MoJo Prison Issue Banned From Prisons
| Wed Jul. 23, 2008 10:38 AM PDT
We must be more street-smart than we thought here at Mother Jones. Apparently, our list of cellblock slang in the current issue was too realistic for actual prison censors. One would-be reader wrote us from Pickaway Correctional Institution in central Ohio after his copy of Mother Jones was confiscated because—according to the prison's Notice of Withholding Printed Material—the article "appears to be written in cipher or code, or that instructs in the use of cipher or code."
The magazine-less 73-year-old prisoner who wrote us reported "evidently, you are doing something right. Alas, I shall never know what it is, since the state of Ohio won't deliver your July issue." But he's not going to just let it slide: "I intend to ask if they will deliver the magazine, after excising p. 59." On the envelope he wrote: "First Amendment! First Amendment! First Amendment!"
Hopefully the censors will reconsider their definition of the First Amendment for our wanna-be reader, especially since they already allow books like The Hitler We Loved And Why in prison libraries.
Continues Below
Continued From Above
Comments
Prisons? Or one guy in one prison? You don't really clarify. Kind of a difference between the implied "the state prison system of Ohio has banned the issue of MJ from all of it's facilities;" and, "some guard in an Ohio prison misread an article and told the guy he couldn't have his magazine (and only 2 of 3 packs of cigarettes)." In the case of the latter, there is a great documentary on life in Ohio called "Gummo". -\
Submitted by Nolaw97 (not verified) on Tue Oct. 21, 2008 11:19 AM PDT.
This is interesting because often times the rules are bent to support the prison, not necessarily the inmate. It makes it very hard for an inmate to know what the rules are when the prison can bend them to their advantage. I hope to hear more about this soon.
