The MoJo Interview: Joss Whedon

Meet the geek god behind Dollhouse, Buffy, and Dr. Horrible's Sing-Along Blog.
For more of this interview, listen to Sheerly Avni's extended conversation with Joss Whedon, or download the podcast from iTunes.
Since creating the cult TV series Buffy the Vampire Slayer in 1997, director, writer, and Toy Story scribe Joss Whedon has emerged as a shining star in the geek firmament. He's also become one of pop culture's most surprising feminists. Though they inhabit the male-centric world of sci-fi, his female protagonists, from Buffy to the women of the short-lived space-cowboy series Firefly, are funny, smart, and able to punch, kick, and banter their way out of trouble. When he came up with the idea for Dollhouse, a new series in which the heroine is rented out to fantasy-seeking clients and has her mind erased after each assignment, he asked for a thumbs-up from the women's advocacy group Equality Now after pitching the networks. The widely anticipated new show, featuring Buffy's Eliza Dushku, is set to premier on Fox in January. Mother Jones met with the 44-year-old Whedon in his small office on the Fox lot, where he discussed the importance of obsession in art and the ironies of preaching feminism on Rupert Murdoch's flagship channel. To listen to an extended interview with Whedon, click here.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Mother Jones: How has writing for television been different from writing for film?
Joss Whedon: I respect television in a way that some people who came out of film might not. Some people might take this as stereotyping, but I describe television as feminine and movies as masculine, in the sense that television wants to examine a problem from all sides and talk about it for a long time, and movies just want to hit the climax and then maybe have a smoke. I respect the rules of TV, the rules of keeping things commercial and interesting and pop-y and fun.
MJ: Some examples of those rules?
JW: My cast was not hideous to look upon. I made every act break at an exciting time that would make you want to come back after you examined these products that we used to examine before TiVo. And I tried to make money for the people that I work with, like Hyman Roth.
MJ: Tell us a little bit about your concept of "womb envy."
JW: Everybody makes fun of Uncle Joss when he brings up womb envy! But I still believe in it. It's a very simple theory and I gave it a silly name, but basically it just seemed to be a fundamental thing that women have something men don't, the obvious being an ability to bear children, and the resilience to hang in as parents. I don't understand why or how anyone ever pulled off the whole idea of "women are inferior." Men not only don't get what's important about what women are capable of, but in fact they fear it, and envy it, and want to throw stones at it, because it's the thing they can't have.
MJ: When you wrote Buffy, were you actively thinking, "I'm going to make an empowered feminist icon," or were you just intuitively telling the story you wanted to tell? Or are they the same?
JW: It's both, and they're not the same. Because "intuitively" means, "This is what turns me on, this is what I need to see, this is my obsession." I've seen a lot of movies [written] by guys who set out to [create a feminist icon] and didn't feel it. Look at A League of Their Own. All of the good lines are Tom Hanks'. Those guys are really fabulous writers, but it's not enough to say, "This should be done." You have to need to do it. The way Guillermo del Toro [Pan's Labyrinth] needs to make movies about insects—that man cares more about insects than anyone I know. He clearly is obsessed. And obsession is beautiful. It's what makes art.
MJ: As a father, what do you think about the fact that Pixar doesn't have a [top-billed] female protagonist yet?
JW: I wrote Toy Story [for Pixar]. And I remember at the time having a crisis in myself because I couldn't figure out Bo Peep. There's no reason why there couldn't be [female Pixar leads]. There is that moment in The Incredibles, when the mom has a pep talk with Violet and Violet stands up like a hero and you can see her other eye for the first time. [My wife] said, "Oh look, they wrote a scene for you."
MJ: What kind of fallout have you gotten for Buffy having an affair with a woman in the Buffy comic?
JW: I have gotten no fallout of any kind. The fact of the matter is that [women kissing] is kind of old news. It's even old news in pop culture. We tried not to turn it into a giant event and spend months going "Wait for the Buffy kiss—so she can figure out how heterosexual she is!"
MJ: You create interesting heroes, as well as interesting villains. In Angel, you have the good guy fighting against an evil law firm, Wolfram and Hart. In Firefly, you have Captain Malcolm Reynolds, a defeated rebel soldier, battling the victorious planetary Alliance.
JW: Evil doesn't come in saying, [breathes heavily, Darth Vader-style], "It's your faaather." Generally speaking, it's a lot more nebulous. In fact, it usually isn't evil so much as it is a lot of people overthinking things until they find themselves caught in an untenable situation.
MJ: In the second-to-last season of Angel, the hero actually takes a job with Wolfram and Hart, and eventually he just loses it and brings down the house.
JW: Well, you know, I'm sure I'm going to bring down News Corp with Dollhouse. Hmmm—maybe you shouldn't quote that. I'm not a huge fan of Mr. Murdoch's politics, God knows, or his methods. But I've been at Fox on and off for practically the whole of my career. Am I the biggest hypocrite in the world for taking their money? Am I doing any good? Or am I working for Wolfram and Hart? I feel at the end of the day, I'm doing some good. They're letting me tell my stories. We'll see if the stories on Dollhouse actually come out the way I plan them to.
Comments
It's like I'm reading an article from about 5 years ago. This is a man who works for Fox, hardly a bastion for equality, or for quality television for that matter. There is nothing strongly feminist about this man or his work: he still portrays women as having to be beautiful,over-sexualized, and equal to men simply because they know how to fight like men. Nothing in this interview is even remotely surprising or challenging. I was compelled by the title, but now don't want to read the article. What the hell?
While this is not the most thorough interview of Joss Whedon I've ever read. I take issue with M's assertion that Whedon is neither a feminist in fact nor in his portrayal of us. While it is true that his female characters are often physical(they do fight well)this is an important and empowering part of femininity long neglected. I teach women self-defense and it is often extremely difficult to get women to react aggressively either verbally or physically.Further, Whedon's females are as smart as they are agile and their physicality can often be seen as metaphor. His admiration of POWERFUL women is apparent.
I also disagree with M's arguments.
It's TV - who ISN'T beautiful on TV? The good thing is that each of Whedon's female characters are a combination of things, more than their "obligatory beauty" - intelligent, fierce, and yes, sexual.
Willow, Tara, Zoe, Kaylee, Fred - each strong in her own way, and not hypersexualized. Even Buffy wasn't a hypersexed character. But yes, some of them (Inara, eg.) were sexual beings, but they OWNED their sexuality, rather than having to depend on another to define their sexuality.
As for "knowing how to fight like men"...being able to stand up for one's self does NOT equal fighting like men. Being a physically strong woman does NOT...OK, you get the picture. None of them are the typical damsel in distress, the "just lie back and enjoy it" kind of women. They DO fight back. They take a stand. How is that as a detriment to their character? That's not "fighting like a man", that's power.
"The geek god behind Dollhouse, Buffy, and Firefly talks about "womb envy" and why feminists are hot."
Feminists are "hot" because saying "feminists are hot" sucessfully trivializes what feminism is about.
"Dollhouse, a new series in which the heroine is rented out to fantasy-seeking clients and has her mind erased after each assignment"
Gag.
Damn straight.
Damn straight.
"Dollhouse, a new series in which the heroine is rented out to fantasy-seeking clients and has her mind erased after each assignment"
Oh, you mean like this?:
M, if you think the only reason the women in Joss' show are considered powerfull is that they fight, clearly you havent watched many episodes.
And the femenists are hot thing doesn't trivialise femenism. first of all it was a quick thing to let people know at a glance the gist of the artice, second of all i just read the article and joss doesnt say it. Finally, alot of people will be reading this just as dollhouse fans, not as femenists, so that was a quick way of speaking in their terms.
I would also like to point out that the attitude of insulting people who ARE ON OUR SIDE for not being femenist enough is one of the biggest barriers holding femenism back. Lots of women i know have turned away from the femenist movement because of that very image.
Feminism and Hotness
Somehow I don't feel very
Where's the podcast?!?
womb envy
Post new comment
MoJo Comments: Send Us Your Feedback
We changed our spam software to better filter comments. Should you encounter any issues, please let us know.



