What To Make of the J Street Endorsements?

| Mon Jun. 16, 2008 7:00 PM PDT

J Street, the new "pro-Israel, pro-peace" group, announced its first PAC endorsements today. The roster of seven candidates, a mix of incumbents and challengers, includes Lebanese-American Rep. Charles Boustany, a Republican; netroots favorite Donna Edwards (MD-04); Mary Jo Kilroy (OH-15), who is running again after nearly beating a Republican incumbent in 2006; and Darcy Burner (WA-08), author of a plan to get out of Iraq.

I think there will be two indicators of J Street's influence over the next year or so: (1) Will the PAC be able to marshall small donors to put serious money behind these candidates? (2) Will the candidates—during their campaigns or, if they win, early in their terms—make a meaningful attempt to broaden the debate over American policy on Israel/Palestine?

As to how the candidates might broaden the debate, J Street's profiles of the endorsees offer clues. They contain a lot of rhetoric about expanded American engagement in the region and strong support of a two-state solution. To the Arab world—and, in reality, the international community beyond the US—these are baby steps. J Street's endorsees aren't talking about, say, how to put an end to Israeli settlement expansion, or about the ongoing humanitarian crisis in Gaza. Still, in the present American context, the endorsements have to be seen as a positive development.

After the jump, a video of Rep. Steve Cohen (D-TN) introducing the endorsements:

Advertisement

Advertisement

Get Mother Jones by Email - Free. Like what you're reading? Get the best of MoJo three times a week.

Comments

If this group truly works for peace in the Middle East to find ways to peace other than by squashing the people who disagree like bugs and forcing peace at gunpoint, it could be beneficial. Time will tell. I don't think they are members of the REPUBLICAN'S Democratic Leadership Council [DLC], but it is difficult to be certain. If they are members of the DLC, peace is not their objective. War is the DLC's objective for total dominion of the world.

It seems to me that any group that is members of Congress should keep their meetings within Congress. J Street sounds like lobbyists and if so would not be beneficial to actual peace, but would be the DLC in another form.

Post new comment

Alternately, you may login to or register an account
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <ul> <ol> <li> <blockquote>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

MoJo Comments: Send Us Your Feedback

We changed our spam software to better filter comments. Should you encounter any issues, please let us know.

Photo Essays

The chaos and humanity of war.
What becomes of Janesville, Wisconsin, now that GM's left town?
The other side of Gitmo.
American Holidays