palma's major customers is Wilmar International Ltd, a Singapore-based firm in which US agribusiness giant Archer Daniels Midland holds a 16 percent stake.)

Advertisement

Advertisement

Over the next two years ptll destroyed 15,000 acres, which the Dayak say amounts to three-quarters of their "customary forest"—land that's vital for their survival and to which they have certain rights under Indonesian law. The plantation also uprooted monkeys and wild boar, which began raiding the community's food supply. Because ptll replaced diverse forest with a monocrop, pests invaded Pareh's subsistence gardens. Rice crops failed. The Dayak filed complaints with regional and national officials; at one point they commandeered one of ptll's bulldozers (an offense for which Momonus, the village head, and Jamaluddin, an elder, served jail time—.pdf). The clearing went on.

Increasingly desperate, in 2007 the people of Pareh offered ptll a drastic compromise. The villagers would surrender every acre the plantation had illegally seized if the company agreed to take no more land. There was no response. Soon after, a villager obtained a ptll map showing the company's long-term plan: It aimed to clearcut 50,000 acres, more than three times as much land as it had already taken. On the map, both Pareh and its sister village, Semunying, were gone.

Later that fall, a hunting party was searching for wild boar when the men heard the unmistakable whine of chain saws. This time, they didn't write up a complaint—they assembled a posse. More than 60 people from Pareh and Semunying descended on the site. They found a clearcutting crew in action, protected by Indonesian army troops; by way of protest, they seized 11 chain saws. "If we didn't do anything, our land would be gone," a defiant Jamaluddin told me.

 

with governments and consumers scrambling for alternatives to fossil fuel, worldwide demand for biofuels has gone through the roof; in Europe, where more than half of all new automobiles run on diesel, consumption of biodiesel is set to triple by 2010. US subsidies for biofuels, mostly ethanol, will add up to $92 billion between 2006 and 2012, and producers in developing countries like Indonesia are often eligible for millions of dollars in development money from the World Bank.

But amid the hype, problems have emerged. Biodiesel emits less than one-quarter the carbon of regular diesel once it's burned. But when production—and the destruction of ecosystems in the developing countries where most biofuel crops are grown—is factored in, many biofuels may actually emit more carbon than does petroleum, the journal Science reported last year. Because oil palms don't absorb as much CO2 as the rainforest or peatlands they replace, palm oil can generate as much as 10 times more carbon than petroleum, according to the advocacy group Food First. Thanks in large part to oil palm plantations, Indonesia is now the world's third-largest emitter of CO2, trailing only the US and China.

Yet Indonesia aims to expand these plantations from 16 million acres currently to almost 26 million by 2015. If deforestation, which is due largely to oil palm, continues at the present rate, 98 percent of the country's forest—one of only a handful of large rainforests remaining in the world—will be degraded or gone by 2022. And although Indonesia has strict environmental regulations and formally recognizes customary land rights, those laws are only as effective as the local bureaucrats enforcing them. "For the permit certification, a guy just comes to your office and you just pay him off," explains Ong Kee Chau, a former Wilmar executive who was responsible for most of the company's operations on Borneo. "This is how it works." For everyone from national politicians to struggling villagers, biofuel represents opportunity. "Oil palm is one of our areas of competitiveness," explains Herry Purnomo, an Indonesia-based forestry researcher. "We can't compete with information technologies or in auto manufacturing, but we have plantations."

 

the only way to get to Pareh is to travel up the Kumba River, typically in a traditional wooden boat fitted with an outboard motor. When I make the trip with a researcher from Friends of the Earth-Indonesia, we arrive about two hours after sundown. Momonus and his wife, Margareta, receive us in their home. (The people I meet in Pareh all go by single names.) There is no furniture; we sit in flickering candlelight around plastic tablecloths spread on the floor. Pages of newspaper have been pasted over gaps in the walls, and in one room I read a story about girls being kidnapped and used as sex slaves by plantation workers.

After a meal of fiddlehead ferns and banana flowers, the front room begins to fill with village men who spill out onto the porch and linger in the doorway. All wear freshly washed T-shirts and jeans or khakis, and all of them smoke except Momonus, a 38-year-old with a low, solid build, dark hair, and a thin mustache. The men tell me that if the government and Duta Palma continue to rebuff them, they will resort to their machetes. (The Dayak have a history of head-hunting, although nowadays they mostly use that reputation to inspire fear.) As the meeting winds down, Julian, a young father of two, asks if anyone has been to the boundary between the forest and the plantation. Another young man speaks up. Yes, he was recently there, and didn't see any logging.

The next day, I go with Momonus, Julian, and two other villagers to see for ourselves. On motorbikes, we navigate the ribbon of slick mud that passes for a road. After two perilous hours, we reach the land Duta Palma has seized.

The contrast between past and future is extreme. The ancestral forest is carpeted with ferns and flowers; monkeys swing from branches of wild mango, teak, and ironwood trees, and soaring above it all is a majestic canopy of dipterocarps. One of the rainforest's iconic treasures, dipterocarps bloom just once every four years but do so in unison, their vivid red flowers erupting over millions of acres.

Across the road is a moonscape. Charred trunks lie prone as far as the eye can see. On the horizon we can make out a thin emerald seam—the encroaching column of palms. Duta Palma has also planted seedlings in a narrow band along the border of the community's land, like a message written in green: The forest belongs to the palm.

We pass the area denuded last fall, and the empty military guard post set up to protect the loggers. Farther along we find a camp. A blue tarp is pitched over a platform covered with bedding and folded clothes. Momonus lifts the lid on a pot of rice; it's still warm. He takes a stub of wood from the cooking fire and writes on the platform in thick black letters: Stop destroying the ancestral forest!!!

We hit the road again. After a few miles, we come to an abrupt halt—several recently downed trees are blocking the way. As the drone of chain saws reverberates, a few workers emerge from the trees. Unlike the people of Pareh, they have tattered clothes and black teeth. Momonus calmly exchanges words with one of them and heads into the forest to see what's going on. When he returns 10 minutes later, his eyes shine with rage. Then another man, better dressed than the laborers, comes barreling toward us on a white motorcycle. He, too, looks furious. Momonus orders us on the bikes, and we speed away. When we finally stop, Momonus reminds me where I've seen the man before. He was the villager at the meeting last night who said the clearing had stopped. He is Momonus' brother-in-law.

I have just witnessed the palm companies' modus operandi in miniature. Operatives will proposition community members to assemble a logging crew in return for a sum that is insignificant to the company and a fortune to a villager. Some people will say no—Julian refused $6,000. But the company will keep trying until someone says yes, and someone almost always does. This helps the plantations expand into the forests, but, even more important, it sows betrayal and division that undermine the opposition.

A few days later, I get a text message from Momonus saying that the community went back to the clearing and confiscated 20 chain saws.

 

is there any hope for Indonesia's rainforests—and the people who depend on them? To answer that question, I visit an older oil palm plantation, Perseroan Terbatas Bumi Pratama Khatulistiwa. It's owned by Wilmar and located in the coastal district of Pontianak, near the village of Mega Timur. This terrain used to be tropical peatland forest, but in 1996, Wilmar began razing the groves and digging deep canals to drain the soil. Now the land is a uniform grid of oil palms. According to Greenpeace (.pdf), the destruction and degradation of Indonesian peatlands releases 4 percent of the world's total greenhouse gas emissions.

Unlike the Dayak of Pareh, the peasants of Mega Timur welcomed the plantation, seeing it as their ticket to a better life. Many families agreed to surrender their land to Wilmar; each received in exchange a smaller plot sown with palm, with the cost of the planting passed on to the family in the form of a loan. This is a common arrangement that somewhat resembles sharecropping: The peasants are obliged to sell their harvest to the company at a set price, regardless of the market rate. The Wilmar plantation siphons off half the money as payments on the planting loans; it also deducts fees for roads and drainage systems, fertilizer and pesticides, harvest collection, security and administrative charges, and a deposit into a mandatory savings account. After almost a decade of working with the company, none of the smallholders I talk to know how much they've earned, how much they've saved, or what portion of their loans they've paid. They do know, however, that floods are common now that the wetlands are gone. Several times a year their fields are submerged, sometimes for weeks on end.

Wilmar is currently under scrutiny for illegalities at three other plantations, including logging protected areas, using fire to clear trees, forcibly removing peasants and indigenous people, and operating without proper permits. These activities violate Wilmar's own social responsibility policies, as well as the standards of the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil, an industry-led oversight group the company belongs to, and the International Finance Corporation, a World Bank agency that has provided Wilmar tens of millions of dollars. After considerable pressure from Indonesian activists, both agencies have launched investigations. The industry group's probe ended last year after Wilmar promised to make improvements.

My last stop in Indonesia is the Center for International Forestry Research, a serene, wooded compound where more than 100 top scientists are working out ways to protect the world's forests and their peoples. Researcher Herry Purnomo is part of an international team that has devised a plan to pay developing countries to leave the trees standing. Known as the Reducing Emissions From Deforestation and Degradation initiative, the program is projected to cost a mere $12 billion annually worldwide—not bad considering that the US government has spent $126 billion on post-Katrina reconstruction. But international agencies and Western governments have promised only $1 billion so far—"nowhere near what there needs to be," Purnomo says with frustration.

While I was in Pareh, some village men asked if I wanted to see the 11 chain saws they'd seized the previous fall. They led me to a hiding place and took out the orange-handled saws one by one, carefully placing them in a straight line on the ground. A few minutes later they meticulously arranged them in a circle. I could tell how proud they were: The chain saws were trophies of their bravery. I also realized that despite all they'd been through, the villagers continued to see the saws as bargaining chips, a monumental misperception of the size and scope of their opponent.

Get Mother Jones by Email - Free. Like what you're reading? Get the best of MoJo three times a week.

Comments

Palm Oil and Orangutans

Thank you for discussing palm oil and the effects it is having on our planet. The palm oil industry is guilty of truly heinous ecological atrocities, including the systematic genocide of orangutans-- who share nearly 98% of our DNA. The forests of Borneo and Sumatra are the only place where these gentle, intelligent creatures live, and the cultivation of palm oil has directly led to the brutal deaths of thousands of individuals as the industry has expanded into undisturbed areas of rainforest. When the forest is cleared, adult orangutans are typically shot on sight. These peaceful, sentient beings are beaten, burned, mutilated, tortured and often eaten. Babies are torn off their dying mothers so they can be sold on the black market as illegal pets to wealthy families who see them as status symbols of their own power and prestige. I am not trying to be overly dramatic. This actually happens. It has been documented time and again. Some of the luckier orangutans are confiscated and brought to sanctuaries such as the Nyaru Menteng Orangutan Rescue Center, which is now home to nearly 700 orphaned and displaced orangutans in Central Kalimantan (Indonesian Borneo). Many of these orangutans are only several weeks old when they arrive, and all of them are psychologically traumatized and desperate for their mothers-- who are no longer alive. The center is managed by a remarkable woman named Lone Droscher Nielsen and is featured on Animal Planet's series 'Orangutan Island'. To learn more about the crisis facing wild orangutans and see how you can help protect them, please visit the Orangutan Outreach website: http://redapes.org Thank you for taking the time to read my long comment! Best wishes, Richard Zimmerman Director, Orangutan Outreach http://redapes.org Reach out and save the orangutans! Join our Facebook Cause: http://causes.com/redapes

great info!

tagged as: 

Thanks for letting people know about that. It's very disturbing to know that there's such brutality to animals such as Orangutans. I hope there'll be more organization worlwide to act on this matter.

chain swas

As the drone of chain saws reverberates, a few workers emerge from the trees. Unlike the people of Pareh, they have tattered clothes and black teeth. Momonus calmly exchanges words with one of them and heads into the forest to see what's going on. When he returns 10 minutes later, his eyes shine with rage

Let's see...

People are very excited in seeing the MMA 101 this coming August 08,2009 in Philadelphia. Let's see what happens...! affiliate programs

It's a mistake to lump

It's a mistake to lump biodiesel in with the other fuels. It's often produced from waste from existing human consumption that would have been thrown out instead.

Great Article

tagged as: 
Thanks for helping make the world aware of what's really going on! The writer who has done this work is very talented and I hope Mother Jones considers publishing more work from Heather, as well as other writers who cover similar issues! Long live the trees, Deane Blog: http://forestpolicyresearch.org Twitter: http://twitter.com/forestpolicy Facebook: http://bit.ly/lmpL Linked In: http://bit.ly/mJmC Slideshows: http://bit.ly/m78D TreePoetry: http://bit.ly/2FbZnP

it's not the fuel, it's the source

I agree that replacing rain forests with oil palm plantations is not the way to go. However, there are other sources for biodiesel such as jatropha which grows in marginal soil with little water requirements, and algae that is being developed that is up to 50% oil. So I disagree that the fuel is planet destroying just because some methods of producing the fuel may be.

BioFuels are OK, but watch where they come from!

This is a very nice article which does a good job of exposing a major problem with some biofuels... especially oil palm in Borneo.

Not only are local people's rights often ignored, but clearing forest to produce palm oil releases even more CO2 making this type of oil palm a bad biofuel bargin. This is especially true when forest on peat soils is cleared since these soils contain a huge amount of CO2.

BUT just a few weeks ago (in late February) Indonesia's Agriculture Minister approved a policy to plant large areas of oil palm on peat soils! Crazy!

Money may be a solution to protect forests, but it is also a source of the problem. Wealthy entrepreneurs will continue to take advantage of the situation until governments, NGOs and local people say no. Hopefuly good governance will prevail, and money allocated to keep carbon in forests will be properly spent.

It's almost impossible to track down the real source of biofuel

I appreciate the perspective of RGDudley, but in relation to track down where the real source of biofuel is from is almost impossible thing to do. for instance, much of Indonesia's oil palm fruit or CPO are shipped out through Malaysia (many of oil palm plantation companies in Indonesia are Malaysia-based). Also, the fruit bunch or CPO or the final products (biofuel, etc) does not have country label.

great article :)

tagged as: 
Thank you for sharing all this info. The thing that irks me the most is that most people don't understand this simple idea: no matter WHAT we use to produce energy (be it for fuel, heating our homes, etc.), we are disrupting some balance or another at all times. Even solar panels may cause problems because if we use them en-masse and all over the US (and internationally), our trees and plants won't have the heat/sunlight necessary to grow as they have for ages because WE are using that energy. No matter HOW you roll the dice, the bottom line is that we ALL must consume more responsibly.

You are an idiot. Maybe you

You are an idiot. Maybe you do not understand how much energy is in UV radiation.

Selfishness

No, I agree with RS. The idiot is you. Why do millions of Westerners take their cars driving aimlessly in a totally unproductive way, and burning the rain forest for that privilege?

"our trees and plants won't

"our trees and plants won't have the heat/sunlight necessary to grow as they have for ages because WE are using that energy" - this is a joke right? Are you saying that the panels will take away the radiation away from the plants? Mother Jones - this is a result of 30-yr+ leftist experiments with our education. YOU too are responsible for this system that produces such illiterates.

Fine Commenting

This is the first time I see in a post in which comments are more informative as compare to the post. before this http://vitiligo.blog.co.uk/

Dear Heather, I agree with

Dear Heather, I agree with everything in you said in the article. My only bone to pick is the claim that biofuels per se will destroy the planet. A heavily subsidized and poorly regulated bioethanol industry (again, bioethanol - not biofuel) can obviously do enormous damage as you show in your article. And it's really ironic that ethanol itself is a very poor biofuel. Instead of subsidizing a faulty industry to give us an inferior product money should be invested in research and technology to allow us to make better fuels (long chain carbon compounds) from sustainable resources - NOT food crops. Disclaimer: I am loosely affiliated with research into this and that's why I'm so passionate about it. I just feel that it's unfair that biofuels as a whole get a bad reputation because of the bioethanol industry (which I'm against for all those reasons mentioned in your article). Thanks.

Has Heather actually been to Borneo?

tagged as: 
Has Heather actually been to Borneo? Or the rain forest? Her report does not reflect the Borneo rain forest I know. The correctness of the cause does not justify embellishment. e.g. 1. Rubber Trees are not indigenous to Borneo rainforest. Rubber is a plantation crop brought to Borneo via Kew Gardens. You don’t find rubber in pristine Borneo forest. 2. Where the indigenous people of Borneo grow rice it is usually “hill” rice (as distinct from padi rice grown in water). To grow hill rice the indigenous people slash and burn the rainforest to make a clearing (not very Green?) and after a few seasons when the ground is drained of its goodness – move on to a different patch of jungle. 3. Wild boar LOVE oil palm. They come to eat the fruits that fall during harvesting. It is my observation that there are more wild boar per acre in plantations than in primary jungle. Some plantations treat wild boar as a pests and pay people to hunt them. 4. Heather says that oil palm does not absorb as much CO2 as rain forest. How does oil palm grow vigorously without absorbing CO2? Forest studies indicate the established rainforest is pretty neutral in respect to CO2; decay equals new growth. 5. Monkeys swing from branches???? In rain forest the monkeys are in the canopy 100 -150 foot up. It is hard to see any of the canopy life from the forest floor. Heather must have been unusually lucky. I spent years in the Borneo rain forest and never saw monkeys swinging branches. 6. She says the forest floor is carpeted with ferns and flowers. Really that is going too far. Quite Disney’esque! The canopy of tropical rain forest shuts out most of the light and so not much can grow on the forest floor certainly not enough to “carpet” the floor with “flowers”. I would like to see significant areas of Borneo rain forest set aside for future generations but don’t think the best way to get support is to give a false romanticised view of things. Stick to the facts. Attack the notion that we can grow enough to provide fuel, the earth does not have enough land to do that (and to feed 6 billion people). Vehicles can be fuelled by electricity and we have the means to make this.

Incomplete Portrayel

I too would like to see a better analysis in the media of the feedstocks used to produce biofuels, rather than lumping them all together as bad. It is important to remember that a large part of funding to criticize biofuels is coming from the Food Industry. Why would they care? Because commodity prices have risen, which means their profits have decreased. Biofuels can be produced from waste products and can be produced on a home or farm scale to offset personal use. It is much easier to decentralize biofuels than it is to decentralize petroleum, because biofuels can be produced all over the world with nearly whatever plants or organic wastes are available in each region. Where is the media's equally strong discussion of the extreme environmental justice issues around petroleum? One only has to look at the massive destruction of Nigeria's once verdant delta and the massacre of her people all over petroleum extraction.

That's another reason

That's another reason OXYHYDROGEN is a good idea. just water, baking soda and electricity! This is a CHEAP alternative to power our motor vehicles. And it doesn't destroy the environment, use food, or pollute. It costs about $100.00 or less to build the generator for your car. It can be used for most vehicles. Gas, diesel, or propane. I guess the downside is nobody can really exploit it & get filthy rich! If in fact that is a downside.

Oxyhydrogen

From what I know of it, it is wildly explosive. Do you have information on a method to render it safe? Thank you, Mary

It's a mistake to lump

It's a mistake to lump biodiesel in with the other fuels. It's often produced from waste from existing human consumption that would have been thrown out instead.

Except it doesn't work. You

Except it doesn't work. You can spend $100 building a "generator" for your car, however, the amount of electricity needed to produce enough of the gas to make a difference in your MPG is more electricity than the car produces.

Poor title...

A more accurate title would be "why Palm oil plantations are the rainforest's worst enemy", but that wouldn't flow quite so nicely. The article makes no argument against biofuels, just against corrupt governments allowing exploitation of their land and people. If we're going to survive as a society, we're going to have to utilize biofuels and every other resource to it's fullest. That doesn't mean we have to destroy what's left of our environment along the way.

This subject needs more balance

What is described in this article is terrible and should be stopped, but too often we read articles by radical environmentalists (who do more harm to the environmental movement than good) who, in the end, are against anything other than everyone living off the land as hunter/gatherers in caves and thatched huts. Well, that is never going to happen - unless we actually destroy the whole eco-system.... We live in wonderful Spain and our great little (over 60 mpg) car drives (when we aren't walking, biking or riding the great public transit) on bio-diesel made from used cooking oil collected at collection points throughout the province. It would otherwise be dumped too often down the drain to float as big gobs out in the Med. Sea. The sea is now cleaner and people are happily taking their oil to the deposit centers and our car and others along with many of the buses are putting out 88% less pollutants. So don't class all bio-fuels together and brand them as all bad. Ours is a win/win for the environment. And where is the effort in stopping the thousands of acres of rain forest destroyed just to raise a few cattle for slaughter? It takes lots of rain forest land and water to "grow" only one pound of cow flesh. IF YOU REALLY CARE ABOUT THE ENVIRONMENT - BECOME A VEGETARIAN! Where's the effort from these environmentalists to stop the waste of agricultural land used to grow plants to produce alcohol that is consumed by people which creates so much of our social and healthcare problems? Those crops should be used to make bio-ethanol/diesel. And the one thing that is the source of all our environmental problems in the end is OVERPOPULATION - THERE ARE TOO MANY PEOPLE ON THIS PLANET USING RESOURCES - FUEL, PAPER, WOOD, WATER, FOOD, HABITATION FOR OTHER ANIMALS ETC. AND PRODUCING MORE SEWAGE AND POLLUTION. STOP BREEDING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Why don't we hear anyone talking about this? Bless the Chinese for their one-child-policy! There would be a lot more people there without it. Some day it will probably have to be the law everywhere if countries and peoples do not reduce their numbers now. But by then it will be probably too late. EVERY LITTLE SPERM IS NOT SACRED and NO ONE HAS A RIGHT TO HAVE AS MANY CHILDREN AS THEY WANT - we all have to share this planet and to share it with elephants, apes, deer, dolphins, whales et. al. Stop being so selfish. If we reduce the birth rate to a sustainable level we will solve much of what ails our beautiful planet right there. And what a totally silly comment that if everyone had solar panels it would use up all the sun light so there wouldn't be any left for the plants! That must have been a joke - right? No wonder the average person doesn't take what the really loud and radical environmentalists say, and make it that much harder for realistic conservation measures to be taken.

Simplistic, superficial and poorly researched

Good bloody lord. First, a proper title would have been "Tropical Oils & BioFuels..." collapsing all biofuel into the Palm Oil rubric is reductionist nonsense. Bloody wooley headed purism. No wonder the environmental Left focuses on pie in the sky solutions, nothing workable is pure enough for you fools.

Palm oil isn't just for burning

tagged as: 

Palm oil will be grown whether it's used to make biodiesel or not. Biodiesel refineries make up a very small fraction of a very large market for palm oil. It is a *food* crop that commands premium prices.

Efforts to preserve orangutans and peat soils and rainforest biodiversity are urgent and vital -- even in the absence of biodiesel.

On the other hand, bioenergy is a potentially massive resource. Approximately 13% of humanity's primary energy is sourced from wood or crop residues (more than nuclear or hydro-electricity). The recent forest fires in Australia, burning up maybe two decades' growth across less than two percent of that country's remaining forest land (which will quickly recover), released as much CO2 in a couple of weeks as the entire country's coal-fired electricity generation produces in several years. Conceivably, sustainably-produced bioenergy can provide as much energy each year for human use as fossil fuels do today; see this International Energy Agency study for details:

http://www.ieabioenergy.com/MediaItem.aspx?id=5586

When will man wake up...

It's hard to know who to believe, when it comes to climate change. Is mans endeavor's really having a detremental effect upon our World...Or is the World heating up naturally, regardless of Human activity, as it has many times before. If it's better to err on the side of caution, surely Politians should be taking this matter more seriously. Yes we need an alternative energy source, and we have at this time the technology and understanding to research and develop many. Do the multi-national corporations have a hand in perpetuating the use of fossil fuels for their own monetary gain. If so, this myopic world view will, according to many of the worlds leading scientists, be our downfall. As some insightful person once said, the planet Earth was here long before us, and it will be long after. When we talk about saving the planet, is it really the planet we're saving, or ourselves. B.Devlin

Rainforests/energy/etc.

tagged as: 
There are several ways to make biofuels, planting palm trees is only one. Sugar cane is something that grows fairly readily, and doesn't require all that much stewardship, and we go through the sugar in this country like MAD. Whaaaat ifff...we took about half the sugar out of things like cereals and candy bars, and started fermenting it instead? Mentioned in this story was a company called ADM, Archer Daniels Midland. Don't they already work with sugar refiners and so forth, producing ethanol? Also, what of the whole thing where they shut down a sugar plantation in Florida? Engines don't run on gentle suggestions, they run on combustible fuels. Now, you could make bio-gasoline, bio-diesel, convert car systems to methane, convert to electricity, or keep on using petroleum, or you could walk. That last option is the least favorite, because it means that you'll be converting sugars right there in your muscles and stuff, and if you've taken a short review of the number of fat, lazy people waddling around lately, that's not exactly a popular activity. Soooo....people use cars. People use a lot of cars. People idle through the drive-through, day after day. Maybe, through concerted effort, like having oil companies take one dime per gallon of your fuel charge, and reserving such money for new oilfield development, and working with companies like the automakers for new powerplant development, Subaru has proven for years that 3 cylinders can get the job done, too, a 2-cylinder diesel will get you to the grocery store just as well as a V-8 can, by modifying and tuning our practices and expectations down a little, we can get a lot more out of that same gallon of gas. I'm a fan of something called E20, because with 20% ethanol/gasoline, now you're talking some octane boost, which the 'rodders' will tell you adds power to an engine. Power is what is needed to haul loads or climb hills. You're not pushing that loaded Fruehauf up that mountain. By looking at some automotive history, we discover that higher compression ratios were used with higher octane fuels, and able to get quite a bit of work out of some of those smaller engines. GM's talking about smaller engines, too, a Camaro with a turbo-4-cylinder, for example. Then, there's hydrogen. The earth is covered 2/3 or so by water, 1/3 of our surface is land. Water can be broken down into hydrogen and oxygen by using electricity, something that can be generated by a variety of processes, none polluting. But, finally, if you really don't want to see companies funded by megaglobalbanks mowing down forests, then learn to conserve, and for the love of Deity, stop sending your money to MegaBank for them to invest. It's like giving a bottle of booze to an alcoholic. Instead, spend your money on learning how to make your OWN biofuels out of things like fermenting garbage(no exaggeration, read about landfill biogas etc). Where there's a will, there's a way. Curb your multinational... Klaatu marachas necktie

stopping the forest cutting

tagged as: 
The kind of hardened steel nails that can be pounded into concrete could be imbedded in the trees by folks like Amazon Indians or the Dayak to make the trees booby traps for loggers and ruinous for lumber mills. They are cheap and once in place, no one needs to be around to protect the trees. The trees will grow around and heel the small wounds. I know that in this country, logging companies avoid fenceline trees because of possible imbedded metal. I'm sure this would be more efffective than taking a few chain saws.

shoddy journalism

Heather, while I agree how deplorable it is that the rainforest continues to be destroyed, it is hardly the fault of Biodiesel . Your logic is silly. Lack of government control and regulation are the culprits here. In your article you made a couple of remarks that show your ignorance and lack of research. 1. "Biodiesel emits less than one-quarter the carbon of regular diesel once it's burned. But when production—and the destruction of ecosystems in the developing countries where most biofuel crops are grown—is factored in, many biofuels may actually emit more carbon than does petroleum, the journal Science reported last year" 2. please! 1/4 are you talking about b20? Do you even know what B20 is? It looks like you found this nice little article to support your outrageous claim that "Forget petroleum. The next planet-destroying fuel is already here." You can't be serious?! 3. Do you even know what goes into making biodiesel? Do you know that Palm oil makes a lousy feedstock for bio? 4. "More than Petro? Seriously?! Do you know they dig petro out of the ground, transport it on big ships? Fight wars over it? Seriously?!!!!!! Do you know the difference between using Waste Vegetable Oil vs Virgin Vegetable Oil? What next? Should we all just go out and buy electric hybrids and forget that 90% or more of our electricity is made from coal? Tell me Heather, how did you get to the rainforest? Did you fly in on your magic wings or did you drive in your gas car or plane? You got a better alternative to our transportation problem than biodiesel? I do! Walk More, Drive Less, Take mass Transit, grow your own food, recycle everything, compost, plant a freaking tree and use/make B100 from waste vegetable oil (WVO) I know that Biodiesel is not the answer but it can surely help. We need everything. Please do some research before you subject your readers to such shoddy journalism.

Thanks for shining a light

Thanks for shining a light on a very serious problem. The destruction of the Borneo rain forest increases global warming, drives untold species to extinction, and seriously harms indigenous cultures. The single largest release of CO2 ever recorded came from fires set in a Borneo peat forest in 1997 http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/NaturalHazards/view.php?id=17467&oldid=... If the world valued environmental justice and ecological sanity it would be possible to grow oil palm, preserve the forest, and in so doing increase the prosperity of the indigenous peoples. Small palm groves in a forest connected by corridors that allow animal migrations could be a boon to local populations and keep the forest intact. Unfortunately, our fast buck world cares little for the rights of forest peoples, or for preserving the biodiversity that future generations will need to craft new medicines and new food and fuel crops. Maybe the REDD $$ will help save the forest. The overdeveloped countries should pay their share for having plundered the atmosphere. However, if REDD is handled poorly it could make things worse: money could find its way into off shore banks instead of building schools in long houses. Some REDD plans even call for more monoculture plantations!!!! Please keep writing about rain forests and global warming. As with most issues involving human rights and ecology, rain forest politics is incredibly complex. Thanks for bringing these issues to light.

replaced

Because ptll replaced diverse forest with a monocrop, pests invaded Pareh's subsistence gardens. Rice crops failed. The Dayak filed complaints with regional and national officials; at one point they commandeered one of ptll's bulldozers (an offense for which Momonus.

Keep up the exposure.

You understand the problem, It's obvious by the fact that you are out there doing something to help bring about change and solutions. The blow hards that do nothing but comment on how wrong you are, Do nothing to solve the bigger issues. Keep it up!

Let's see...don't use

Let's see...don't use petroleum, use a renewable fuel. Then when someone does there are liberal "do gooders" who jump in a jet and fly to the site thousands of miles away to tell us all how bad it is. What should be done is the banning of high atmospheric pollution both chemical and particulate by jet aircraft! By the way the quicker those dangerous monkeys are gone the better!!

That headline is very

That headline is very deceptive and misleading, which is a sign of irresponsible journalism. Biofuels are not causing the destruction, a biofuel company is.

Biofuels use recycled carbon

One important factor, almost always overlooked in this debate, is that biofuels take carbon out of the atmosphere rather than the ground. That is, a gallon of biofuel recycles carbon atoms that have already been injected into the atmosphere; a gallon of geofuel introduces "new" carbon, carbon that hasn't been seen above ground since the Carboniferous era. Over any period long enough to describe as "climate" (30 years min), biofuels add no new carbon at all to the atmosphere. They just use what's already there. So the correct figure isn't 25%. Biofuels inject 100% less carbon than petroleum or coal based fuels.

BIO FUEL for green living

Brazil has been the worlds leading consumer and for bio fuels. Develop this will help us live in an ecofriendly environment while generating jobs and coping with technology. There are means of being productive and not being destructive at the same time.

Where is the government in all this?

Biofuels have been an issue for sometime now. I can't believe the government hasn't gotten involved more than it has. It's an issue that affects so many people and yet the government doesn't give it as much attention as it ought too.

Where is the government in all this?

Biofuels have been an issue for sometime now. I can't believe the government hasn't gotten involved more than it has. It's an issue that affects so many people and yet the government doesn't give it as much attention as it ought too.

http://www.adwido.com

we should stop this use of

we should stop this use of bio fuels

i don't know when everyone

i don't know when everyone will understand the need to protect environment from these biofuels

LETS HELP PROTECT MOTHER EARTH

I will comment in this quote "Is there any hope for Indonesia's rainforests"
will basically there is always a chance if there is discipline among people.
But it would be hard to recover a destroyed forest.

Beautiful rain forest

This is informative and sad. I visited Indonesia a few times including Sumatra and Nias, and this is such a gorgeous country, including its rain forest and its islands among other marvels. It is sad to hear that because Westerners need even more cars and fuel to propel them, they request to destroy what does not belong to them.

Similar Thing In Our Country

The problem seems to be getting universal. In our country, the Philippines, there is a Bio-Fuel Law that encourages the planting of jathropa trees instead of oil palms as source of biodiesel. The problem is that the initiative would take away tracks of land currently planted with sugar canes and coconuts which are more economically supportive of our farmers and consuming people.

EdZee

Sounds alot like what Dole

Sounds alot like what Dole did to the indigenous people of Guatemala.... Big companies putting profit over environment and people. At any rate, it seems we are all wrapped up in what kind of fuel is next... what kind of fuel is "earth-friendly"... valid concern for us humans and our modern way of life. But why don't we address the REAL issue?!?!?! WE HAVE TOO MANY PEOPLE ON THE PLANET!!!! How about educating people on family planning??

thanks for the post

There are several ways to make biofuels, planting palm trees is only one. Sugar cane is something that grows fairly readily, and doesn't require all that much stewardship, and we go through the sugar in this country like MAD. Whaaaat ifff...we took about half the sugar out of things like cereals and candy bars, and started fermenting it instead?
Where there's a will, there's a way. Curb your multinational...
brainstrom

Great Read

Wow what an amazing read. Thanks for the article.

Get Free Wii Points
Free Wii Points

This is very good post :) I

This is very good post :) I like it .. Thank mate!

Coffee

It's easy to discuss something you may not use everyday but do some research... the REAL number 1 killer of the Rainforests is COFFEE!

MMA is Hanging on the SpotLight

People are very excited in seeing the MMA 101 this coming August 08,2009 in Philadelphia. I myself is an advid fan and was able to see a great site to purchase Cheap UFC Tickets and not I'm ready to go. See you all there folks.

Realtors are getting an edge

I've been a realtor for more than 2 years now. I use to do it in the ordinary way where it is cost efficient. Technology was able to make it a lot easier. I was introduced by a friend and a realtor to try doing my marketing through the internet. What else can I say, Realtor Website is making me on top of everyone else.

Post new comment

Alternately, you may login to or register an account
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <ul> <ol> <li> <blockquote>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

MoJo Comments: Send Us Your Feedback

We changed our spam software to better filter comments. Should you encounter any issues, please let us know.

Photo Essays

The chaos and humanity of war.
The craftspeople and musicians of Appalachia.
A selection of '70s ads depicting African-Americans.
As climate change melts the permafrost, native villages slip into the sea, taking a way of life with them.