Who's the Real Barack Obama?
WHO'S THE REAL BARACK OBAMA?....Here's a little Friday morning game for everyone to play. Below are half a dozen desperate right wing luminaries calling Barack Obama half a dozen preposterous names:
McCain spokesman Michael Goldfarb: "Barack Obama has a long track record of being around anti-Semitic, anti-Israel, and anti-American rhetoric."
Former Republican House leader Tom DeLay: "I tagged him as a Marxist months ago."
Republican congresswoman Michele Bachmann: "I'm very concerned that he may have anti-American views. That's what the American people are concerned about."
Republican presidential candidate John McCain: "I think his plans are redistribution of the wealth. He said it himself: 'We need to spread the wealth around'....That's one of the tenets of socialism."
National Review contributing editor Stanley Kurtz: "The fact that Obama funded extremist Afrocentrists who shared Wright's anti-Americanism means that this is now a matter of public policy, and therefore an entirely legitimate issue in this campaign."
Republican vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin: "Our opponent though, is someone who sees America it seems as being so imperfect that he's palling around with terrorists who would target their own country."
So Obama is anti-Semitic, Marxist, anti-American, a socialist, an extremist Afrocentrist, and a terrorist sympathizer. And that's just off the top of my head.
So here's the game: what else has the McCain campaign and its surrogates called Obama? The only rule is that the name caller has to be someone with credentials: a campaign aide, a national politician, a major league pundit, etc. No obscure bloggers or commenters from Free Republic. What have you got for me?
Continues Below
Continued From Above
Comments
On the sex ed to children thing, the reference is of course to the Des Moines Register intereview. There's the relevant text to drop into Google (foregoing the link b/c they seem to throw Mother Jones into a tiz).
***
Reporter: ?when the ad saying that Obama supported comprehensive sex education for kindergartners?
McCain: He did. He did. He did! I'll be glad to provide you?we have the documentation. I'll be glad to provide it to you. Now you may not accept that documentation; we have it and we found out it's true.
Reporter: You can take this small slice of truth that may not represent the real truth of the situation; is that being straight?
McCain: Yeah, but I didn't do that. I didn't do that. Now you can assert that I did; I didn't. I've got the facts to back it up. He strongly supported that legislation, and I'll be glad?it's on our website. It's on our website.
The video was pulled within minutes after this was posted on Right Truth, but the transcript highlights are on my website.
After spending nine years in Navy Intelligence as a Cryptologist, intercepting communications from Marxist/Socialist countries, breaking their codes, and gathering intelligence in "other" ways. I am familiar with their methods of using the media for propangada, using the educational system to indoctrinate young minds, using the judicial system, and voter fraud to steal elections.
This is what is happening now in america.
From everything I have researched in the last two years, has lead me to conclude that Obama was selected, tutored, groomed, scripted, and financed by Radical Marxist/Socialists to become the puppet leader of the USSA.
There is a vast difference between Social Democrats and Radical Marxist/Socialists. Hillary Clinton is a Social Democrat. Obama, Pelosi, Reid, Dodd, Schumer, Durbin, Franks,Boxer, and a few others now in Congress are Radical Marxist/Socialists.
On my website: [valsword.spaces.live.com] I have a 16 minute video of an interview with Yure Bezmenov a KGB agent who defected in 1970. This interview was recorded 24 years ago,
and the transcript highlights, in Yuri's own words confirm what I mentioned in the first paragraph.
I pray that I am wrong, but from everything I have researched, I believe Obama, with a Reid Pelosi led Congress, with a radical judicial system will pull a Hugo Chavez.
With a filibuster proof congress led by Reid and Pelosi. What is to stop Obama from pulling a Hugo Chavez. A closed mind is like a locked door, unless the right key is found, nothing enters. Unfortunately for many the key will be hindsight.
Frank Marshal Davis
Ayers
Rezko.
Wright.
Dohrn
Odinga
ACORN
The New Party
All Radical Marxist/Socialist links in Obama's
chain that launched his political career, and
unlike the theory of evolution, there are no missing links.
Davis, a known, avowed Communist Mentored Obama
as a teenager shaping his social views, and fostered his hate for whites.
The rest of the Radical Associations reinforced
Davis's teachings, and the Socialist NEW PARTY launched Obama's career.
Obama, selected, tutored, groomed, scripted,
and financed by Radical Marxist/Socialists to become
the puppet leader of the UNITED SOCIALIST STATES OF AMERICA If you do not believe associations shape the
character and judgement of a person, why do you
NOT let your child hang out with the local street gangs and crack heads. All of the people I listed are linked together, all share the same values, all are long term and continious Associations of Obama. They are not just random accidental associations with whackos that everyone encounters occaisionally.
In a recent address to his subjects, carried by fiat on all of the nation's television channels, Venezuela's authoritarian president Hugo Chávez Frias, who has previously taken over the airways for the celebration of his own birthday, now turned his country's attention to more urgent matters. The time had come, he explained, to move the "Bolivarian revolution" from its Lenin-like beginnings of transitional capitalism towards a more robust command economy. The nation had at last "broken the chains of the old, exploitative capitalist system," he said. "The state now has the obligation to build the model of a socialist economy."
The next stage of the socialist revolution will require making thirty-three separate amendments to the Venezuelan constitution?a document Chávez previously rewrote upon his ascension to Miraflores Palace in 1999. The most dramatic and controversial change will eliminate presidential term limits, ensuring the fulfillment of Chavez's promise not to leave office until 2021. To Hugo Chávez, a permanent revolution requires that he wield permanent power. It's a risky move, considering recent opinion polls showing a majority of Venezuelans skeptical to further constitutional "reform," especially if it means the possibility of adopting a President Chávez for life. But the same public, polling data demonstrates, also opposed the government's refusal to renew a broadcast license for RCTV, the country's oldest and most anti-Chávez private television network, and that storm seems to have passed.
On the sex ed to children thing, the reference is of course to the Des Moines Register intereview. There's the relevant text to drop into Google (foregoing the link b/c they seem to throw Mother Jones into a tiz).
***
Reporter: ?when the ad saying that Obama supported comprehensive sex education for kindergartners?
McCain: He did. He did. He did! I'll be glad to provide you?we have the documentation. I'll be glad to provide it to you. Now you may not accept that documentation; we have it and we found out it's true.
Reporter: You can take this small slice of truth that may not represent the real truth of the situation; is that being straight?
McCain: Yeah, but I didn't do that. I didn't do that. Now you can assert that I did; I didn't. I've got the facts to back it up. He strongly supported that legislation, and I'll be glad?it's on our website. It's on our website.
The video was pulled within minutes after this was posted on Right Truth, but the transcript highlights are on my website.
After spending nine years in Navy Intelligence as a Cryptologist, intercepting communications from Marxist/Socialist countries, breaking their codes, and gathering intelligence in "other" ways. I am familiar with their methods of using the media for propangada, using the educational system to indoctrinate young minds, using the judicial system, and voter fraud to steal elections.
This is what is happening now in america.
From everything I have researched in the last two years, has lead me to conclude that Obama was selected, tutored, groomed, scripted, and financed by Radical Marxist/Socialists to become the puppet leader of the USSA.
There is a vast difference between Social Democrats and Radical Marxist/Socialists. Hillary Clinton is a Social Democrat. Obama, Pelosi, Reid, Dodd, Schumer, Durbin, Franks,Boxer, and a few others now in Congress are Radical Marxist/Socialists.
On my website: [valsword.spaces.live.com] I have a 16 minute video of an interview with Yure Bezmenov a KGB agent who defected in 1970. This interview was recorded 24 years ago,
and the transcript highlights, in Yuri's own words confirm what I mentioned in the first paragraph.
I pray that I am wrong, but from everything I have researched, I believe Obama, with a Reid Pelosi led Congress, with a radical judicial system will pull a Hugo Chavez.
With a filibuster proof congress led by Reid and Pelosi. What is to stop Obama from pulling a Hugo Chavez. A closed mind is like a locked door, unless the right key is found, nothing enters. Unfortunately for many the key will be hindsight.
Frank Marshal Davis
Ayers
Rezko.
Wright.
Dohrn
Odinga
ACORN
The New Party
All Radical Marxist/Socialist links in Obama's
chain that launched his political career, and
unlike the theory of evolution, there are no missing links.
Davis, a known, avowed Communist Mentored Obama
as a teenager shaping his social views, and fostered his hate for whites.
The rest of the Radical Associations reinforced
Davis's teachings, and the Socialist NEW PARTY launched Obama's career.
Obama, selected, tutored, groomed, scripted,
and financed by Radical Marxist/Socialists to become
the puppet leader of the UNITED SOCIALIST STATES OF AMERICA If you do not believe associations shape the
character and judgement of a person, why do you
NOT let your child hang out with the local street gangs and crack heads. All of the people I listed are linked together, all share the same values, all are long term and continious Associations of Obama. They are not just random accidental associations with whackos that everyone encounters occaisionally.
In a recent address to his subjects, carried by fiat on all of the nation's television channels, Venezuela's authoritarian president Hugo Chávez Frias, who has previously taken over the airways for the celebration of his own birthday, now turned his country's attention to more urgent matters. The time had come, he explained, to move the "Bolivarian revolution" from its Lenin-like beginnings of transitional capitalism towards a more robust command economy. The nation had at last "broken the chains of the old, exploitative capitalist system," he said. "The state now has the obligation to build the model of a socialist economy."
The next stage of the socialist revolution will require making thirty-three separate amendments to the Venezuelan constitution?a document Chávez previously rewrote upon his ascension to Miraflores Palace in 1999. The most dramatic and controversial change will eliminate presidential term limits, ensuring the fulfillment of Chavez's promise not to leave office until 2021. To Hugo Chávez, a permanent revolution requires that he wield permanent power. It's a risky move, considering recent opinion polls showing a majority of Venezuelans skeptical to further constitutional "reform," especially if it means the possibility of adopting a President Chávez for life. But the same public, polling data demonstrates, also opposed the government's refusal to renew a broadcast license for RCTV, the country's oldest and most anti-Chávez private television network, and that storm seems to have passed.
I'm not certain it's fair to the McCain campaign to describe mad Pam Geller ("Atlas Shrugs") as a surrogate, but a few days ago she was pushing the droll notion that Obama is the love child of Ann Dunham and Malcolm X.
I wonder if the wealth redistribution narrative has been a net plus for McCain. Regardless of the fact that it's a ludicrous accusation (Obama was quoted completely out of context), it is possible that it didn't have the effect McCain thought it would have even on people who believed it as McCain intended it. Complaints about highly paid CEOs and Wall Street fat cats in the face of the meltdown (made even by McCain himself) have focused attention on the extreme income inequality in the USA, and McCain may have been shooting himself on the foot with this point.
Remember this ad? It calls Obama "dishonorable" and "dangerous".
Has anyone said, "illegitimate son of Malcolm X" yet?
Oh wait, Pam's a nutjob blogger. She don't count. Unless you ask her.
Kevin: You left out that he carouses with neo-Nazis. As I noted elsewhere sometime kind of recently, that means he's into both international and national socialism! For good measure, you might also stir in a "wants to do sex education to young children slowly" sweetener.
A person can't be bothered to keep track anymore. These things have simmered together into a special kind of Sarah Palin verbal mush.
Ah. I missed that you invited addition stuff, with references. It was of course John McCain himself that said very recently, speaking of Obama and Khalidi in some strange connection, "If there was a tape of John McCain in a neo-Nazi outfit, I think the treatment of the issue would be slightly different."
On the sex ed to children thing, the reference is of course to the Des Moines Register intereview. There's the relevant text to drop into Google (foregoing the link b/c they seem to throw Mother Jones into a tiz).
***
Reporter: when the ad saying that Obama supported comprehensive sex education for kindergartners
McCain: He did. He did. He did! I'll be glad to provide youwe have the documentation. I'll be glad to provide it to you. Now you may not accept that documentation; we have it and we found out it's true.
Reporter: You can take this small slice of truth that may not represent the real truth of the situation; is that being straight?
McCain: Yeah, but I didn't do that. I didn't do that. Now you can assert that I did; I didn't. I've got the facts to back it up. He strongly supported that legislation, and I'll be gladit's on our website. It's on our website.
Ah, for the good old days when George Smathers, running in the 1950 Democratic primary against Senator Claude Pepper, could accuse him of being a shameless extrovert, mention that his children matriculated while in college, and claim that his sister was a noted thespian in New York City.
[All apocryphal, of course; Smathers instead accused Pepper of being a Soviet stooge and favoring universal health care. He still looks statesmanlike by comparison with McCain and Palin.]
Synonyms for anti-Semite are the charges that Obama is a secret Muslim (viral e-mail) and a vote for Obama means The Death of Israel (Joe the Plumber.)
And Sarah Palin and Rudy Guiliani called him a...Community Organizer. In the snide insinuation of slimeball, Michael Goldfarb, "We both know what THAT means."
I am ashamed of McCain-kinda rythmic isn't it? McCain and the Republicans have missed their golden opportunity, a claim that Obama cannot deny, and it could be fatal to his campaign-There has been several comments about Obama's lack of a valid State sealed birth certificate and that combined with his own admission that he came from the Planet Krypton makes him the ultimate "illegal" Alien-get with it mcCain, you got him on this one! Don't back down-you refered to Obama as "That one" in the debates because you knew that any intelligent Candidate had to be from another Planet!
Rep. Heather Wilson (R-NM) suggests that Obama is anti-American: Well, he has talked down about America. You know, we've always had this history of saying, "Well, you know, politics ends at the water's edge." It didn't for Barack Obama. He's been critical not only of the President but of American policy and hence has kind of a negative view of America in the world. That's not unusual frankly among liberals in kind of post-Vietnam America, to say that America is the problem.
Oh come on, people, you're not even trying. There's so much untapped material still out there, though I'm not quite motivated enough to look up all the specific mouthpieces involved.
Elitist (too many to name)
Traitor ("Would rather lose a war to win an election")
Chicago-style sleazeball ("Teachers" ad)
Baby-killer (Not sure there's an official reference on this one)
Liar (too many to name)
Someone with a Messiah-complex (too many to name)
Hitleresque cult-of-personality figure (not sure there's an official reference on this one)
Chamberlain-like Appeaser (Bush, among others)
Not a "real" American (Joe the Plumber recently said "I'm voting for a REAL American: John McCain!" What does that make Obama?)
I'm sure there are more...
"You have to pinch yourself – a Marxisant radical who all his life has been mentored by, sat at the feet of, worshipped with, befriended, endorsed the philosophy of, funded and been in turn funded, politically promoted and supported by a nexus comprising black power anti-white racists, Jew-haters, revolutionary Marxists, unrepentant former terrorists and Chicago mobsters, is on the verge of becoming President of the United States. And apparently it’s considered impolite to say so,"
- Melanie Phillips, the Spectator.
Jonah Goldberg:
“This is just a late Friday night prediction. But after reading this regrettable excess from Ezra Klein as well as all of the more reasonable but nonetheless hopeful, proud, idealistic and sincere sentiments of pride and well-wishing for Obama as the first serious mainstream black contender for the White House (some, but by no means all, of these sentiments shared by yours truly) , I think it's worth imagining a certain scenario. Imagine the Democrats do rally around Obama. Imagine the media invests as heavily in him as I think we all know they will if he's the nominee — and then imagine he loses. I seriously think certain segments of American political life will become completely unhinged. I can imagine the fear of this social unraveling actually aiding Obama enormously in 2008. Forget Hillary's inevitability. Obama has a rendezvous with destiny, or so we will be told. And if he's denied it, teeth shall be gnashed, clothes rent and prices paid.”
But no one has been worse than Andrew McCarthy at National Review:
"Obama's radicalism, beginning with his Alinski/ACORN/community organizer period, is a bottom-up socialism. This, I'd suggest, is why he fits comfortably with Ayers, who (especially now) is more Maoist than Stalinist. What Obama is about is infiltrating (and training others to infiltrate) bourgeois institutions in order to change them from within…"
There was that rather odd Rove quote about Obama being the suave guy in a tuxedo at the country club that leans up against the wall, gets all the girls, and makes fun of everybody else.
I am not sure what it means, but if I belonged to a country club and there was an attractive black man leaning up against the wall, getting my girl, and making fun of me I would probably not want to go back!
I've been keeping a list of everything he's been called:
Muslim, Arab, Terrorist, Racist, Race-Baiting, Palestinian, Anti-Semitic, Messianic, Uppity, Elitist, Foreign, Dangerous, Risky, Socialist, National Socialist, Marxist, Communist, Fascist, Professorial, Presumptuous, Attack against American inciting, Most-Liberal, Radical, Inexperienced, Appeaser, Celebrity, Corrupt Chicago Politician, Promise Breaker, Liar, Big spender, Black, White, Half-Breed, Related to Kenyan who has killed 300,000 people, Related to Kenyan living in Poverty, Selfish to his family, and may be the Antichrist.
So you Obama fans think it is OK to increase taxes on people who are successful and then turn around and give it to people who have low income?
And you think its cute to hear your favorite candidate talk about sharing peanut butter sandwiches?
Here's the deal: You are being suckered into accepting an agenda that you disagree with!
You don't agree with what Obama has in mind to force through if you elect him!
How can this be you say?
The answer is as old as politics. Just lie to the voters. Tell them what they want to hear. Blame all problems on your opponent.
Just look at Obama's record in the Illinois state senate! He is an established ultra liberal. Forget what he says, just look at what he has done.
Sure, now that he is running for president he pretends to be a moderate.
Obama is an ultra liberal who is masquerading as a moderate. You are so blinded by your hatred of Bush and your fears of impending doom that you accept the flowery oratory of Obama.
Yes, Obama says he's different, and you believe him!
Wake up, you're acting like some third world peasant standing in the street adoring the great leader standing in the balcony. Chanting O BA MA, O BA MA.
Oh, and remember, spreading the wealth around means taking your money and giving it to somebody else. Any takers?
Obama is a far left liberal who only pretends to be moderate so that you will vote for him.
Obama would appoint far left liberal judges at all levels of the federal judiciary. The vast majority of voters do not agree with the far left values of these judges, yet by voting for Obama, these voters will be approving an ideology and an agenda that they strongly disagree with.
And remember, judges are appointed for life. We're still suffering from old liberal judges appointed during the Carter administration.
Obama would appoint far left liberals to his cabinet. Once again the vast majority of voters do not agree with the ideology or agenda of these liberal bureaucrats. But when you vote for Obama that is what you get.
Too bad for you.
And Obama would sign legislation authored by ultra liberals like Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid and Barney Frank.
Again too bad for you. The vast majority of voters do not approve of the ideology or agenda of these ultra liberals, but if you vote for Obama because you hate Bush that is what you get.
If you vote for Obama because you are mad at Bush, there is a comeuppance. For the brief pleasure you get from voting against Bush, you risk having to bear the consequences of approving an ultra liberal agenda that you don't agree with for at least four years.
Many voters are letting their hatred of Bush cloud their minds.
McCain is not Bush. Remember all the vicious things that the Bush campaign did to sabotage McCain's run for president in 2000?
If you are angry at Bush, take it out on Bush. Send him a long letter telling him exactly what you think of him and what he has done to America.
Voting for Obama means accepting an ultra liberal agenda that you will regret for many years.
So does it make sense to put Obama and his pack of liberals in power just because you are mad at Bush?
Oh, and remember, spreading the wealth around means taking your money and giving it to somebody else. Any takers?
Obama is a far left liberal who only pretends to be moderate so that you will vote for him.
Yeah, don't I f*cking wish. But I fear he will actually turn out to be a moderate.
But seriously, it's a good thing he wasn't President during the 1980's. The war then going on in Afghanistan, between Marxism and Islam, he would have had to be on both sides at once.
Problem: 'Michael Goldfarb: "Barack Obama has a long track record of being around anti-Semitic, anti-Israel, and anti-American rhetoric."'
Let's see...
Rhashid Khalidi, anti-semitist? Check.
Khalidi and Rev Wright, anti-Israel? Check.
Ayers Anti-american? Check.
'Tom DeLay: "I tagged him as a Marxist months ago."'
Ok.
Obama speaks of "spreading the wealth" and redistribution.
Sounds socialist or Marxist-friendly?...
Check.
Conclusion:
Nope. Those right-wing nut jobs must really be out of their minds!
And f*ck this "redistribution of wealth" noise. Does anyone really believe that if the tax rate on people making over $250K, or even $100K, is raised by a few percentage points, they will lose all desire to work for a promotion and make more money?
As an interesting exercise, redo this one, but DO include relatively well known bloggers. And do it on both sides: liberal and conservative.
If you are curious as to why some people have become disgusted with the tantrums and illogic and smears from our own party, redo this exercise, and include our best known bloggers.
The video was pulled within minutes after this was posted on Right Truth, but the transcript highlights are on my website.
After spending nine years in Navy Intelligence as a Cryptologist, intercepting communications from Marxist/Socialist countries, breaking their codes, and gathering intelligence in "other" ways. I am familiar with their methods of using the media for propangada, using the educational system to indoctrinate young minds, using the judicial system, and voter fraud to steal elections.
This is what is happening now in america.
From everything I have researched in the last two years, has lead me to conclude that Obama was selected, tutored, groomed, scripted, and financed by Radical Marxist/Socialists to become the puppet leader of the USSA.
There is a vast difference between Social Democrats and Radical Marxist/Socialists. Hillary Clinton is a Social Democrat. Obama, Pelosi, Reid, Dodd, Schumer, Durbin, Franks,Boxer, and a few others now in Congress are Radical Marxist/Socialists.
On my website: [valsword.spaces.live.com] I have a 16 minute video of an interview with Yure Bezmenov a KGB agent who defected in 1970. This interview was recorded 24 years ago,
and the transcript highlights, in Yuri's own words confirm what I mentioned in the first paragraph.
I pray that I am wrong, but from everything I have researched, I believe Obama, with a Reid Pelosi led Congress, with a radical judicial system will pull a Hugo Chavez.
With a filibuster proof congress led by Reid and Pelosi. What is to stop Obama from pulling a Hugo Chavez. A closed mind is like a locked door, unless the right key is found, nothing enters. Unfortunately for many the key will be hindsight.
Frank Marshal Davis
Ayers
Rezko.
Wright.
Dohrn
Odinga
ACORN
The New Party
All Radical Marxist/Socialist links in Obama's
chain that launched his political career, and
unlike the theory of evolution, there are no missing links.
Davis, a known, avowed Communist Mentored Obama
as a teenager shaping his social views, and fostered his hate for whites.
The rest of the Radical Associations reinforced
Davis's teachings, and the Socialist NEW PARTY launched Obama's career.
Obama, selected, tutored, groomed, scripted,
and financed by Radical Marxist/Socialists to become
the puppet leader of the UNITED SOCIALIST STATES OF AMERICA If you do not believe associations shape the
character and judgement of a person, why do you
NOT let your child hang out with the local street gangs and crack heads. All of the people I listed are linked together, all share the same values, all are long term and continious Associations of Obama. They are not just random accidental associations with whackos that everyone encounters occaisionally.
In a recent address to his subjects, carried by fiat on all of the nation's television channels, Venezuela's authoritarian president Hugo Chávez Frias, who has previously taken over the airways for the celebration of his own birthday, now turned his country's attention to more urgent matters. The time had come, he explained, to move the "Bolivarian revolution" from its Lenin-like beginnings of transitional capitalism towards a more robust command economy. The nation had at last "broken the chains of the old, exploitative capitalist system," he said. "The state now has the obligation to build the model of a socialist economy."
The next stage of the socialist revolution will require making thirty-three separate amendments to the Venezuelan constitutiona document Chávez previously rewrote upon his ascension to Miraflores Palace in 1999. The most dramatic and controversial change will eliminate presidential term limits, ensuring the fulfillment of Chavez's promise not to leave office until 2021. To Hugo Chávez, a permanent revolution requires that he wield permanent power. It's a risky move, considering recent opinion polls showing a majority of Venezuelans skeptical to further constitutional "reform," especially if it means the possibility of adopting a President Chávez for life. But the same public, polling data demonstrates, also opposed the government's refusal to renew a broadcast license for RCTV, the country's oldest and most anti-Chávez private television network, and that storm seems to have passed.



