Mojo

BP's $93 Million Ad Blitz

| Thu Sep. 2, 2010 8:23 AM PDT

In the months since the explosion of the Deepwater Horizon, BP has spent a whopping $93 million on advertising. That's three times the amount they spent during the same period last year.

The ads, which have been featured on on local and national television and print publications, have promoted BP's efforts to clean up the giant mess they made in the Gulf.

"BP told the committee that they have increased advertising expenditures for a number of reasons, including to keep Gulf Coast residents informed of issues relating to the oil spill and recovery and to ensure transparency during the recovery process," wrote Henry Waxman (D-Calif.), chair of the Energy and Commerce Committee, in a letter to Rep. Kathy Castor (D-Fla.), who had requested the information. Waxman wrote to the company last month requesting BP's ad figures.

The increased spending was "almost entirely targeted at national and local newspapers and magazines and national and local television advertising," Waxman writes. A small portion was also spent on online advertising.

More from Waxman's letter:

BP also indicated that it significantly expanded the markets in which it ran local newspaper advertisements during the 2010 period. From April to the end of July 2009, the company ran local market newspaper advertisements in two states and the District of Columbia. In that same period in the 2010, the company ran local newspaper advertisements in 126 markets in 17 states, including the states directly impacted by the oil spill – Florida, Louisiana, Alabama, and Mississippi–as well as California, Connecticut, Delaware, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Ohio, Maryland, Michigan, New York, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Texas.

Waxman also notes that BP provided $89.5 million in grants to Florida, Alabama, Mississippi, and Louisiana to promote tourism, some of which was likely used for advertising, too.

Combined, that means BP has spent $182.9 million on advertising and public relations efforts since the spill. To put this in perspective, that's about half as much of the money they spent on actually compensating the victims of the spill—which was just $368 million as of last week, when the independently administered, $20 billion Gulf Coast Claims Facility assumed responsibility for doling out compensation.

Advertise on MotherJones.com

The NRA's Chuck Norris Ad

| Thu Sep. 2, 2010 7:38 AM PDT

The National Rifle Association is firing up its voter army for November's midterm elections. Nevermind that the past two years have brought the greatest advances in gun rights in a half-century: that won't stop the NRA from scaring people with the prospect of "them" coming to try to take away your gun. Here's Walker, Texas Ranger star Chuck Norris, helping out:

Anyway, Chuck, who makes Apple Pie look un-American, is right: you should register to vote. And you should also read Mother Jones' full Chuck Norris coverage. Remember the time he took on the climate change "con game"? Or debunked the theory of evolution? Or joined the birthers? Those were all awesome. But while I realize Chuck Norris can win a game of Connect Four in only three moves, I'm personally more of a fan of General Petraeus—a man who has his own adjective.

Who Should Pay for Illegal Immigrants' Health Care?

| Thu Sep. 2, 2010 3:00 AM PDT

Advocates for tighter immigration restrictions frequently rail against illegal immigrants for availing themselves of social services like education and publicly supported health care, arguing that they are overburdening taxpayers and utilizing scarce resources. They've succeeded in maintaining a ban on government health coverage for illegal immigrants, for instance, and have tried to implement more draconian measures on the state level.

But such measures haven't solved the political and ethical dilemmas of providing health care for illegal immigrants, which this New York Times story brings into focus. The Times piece explains how a public charity hospital in Georgia closed its outpatient dialysis clinic, only to displace some 60 uninsured illegal immigrants who need the treatment to survive. The charity hospital brokered a deal to cover about half the patients but only after a handful had died after being repatriated to Mexico. The Times explains:

Thirty-eight end-stage renal patients, most of them illegal immigrants, would receive the dialysis they need to stay alive at no cost under a rough agreement brokered Tuesday among local dialysis providers and Atlanta’s safety-net hospital, Grady Memorial... Grady, which receives direct appropriations from Fulton and DeKalb Counties, ultimately agreed on Tuesday to help pay for continuing dialysis for most of the immigrants. Others would be distributed among local dialysis providers as charity cases...

Five of the 13 patients who left for Mexico with assistance from Grady or the Mexican government have died, according to Matt Gove, a Grady senior vice president. Most died while still receiving dialysis, although not always as regularly as recommended... One patient, Fidelia Perez Garcia, 32, apparently succumbed in April to complications from renal failure after running out of Grady-sponsored treatments in Mexico.

However you slice it, there isn't an easy answer. Even if Grady hospital pulled all support for such dialysis patients, they would still end up in emergency rooms where they would be required by law to receive treatment. And if they couldn't pay, taxpayers would still end up footing part of the bill, as hospitals pass on such costs to state governments.

We're Still at War: Photo of the Day for September 2, 2010

Thu Sep. 2, 2010 2:00 AM PDT

Iraqi and US flags decorate the entrance to Al Faw Palace on Baghdad’s Camp Victory, welcoming dignitaries and guests to the USF-I change of command ceremony, on Sept. 1, 2010. Photo via the US Army by Lee Craker.

More Ominous Signs for Dems

| Wed Sep. 1, 2010 11:21 AM PDT

Signs continue to proliferate that 2010 will be a very, very bad election year for Democrats. The latest poll of the Ohio Governor's race—a contest I have pointed to as a bellwether—has incumbent Democrat Ted Strickland down 10 points to former GOP congressman John Kasich. The poll by Public Policy Polling (Daily Kos' pollster) has Kasich at 50 percent, with Strickland at 40 and 10 percent undecided. That's a terrible position for an incumbent to be in on September 1.

Meanwhile, the Dems seem to have already lost Senate races that in any other year should be close-fought contests. Two top Dem recruits—Ohio Lt. Gov. Lee Fisher and Missouri Secretary of State Robin Carnahan—are trailing flawed, Bush-tied opponents Rob Portman (Bush's budget director) and Roy Blount (a longtime member of the Bush-era House GOP leadership). Neither Fisher nor Carnahan has led in a single poll for months. In New Hampshire, Democratic Rep. Paul Hodes is having similar trouble with GOPer Kelly Ayotte, a former* state attorney general. These are all open-seat races for Republican seats, and the Dems don't seem likely to flip a single one. That means the Republicans can move their focus elsewhere, to states like Washington, Wisconsin, and California, where Sens. Patty Murray, Russ Feingold, and Barbara Boxer, three important liberal votes, face very tough races.  

Finally, the latest polling on the generic congressional ballot (i.e., would you rather vote for a Republican or Democratic candidate) gives the GOP their biggest lead ever. As SwingState's James L. writes, "Ted Strickland has run a good campaign, but he can't make the weather."

*I corrected this per comments.

Will Labor Day Gridlock Hurt the Dems?

| Wed Sep. 1, 2010 7:34 AM PDT

This weekend congressional Democrats may rue the day that they required states to put up big promo signs on road construction projects telling drivers that it was funded by the stimulus. That's because, according to the Wall Street Journal, the record number of stimulus-funded road construction projects are threatening to cause huge traffic jams in lots of major metro areas around the country, potentially putting a serious damper on the last vacation of the summer for many travelers.

Joe White writes:

Roads and bridges need to be rebuilt and repaired, and in many parts of the country summer is the best time to get the work done. This year, the normal hassles of dodging construction delays have been exacerbated by some 12,000 or more highway projects funded by the federal stimulus program.

More travelers will be on the road, too. Compared with 2009, when the recession-era travel buzz word was "staycation," the number of people taking a significant trip this weekend is expected to be up nearly 10%, auto club AAA predicts. Gas is under $3 a gallon, on average, so it's no surprise that an estimated 9 out of 10 of those travelers will likely be doing exactly what I plan to do: Driving a long way in their cars.

The traffic jams couldn't come at a worse time for Democrats. Already they are heading into the final stretch of this year's midterm election campaign season facing a host of grim polling numbers suggesting that they could lose not just the House, but the Senate too. But those polls are based on data from calls conducted BEFORE millions of American hit the road this weekend. Now, instead of winning kudos for creating jobs with all those road construction projects, Democrats could suffer the wrath of millions of Americans who got stuck in traffic. After all, thanks to the big signs on the road, all those Americans mired in endless traffic jams will know exactly who to blame for their troubles.

Advertise on MotherJones.com

We're Still at War: Photo of the Day for September 1, 2010

Tue Aug. 31, 2010 11:59 PM PDT

 

US Army Live fire training at Galloway Range, Fort Benning, GA. C Co 2nd Btn 11 Infantry Regiment. Photo via the US Army by John D. Helms.

Corn on "Hardball": Why Did We Go To War in Iraq?

Tue Aug. 31, 2010 3:53 PM PDT

On the occasion of President Obama's Oval Office speech on Iraq, David Corn and Dan Senor duke it out over the origins of the Iraq war on MSNBC's Hardball with Chris Matthews. Spoiler alert: Corn outclasses Senor with an Ernest Hemingway quote.

David Corn is Mother Jones' Washington bureau chief. For more of his stories, click here. He's also on Twitter.

Auto Industry Lobby Fail

| Tue Aug. 31, 2010 9:37 AM PDT

Soon, your car might come with a letter grade for fuel efficiency. The Environmental Protection Agency is considering a plan to add As, Bs, Cs, and even Ds to the window stickers that appear on new cars and trucks. Electric vehicles would get an A+, while plug-in hybrids would earn As. The Toyota Prius, Ford Fusion Hybrid, and Honda Civic Hybrid (all gas-electric cars) would get A-, while other hybrids would fall in the B range. Less fuel-efficient vehicles like pickup trucks and sports cars would get Cs and Ds. As you might imagine, the automobile industry lobby isn't too thrilled by this idea:

Automakers questioned the proposed letter grades, saying it might affect sales. Gloria Bergquist, a spokeswoman for the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, said "the letter grade inadvertently suggests a value judgment, taking us back to school days where grades were powerful symbols of passing or failing." She said a broad range of vehicle technologies were needed to improve fuel efficiency.

This has to be one of the worst PR statements ever. I almost suspect the AP writer put it in to embarrass the AAM. "Inadvertent" generally means "unintentional." But I'm pretty sure that the letter grade system intentionally suggests a value judgment. Showing that some vehicles are better for the environment than others is kind of the point of the exercise. If the new system "affects sales" by encouraging people to buy more fuel-efficient cars, well, I'm sure the EPA wouldn't complain about that, either. And what's all this about "school days" being the long-forgotten past "where grades were powerful symbols of passing and failing"? Last time I checked, they still are. A Maybach 57 might get an "A" in acceleration, but it only gets a D+ when it comes to the environment. That's life. Anyway, this statement gets an F. That's for "FAIL."

Reid Hits Angle on "Spoiled" Workers Remark

| Tue Aug. 31, 2010 7:26 AM PDT

You knew this was one coming. The campaign of Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid has a new ad out hitting his opponent, conservative Sharron Angle, for one of her most controversial claims, made in June: that unemployment insurance makes people "spoiled." (Here's the video of that claim.)

Reid's ad features Nevadan Debra Harding, who the ad says has been out of work for a year, pushing back against Angle's positions on unemployment, including her stated opposition to extending jobless benefits. And in response to Angle's claim that unemployed Americans "want to be dependent on the government," Harding replies, "I'm not spoiled and I don't want to be dependent on anybody. If Sharron Angle doesn't get that, she should be out of work. Not people like me."

And of course the 35-second ad concludes with a popular Reid campaign tagline: "Sharron Angle: Just too extreme."

Here's the ad: