Economic Fascism

| Thu May. 28, 2009 10:04 AM PDT

The latest firestorm in the conservosphere concerns Chrysler's shutdown of a quarter of its dealer network.  Capitalism at work, you say?  More like crony capitalism, my friends:

Is the Obama administration punishing Chrysler dealers for their politics? A preliminary analysis by Doug Ross suggests that could be the case.

....[Ross] started with the list of Chrysler and Dodge dealerships which will be closed as a result of the government-mandated Chrysler bankruptcy plan. Then he marked those dealers whose names appeared more than once in the list. Next, he checked which ones contributed to political campaigns. Every one of them had donated almost exclusively to Republican candidates. Ross found only one dealer on the closing list who had contributed to the Obama campaign, a $200 donor in Waco, Texas.

....Shades of the Nixon enemies list, we first saw signs that Obama wasn’t above playing hardball with his political opponents during the active campaign.

Nate Silver puts his high-powered statistical brain to work on his puzzler and concludes....wait for it....that there's no there there.  "It turns out," he says, "that all car dealers are, in fact, overwhelmingly more likely to donate to Republicans than to Democrats — not just those who are having their doors closed."  Big surprise.

So that's that.  But I want to defend Doug Ross and the RedState folks who publicized this anyway.  I'm serious.  Sure, it turned out that nothing was going on, but you know what?  If George Bush's administration had gone down this road, I'd want someone to watch them like a hawk too.  The crackpotty writing may be a source of amusement, and I have no doubt that these guys are, as usual, going to embarrass themselves in an Ahab-like quest to prove that Obama really did force Chrysler to target Republican donors — with the lapdog mainstream media covering up for him because, you know, that's what they do.  But even so, I say dig away.  Even blind squirrels find nuts occasionally, and if the government is going to be running car companies, then this is exactly the kind of thing people should be watching out for.  That's what opposition parties are for.

As Bob Somerby reminds us frequently, the real damage to Bill Clinton didn't come from the crackpots and their conspiracy theories.  It came from the mainstream media eagerly picking up on these theories even when there was nothing there.  As long as modern-day Jeff Gerths hold their fire unless there's some real smoke, we'll be OK.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Kevin Drum is a political blogger for Mother Jones. For more of his stories, click here.

Get Mother Jones by Email - Free. Like what you're reading? Get the best of MoJo three times a week.

Comments

But you have to admit Kevin

But you have to admit Kevin with Rahm Emanuel pushing the levers in the White House its not too hard to imagine that political affiliation was not a consideration in which dealerships to close.

I think the president's

I think the president's chief of staff has better things on which to spend his time than deciding which Chrysler dealers to close.

For whatever it's worth,

For whatever it's worth, opensecrets.org has a table that indicates a 3-1 ratio, not 7 or 8 to 1. The methodology used to construct the opensecrets.org table is not described though. (Via comments at rightwingnuthouse)

A former Chevy dealer in my

A former Chevy dealer in my city, who sold his dealership a few years ago, has led the local anti-immigrant movement. Another former Pontiac dealer, and Republican, was once elected as governor of my state. He was the only governor to be impeached. Nixon was never a car dealer, but he was compared to a used car sales person. Sales persons usually want to seize as much of the available revenue as possible for themselves, which makes them natural born Republicans.

honor role

You must live in AZ. Their ultra-right-wing & ultimately impeached (and convicted) Governor, Ev Meacham, was a Pontiac dealer.

Whew!

As long as modern-day Jeff Gerths hold their fire unless there's some real smoke, we'll be OK. I feel so much better now.

I wouldn't even suspect

the Bush admin of doing this level of detail. It makes no sense whatsoever. The idea that the White House -- any White House -- would research and then tell Chrysler or GM precisely which auto dealers to close is preposterous wingnuttery. Even Karl Rove wouldn't be stupid enough to do that.

Kevin, I'm on board with people digging deep

into all government activities. But I won't go so far as to congratulate RedState for publishing this claim. Dig, then analyze, then verify, then publish. I know this is the blogosphere and I can't expect high powered analysis before every bit of information is posted, but this seems quite easy to debunk. But they don't want to debunk anything or present just valid criticism. The right is happy to throw any shit at the wall till some sticks. And that's not praiseworthy.

"It turns out," he says,

"It turns out," he says, "that all car dealers are, in fact, overwhelmingly more likely to donate to Republicans than to Democrats
I'm afraid this possible scandal can't be dismissed this lightly when you have people like Mack McLarty involved. Too much smoke. http://directorblue.blogspot.com/2009/05/dealergate-statistical-evidence... Thomas "Mack" McLarty (former Chief of Staff for President Clinton), and Robert Johnson (founder of Black Entertainment Television and co-owner of the NBA's Charlotte Bobcats)... McLarty campaigned for Obama in 2008, and Johnson has given countless amounts of money to Democrats over the years."

stats

Luther, to my shame I clicked your link. Those guys are about on par with creationists' attempts to disprove evolution through probability theory. Deceptive, stupid, and completely incapable of putting a result in context.

Any table or chart comparing

Any table or chart comparing the political affiliation of the dealerships being closed to those that are not is completely meaningless without also including a comparison of the finances. Which sold the most/least cars? Which are the most/least profitable? Which made the most/least money? Without a comparison of the profitability of the dealerships, comparing their political affiliations is about as worthless as comparing the ratio of dealerships being closed that are owned by bald-headed men. Are more of the owners of the dealerships being closed bald? Are they older? Is this really a bias against bald-headed men? Or age discrimination? As usual from the right, these attacks tell only a part of the story. And since they totally miss the biggest part, there is no way to determine the importance of the part they focus on.

Post new comment

Alternately, you may login to or register an account
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <ul> <ol> <li> <blockquote>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

MoJo Comments: Send Us Your Feedback

We changed our spam software to better filter comments. Should you encounter any issues, please let us know.

Photo Essays

The chaos and humanity of war.
The craftspeople and musicians of Appalachia.
A selection of '70s ads depicting African-Americans.
As climate change melts the permafrost, native villages slip into the sea, taking a way of life with them.