If I Were an Obama Strategist, Here's How I'd Spend the Next Month
Aside from even one word about poverty, minorities, or the underclass in last night's VP debate, I was most waiting to hear Sarah Palin questioned about her "maverick" boss's role in making sure that America neither knew, nor cared, about the fate of its Viet Nam era POWs. If there's ever a better time to delve into exactly how the "party of patriotism" feels about inconvenient soldiers (they were slowing up the peace process), I hope I don't live to see it.
Like most Americans, I existed in a pre-war, pre-Gitmo state of annoyed disbelief whenever some bug-eyed Pinko insisted we'd left soldiers behind when we left Viet Nam. This is America: we don't, we'd never, do such a thing. But since we started extraordinarily rendering folks to places like Egypt and Syria so they could be tortured, since we continue a war aimed largely at enriching companies like KBR and Halliburton, when it's clear that Wall Street will be allowed to do absolutely anything it likes to Main Street (let alone MLK Blvd, as SNL so aptly put it) I no longer roll my eyes when presented with such evidence. Instead, I have to fight bitter tears when my kindergartener comes home proudly reciting the Pledge of Allegiance she's just learned. "With truth and justice for all?" Gets me every time. It makes me so angry and ashamed, I have to look away as I hypocritically applaud her recitation of those increasingly hollow words.
Continues Below
Continued From Above
Fearful as I am of what we're becoming, I still don't accept hideous allegations at face value. But I definitely listen, where before I would have been blasé and patronizing. I just don't know anymore what we are, what we've always been capable of, world weary as a formerly working class black chick thought she was. After eight years of Bush and the unbelievable damage he's done to the very meaning of America, I'm like the idiot, half-dressed, half-drunk teenager who just has to go down to the basement and find out what that fiend-from-hell sound is. Now, I study claims I'd have been too "busy" for before, desperately hoping to find no there there. Sadly, I'm all too primed to find yet another horror in every formerly bright corner of my American psyche.
Lately, I'm reading and re-reading Sydney Schanberg's extremely disturbing Nation expose on exactly what role John McCain may have played in not only burying info on our MIAs, but going so far as to abuse and terrorize the families desperate to have their questions answered on a subject which McCain (you may have heard he's a maverick and former POW by now) might well be expected to focus some attention. If he's going to keep mentioning his combat role and POW experience (and I certainly would), then he damn well needs to mention everything else that went with it. The party which so embraced Swift Boating a bona fide hero needs to have its script flipped. Palin claims she wants to speak directly to the American people? OK, let's take that at face value (and not as she really meant it, i.e. that she considers her inability to answer a direct question a virtue): Tell us exactly what role McCain played in settling the question of our MIAs.
According to Schanberg, whose war/defense reporting is impeccable, McCain has used his POW credentials to bury what could be one of America's greatest willful tragedies. Schanberg writes:
John McCain, who has risen to political prominence on his image as a Vietnam POW war hero, has, inexplicably, worked very hard to hide from the public stunning information about American prisoners in Vietnam who, unlike him, didn't return home. Throughout his Senate career, McCain has quietly sponsored and pushed into federal law a set of prohibitions that keep the most revealing information about these men buried as classified documents. Thus the war hero people would logically imagine to be a determined crusader for the interests of POWs and their families became instead the strange champion of hiding the evidence and closing the books.
Almost as striking is the manner in which the mainstream press has shied from reporting the POW story and McCain's role in it, even as McCain has made his military service and POW history the focus of his presidential campaign. Reporters who had covered the Vietnam War have also turned their heads and walked in other directions. McCain doesn't talk about the missing men, and the press never asks him about them.
The sum of the secrets McCain has sought to hide is not small. There exists a telling mass of official documents, radio intercepts, witness depositions, satellite photos of rescue symbols that pilots were trained to use, electronic messages from the ground containing the individual code numbers given to airmen, a rescue mission by a Special Forces unit that was aborted twice by Washington and even sworn testimony by two defense secretaries that "men were left behind." This imposing body of evidence suggests that a large number—probably hundreds—of the US prisoners held in Vietnam were not returned when the peace treaty was signed in January 1973 and Hanoi released 591 men, among them Navy combat pilot John S. McCain.
Read the report. It's explicit and very specific in its well reported charges. I'd like to learn that we didn't bury those men alive for political expediency. I really would. Because by the time my daughter is singing "the land of the free and the home of the brave," I'm going to be in a strait jacket. So, say it ain't so, John. Tell me you didn't do this. Answer Sidney.
Comments
I will read that report.
But I have long considered this POW/MIA issue to be a massive read-herring of the extreme right. One of those offensive flags flies over my workplace dailyand I have always considered it to be an affront to the dignity and intelligence of the USA.
More than a decade ago I looked into this issue and concluded that the POW/MIA crowd were completely frothing neo-nazis who wanted to repoen the Vietnam war simply for revenge. I heard a series of speakers at the Vietnam Memorial in DC on Memorial Day and they were totally barking mad. I'm quite serious. As far as I could tell, they were uniformly delusional.
Anyone serious about this subject needs to read Hendon's "An Enormous Crime."
Contrary to common belief, evidence that US servicemen were knowingly abandoned in SEA after the war, is both compelling and overwhelming. Philip Corso spilled the whole can of worms on the table, in open session,during the Senate Committee for POW/MIA's on live TV and it didn't cause a ripple of interest or outrage.
Thousands of US servicemen were swallowed up by the Soviet Union as they overran German POW camps in the East.
During the Korean War, the North Korean's were known to be sharing Allied POW's with the Chinese and the Soviet's.
It is our Nation's greatest shame.
I have known for awhile now about McCain's behavior while serving as a memeber of a panel on MIAs. I was shocked at his treatment of one mother which was aired on eihter Facebook or YouTube. He was mean and unbelievably harsh with that poor mother.It is time to bring the "songbird" to justice, and let Americans see the real McCain.
Sadly, the report isn't new. I first read it in "You Are Being Lied To: The Disinformation Guide to Media Distortion, Historical Whitewashes and Cultural Myths " back in 2001 (the book has recently been updated and will release in November of this year). I keep wondering when someone will bring it up.
You know we have a ex military man in our hometown name Ted Sampley who was always here in D.C. on the Senate steps about this issue and he was notorious for confronting John McCain about the very subject you raise. He despises McCain for just that reason. I wish you were able to talk with him. He still carries that anger and continue so harass D.C. about it. thanks for the article.
I am glad someone is actually talking about this issue. If you want to delve a bit deeper into WHAT McCain doesn't want the public to know about his time in Hanoi, check out www.vietnamveteransagainstmccain.com.
It completely floored me.
There are a few angles to approach this. one could could argue that the
mainstream allegedly liberal media is (or was) a big fan of Sen. McCain because
he's a Republican with a history of taking moderate positions. Now, supposedly, the
media have all but abandoned McCain for a preferred candidate: a Democrat. Especially a
"Black" candidate for President. In that case, the press shouldn't hesitate to report
this negative story about McCain if they are so "in the tank" for Barack Obama. Another
argument to be made though, is that Obama has been helped by the limited coverage
of William Ayers and Tony Rezko. so who knows? i don't.
Now why is this such a compelling story? Why such a monumental story? Even if true, how does it compare to the over a million Iraqi civilians whose death we have caused? The over three million refugees from Iraq?? the millions of Vietnamese children deformed from the Agent Orange that bombers like McCain dropped?
Is is because they are American military men, the "warriors" we have been taught to idolise while we ignore the huge tragedies that or government causes? Compared to that, a thirty year old story of a few hundred invaders is of little cocern.
In addition to McCain being a self professed hero, when in fact he is a war criminal for bombing Vietnamese civilians and A TRAITOR for VIOLATING THE UCMJ, Uniform Code of Military Justice by collaborating with the then enemy, Vietnamese, and confessed his being a war criminals which was broadcast by the Vietnamese.As a POW he was legally bound to give his name, rank and serial number. His father had the UCMJ changed after the war to prevent McCain from being prosecuted. A retroactive pardon, if you will. Also, McCain DOES NOT SUPPORT Veterans 80% of the time. McCain votes to fund the Veterans Administration 20% of the time. McCain denies benefits to Veterans that he has enjoyed since his BIRTH IN A U.S. GOVERNMENT HOSPITAL to his Annapolis appointment which was because of his Admiral Fathers political contacts. McCAIN DID NOT GO TO ANNAPOLIS BASED ON MERIT.
God knows. But isn't this the issue that is supposed to have set off the totally bogus slander of Kerry by the Swiftboaters? If that's not the case, could their motivation have been-gasp-ideological?
Never having been in combat, I'd tend toward thinking commanding a Swift Boat in Cambodia was more like combat than dropping incendiary and chemical bombs from way up in the air, and being so incompetent you got your a** shot down.
I've read about this before and wonder why no one has brought it up in this campaign. I have also read an interview with a POW who was captured before McCain arrived and knew him there. I want to know WHY DID OTHER POWs HELD CAPTIVE WITH J.McCAIN CALL HIM "SONGBIRD"? That seems to be a very loaded nick-name.



