Do We Need More Think Tanks?

| Wed May. 27, 2009 7:43 AM PDT

Douglas Holtz-Eakin, former CBO director and John McCain campaign advisor, wants to start up a new conservative think tank, a "Center for American Progress for the right."  Matt Yglesias, who works for the actual Center for American Progress, isn't impressed:

This seems pretty misguided to me. In particular, DHE needs to think harder about the fact that there are already well-resourced conservative think tanks with plenty of capabilities. Before CAP came on the scene, there really wasn’t a “Heritage of the left.” On the right, Heritage and AEI already exist. The problem they face is that the conservative movement, as presently constituted, is not prepared to accept anything other than “tax cuts” as a solution to anything. Consequently, they’re not really even prepared to accept the premise that other problems exist. Tax cuts can’t solve climate change, so there must be no such thing! Tax cuts can’t curb inequality, so there must not be a problem with growing inequality.

But there's another way to look at this.  After all, a decade ago conservatives would have said that liberals already had think tanks too: Brookings, the Ford Foundation, CFR, etc.  The problem is that they were the wrong kind of think tank: they may have leaned toward the left institutionally, but they weren't overtly partisan.  They weren't dedicated to a cause.

So liberals decided they needed more direct competitors to Heritage and AEI, and CAP was one of the results.  Likewise, although Holtz-Eakin may say his proposed think tank is CAP for the right, my guess is that it's really more a DLC for the right.  That's what the conservative movement needs, after all.  They have plenty of partisan, conservative think tanks at their disposal, but they've ossified so much that they're now as much a part of the problem as the Republican Party's special interest base itself.  What they need is a think tank that tries to move the party back toward the sane center, one that produces ideas beyond bashing gay rights, extolling endless tax cuts, pretending that global warming doesn't exist, and cheerleading the death of ever more people from central Asia.  They need a conservative DLC, and I'll bet that's what Holtz-Eakin really has in mind.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Kevin Drum is a political blogger for Mother Jones. For more of his stories, click here.

Get Mother Jones by Email - Free. Like what you're reading? Get the best of MoJo three times a week.

Comments

No, tanks.

No, tanks.

I find the results of Opium Dens much more useful

...And more lucid.

Do we need more think tanks?

No. We need more actual thinking.

Conservative think tank = Corporate propaganda mill

The problem for "conservatives" is that so-called "conservatism" in America today is a fake, phony, trumped-up, scripted, teleprompted, corporate-sponsored pseudo-ideology, manufactured by propagandists for America's corporate oligarchy for the purpose of bamboozling the American people into supporting the corporations' class warfare against everyone else. The Heritage Foundation, the Cato Institute, the American Enterprise Institute, the Hudson Institute and the rest of their ilk are not actually "think tanks". They are corporate propaganda mills, who are paid by huge, ultra-rich corporations to deceive and mislead the American people. They aren't promoting any principled ideology, they are promoting corporate interests, with lies. That's why it is "conservative" to deny the scientific reality of global warming. That's why it is "conservative" to deny that smoking tobacco causes cancer. Because "conservatism" is about using talk radio and other top-down, centrally-controlled broadcast media to create a zombie army of mental slaves who will do whatever they are told, and say whatever they are told to say, and believe whatever they are told to believe -- as long is it is branded "conservative".

What we need...

is more OBJECTIVE thinking...less emotionally based thinking.

Simple

The explanation for his initiative is much simpler: He wants a think tank where he personally has more clout than at Heritage or AEI. Since they won't make room for him, he wants to start his own where he is the big cheese.

Two purposes only.

These tanks have two purposes, Secular Animist covers the propaganda mill aspect. The other purpose is cushy jobs for people who have forgotten how to think (or never knew how), but wanna play at intellectualism. That is really what DHE is looking for, easy money for himself and his buddies.

If the Rethugs try to make

If the Rethugs try to make good on tying up Sotomayor's appointment, I suggest that Obama threaten to appoint SecularAnimist for the job. I'll bet their think tanks haven't thought about that excellent option.

Think tanks make the people

Think tanks make the people stupid.

What DHE really needs to do...

...is to go to Heritage or AEI and stage a coup. The bloodier, the better.

cool

oh,no

conservative think tank

Alan P. "conservative think" is becoming more of an oxymoron everyday

I think this is exactly

I think this is exactly correct.

Post new comment

Alternately, you may login to or register an account
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <ul> <ol> <li> <blockquote>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

MoJo Comments: Send Us Your Feedback

We changed our spam software to better filter comments. Should you encounter any issues, please let us know.

Photo Essays

The chaos and humanity of war.
The craftspeople and musicians of Appalachia.
A selection of '70s ads depicting African-Americans.
As climate change melts the permafrost, native villages slip into the sea, taking a way of life with them.