Nowhere to Go
NOWHERE TO GO....Sarah Palin is getting props in the media for her decision last year to cancel Alaska's notorious "bridge to nowhere," but it's worth pointing out that this was hardly a brave decision. Originally, while she was running for governor and stumping for votes, she thought the bridge was a fine idea:
As for the infamous "bridges to nowhere," [debate moderator Steve] MacDonald asked if the candidates would forge ahead with the proposed Knik Arm crossing between Anchorage and Point MacKenzie and Ketchikan's Gravina Island bridge. Each has received more than $90 million in federal funding and drew nationwide attacks as being unnecessary and expensive. He also asked if they support building an access road from Juneau toward but not completely connecting to Skagway and Haines.
"I do support the infrastructure projects that are on tap here in the state of Alaska that our congressional delegations worked hard for," Palin said. She said the projects link communities and create jobs.
She later changed her tune, but only after Congress had already decided not to fully fund the Gravina bridge and it was clear that Alaska itself would have to put up most of the money for the project. What's more, it's not as if she was giving up anything: the funding that had been approved still went to Alaska. It just wasn't earmarked for the bridge. So this wasn't quite the profile in courage that the McCain campaign would have us believe.
Continues Below
Continued From Above
Comments
Well we can say one thing about the Palin choice. It has certainly sucked all attention away from Obama's speech last night. Dems and Repubs alike are very very very busy discussing the choice.
Score one for McCain. Us Dems really need to wise up.
OW - I was thinking the same thing.
So if I understand Kevin's post, Alaska got the money but just didn't spend it on a boondoggle as Stevens had earmarked it. I doubt that was a tough choice given the high negative profile of the project.
And her own government affairs liaison makes it perfectly clear that she wasn't a leader on earmark reform--she was REACTING to a Congressional crackdown!
Her position on earmarks came about because Alaska was a notorious abuser who finally get busted! The actions she took on earmarks were to protect their state's ability to continue to get money from the federal government! It says so in an op-ed!
In an op-ed entitled "Palin not abandoning earmarks altogether," her government affairs representative writes:
"Recognizing there have been instances of earmark abuse, Congress has instituted reforms...Congressional earmarks for roads and bridges have received much attention in Congress and have become a principal impetus for reform. Unfortunately, Alaska has featured prominently in this discussion...
The Palin administration has responded to this unwanted attention in a number of ways....
Palin has said the state can either respond to the changing circumstances in Congress or stick its head in the sand. We believe that by recognizing the necessity for change, we can enhance the state's credibility in the appropriations process and in other areas of federal policy as well.
The governor is very much aware of the importance of the federal budget to virtually every Alaskan. In responding to the new realities, we are not abandoning earmarks altogether but are seeking to constrain and document them in the ways discussed here."
This is like an underage drinker proudly touting how he told a crooked shopkeeper "thanks, but no thanks" on a 6 pack of beer when he knew a cop was looking. Of course, left unmentioned is the fact she went back for vodka, whiskey, and a 3-pack of beer later.
Really Kevin do you want to start the discussion about profiles in courage? That is gonna lead you back to the McCain vs Obama courage measurement. That's a big loser.
I have yet to see Barak take a courageous stand on anything.
How about we just call her clean and articulate?
Hey Kevin, I can't find your email so I'm leaving a comment here.
I was just watching Wolf Blitzer and he was interviewing Lindsay Graham.
Blitzer asked if Palin was ready to be Commander-in-Chief.
Graham answered:
"She stood up to Ted Stevens, she can stand up to the Russians."
Holy shit!
"Well we can say one thing about the Palin choice. It has certainly sucked all attention away from Obama's speech last night. Dems and Repubs alike are very very very busy discussing the choice.
Score one for McCain. Us Dems really need to wise up."
Yes, instead of talking about Obama's speech, the media are comparing Palin to Dan Quayle. And yes, they're saying that Palin's first performnce compares favorably to what Quayle did.
But they're talking about Dan Quayle! Do you *really* think that's a "win" for Republicans?
Probably a braver decision than Obama's decision to oppose the war when he represented a district characterized as Hard Left. Boy he really went out on the plank on that position, didn't he? Like Bill Ayers and Rev. Wright would have raked him over the coals.
Kurzleg: "Alaska got the money but just didn't spend it on a boondoggle as Stevens had earmarked it."
Rep. Don Young was the one who earmarked it. Stevens merely threw a fit when Sen. Tom Coburn suggested de-funding it after Hurricane Katrina.
IIRC, Alaska received only the initial $90m. In order to actually build the bridge to nowhere, The state would have had to cough up another $350m, MoL. Since the total state budget is well short of $10b, obviously the bridge had to go.
Well, the fact she was for the Bridge to Nowhere before she was against it should of great comfort to the great Flip Flopper at the head of the ticket. Peas of a pod. Probably why he took a shine to her. The lack of careful vetting will probably eventually result in the biggest blowback for him.
Disocunt
Disocunt Handbags
Handbag
Fake Handbags
Cheap Handbags
Gucci Jewelry
The fashion Wholesale Shoes On Sale
Best Cheap Discount Designer Replica Handbags On Sale
Cheap Discount UGG Boots
cheap deisgner replica handbags
Fashion Wholesale Replica Handbags
Cheap Handbags
Leather Wallet
Marni Handbags
Hermes Handbags
Givenchy Handbags
Juicy Couture Handbags
Christian Louboutin Sandals
louboutin 2009
Burberry Handbags
Gucci Handbags
UGG Women's Gissella
UGG Classic Argyle Knit

