California's Choice
Here's the latest news from the world's biggest provider of penal services:
Caught between state funding cuts and rowdy student protests, a key committee of the University of California's Board of Regents on Wednesday reluctantly approved a two-step student fee increase that would raise undergraduate education costs more than $2,500, or 32%, by next fall.
...."I hate to say it, but if you have no choice, you have no choice," UC President Mark G. Yudof told reporters after the committee vote.
He empathized with student anger, but said it would be better directed toward state lawmakers who have cut education funding.
....The regents' finance committee approved the new fees for UC's undergraduates 10 to 1, with only student Regent Jesse Bernal voting no. The full board is expected to endorse the change today, along with even higher increases for students in professional schools such as law and medicine.
Yudof is right: there's probably not much choice anymore. Partly this is because of dumb tax and spending decisions in the past. Partly it's because of the recession. And partly it's because the prison guards union has spent the last 30 years scaring Californians into fits in order to build up the prison population. The chart on the right shows an almost ghostly parallel: adjusted for inflation, UC tuition has gone up 5x since 1980. During the same period, spending on corrections has also gone up 5x. As we spend ever more on warehousing prisoners, we're forced to make students pay ever more for their education. The two lines track almost exactly.
We used to have the world's greatest system of higher education and we thrived. Now we have the world's biggest system of penal institutions and we're broke. That's the decision Californians have made over the past 30 years: more prisons and better paid prison guards, but lower taxes and less education. (And not just higher education, either.) It's hard to think of a stupider allocation of resources. But hey — at least our property taxes are capped! Hooray!
Advertisement
Advertisement
Comments
Almost
You almost seem to be implying that locking people up for long periods of time for having drugs is not way, way, way more important than having an educated populace.
And what is the worst that can happen with a stupid population? Something like this?
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2009_11/021069.php
"some of us are prisoners and some of us are guards"
I lived in California for thirty years. At the time the big prison build was taking place, under Pete Wilson, I was going around muttering that soon everyone in California would either be inside a prison or employed as a guard. Most people seemed to think I was nuts.
The quote, BTW, is from one of Dylan's lesser songs.
pedantic nitpick
You didn't interpolate, you extrapolated.
I was going to make that point.
But you got there first.
anti union?
PMike1
Why do you blame the prison guard union for the growth of prisons? I would have thought it was the idiots in the legislature and the voters who put them there.
Why extrapolate.
The graph would have looked perfectly good with the last blue point missing. Now you have exposed yourselves to all sorts of allegations about cooking the data.
I don't know how much is due to the prison guards union. They used to be a hate target of the conservatives, who thought they had extracted way too many benefits. Are they capably of pushing the state towards Gulaghood? I suspect it has more to do with the system of government by proposition, many of which read as:
Behavior XXX is unacceptable. Proposition YYY says anyone suspected of engaging in XXX should be throw in the slammer for life. Clean up our streets, vote yes! Anyone voting no, approves of XXX!
And so we keep finding more and more things to crack down on, and the Hotel California fills up.
traditional low wage and low prestige workers
Other traditional low wage and low prestige workers should adopt the CA correctional officer's organizational power to improve their circumstances, but most of those types of workers are not public servants able to back ballot initiatives that would benefit their industries.
Bat Shit crazy Legislature elected by Bat shit crazy populace
Amen, PMike1. The prison guard union surely must take some of the blame and Kevin is right about them having spend most of the 1980s scaring the bejezus out the of citizenry. But -- and it's a bit but, whether it's the Repubs who think nothing is worth taxing anyone, anything for or the Dems who don't think anything really costs anything and so have agreed to fund a laundry list of special projects that break the bank,, the Legislature has not been a responsible partner in funding higher ed in CA.
Also, those of us in Higher Ed are straight-jacketed by our unwillingness to call out the CTA and the community colleges for Prop 82 which guarantees their funding (and funding increases) in ways that shrank the discretionary part of the General Fund budget for the last couple of decades. Ok, K-14 is suffering now as the Prop 82 promises are broken in the latest round of doom, but the guaranteed funding of those systems has messed up K-16 funding for a long time.
And of course my fellow citizens who continually vote for these stupid initiatives -- well we bear the largest blame. I vote no on all, even one's I approve of, because the initiative process is no way to run a state.
Finally, if you think the UC is in bad straights, spare some tears for the CSU. It educates nearly half a million folks and prepares most of the teachers, engineers, nurses and business folks in the state --- yet their situation is even worse since 90+% of their funding comes from the state, whereas in the UC it's well under 50%
Don't let Yudoff off so easily.
Other than this very minimal lip service, Yudoff seems not at all bothered by the rise in student fees, and not at all committed to trying to meet the state Master Plan, or interested in educating himself about California. Since he has no background in CA or in a state that has a commitment to public service, that probably makes sense. See his recent NYT Mag interview: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/27/magazine/27fob-q4-t.html?_r=1&scp=3&sq...
"we thrived"
California's almost free university system of the past is probably the greatest input to the computing revolution begun in the Eighties. Unfortunately, despite its low cost, California's past university system did not properly educate Californians about the benefits of distributing economic wealth equitably and about how punitive punishment makes human beings' behavior worse. Now, California will be lucky if it thrives. Most likely California will suffer a long decline from its reactionary politics.
Alternatives
What's sad is that the state refuses to take a strategic look into improving productivity.
Private sector employers have found ways to streamline operations so that they can continue to provide good value to consumers. The public sector remains decades behind private employers in optimal use of resources.
While private sector employees are coming up with innovative ways to save money and increase value, public employees stay on the sidelines, forcing the state to either cut services or increase the financial burden on it's citizens.
Re: Alternatives?
Fortunately, the state cannot "increase productivity" by sending its technical jobs to India or its unionized labor to sweat shops in China.
Increase productivity, innovate, when the only bonus will be awarded to my brain-dead manager?
As your actors say, "Where's my motivation."
The problem with the upper crust is too many crumbs.
When are we going to uncap commercially held properties?
They've been escaping under a loophole in the law that since the property isn't directly being transfered, only the owner changed hands, they're paying the same taxes their grandcorpies did back in the day, no matter how many times they've been bought or sold.
Heh.
Penal. Heh.
Hey, somebody had to do it.
Paul Gann and Howard Jarvis
Paul Gann and Howard Jarvis are laughing right about now, wherever they are. Personally, I think the state that loosed Ronald Reagan on the world is reaping what it sowed, if not getting what it deserves. Pity.
Inevitable
I'd like to see a similar graph of total spending and spending per student in the UC system, in real dollars over the same time period. I bet it goes up too. I could be wrong, though. Seriously, anyone know the answer?
This is what happens when people don't address real cost controls. How much spending in enough? When do we say, "No more"? It's a question we had better answer.
It is interesting that Kevin is attacking public sector unions, though. Is it OK in lefty circles to grouse about the prison guard union? Are there any other public sector unions that lefties are getting impatient with?
Progressives, liberals and
Progressives, liberals and leftists are not authoritarians like moderates, conservatives and neocons, who rely upon institutional direction to inform their opinions. Lefty's are able to discuss any issue without fear of institutional reprisal, as long as they stay away from the moderates' enforcer, the DLC.
"Private sector employers
"Private sector employers have found ways to streamline operations so that they can continue to provide good value to consumers. The public sector remains decades behind private employers in optimal use of resources."
Proof for these assertions, please...
Some of the things the state does (eg construction of schools) will show, I suspect, tracking of private sector productivity.
Some of the things the state does (eg repairing highways) are horribly inefficient, but the citizens are unwilling to accept the alternative --- you can either do the job for a few hours each night, or, at a tenth of the cost, you can shut the highway down for a week. You personally may be willing to accept the shut-down alternative, but the fact is that both are rational choices, and in most cases it appears that citizens prefer the expensive (but more convenient) choice.
Many of the things the state does intrinsically require people (eg education and health) and there are problems with improving productivity in these sectors. Once again it is not "the state" that is somehow malign and unwilling to do things sensibly, it is that the voters of the state have made specific choices.
In the case of health, for example, the voters insist on (basically irrelevant) "rights" like the "right to choose" their doctors.
They insist on being given treatments even when it has been shown that these treatments are invalid (eg stents in arteries, or most screening for cancer). Health is an interesting case because there is a large private component, and we see the same idiocies and pathologies there as in the public component.
Likewise for education, where every parent assumes they're an expert in what does and does not work in teaching.
Complaining about "the state" is stupid and ignorant. A better complaint would be about the culture of US society, which pairs individual bone-crushing stupidity with an absolute belief in the validity, indeed superiority, of one's opinions, to the extent that they need to be deferred to by health and education (and crime/justice for that matter) no matter how inane they are.
they pledged our tuition
i'm a graduate student at uc berkeley. the state is clearly a problem; but yudof and the uc administration are just as culpable. they're using the state budget crisis as an excuse to increase student fees.
there is a very clear logic to what they're doing. the most important piece on this topic has been published by bob meister, a professor of political theory at uc santa cruz:
The shift in priorities reflected in UC’s General Revenue bonds is even more important than the off-the-top costs, which will certainly rise over the decade unless UC’s priorities are reversed. The concept of a “General Revenue” bond is a hybrid between a “general obligation bond” and a “revenue bond,” and is as close as UC can come to backing each individual project with all it revenues without having the power to tax—although the power to raise fees comes close. By pledging “General Revenues” (everything it can legally pledge) for every project UC thus changed its spending (aka “budget”) priorities to suit the bond market. This shouldn’t be surprising—you, too, would change your spending priorities to suit that bank if you pledged your entire paycheck, or as much of it as you could. For UC this means increasing tuition for its own sake, because every tuition dollar can be added directly to the pledged collateral. It also means cutting spending when and where it can get away with doing so. What this is means is that state budget cuts are actually good for UC’s bond rating, because they allow UC to raise tuition simultaneously. Construction funding is a reason why the Regent’s want to raise tuition, perhaps the most important reason, but, as students, you are unlikely to go along with big increases to fund UC’s list of construction projects. Cutting back on instructional budgets is how they get you to agree to higher tuition without telling you how much will go to fund construction. On my campus, the most visible instructional cuts typically become permanent, and we’re told that without higher tuition they would have been worse. Campus administrations can always say that no particular tuition increase is ever large enough to reverse whatever instructional cuts were imposed to persuade you that it was necessary. If you accept this claim, you’ll never question how much of your tuition is used to fund construction, and whether you would have found an increase justified had you known.
read the whole thing.
That's what you get for your
That's what you get for your war on drugs and prosecuting victimless crimes and your police state and you thug cops who don't respect the Constitution and your unjust courts and your citizens who live to turn each other in to the authorities with their cel phones. Release the criminals that you have turned into vicious rabid hateful animals in your torture chamber prisons. You people are scum. May weasels eat your flesh.
make the connection
More poor people who can't get an education = more crime = more market for prisons
It's criminal. It's the wholesale warehousing of black youth.
Yudof in Texas
It might be interesting to update this post with Yudof's history of raising tuition rates when he ran the UT System. Under his leadership, the university system aggressively lobbied state government (during the 2003 session which faced a large deficit) for tuition de-regulation so they would be able to raise tuition rates. With Republicans firmly in control of both chambers and the governorship, they did, and tuition increased 30% the first year after it was passed. It increased every year after by some pretty large percentages.
The situation was similar in Texas. The system was underfunded by the legislature, etc. And perhaps the arguments that Yudof used at the time were partially valid - tuition is too cheap, if the state won't fund us, then we need to fund ourselves, etc. I'm not saying Yudof was bad for the UT System (he wasn't), but he's done this before, and the consequences are more student debt, and less accessibilty to the higher ed system. Just sayin ...
California Tuition Increase Woes
Repeal Proposition 13, and we can begin to reverse the decline of public institutions in California that Prop 13 created. The Jarvis gang, walking corpses, dripping with jewelry and stinking of greed, brought the state down with their petulant withdrawal from public responsibility. If we dump 13 and bring property taxes back to where they should be, there might be some chance of stopping California's precipitous decline.
Cali,Kali,Kalifornia
I visited Cali once, I found the brown hills and deceitful people distressing and I left after only a day, pausing only to visit the sequoyahs.
Cali is in a situation that magnifies a reflection of the nations problems as a whole, our class structures are fracturing as elements of a powerful would be oligarchy destabilize society by manipulations of markets, media and politics. So called "conservatives" are bent on creating a society with a very privileged and entrenched corporate class lording it over a vast SEA of peons with few rights and no assets to sell but their labor. Burning the bridges to higher education bars the path to social advancement as does creating a vast gulag populated by only by Zeks and Screws. The "war on drugs" is such a culturally disempowering fabrication, as is the recent epidemic of forcloseures on private homeowners through usury. (6 for 5 is usury! but today 6 for 5 is considered a good credit card rate it's only 20%!) The same goons who laid off the workers and shipped factories to Mexico and Malaysia to avoid having to pay employment benifits or obey environmental regs are the ones to blame for the crumbling of our society as a whole. As far as Cali goes, usually it is like the rest of the nation except more extreme. Superficial and unsustainable, Cali culture is crushing us. People are short sighted, doesn't anyone see that people can only take so much before snapping? The gap betwixt the richest and the poorest hasn't been so wide since the Bastille was stormed and their is no man more dangerous than a desperate man, angry, dispossessed and with nothing to loose. The wealthy corporate class would be rulers of us all forget this, as they forget how vulnerable our modern technological society is to malfunctions and sabotage. Crude efforts to disarm the populace disguised as "gun control" cannot protect the corporate elite when things like remotely guided vehicles and night vision equipment are available as toys for the self indulgent. Then there is the simple fact that people still get killed with ordinary rocks (and rocks cannot be "controlled")
Frankly unless we turn the trends around we are all in big trouble as economic forces, class warfare and ecological collapse converge. If you don't have a firearm already, I suggest you acquire one, whoever you are, liberal or "conservative". While rocks still work, guns have more range. Note this, I am a veteran AND IN NO WAY SUPPORT, SUGGEST OR CONDONE INSURRECTION. But I see what I see, and I know I am not alone. Cali may fall into the sea yet, and the rest of us will still have to face tough times yet.
Classrooms or cages?
As someone who spent some time in the penal system (as a juvenile) and in public universities, I learned a valuable lesson about the importance of investing in education, not just for myself, but for the populace. The direct costs and lost productivity of warehousing non-violent individuals who could be rehabilitated far exceed the costs of educating them. Everything else being equal, would you rather live in a neighborhood filled with ex-cons or college graduates? Why? "Extrapolate" that out to society as a whole.
Anyone who thinks spending as much on prisons as on education is overlooking the root causes of crime and ultimately perpetuating the cycle. I want to live in a country that prioritizes rehabilitation over revenge, but that would require getting the prison industry out of politics. Like most of what's wrong with our country, these decisions are heavily influenced by corporate profits and not by what makes the most sense over the long haul.
California prisons
Schwarzenegger even had a plan to sell San Quentin to real estate developers for $2 billion. One billion would be used to build another prison and the other billion would go to the state for this years deficit.
It didn't fly. In the future it probably will.
Post new comment
MoJo Comments: Send Us Your Feedback
We changed our spam software to better filter comments. Should you encounter any issues, please let us know.
He empathized with student anger, but said it would be better directed toward state lawmakers who have cut education funding.


