Is McCain More the Populist than Obama?

| Fri Sep. 19, 2008 9:01 AM PDT

Is John McCain out-populisting Barack Obama?

On Friday morning, McCain, at a rally in Green Bay, Wisconsin, delivered a speech on the financial crisis. He tore into Wall Street and Washington, proclaiming, "The crisis on Wall Street started in the Washington culture of lobbying and influence peddling." And he named names. He blasted Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae:

These quasi-public corporations led our housing system down a path where quick profit was placed before sound finance. They institutionalized a system that rewarded forcing mortgages on people who couldn't afford them, while turning around and selling those bad mortgages to the banks that are now going bankrupt. Using money and influence, they prevented reforms that would have curbed their power and limited their ability to damage our economy.

McCain noted that years ago he had tried to reform these institutions and had run smack into Washington's same-old/same-old:

At the center of the problem were the lobbyists, politicians, and bureaucrats who succeeded in persuading Congress and the administration to ignore the festering problems at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

Moreover, McCain accused Obama of having been pals with Freddie and Fannie. Obama, McCain pointed out, has taken large amounts of campaign contributions (a total of $165,400) from donors associated with the two institutions. In addition, Obama put a former Fannie CEO, Jim Johnson, in charge of his vice presidential search committee. McCain also charged that Obama has been receiving policy advise from Franklin Raines, another former Fannie CEO. The Obama camp says Raines is no adviser to Obama and that earlier this week Raines sent an email to Carly Fiorina, a McCain adviser, informing her of this. Still, McCain declared:

Continues Below

Continued From Above

Senator Obama may be taking their advice and he may be taking their money, but in a McCain-Palin administration, there will be no seat for these people at the policy-making table. They won't even get past the front gate at the White House. My friends, this is the problem with Washington. People like Senator Obama have been too busy gaming the system and haven't ever done a thing to actually challenge the system.

McCain went on to propose a Mortgage and Financial Institutions trust that will work with troubled companies and institutions to help them avoid collapse. He called for greater transparency and better regulation regarding financial markets. "Many in the financial services industry also either forgot or neglected their duty to act ethically and honorably," he said. "This shortcoming was aided and abetted by the creation of financial instruments that allowed lenders to escape any responsibility for the risk of their loans."

Forget for a moment all of McCain's connections to the current crisis. (He seems to do so easily enough.) Forget that his pal and adviser Phil Gramm helped create this mess. That his top advisers and campaign staffers lobbied for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. And that over 80 lobbyists for top financial industry firms--including AIG, Lehman Brothers, Merrill Lynch, and Washington Mutual--have worked for McCain's campaign. McCain is showing anger, vowing to knock heads together (on Wall Street and Washington), and, by the way, tying Obama to the mess. McCain is no William Jennings Bryan. But for a Republican, he's coming on like a populist gangbuster. Given his track record as a deregulator, this is faux populism. But that doesn't mean it can't work politically.

Let's look at Obama's response. The other day, his campaign released a two-minute ad in which Obama sits in a generic living room (in front of a generic couch and a generic lamp). In a calm tone, he notes,

Wall Street's been rocked as banks closed and markets tumbled...This isn't just a string of bad luck. The truth is as you have been living up to your responsibilities, Washington has not. That's why we need change...This is no ordinary time.....Much of this campaign has been consumed by petty attacks and distractions that have nothing to do with you.

Obama then proposes a $1000 tax break for the middle class ("instead of showering more on oil companies"), putting an end to the "anything goes culture on Wall Street with real regulation," fast-tracking a plan for "made-in-America" energy, instituting a "crack down on lobbyists once and for all so that their backroom dealing no longer crowds out the voices of the middle class," and bringing a responsible end to the Iraq war.

There's not much passion or outrage expressed. Obama asks viewers to visit his website for details of his economic plan. But following the link led to a page that contained nothing about lobbyists, the culture of Washington, or regulating Wall Street. The plan was a package of his core economic proposals: that middle-class tax cut, energy rebates, a fair trade initiative, green jobs, cracking down on mortgage fraud and predatory lending.

At the end of the ad, Obama says, "Bitter partisan fights and outworn ideas of the left and the right won't solve the problems we face today. But a new spirit of unity and shared responsibility will."

Obama's approach is cerebral--a term not often well received within political circles. In the ad, he does not directly connect to and tap into the frustration or anxiety of voters. His message: let's rise above our politics and solve this thing together. There's not much talk of punishment or consequences for those who messed up. And there's no slap at McCain, George W. Bush, or the Republicans for leading the system that failed. (The McCain camp has produced a television ad assailing Obama for his tie to Jim Johnson, and another for his purported--but denied--connection to Franklin Raines.)

On the campaign trail, Obama has been more pugilistic. At a campaign rally on Thursday, he slapped McCain for his recent comment that "the fundamentals of our economy are strong." And he assailed McCain for holding "the same philosophy" as George W. Bush "that says we should give more and more money to those with the most and hope that prosperity trickles down...that says even common-sense regulations are unnecessary and unwise...that lets Washington lobbyists shred consumer protections and distort our economy." Obama noted that "Phil Gramm, one of the architects of the de-regulation in Washington that led directly to this mess on Wall Street, is also the architect of John McCain's economic plan." He pointed out that McCain "took seven of the biggest lobbyists in Washington from that [old-boy] network and put them in charge" of his campaign. Obama derided McCain's call for a commission to review the financial crisis, and he called McCain out on his late-to-the-party proposal for better regulation of financial markets.

Obama went after McCain's hypocrisy. (And an ad the campaign released ton Friday morning blasted McCain for relying on the policy advice of Gramm and Fiorina, who received a $42 million package after being fired as Hewlett-Packard CEO.) He did not, though, direct much anger at the financial players and their Washington pals who recklessly steered the US economy into a ditch. Obama must be careful not to come across as an angry black man. But he still needs to show some gut-level outrage: not only at McCain and his lobbyist friends but against all the Big Finance screw-ups who got rich on Wall Street while placing the economy in peril.

Right now, McCain is keeping up--if not ahead of--Obama in displaying fury concerning the ongoing economic meltdown. And he's also playing even when it comes to proposing policy responses to the crisis at hand. But it sure takes chutzpah--and selective amnesia--for McCain to position himself as the enraged scourge of Wall Street greed-meisters and Washington influence-peddlers. After his speech on Friday morning, a New York Daily News reporter blogged, "Our jaw dropped just now listening to McCain blame lobbyists and Obama advisers. Just consider that McCain advisers (chief among them Phil Gramm) wrote the laws that deregulated these markets and lobbied hard to keep scrutiny to a minimum."

But McCain's campaign has already signaled it doesn't give a damn about its reviews in the press. Reality doesn't matter; impressions do. And McCain is trying to create the impression he is indeed a mad-as-hell populist maverick and reformer. Obama cannot stop the McCain camp from attempting this extreme makeover. He can only control his own reaction to the crisis. But it would pose trouble for the Democrats if Obama's response leaves any opening for McCain the Populist to stomp through.

Get Mother Jones by Email - Free. Like what you're reading? Get the best of MoJo three times a week.

Comments

DC,

If Barack answers every lie he will be on defense and will be reacting.

Some of the "exposing" the lies will have to come from the media.

McCain might not care for anything reality based. The media can either support him or expose him.

I pointed this out today on Salon. Problem is, Obama is an upper middle class attorney taking advice from free market Chicago boys slightly to the left of Friedman. He's got the same problems Mondale, Dukakis, Gore and Kerry had. The Democratic Party will never be a populist party, and they are too stupid to even use the tactic.

Obama is a clueless fuck emotionally, for all his rhetoric. Of course, John McCain can just turn on the 'anger' switch, and it comes out. Obama doens't 'have' an anger switch, I don't think. Which may make him friends with Robert Rubin, but it doesn't speak to anyone else.

What do Obama and McCain share? Two deregulators - Gramm and Rubin.

"These quasi-public corporations led our housing system down a path where quick profit was placed before sound finance."

Reality check! It was the unregulated firms (unregulated b/c idealogues led by Gramm) that created the subprime market and offered the no money down mortgages. Fannie and Freddie maintained the highest loan standards--not that this was a very high bar--but they at least maintained a bar.
This is not to say that Fannie & Freddie are blameless institutions, but they did not set the rules that led to the abusive/fradulent lending practices.

Sorry Corn, but I just don't think Obama can do the angry firebrand thing. He's too cerebral. He's got to play to his strengths, and let's face it, angry 'nerds' don't get taken seriously. I really like Obama, but he sort of reminds me of Adele Stephenson as a candidate and I just don't think that plays well to Americans. McCain can play angry old man because he is one.

This is utterly surreal.

Apparently the past is something that never actually happened. Apparently things that people say and do just go away and no longer exist. Red pill, blue pill. Take your choice, it doesn't really matter, it's all going to turn out the same because they will tell you what it is, what it was, and what it's going to be.

Amazing. I feel like I'm having a flashback, but not in a good way.

-Wexler

This is really a shocker. If McCain gets away with it, and poor people vote for him, people who got Ninja loans, who lost houses or will lose their house, who have no health insurance, then oh my god. If I were Obama I'd be charging hard on this issue - he doesn't have Clinton on the ticket so he doesn't have to respond when McCain shouts out that Bill signed the legislation that contained Gramm's deregulation of derivatives.

It is ridiculous that in the end, people will vote against their best interests (and the nation's best interests, too) due to the inability to recognize reality. The GOP has corned the market on fairy tails and the dumbass American population eats it up.

The answer to the question you posed is, no. I think McCain has come off this week as trigger happy, change every minute, unclear of what my policies are. I am an independent voter and he has totally turned me off.

TRUST IN MC-CAIN'S EXTRAORDINARY CHARACTER AND UNIQUE EXPERIENCE,
OR TRUST IN MC-CAIN'S PROMISE OF A VERY DANGEROUS WORLD

Unpatriotic Sacrifice of American Wealth and Blood for the Benefit of Judeofascist Israel
Support for the Illegal Torture of Suspects
Unpatriotic Amnesty for Illegal Mexicans Aliens Usurping Jobs and Services
Outsourcing of Jobs and Technology to China
Early Release from Captivity for Giving Military Secrets
McCain-Feingold Legislation Suppressing Freedom of Speech
McCain-Leiberman Control Gun Legislation
Slander and Ridicule of Huckabee, Romney, and Ron Paul
Roberts and Falwell, "agents of intolerance"
Roe vs. Wade Sacrificial Killing of Children
To "occupy Iraq for 100 years", "bomb Iran", and "just keep Afghanistan".
Veto of Bush Tax Cuts
Veto of the GI Bill
Keating Five Crooks
Political Prostitute of 159 Lobbyists
Lies About Obama's Tax Proposals
Long Scandalous, Contentious, and Non-Productive Political Career

I disagree that McCain is talking to populists or Independents. His strategy so far is to arouse the emotions of his social conservative base (they lap it up) and his opponent (who is smart enough not to react). Anyone who's been critical of the Bush-Cheney policies can see right through him...and what they see is The Angry White Man.

David Corn: Please do see that, and encourage others to see that McCain has made an enormous mistake by blaming short-selling.

Obama can respond by:

1. Pointing out often and plainly that the current crisis has come about under the Republicans. Ignore the Republican spin and keep telling the truth: We've seen what the Republicans do when they have control over the economy. Now elect responsible, ethical people.

2. Asking McCain, in plain language, the names of his staff members who are lobbyists for corporations that will profit by this donation of tax money, and which company they lobbied for. Not just stating that McCain has lobbyists on board. Instead, force McCain to answer the question.

3. Pointing to the high salaries that are now being paid by tax payers: much of the donation to corporations will go towards paying wealthy "executives". This is a point to be pushed. Demand accountability and a reduction of these salaries loudly and often.

4. Keep hammering on McCain's wealth: the number of houses he has, while so many people are losing their own much smaller houses. Some videos of McCain's many houses might help here--isn't this an obvious thing to do?

In other words, tell the truth, plainly, clearly, and very, very often in repeated ads. Soon.

Three degenerates and a poster boy. Forget 'em.

WE are the president.

FREE AMERICA

REVOLUTIONARY (DIRECT) DEMOCRACY

No outrage? Well we need a leader that stays cool and calm in the face of disasters. If Obama ranted and raved like McCain the entire world would panic and every bank would fall. McCain, drill here!! Drill Now!! Fight now! Fight Now!!! Snort, fart, slobber, gag. Enough, we need calmness in these trying times.Give me a break, I like the report, but we are looking for a leader, not a old man in the first stages of dementia .

This is my first visit..and..let me say I am not impressed..One sided article..Might as well have been written by the McCain campaign..

"This is my first visit..and..let me say I am not impressed..One sided article..Might as well have been written by the McCain campaign.."

I have to say, I wasn't expecting THAT.

Capt... agree, but traditionally isn't that what the "bulldog" VP candidate does? Where is Biden, anyway? Spending 5 hours a day commuting?

-Wexler

"But McCain's campaign has already signaled it doesn't give a damn about its reviews in the press.

Reality doesn't matter..."

As the the Obama press was a trustworthy conveyor of "reality."

What McCain has done is refuse to pretend that a bunch of partisan DNC hacks are objective arbiters of the truth.

I don't think America and the future president Obama will change things as fundamentally as we would like to think (and as much as we really need). The reason I say this is that things are still not as bad as they were in the Great Depression--the last time there was REAL reform in this country.

Allthough the current economy is nothing to be happy about, it was far worse in the early 30's when FDR was swept into office. Then we had an official unemployment rate of 25% (unofficially probably closer to 40%) and those with jobs had sharply cut wages. The present housing crisis, while bad, can't compare to back then; when in New York alone 5000 families a week were being evicted. When banks were failing by the thousands. My dad was a farmer and he remembers that corn was selling for - 5 cents a bushel--you took corn to the local elevator and you had to pay them five cents to take it.

Americans are so wrapped-up in the myth of Yankee self-reliance that only something as drastic as the Great Depression makes us look at real change.

Another critical factor present back in the 30's but not present today--a strong sense of solidarity in the laboring classes. It was the fear of the laboring classes in this country finally uniting and taking over the truly frightened the ruling economic elite into allowing fundamental reforms to save themselves.

Even with all these factors on his side, FDR still faced tremendous opposition to his reforms; and even an attempted military coup to drive him from office.

So while I do feel that Obama will make some changes, I don't think he or the American people--under the present situation--are going to truly tackle the fundamental problems that need to be tackled for true reform to take place.

John McCain is another in a long line of rich faux populists who slap the working class on the back with one hand and shank 'em in the gut with the other.

The biggest magic trick I've seen since that guy made an elephant disappear is making a nerd who grew up on food stamps into the elitist while simultaneously convincing everyone that he's not one of the fat cats from the Keating 5 S&L scandal or a 26 year Washington insider with nothing on his record except a stint as a pow which he uses to excuse everything that that issues forth from his mouth. Can you say alzheimers? And we the people are stupid enough to fall for it. We deserve colossal deficits, war without end and the coming takeover by these suicidal rapturists.

Hasn't it been confirmed by impartial fact checkers that Rubin has never been an advisor to the Obama campgain, nor is he associated with it. It is amazing how people are willing to ignore the facts time and time again.

Anyone play football?

When you are ahead you play ball control right?

When you are behind you play wide open and aggressive right?

Obama = Ahead
McCain = Behind

Plenty of time on the clock...

Uh... McCain became a faux populist on the Economy like a few days ago. Trust me Axelrod will make the play when necessary. He ain't no bum Shrum.

Republican, stuck in the 20th century
Democrat, progressive for the 21st

Unpredictable anger, irresponsible and inaccurate attacks, senseless solutions (drill baby drill), belligerence, Phil Gramm, Palin's resume and baggage, the Republican Convention circus (Giuliani, Romney...), inconsistent and contradictory proposals for the the Wall St. mess...

This type of campaigning loses its luster after some time. It's too easy to see through. The ads are childlike. It grows boring. If the candidate has nothing to offer then it shows.

Certainly, few devoted republicans will be convinced but keeping our base committed and grabbing a good share of independents and green party will carry the Obama campaign over the finish line.

I expect reason to prevail while petty campaigning will self destruct.

David,
You are most correct in one way: Obama needs to take the essence of his public speeches to national ads, and has yet to do that apparently.
I say "apparently," because I live in one of those hot, contested swing states (Michigan). The ads Obama (and the now-loosed 527s) are running in Michigan are spot-on attacks against McCain in very easy to understand "you can tell he's lying -- because his lips are moving" ads.
And the only cerebral thing that needs to be avoided, though it is the core of what's implied by "change" (when analyzing the overall thrust of Obama's speeches, not the details), is acknowledging his goal is for the Reagan Revolution to stop here. A lot of "swing voters" were swayed by Reagan, and further duped by the populism of Bush/Rove, that ushered in our living on the precipice of total neo-fascist takeover of the US.
That this is in fact our true situation is too radical and cerebral for those who view political campaigning in the same light as watching cage match fighting or needing the trappings of some World Wide Wrestling script before they feel the candidates are doing a proper job.
It's a bit tough to go populist with a "the brownshirts are coming, the brownshirts are coming" message because, for those lowest-common-denominator voters who ditched history classes to go smoke or make-out in the public school parking lot, too much has to be explained before they know what that means.
That's why the McCain brand of populism -- taking every side of every issue -- might work, especially in a day where the majority of mass media outlets are complicit in obscuring the importance of the details of our country's takeover by fascists wrapped in the American flag.
That the new-found "peace" in Iraq from the surge is already falling apart is blotted from our TV screens by BREAKING NEWS of bears roaming in a public park or lipstick and pigs, of playing John McCain's latest "shocking" ad -- over and over and over again -- while burrowing in to Obama negatives.
That's populism you can believe in.

PBS has a poll asking if the voter believes Palin is qualified to be President.
Please Vote: go to: http://www.pbs.org/now/polls/poll-435.html

McCain's bi-polar like fluctuations this week producing contradictory and just plain weird comments are nicely analyzed by the old ABC crew of Will, Donaldson and Roberts: ABC Panel Tears into McCain - Not Presidential & Age should be an issue -

URL
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/09/21/abc-panel-tears-into-mcca_n_128...

Elydo - What, Obama has an anger switch and you will see it soon enough, it not already. McCain is hothead, lying, hypocritical psychopath. McCain is clueless f*** if he thinks American is going to fall for his s***. Now he is suppose to be concerned about the American people, give me a f***ing break. He accuses Obama having connections with mortgage lobbyists, which is very thin if at all, when his own camp manager Rick Davis is one of the biggest and well known lobboyist for mortgage companies. What amazes me is McCain's aggorance to think that he would be not be called on this hypocrisy.

Obama will lose if he fails to "put down" McCain.

That doesn't mean he has to be visibly angry; but it does mean that he has to eviscerate his opponents flaws with no mercy.

That's easy for Obama to do IF he chooses to destroy the rotten edifice that is McCain.

If Obama doesn't have the stomach to thoroughly expose this vampire to sunlight he will lose.

McCain is so f****** vulnerable.

And Biden...Biden is such a disappointment; he's being meek and mild mannered when he should be breathing fire and exhaling solar flares.

The American people will vote for an aggressive p**** who's an ignorant phony a****** before they'll vote for someone they perceive as weak.

Also, Obama has to confront the race problem (ours not his) head on and shame all the decent people who are letting their unconscious prejudices be played by the Rovian devils running McCain's operation.

The hard core racists all vote Republican anyway; but too many decent people are succombing to their dark/prejudiced fears.

McCain is downright evil to play up to these people in subtle coded ways.

The two trillion (at least) dolloar bailout Bush is pushing for is a complete scam....Obama should say so and offer a plan that really helps the poor, working and middle classes by protecting them from the effects of the coming recession.

The rich have more than enough saved to be able to retire at any point.....they may have to cut back to living like human beings; but that's not so terrible.

If the bailout goes through as a scam it will cause a major depression...let's hope the Dems and Obama have the guts to "just say no".

***KEATING 5 *** KEATING 5***
McCain is a lying hack who lost his honor a long time ago.

Great post and enjoyed reading some of the thoughful analysis. Adding it to my reader.

Post new comment

Alternately, you may login to or register an account
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <ul> <ol> <li> <blockquote> <img>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Photo Essays

When you dial a 1-900 number, who picks up the phone?
Meet the KKK's seamstress of hate couture.
The other side of Gitmo.
A photographer’s year at Angola Prison.