Trying to Decipher Newt's Appeal at CPAC
| Fri Feb. 27, 2009 11:45 AM PST
As David Corn discussed in a recent magazine article for Mother Jones, Newt is back in a big way. As conservatives try to figure out which national figure is best fit to lead them back to power, they are increasingly turning to a guy who had no role in the failures of the last eight years and was responsible (as he is ready to remind you) for the party's last major success, the 1994 takeover of Congress.
But I've had trouble understanding Newt's appeal. His ideas and theories are sometimes bizarre. ("There is a gay and secular fascism in this country that wants to impose its will on the rest of us," he told Bill O'Reilly.) When he does find an idea that sounds serious, it often doesn't hold up to scrutiny. He argued today, for example, that jobs would flourish and "virtually every American with savings would immediately be better off" if the capital gains tax was reduced to zero. Anyone with a working muscle in their head knows that such a plan, if enacted, would primarily benefit the wealthy investor class. It would essentially be a payday for people who make substantial amounts of money through their investments. That's the rich, not everyday Americans. And there are about a million better ways to create workaday jobs than giving a massive tax cut to the rich.
Advertisement
Advertisement
And think about that for a second. Newt likes to tout his proposals as "new" and "bold." He positions himself as the GOP's top idea man. And yet, what's new about a tax cut for the rich? It's the same topline economic idea the GOP has been pushing for two decades.
I think Newt is so widely beloved here because of something else: his presentation. He is the snarkiest kid in the classroom. His taunts of Democrats and the media sound intelligent and are often genuinely funny. His flair, his sarcasm, his ability to make his listeners feel like they are smarter than not just those idiot libs but every dolt in Congress – they simply cannot be matched by any other public face in the GOP today. Newt's often inflammatory, as well. He never shies from a declaration that is obviously too grand for the moment.
These tendencies were on display today. Jibes included: New York Times seeks the resurrection of the Soviet Union. Chris Dodd and Barney Frank would flop pathetically if they tried to run their own businesses. Tim Geithner couldn't figure out how to pay his taxes. "Jimmy Carter was utterly, totally confused…. This guy was just not there."
Overstatements included: Obama's first month is the "boldest attempt to create a European socialist model I have seen." The upcoming elections are the "most consequential in American history." Card check, a labor law soon to be before Congress that would make it easier to organize a union, is "the greatest threat to the freedom in the workplace in American history" and "a mortal threat to American freedom." Hamas, Iran, and North Korea pose a threat to the very existence of western civilization. "Ronald Reagan defeated the Soviet Union in 10 years."
Newt argued here at CPAC that there is a people's party, which rests on conservative principles and saw its zenith during the 1994 Republican Revolution, which, coincidentally, he led. Opposing the people's party is an elites' party, which includes Barack Obama and the Democrats, George Bush, and any Republican in Congress that Newt and the attendees of CPAC don't like. The idea that our economic policy over the last 18 months have been part of a "Bush-Obama" recovery plan is something of a stretch, but the CPACers here today ate it up. Who cares if it makes sense? If you oppose Obama and you view Bush as an apostate, as many conservatives now do, there's a man out there for you. His name is Newt, and he is ready to lead.
I think Newt is so widely beloved here because of something else: his presentation. He is the snarkiest kid in the classroom. His taunts of Democrats and the media sound intelligent and are often genuinely funny. His flair, his sarcasm, his ability to make his listeners feel like they are smarter than not just those idiot libs but every dolt in Congress – they simply cannot be matched by any other public face in the GOP today. Newt's often inflammatory, as well. He never shies from a declaration that is obviously too grand for the moment.
These tendencies were on display today. Jibes included: New York Times seeks the resurrection of the Soviet Union. Chris Dodd and Barney Frank would flop pathetically if they tried to run their own businesses. Tim Geithner couldn't figure out how to pay his taxes. "Jimmy Carter was utterly, totally confused…. This guy was just not there."
Overstatements included: Obama's first month is the "boldest attempt to create a European socialist model I have seen." The upcoming elections are the "most consequential in American history." Card check, a labor law soon to be before Congress that would make it easier to organize a union, is "the greatest threat to the freedom in the workplace in American history" and "a mortal threat to American freedom." Hamas, Iran, and North Korea pose a threat to the very existence of western civilization. "Ronald Reagan defeated the Soviet Union in 10 years."
Newt argued here at CPAC that there is a people's party, which rests on conservative principles and saw its zenith during the 1994 Republican Revolution, which, coincidentally, he led. Opposing the people's party is an elites' party, which includes Barack Obama and the Democrats, George Bush, and any Republican in Congress that Newt and the attendees of CPAC don't like. The idea that our economic policy over the last 18 months have been part of a "Bush-Obama" recovery plan is something of a stretch, but the CPACers here today ate it up. Who cares if it makes sense? If you oppose Obama and you view Bush as an apostate, as many conservatives now do, there's a man out there for you. His name is Newt, and he is ready to lead.
Comments
Mr. Gingrich's appeal
Submitted by gerrymander (not verified) on Fri Feb. 27, 2009 9:13 PM PST.
Whenever Mr. Gingrich is the subject of conversation, ( Shakespeare runs through the back of my mind ) I think about the years that were spent developing "monarchial" capitalism. - see senator Jim Webb.
Probably England's King George III, represents monarchial capitalism in its purist form. All the money is mine. Be happy with what I give you; I make the rules.
So in 1776 our forefathers revolted.
Which makes me wonder where the CPAC folks get their attitude that working for the man for some trickle down pennies is free enterprise much less freedom.
Just where do they get that "sharecropper" mentality?
Mr. Gingrich' ideas about how a government should run and your place in the scheme of thing; goes back many years to around 1605 (with apologies to William )
"Eye of newt, and toe of frog,
Wool of bat, and tongue of dog,
Adder's fork, and blind-worm's sting,
Lizard's leg, and howlet's wing,
For a charm of powerful trouble,
Like a hell-broth boil and bubble"
Macbeth IV, i, 14-15
Sounds like a CPAC convention speech to me! ( and you thought "they" didn't have conventions back then! )
Newt's Contract with America
Submitted by Ferrel Atkins (not verified) on Fri Feb. 27, 2009 9:55 PM PST.
Newt's Contract with America was not a statement of intent of the Republican
party, but a list found by pollsters to resound with the public. It was a total
fraud. Note that it promised an Amendment to the Constitution which
would require a balanced budget, but once in office the Republicans not
only continued deficit spending but never made any effort to pass the
balanced budget Amendment for submission to the states for
ratification.
I AM a MJ subscriber.
"The wealthy investor class ..."
Submitted by Thomas L. Knapp (not verified) on Mon Mar. 2, 2009 12:02 PM PST.
... is pretty much a figment of populist imagination these days. Most "investors" are middle class stiffs socking money into second homes and retirement portfolios.
That's not to say that Newt's right about the effect of cutting the capital gains tax. It would help, but probably not as much as a FICA floor or a large, regularized annual increase in the personal exemption to the income tax. Better yet, why not all three, couple with oh, say, a 50% real reduction in federal spending instead of Obama's insane "blow our money and everyone else's too, and we'll magically become wealthy" plan?
A common mistake of people
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sun Jun. 14, 2009 11:41 PM PDT.
A common mistake of people writing blogs out there is forgetting to introduce your story or subject in the first paragraph. We don’t runescape money take enough time to explain the story or we just runescape accounts cover to much in four sentences. Keeping it simple and easy to understand will keep readers going, don’t tell the whole story. Start by introducing your topic with a few sentences. Now use different runescape gold ideas that explain or relate to the main topic, write 2 or 3 paragraphs in this area. You will wrap everything up in the last paragraph, concluding the topic
Post new comment
MoJo Comments: Send Us Your Feedback
We changed our spam software to better filter comments. Should you encounter any issues, please let us know.
