Violation of Hatch Act Now Clear: Rove's Team Gave 20 Partisan Briefings to Fed. Employees
| Thu Apr. 26, 2007 8:57 AM PDT
I blogged yesterday about how the Hatch Act prohibits federal employees from using government resources on partisan political activities. One might argue that having Karl Rove as the deputy chief of staff is a violation of the Hatch Act in and of itself, since his only job, really, is to get Republicans elected. But that's not specific enough to be a real allegation. I understand.
You know what is specific enough? This:
White House officials conducted 20 private briefings on Republican electoral prospects in the last midterm election for senior officials in at least 15 government agencies covered by federal restrictions on partisan political activity, a White House spokesman and other administration officials said yesterday.
The violations of the Hatch Act seem pretty obvious:
In the GSA briefing -- conducted like all the others by a deputy to chief White House political adviser Karl Rove -- two slides were presented showing 20 House Democrats targeted for defeat and several dozen vulnerable Republicans.
At its completion, GSA Administrator Lurita Alexis Doan asked how GSA projects could be used to help "our candidates," according to half a dozen witnesses.
Currently, the administration's defense is that these were "informational briefings about the political landscape." Whatever that means.
Now, Henry Waxman will probably hold a hearing or two on this, but the entity specifically tasked with investigating violations of the Hatch Act is the disturbingly partisan Office of Special Counsel, who has a history of neglecting its core responsibilities and instead toeing the Bush line.
That's why we're worried the OSC's investigation of Karl Rove and his shop (for these partisan presentations and other things) is just a crafty diversion. We'll see.
Continues Below
Continued From Above
Comments
"...history of neglecting its core responsibilities and instead toeing [sic] the Bush line..."
Pardon me if this is considered off topic, but what kind of editing leaves "towing" spelled this way? This phrase has everything to do with towing a line (a phrase of marine origin referring to towing a line attached to a waterborne vessel) and nothing to do with toes. Good grief!
'toeing' not 'towing'
Its fascinating that someone could be so indignant over the editing when they are just so completely wrong. The phrase is related to "toe the mark" and is _not_ nautical in origin. Try a quick google - the consensus is clear among the experts that the phrase was used with sporting connotations in the early nineteenth century but that is predated by a meaning taken from the rules of the British parliment. No ropes involved.
