Obama's Lifeline: For a Change, a Stimulus Plan That Actually Helps the Poor and the Sick
Republicans took to the Sunday morning news shows to express their "concern" about parts of the stimulus package presented by the Obama administration last week. House Minority Leader John Boehner declared that he would vote no "if it's the plan I see today"a pretty idle threat, since even if he takes his entire party with him, the Democrats still have nearly an 80-vote margin. In the Senate, however, two Republican votes are needed to create a filibuster-proof majority, which might at least slow the package down and could force some compromises.
There's good reason for the Republican resistance. While it makes numerous concessions to favored conservative approaches--lots of public-private partnerships that will allow the private sector to cash in, tax cuts for businesses and the middle class, and no immediate end to the Bush tax cuts (which will expire on their own in 2010)the $820 billion stimulus package also includes some dramatic increases in support for the nation's social welfare programs.
With this package, Obama begins the process of reversing cutbacks initiated by Reagan and carried forward by the two Bushes, with some help from Clinton's welfare "reform." There may still be plenty of holes, but with this plan, the new government confirms that has some responsibility for providing a safety net for its poor and disabled, its children and elderly. To see the magnitude of the shift, it is only necessary to glance at the last budget drawn up by President Bush, for fiscal year 2009: In the midst of the growing recession, it had yet more cuts to the social welfare system, reducing already inadequate health and feeding programs for the most vulnerable Americans.
Here are some of Obama's initiativesnot quite the New Deal, but quite a new deal compared to what we've grown used to over the past 30 years:
Advertisement
Advertisement
* As unemployment grows, more and more people lose their health insurance and turn to Medicaid. State budgets already are in desperate straits, and can't possibly shoulder this added burden. Obama would pump federal money into state Medicaid budgets as well into the program providing for health insurance for children.
* In addition, Obama wants to shore up existing health insurance coverage for people losing jobs by extending COBRA and underwriting part of its cost through tax rebates. COBRA is a program that enables people losing their jobs to continue their health insurance if they pay for it. Obama wants the federal government to partially subsidize these payments, and also gives some low-income unemployed people access to Medicaid.
* The president's plan proposes to extend unemployment benefits through December 2009 and increase weekly unemployment insurance benefits by $25.
* The stimulus package would incresasing food stamp benefits for the 30 million people now in the program, and provide support for food banks, school lunch programs, and the WIC program that provides for mothers and infants.
* Obama's plan would give 7.5 million blind, disabled, and aged Americans an immediate $450 by increasingon a temporary basis--Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits.
Comments
Speaking of helping the poor, the link below is to how President Bush helped poor and oppressed people in Afghanistan, Iraq and Africa. The point is that Bush should get some credit for it, but he gets almost none. I realize ther are not many Bush fans here, but seriously, what is there to diagree with in this column (I realize it is not the full story and there are other issues on which Bush can be criticized, but just focusing on the issues raised by this guy, what would be the disagreement):
http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/opinion/oped/bal-op.bush25jan25,0,16581...
President Bush might have done some good things but these have been overlooked and we know the reason why. For President Obama, he did his job since the day he accepted the responsibility as a president. We'll just hope this lasts longer and truthful.
I have to agree with Brian. There are lots of decisions that Bush made that I seriously don't agree with, but I read an opinion article in the NYTs last week that said Bush had made decisions for Africa that actually spread HIV/AIDS. The writer was uninformed.
Bush has done more to help victims of HIV/AIDS than any other President, and yet when people talk about helping those who can't help themselves, he isn't given the credit that's due him.
Imagine what Bush could've done to PREVENT NEW cases of HIV/AIDS if he'd just been passing out condoms or put forth massive research into an effective topical antimicrobial...
Treating victims is a good thing, after the fact. Anti-Retrovirals are good things...
...inflicting your morals on others at the expense of prevention...notsomuch.
Sorry Chris, but I have to respectfully disagree. How many organizations did Bush pull funding from for teaching safe sex measures such as condom use? Not only did he do this to our schools, he put those same stipulation on foreign aid as well, and refused money to organizations that performed abortions.
So sure, he gave them the $, but much of it was wasted on programs proven not to be effective(abstinence) versus programs with shown benefits such as condom dispersal and antiretroviral drugs. In fact, it was predetermined that 1/3 of the PEPFAR went to abstinence only programs.
So, what Bush did, was triple our aid to Africa on programs that have been proven to fail, all the while this economic storm was brewing, and not being acted on.
What BO and the rest of the consensus crowd are doing is pure socilaism. Let's not mince words here. And, spending billions when the country has none to spend. This man and his ilk are spending your children's future now! It's time to cut up the credit card, not issue more credit.
"To cure the British disease with socialism was like trying to cure leukemia with leeches." - Margaret Thatcher
no income tax for a year and give Congress a set of ba!!s so they can buy out the Federal Reserve for $450 million and get the Treasury to print "we the people" dollars interest FREE.
Woman in the Dunes
The writer says, * Obama's plan would give 7.5 million blind, disabled, and aged Americans an immediate $450 by increasing—on a temporary basis--Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits.
____________________________
Not only is $450.00 a joke, but I'll believe it when I see it.
For those who don't know, the "WOMAN IN THE DUNES" is a 1964 acclaimed Foreign Film (Japan) where a woman who lives trapped in the bottom of a sand pit spends all her time preventing her home from being swallowed up by advancing sand dunes.
This year (2009)California ran out of Home Energy Assistance Funds and now denies applicants assistance to heat their homes and light their lights until further notice, which may be never.
Last year, 2008, California permanently cut the annual low-income home owners and renters refund.
So much for Governor S. who also tried but failed to end funding for the Special Olympics and In Home Social Services for elderly and disabled who fear being forced into nursing homes.
Nursing homes, BTW, cost more - but I guess he's betting on the resident's early demise from nursing home depression for it to make dollar sense.
The $450.00 stimulus package for SSI recipients (if it's even so) does not even add up to the loss of these two fore mentioned programs that had helped SSI recipients and other low-income persons to at least help pay for the pail and pulley system used to help carry out the ever increasing sands from their homes.
By Timothy Sexton
Takeaways
The Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act not only cut funding, but also inducements for state funding.
Reagan's pathetic tax cuts for the poor failed to make up the losses experienced by budget cuts.
Any budget gains made from cuts in military spending were ineligible for social program spending. President Ronald Reagan was given the honor of The Greatest American Ever as the result of a poll conducted in cooperation with a Discovery Channel presentation that narrowed down the candidates for that particular honor. According to many of those who defend this choice, Reagan deserves this honor in part because he brought back a sense of respect to Americans following the Vietnam War, Watergate and the Iran hostage crisis. According to Reagan's own campaign slogan for the 1984 election, thanks to the previous four years of his Presidency, it was morning again in American.
Maybe someone just misspelled "mourning." The budget deficit explosion that occurred during the 1980s were a direct result of President Reagan's tax cuts, and the resulting lack of available funds that could have been earmarked toward social programs contributed to the continuing deconstruction of American social programs. Reagan's assault on these programs took as its starting point the conservative ideological foundation that if people rely upon government welfare strategies to provide them with such things as food, housing and help taking care of their children it will serve as a disincentive for them to work; therefore the less the government helps the poor, ultimately the more they will help themselves and the better off they will be.
President Reagan was a firm believer in this methodology and almost from the moment he took his oath of office set to work dismantling government entitlement programs. The first major step toward rolling back opportunities for those not lucky enough to be born into wealth took place when he signed the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (OBRA). OBRA served to cut federal funding programs for the poor as well as inducements for states to provide funding. Unfortunately, cutting funding for programs was not enough to revolutionize the welfare programs in the way that conservative ideologues desired. In order to completely undermine the progressive system of entitlements to the poor, the Reagan administration began to use tax reform as a method of undercutting welfare.
By cutting taxes and instituting such concepts as the Earned Income Credit, Reagan-always the actor-gave the outward appearance of helping poor families. Unfortunately, those measly tax cut gains made barely a dent in the overall loss in benefits the poor were no longer receiving because of cuts and changes to entitlement programs. Throughout the Reagan presidency cuts and rollbacks to welfare programs were systematically enacted even as the income gap between the richest and poorest Americans reached peak proportions. While the wealthy were unquestionably benefiting from their huge tax cuts, the poor were actually losing ground because of them. When Reagan finally left office and his Vice President George Bush ascended to the Presidency in the election of 1988, Bush inherited historic budget deficits of over 3 trillion dollars. Deficits like these left little opportunity to increase spending on social programs even if he had desired to do so. Which, of course, he didn't. After all, there was a war to be waged in Iraq. Remember, I'm talking about George Bush the First. Sometimes, it seems like the country went through a time machine and we're reliving 1989-1992 all over again.
Because the enormous deficit threatened all spending programs, a budget compromise deal was cut in Congress. The compromise contained provisions to increase funding for many social programs that had been assaulted during the Reagan presidency. Despite the best efforts of the social progressives to spin these gains into a success story, the compromise required to ensure these budget increases came at the price of effectively undermining completely the very structure of program funding. For one thing, any budget gains that resulted from a reduction in spending on defense programs-which had skyrocketed during the Reagan era and therefore represented a potential goldmine-would go toward deficit reduction and would therefore not be eligible for spending on domestic programs. And secondly, any increase in spending on domestic programs would have to be offset by a reduction in spending on another domestic program. In other words, the government had to steal from Peter to pay Paul while Caesar sat around spending billions on lances and spears.
Without most people even realizing it was taking place, a profound shift in the paradigm toward government entitlement theory was created by the Reagan policies of tax cuts and deficits. Although no one in the Reagan/Bush administrations came out doing high-fives and boasting that they had undone the New Deal and Great Society efforts put forth by FDR and LBJ, that is essentially what happened. The exploding deficit led to an unavoidable clash of ideologies resulting in a compromise plan to cut the deficit that has left funding for social programs almost irrevocably altered to the detriment of the welfare state. Meanwhile, people like Jack Abramoff are giving our highest-paid federal employees-who were all wealthy to begin with-paid vacations and parties and dinners and gifts to ensure that what money isn't being spent on the military and space programs designed to line the coffers of Bush's big business buddies is going to whatever precious pork plan our leaders desire and not toward taking care of people who aren't lucky enough to have born in the same class of wealth that they were.
So, one of the legacies of President Reagan-the Greatest American of All Time-was the significant deconstruction of the American social policy of taking care of those least able to take care of themselves.
Wooo-ooo Barrack Obama is pushing Socialism. Run for the hills! Let's all die of fright at the word "Socialist". People, please get over your fear of labels. So, some of his plans are socialist ... so what? Who cares?
We can see what a resounding social and economic and foreign relations success unbridled capitalism has been. Please.
Capitalism exploits the working class for the benefit of the rich. Socialism exploits the rich for the benefit of the working class. Pick the one with which you are more comfortable.
"Ohhh, no, Jimmy!! It's SOCIALISM!! Ahhh, whatever shall WE do?!?" lol.
Have you ever stopped and questioned what exactly that $700 billion bailout was? Have you?
All of these 'solutions' to this 'crisis' appear to be little more than generous handouts to corporate elite.
Why is it that public funds are being given away to large failing corporate entities? So that they in turn can buy up floundering companies and promote further consolidation of the financial and other industries?
In the end it appears and if we're spending trillions of taxpayer dollars to save the very financial industries who's actions contributed to this crisis and have gained most from it.
... what's really kinda funny is that we've seen similar things happen in the past.. . in Nazi Germany. hmmmn. interesting... we even have this same anti-union anti-socialist mindset.
You need to wake up and smell the Fascism.
Quit whining about handouts to the poor and take a look at the handouts to the wealthy corporate players.
:: FASCIST BAILOUT ::
Just wondering all of you pro-entitlement pro-welfare non-taxpaying Social Program lover's are going to think, say and do when there's not enough people working anymore to pay the 'higher taxes' that are supposed to save the day.
Oh ya, we that pay taxes from working should just be happy about future tax increases to pay for non-taxpaying tweekers, drunkards, and gluttons that cannot be sued even if they drive drunk without insurance or a drivers license because nobody but the Federal Government can attach an SSI or SSP check.
Whatyagonnado?
Because I know lots of people that are going to retire early and get onto checks, but those are mostly checks from jobs, and money they saved for years while they worked for this time to come.
Yup, know alot of people that are tired of seeing homeowners that live off SSI & SSP in lovely paid for free and clear homes and never worked a single day in their life for it nor' do they pay any taxes and they get 95% of their property taxes back at the end of the year.
Watch millions of people this next year and the following years quit working and get on the SSI bandwagon cause YUM that Gubment Gravy is Soooo good!
It's time for millions upon millions of people to just tell SSA intake workers that "I'm just so depressed from drinking, doing crank, overeating, I just cannot ever work again". Or the Crazy act one alot of the people in my small town use. That's a good one that works.
"uh, I took too much acid and I'm like crazy now, so I need SSI and SSP checks at $907 a month tax free for the rest of my life".
I really hope every person in America decides to get onto SSI Entitlement or Welfare Entitlement checks, MediCal, MediCAID, and this Socialist system you all think is a funny joke becomes REAL.
Then everyone will be on checks, and there will not be enough money to pay for EVERYBODY sitting all day on their computer.
It won't work.
Everybody on Entitlements will sooner more than later, EMPLODE.
And, people that work and pay are getting sick and tired of looking at disgusting entitlement bums on the 1st of the month, chewin' their gums.
Everyone quit working, EMPLODE the system.
Whatyagonnado?! What am I going to do?
I'm going to respond to your large rambling of BS. That's WhatImAGunnaDo.
First WTF is 'EMPLODE'?
What are you going to do when SSI and other social programs can no longer cover the tax breaks of your beloved corporate elite?
What are you going to do when the people who actually work to produce the product and/or service which enables the CEO to reap great profits -- what are you going to do when those who actually work, get their fair share?
Something can be said of those that work for a living, but those who organize the work of others, while deserving merit and some pay, certainly do not deserve the gobs and gobs of cash that you must feel they're entitled to.
Sure, handouts of BILLIONS AND BILLIONS of dollars to corporations who obviously cannot conduct wise business and take all the wrong risks is fine... but trying to help EVERYONE, that's a no-no.
Somehow, the working class Joe has confused himself with someone who actually benefits from anti-union anti-socialist mindset.
So, why don't you go ahead and be gung ho for all the anti-people anti-worker pro-war pro-profit pro-privatization goons and watch that same very system destroy itself.
Is Entitlement + Implosion = EMPLODE
And, that's what is going to happen when there's not enough Tax Payers and Foreign Country Lenders to keep paying for the Super Social Entitlement Program Stuffed Economic Stimulus Package Bill.
Now, you can keep on pissin' and moanin' it's all good and great to stuff that Bill full of pork, pork, piggy, piggy, porkey, fat, fatso, morbidly obese, piggy, pork, but There's not going to be even enough money to keep on handing out Tax Free money every month to all these Programs to even last Obingo's 4 year term.
If you believe that, go to the nearest SSA Office, pull a tab, sit on your backside and fill out the Intake form to start collecting SSI for 'Mental Other'.
Porky....Piggy...Stuffed...Pork....Fatty....Economic Stimulus Package Bill, Luva
Why is it conservatives ask where the money to support government benefits for the middle class and poor are "going to be cut from" but never ask where the money for munitions manufacturers or bank bailouts comes from?
As for "socialist" agendas, Obama will do nothing to seriously endanger the riches or power of the elites. (How long do you think they'd let him live if he did?)
Post new comment
MoJo Comments: Send Us Your Feedback
We changed our spam software to better filter comments. Should you encounter any issues, please let us know.


