Healthcare Reform and Cost Control

| Wed Jan. 13, 2010 8:33 AM PST

Will healthcare reform help to cut the growth of Medicare costs? Skeptics are....skeptical, but Austin Frakt has a guest post by Randall Brown, Vice President and Director of Health Research at Mathematica Policy Research, that provides some real-world evidence about proven ways to make Medicare more efficient:

Mary Naylor and Eric Coleman provide clear, rigorous evidence on how to reduce the appallingly high readmission rate (20 percent within 30 days) for Medicare patients discharged from a hospital. Their “transitional care” programs reduce the need for re-admissions by providing much closer attention to patients and their families as patients move from hospital to home. Randomized trials, the most rigorous and credible type of evidence, showed these programs reduced readmission rates by 18 to 35 percent, resulting in reductions in costs that substantially exceed the intervention costs.

....Following the evidence also means establishing a care coordination benefit for a well-defined high risk population of beneficiaries....Randomized trial studies of programs serving beneficiaries with chronic illnesses have found that targeting is critical. For a subgroup of beneficiaries at high risk of near-term hospitalization — which comprises 18 percent of Medicare beneficiaries and 38 percent of Medicare expenditures (those with congestive heart failure, coronary artery disease, or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and a hospitalization in the past year) — 4 of the programs in the Medicare Coordinated Care Demonstration had significant and sizable reductions in hospitalizations over the 6-year life of the study.

These two ideas are nowhere near enough to solve Medicare's funding problems on their own. However, unlike other "curve bending" proposals, which are admittedly speculative, these are proven to work. And in the end, that's why funding pilot programs and research studies is such an important part of healthcare reform. Not all of the ideas will pan out, but a billion dollars on research will identify which ones work and which ones don't. Sometimes this means hard choices, but like the programs Brown cites, sometimes it doesn't. Sometimes cutting costs actually means providing better care.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Kevin Drum is a political blogger for Mother Jones. For more of his stories, click here.

Get Mother Jones by Email - Free. Like what you're reading? Get the best of MoJo three times a week.

Comments

Absolutely right

"Sometimes cutting costs actually means providing better care."

As someone who spent some years tending to an elderly parent with various ailments and hospitalizations, I emphatically agree with that. For just one small example, the cost-cutting in the last couple decades that has shifted many procedures into day surgeries and requires patients to show up at 7:00 AM the day of even major procedures-- without food or even a cup of coffee-- is a trial for middle-aged adults, but you cannot imagine how difficult and debilitating it is when the patient is a frail elderly person.

In the "old days," you'd report to the hospital the evening before for surgery the next day and be wheeled in for your procedure before you were even fully awake. Now the elderly person arrives exhausted and heavily stressed, extremely anxious and miserable, not a good state to be in before the physical stress of the surgery itself. I'd be willing to bet that that one fairly small thing extends hospital stays, very negatively impacts the likelihood of significant recovery and results in a lot of those readmissions.

That stupid graphic.

Kevin:

Is there something in your contract with MoJo that requires you to use that same tired old graphic every time you post on health care?

If you can't find something new, just post *without* a graphic. We're fine just reading words.

Even gratuitous cat pictures would be an improvement.

Really.

If you think you saw horror

If you think you saw horror stories before Obama care, wait until your mom and pop get pushed out into the gutter to croak because Obama transferred $500 billion from Medicare to former illegal aliens to buy the Hispanic vote.

Post new comment

Alternately, you may login to or register an account
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <ul> <ol> <li> <blockquote>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

MoJo Comments: Send Us Your Feedback

We changed our spam software to better filter comments. Should you encounter any issues, please let us know.

Photo Essays

Meet the guys who risk life and limb to dismantle weapons in Afghanistan.
Post-genocide, Rwandan women raise the children of their attackers.
Behind a generation's iconic images.