Palin and the Presidency

| Thu Oct. 29, 2009 9:40 AM PDT

Iowans aren't accustomed to paying politicians to speak at their events.  Just the opposite, in fact: as the kick-off state for the presidential primary season, most politicians are so eager to speak in Iowa that they're almost willing to pay for the privilege.

But not Sarah Palin!  She's hungry for scratch, and Iowans have to pay up the same as anyone else:

A conservative Iowa group’s effort to lure Sarah Palin to its banquet next month has had an unintended effect: Rather than exciting conservatives about the prospect of a visit from the former Alaska governor, the group’s plan to raise a six-figure sum to bring her to the state has GOP activists recoiling at the thought of paying to land a politician's speaking appearance.

Matt Yglesias is cynical: "The hard-right loves Sarah Palin and wants her to be president, but she really just wants to cash in." Nick Baumann isn't so sure: "Running for President does mean sucking up to Iowans, and if Sarah Palin isn't willing to do that, she either has an outrageously inflated sense of her own importance or she isn't planning on running. You can probably find evidence for either of those explanations."

Why yes you can.  Or both!  As for myself, I go back and forth on whether Palin plans to run for president in 2012.  At times, it really does seem as if the 2008 campaign made her realize that the rigors of big-time politics weren't for her.  On the other hand, she really, really loves the spotlight, and what's a bigger stage than the White House?  But if she planned to run, would she really be quite so obviously frenzied about cashing in on her notoriety while she has a chance?  Still, Nick is right: her sense of self-importance is so manifest that you can practically see her measuring the Oval Office drapes when she makes public appearances.  But surely her advisors know perfectly well that she has absolutely no chance of beating Barack Obama and will let her know that?  Maybe so, but that might just mean she'll find herself new advisors.  The ability of people to convince themselves that they can win the presidency (Fred Thompson?  Chris Dodd?  Seriously?) is the stuff of legend.

So I don't know.  I'd put it at about 50-50.  Or maybe 45-55.  If I had to bet, I'd say she won't run.  But I wouldn't bet very much.  Give her another year or two and she might very well delude herself into thinking that the American people are really, really yearning for her to be the leader of the free world.  After all, they love her book, don't they?

POSTSCRIPT: If you want to know the truth, this post is really just an excuse to include that picture of Palin, captured some time ago from her old Twitter page.  It cracks me up.  The first time I saw it she reminded me of some Paul Bunyanesque giant gazing down curiously on the antlike peasants below — perhaps just before rampaging over the Alaskan tundra and crushing a few villages in the process.  Or maybe I just have an odd sense of humor?

UPDATE: As is so often the case with Palin, it turns out that the real story here is murky.  Is she really asking for $100,000?  Is she even planning to be in Iowa at all?  Maybe not.  More here.

Continues Below

Continued From Above

Get Mother Jones by Email - Free. Like what you're reading? Get the best of MoJo three times a week.

Comments

Palin or not, I say the odds

Palin or not, I say the odds are better than even that the GOP will nominate a real odd ball in 2012. Just look at their base -- right out of casting in a Tod Browning movie. Those are the people who will decide who the nominee is.

No, you don't have an odd sense of humor, Kevin. That photo is gold.

Nope, not just you. The pic

Nope, not just you. The pic is hilarious. Especially if, as you say, she put it on her own Twitter page.

I don't think there is any way she is running for president. If that was the case, she would still be governor. I think she resigned specifically so that she could cash in on $100K speaking engagements while she was hot. She knew that by the time she served out her term, her star would have dimmed and she would no longer be worth half that much.

picture and compensatory personality type

Ms. Palin, a climate change denier, is sinking into the melting permafrost.

Palin will run for president because she will desperately crave the attention, which will be in short supply if she does not.

False

Palin is not a climate change denier. She's skeptical of how much human activity has contributed to climate change, but she doesn't deny it's happening.

...

Talk about missing the forest for the trees. If you don't accept an anthropogenic source, you're denying the evidence. Period. There's no evidence for a natural source of the current climate-change!

That makes her a climate-change denier. A flat-earther. A Luddite.

That makes her a

That makes her a climate-change denier. A flat-earther. A Luddite.

It makes her a anthropogenic climate-change denier. Alaskans have a hard time denying climate change because it is more obvious in Alaska than in the lower 48. Conservatives are driven to this luddite-like distinction because, well, Al Gore is fat. Because pumping several cubic kilometers of fossil carbon into the atmosphere each year (2 or so if diamond, 5 or so if coal, burnt into 20 gigatons of CO2) has no significant consequences because there are negative feedback effects. etc.

Yep, I agree

It's not just you. I loved that photo the first time I saw it. Sure shows her as she sees herself.

Seems strange

tagged as: 

The longer Palin is gone from the lime light the more you writers put her out front. The negative attacks on Palin draw more and more people to be sympathetic to her. The media attacking Palin is like a bully picking on a little girl. It's no wonder she is asked to speak so often and for such large fees. "Mother with disabled child attacked by news organizations 24/7". Not a smart approach and doesn't make you look any better. At this rate we are going to end up with a female president that loves to hunt, fish spend time with her family and loves America. You are doing it to yourselves.
OldSarg

I agree OldSarg

CNN and Politico are absolutely besotted with her. So is Steve Bennen. They are feeding the beast.

I think the best thing to do with characters like Palin, Beck, Limbaugh, Bauchman, etc. is to just ignore them. Calling attention to their silly antics only makes more people want to tune in and watch - just like folks slow down to see a traffic accident. The more attention these folks get, the sillier their schtick gets, the sillier the schtick the more CNN and Politico point, the more CNN and Politico point the more people gravitate to watch the "accident" .....

Little girl?

She doesn't look like a "little girl" in that photo.

But seriously, her poll numbers are way down. So I think your idea that the "attacks" (as in telling the truth) will make more people more sympathetic is not backed by the evidence. The high speaking fees are just admission to the greatest freak show in town.

Yet another made-up smear

What "high speaking fees"? There is a certain sub-class of people who believe it is perfectly okay to make up and perpetuate lies as long as it is in a good cause. Why are the anti-Palin mob making up nonsense? Are their policies so empty that the only tool they have left is personal attack? Is the only justification for every left-wing lunacy made up "facts" asserting that Palin is ugly, or stupid, or some other reflection of the poster's deepest fear about himself?

Seems pretty obvious to me

Seems pretty obvious to me she's decided to cash in about as hard as she can, I doubt she'll run.

That said, I bet we'll see her play a similar game to the one Newt Gingrich seems intent on playing, publically flirt with the idea of running for office every few years to extend her political relevance and time in the sun without having to actually assume the responsibility of doing anything.

Palin

You gotta admit, politics aside, a weekend with her, a gallon of Wesson oil, some rubber sheets and a box of assorted toys would do a body good..........

the third level of sexual liberation: attraction to airheads

That is what Rielle Hunter thought about John Edwards.

uncle!

This thread is starting to make me queasy.

Yes that Twitter page background caught my eye at the time.

Actually, the Alaska part is pretty nice (I've visited the state).

That picture of Palin

Dude, she needs to be that big so she can have an unobstructed view of Russia from her house. You can't keep an eye on Putin if the neighbor's McMansion is in your way.

Oh, my!

Smack me upside the head with a two-by-four! Don't tell me Politico, of all places, actually got something wrong? Oh, heavens to betsy.

maybe

"As is so often the case with Palin, it turns out that the real story here is murky."

Maybe if you didn't post about her so early and often, you wouldn't have to keep adding updated caveats and retractions.

The coming mother of all temper tantrums?

Don't know whether Sarah Palin will run in 2012 or not, though I have no doubt that in her mind she sees presidential material every time she looks into a mirror. But, based on her mavericky personality, I'm happy to predict that if Sarah does run, it will be one of the most disjoint attempts at it ever. Way worse than John McCain in the early stages of the 2008 Republican primaries.

And yet, as the McCain precedent suggests, even a chaotic Palin 2012 campaign as such may not mean that her candidacy would invariably come to an early end. After all, although it is still a long way to go, there isn't much of an indication that the Republican field for 2012 will shape up any more impressive than the one for 2008.

There are two question for a Palin 2012 campaign though. The first one is whether she could raise enough serious money. Her hardcore fans don't seem to be the ones with deep pockets, and Republican backers with deep pockets don't seem to be Sarah fans. But if she does find the money, the second question is how long she would manage to hold herself together in the glaring, and partly certainly hostile light of daily media exposure.

My money would be on a Sarah Palin 2012 campaign blowing up in a temper tantrum somewhere along the halfway mark of the Republican primaries.

...

They should have to pay, just like anyone else. I have nothing against Iowa, but its position are premiere of the Presidency has got to go.

...

PS, are those trees or tundra? If they're tundra, she's too small per scale. And it really looks to me as if it's tundra...

She bestrides the Earth like

She bestrides the Earth like a colossus
her gentle tread like a herd or two of rhinoceros
While we petty men but scurry between her two great legs
and strain to gaze up so far unto her sky filling empire,
embiggenned now in tender love,
where cash, some say, is it's own reward

Iowan tundra?

Maybe it's not the Alaskan tundra, but rather Iowa in January.

ODD?

No, not an odd sense of humor at all. That is a funny funny picture.

Drapes

"You can practically see her measuring the Oval Office drapes when she makes public appearance."

Again, wouldn't she measure the windows, not the drapes?

Steve Duncan aside . . . , I

Steve Duncan aside . . . , I feel sorry for the poor Alaskan critters that might accidently look up that skirt.

Run, Sarah, Run

I'm hoping she does run; her campaign would be an absolute cornucopia of fail. Not only would she not make it to the nomination, I doubt she'd even make it to Super Tuesday.

"There is no indication that

"There is no indication that the former governor has requested a fee or that her decision whether to attend is being influenced by whether she’ll be paid."

Too bad Politico didn't put that sentence first. No wait, I know why they didn't. Because it would scuttle their none-too-subtle smear job.

Too bad the MSM can't print BS articles like this against Democrats.

It took the National Enquirer - yes the National Enquirer - to break the John Edwards scandal. Too bad it takes a tabloid to do the job of the MSM. I guess the MSM is too busy making shit up about Republicans to do even a modicum of research on their liberal Democrat buddies.

Why does Iowa get to vote

Why does Iowa get to vote first? Because it's always been that way? Eff that noise. Of all the campaign reform laws I'd like to see put into action, deep sixing Iowa/NH's monopoly on the primaries is #1 on my list.

دردشة

دردشة

Post new comment

Alternately, you may login to or register an account
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <ul> <ol> <li> <blockquote> <img>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Photo Essays

When you dial a 1-900 number, who picks up the phone?
Meet the KKK's seamstress of hate couture.
The other side of Gitmo.
A photographer’s year at Angola Prison.