A Post About Yemen
I've kept silent about Yemen so far because I don't want to even begin to pretend that I know anything about the place. But, like everyone else, I've been reading about it, and I have to say that this paragraph from Richard Fontaine and Andrew Exum is probably the most enlightening one I've seen so far:
Yemen's economy depends heavily on oil production, and its government receives the vast majority of its revenue from oil taxes. Yet analysts predict that the country's petroleum output, which has declined over the last seven years, will fall to zero by 2017. The government has done little to plan for its post-oil future.
Yemen's population, already the poorest on the Arabian peninsula and with an unemployment rate of 35%, is expected to double by 2035. An incredible 45% of Yemen's population is under the age of 15. These trends will exacerbate large and growing environmental problems, including the exhaustion of Yemen's groundwater resources. Given that a full 90% of the country's water is used for agriculture, this trend portends disaster.
So Yemen's population has tripled since 1975 and will double again by 2035. Meanwhile, state revenue will decline to zero by 2017 and the capital city of Sanaa will run out of water by 2015 — partly because 40% of Sanaa's water is pumped illegally in the outskirts to irrigate the qat crop.
Bizarrely, even after writing this, Fontaine and Exum follow up with this:
Given the threat posed not just by terrorism but by the potential for nationwide instability, the United States should move toward a broader relationship with Yemen, still focusing strongly on counter-terrorism but also on economic development and improved governance....Over the weekend, Obama pledged to double aid to Yemen, but this money must be spent strategically. Several areas are ripe for foreign help, including training and equipping counter-terrorism forces, bolstering border security and building the capacity of the coast guard, expanding counterinsurgency advice to the Yemeni government and expanding programs focused on basic governance and anti-corruption.
Even though they say that economic development is important, nearly their entire list is dedicated to military aid of one kind or another.1 But it's hard to see what good that will do to help a country with a soaring population, no revenue, and a rapidly dwindling water supply. Frankly, it's a little hard to see how anything is likely to have much impact on a country with problems that severe. And until those problems are addressed, it's also hard to see how even the best designed and executed counterterrorism program can have more than a very limited effect. More here from Marc Lynch, who basically seems to agree: "So what should the U.S. do? Pretty much what it's been doing in the Obama administration, which has in fact been thinking seriously about Yemen all year and which has quietly been working there in some constructive and some unconstructive ways. It's never as satisfying as a morally pure call to battle. [...] But the administration shouldn't fall into the trap of thinking it must "do something" to fend off political harping from the right and end up over-committing... or taking steps which ultimately make the situation worse."
1There's more detail in the policy brief that their op-ed is drawn from, but it's still focused almost exclusively on military and counterterrorism programs.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Comments
The problem in a microcosm
Revealing post. Speaks volumes on two things about which our government, our media and (therefore) the American public are in denial: peak oil and overpopulation. (Resource depletion, overshoot, tipping point, etc. could be added, as well.)
Equally instructive is the Obama Administration's response. Obviously, the president and his advisers are not serious about solving problems, only finding ways to maintain a presence in the Middle East that supports "the military-industrial complex."
Surrender all hope that this government (including Congress, replete with campaign donations from Wall Street, Pharma, Raytheon, Boeing, et al.) will address in a meaningful way the problems that actually threaten our existence.
There is a great live
There is a great live discussion on this at www.whydoyoufearme.com
and a great book called Tea With Hezbollah on Amazon.
Hammer-nail
"....nearly their entire list is dedicated to military aid of one kind or another. But it's hard to see what good that will do to help....."
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
For the United States every nettlesome problem is a nail and the solution is a hammer.
Sounds like the biggest thing
Sounds like the biggest thing Yemen needs foreign aid for is birth control. 6.5 children per woman? Even Saudi Arabia is half that.
It is the nature of all
It is the nature of all animals (which includes humans) to reproduce in numbers that will outstrip resources without effective predation. We have eliminated most predators, improved sanitation and life expectancy significantly and are progressing to breeding ourselves into starvation/disease. Just hope it doesn't happen in our lifetimes because it will not be pleasant.
educate women and birth rates
educate women and birth rates drop.
I guess people have nothing
I guess people have nothing positive in their lives but screwing, which is why they well, are breeding like rabbits.
Huh?
Haven't we been dropping large bombs, remotely delivered in ways that resemble children playing video games on areas with enough civilians to make what we are doing indistinguishable from terrorism? Oh, sorry, we're killing the evil terrorists. My bad.
If that be the case, I haven't the slightest idea why the Yemenis would be unhappy with our involvement in their world.
OK, so the above is pretty snarky. But, damn, can we stop pretending, even in supposedly "progressive" fora that any use of our military results in any thing other than the deaths of lots of civilians, the survivors of which will ever after hate our guts, and rightfully so?
Can we all start to, collectively, denounce our extreme militaristic world view as the cancer that it is? Can we stop pretending that we are promoting anything other than misery with our actions? Please?
More Serious
OK, so my last post was maybe not so productive...
I think my point is to call into question the notion that we should ever dane to believe that *any* sort of military action will benefit the natives. Or, for similar reasons, ever dane to believe that dropping bombs on those same natives will benefit *us*.
I don't know about you, but I'd be kind of pissed off at the Chinese if one of their laser guided smart bombs blew my family up while they were sleeping in their beds. Furthermore, I wouldn't care that much if they claimed it was in my nations best interest just because they believed we were ruled by a nutcase like, say, Sarah Palin. Why is that so hard to grok? Why are we, as a nation, so monstrously and violently stupid?
I haven't always been this way. I believe that, for example, as morally repugnant as our actions were during WWII, that they were, nonetheless, justified given the far more heinous brutality of our foes in that war. I've only become an extreme pacifist because my country has become so unremittingly militaristic. I truly think we have so overplayed the military response that we should maybe, just maybe, try erring on the side of *not* dropping bombs on civilian neighborhoods in the hopes that maybe some underwear type bomber is killed.
Jeebus.
echo
I want to associate myself with the views expressed by Vincent. We are now a militaristic empire. For many people in poorer countries we are the preeminent monster. We need a $600+ billion a year budget to promote our foreign policy, which is clearly a policy frequently aimed at people who hate us more and more, largely because of that very same policy. We have become the preeminent militaristic state, the Holy American Empire, The Fifth Reich. Personally, I believe it's too late for us to change, and now I only wonder if the world will survive us while we unravel every principle of decency we once stood for.
"I guess people have nothing
"I guess people have nothing positive in their lives but screwing, which is why they well, are breeding like rabbits."
Yemen has a UN-estimated 24% rate of female genital mutilation, so it's not everyone who's having sex because they enjoy it.
Perhaps circumcision explains
Perhaps circumcision explains US aggression. Something like 75% of US males have their genitals mutilated when they are babies. The engrams these mutilations create probably have many unconscious consequences.
U.S. aggression
A lot of aggression is just natural human behavior. We don't always see it though because individuals and tribes and nations don't always have the wherewithall to exhibit big dangerous violent behavior. The U.S. since our Civil War has grown incredibly powerful and economically voracious and some of these other human qualities naturally appear.
But, have we been more militarily aggressive than dictatorships around the world? We've been involved in quite a few wars to help other people defend themselves. things have gone a lot better for Europe, Japan, S. Korea, Taiwan and some other places after we were involved and helped them.
Now, if we can only achieve similar good results with less killing.
Perhaps one could, you know,
Perhaps one could, you know, think for half a second before posting crap like this.
Let's consider: was circumcision common in Japan in the years leading up the WW2? One suspects it was NOT especially common in Germany over that time period.
What about in other notoriously aggressive societies? The Vikings? The Apache and Comanche?
Hmm...
Back to Yemen
While the evil empire does need to change it's ways, it's even more vital to Yemen that they fix the broken state. Somebody commented above about humans reproducing in numbers that outstrip resources, Yemen may be a harbinger of what's to come for the rest of the world. Simple birth control distribution will do nothing without an educational program which won't be effective without ... The pattern of confronting problems which results in more profound problems is also shared with Yemen's other problems such as ater, qat, terrorism, and separatism. (Does that make any sense?) Whatever, found a good site for Yemen information at: http://islamandinsurgencyinyemen.blogspot.com/
One way the evil empire can
One way the evil empire can help is by not flooding the government of Yemen with high priced toys like attack helicopters, machine guns, and ordinance of various and sundry sorts, but I won't hold my breath looking for rational behavior from either government.
How about US dollars getting
How about US dollars getting some desalination plants up and running before 2017? Agriculture will be even more important once the oil stops flowing.
desalinization
It would be great if we had that technology for California and some other areas where droughts have had severe effects. I seem to recall this past year that Georgia had a very severe drought problem.
Of course, that technology is not a perfect answer to climate change which causes severe droughts. The more perfect answer would be to prevent whatever is causing the climate change.
Wholistic solutions tend to work better for everyone.
A NASA-style effort to
A NASA-style effort to create and distribute massive and inexpensive desalination systems is the single ideal way of winning hearts and minds everywhere.
Yemen has no army, navy or
Yemen has no army, navy or air force to threaten the US with. If the US has discretionary income with which to provide economic developmental aid to Yemen, then it should offer limited, well defined help. Otherwise, the US should not interfere in Yemen in any way. Yemen has enough problems without the US supporting a regime that wants to extract as much wealth from this poor nation as possible.
Neo-cons.......
Kevin: "Even though they say that economic development is important, nearly their entire list is dedicated to military aid of one kind or another."
At this point I don't believe *any* of these people. Even the alleged 'liberal' COIN guys haven't seen too many problems for which military solutions are not first and foremost. It's probably due to the simple fact that advocating policies which don't help the military-industrial complex doesn't garner those sweet, sweet donations.
No Such Thing
Neo-cons has it right---basically---don't believe anything that anyone in any position of authority tells you on the face of it.
Mojo is now holding forth on Yemen. All we as Americans need to know is how to avoid going there or depending on the Arabian Peninsula for anything. If we are kind, we can ship them lots and lots of condoms and food. After that, they are back to being on their own as they were for thousands of years before they set eyes on us.
We are not their Big Brothers, not responsible for their destiny, not liable for their bills. And it is beyond high time that every single American started singing this same song and realizing that not only is it not our problem, we have to stop making it our problem.
That means we need to "de-globalize" in a big way. That means we develop our own gas and oil and other energy sources, pay our own bills, build up our own industry, seal our own borders, and live like sane and peaceable people once again. Oh, and we "remonetize" after we default on the huge debt these maniacs have cranked up on us, and we send the bankers back to Europe, where they came from like the plague in 1913. After that, we nationalize all our media outlets, except FOX----we should let Murdoch stay, because he has been more of an American than most college professors---and resell them to AMERICAN owned companies and we never ever again allow foreigners to buy up all our networks.
Because a great big part of this problems is that all of our media is owned by foreign interests, and except for Australian-owned FOX Network, they all hate us. They love to spew their socialist dogma at us worse than Radio Free America used to bombard the Eastern Bloc, they just do it from inside our own borders and hire our own citizens as members of THEIR press corps. They despise Americans and are forever trying to talk us out of our land and our money. According to them, we are just supposed to GIVE it all to them. Voluntarily.
Isn't that what Mr. Obama is really all about---giving it all away? To the bankers, to the UN, to the car companies, to Big Pharma, to Ben Nelson. I had the evil impulse to cheer---he and every other member of Congress who votes for that health bill is committing TREASON, but at least he was game for a profit.
How about the rest of you? Still wearing your Gucci shoes and cashmere sweaters? How's it going to be when all that "evil" American wealth has been "given" away and you are FORCED back to the turnip patch and made to work twelve hours a day like all those poor people in Yemen?
Post new comment
MoJo Comments: Send Us Your Feedback
We changed our spam software to better filter comments. Should you encounter any issues, please let us know.
Yemen's population, already the poorest on the Arabian peninsula and with an unemployment rate of 35%, is expected to double by 2035. An incredible 45% of Yemen's population is under the age of 15. These trends will exacerbate large and growing environmental problems, including the exhaustion of Yemen's groundwater resources. Given that a full 90% of the country's water is used for agriculture, this trend portends disaster.



