In Lifting Bush's Stem Cell Research Ban, Obama Removes a Bush Lie

| Fri Mar. 6, 2009 2:51 PM PST

One of the more infuriating prevarications of the presidency of George W. Bush concerned stem cell research.

On August 9, 2001, Bush delivered his first nationally televised prime-time address, and the subject was the federal funding of stem cell research. In the speech, he announced that he would allow federal funding of research involving stem cell lines that had already been created, but he said he would prohibit federal financing of research using new stem lines. His reasoning was that doing the latter would place the US government in the position of underwriting the destruction of blastocysts (a.k.a., very young embryos), and that would be morally wrong.

But have no fear, Bush said, this restriction would not get in the way of stem cell research, for there were already 60 existing stem lines. These lines, he said, "have the ability to regenerate themselves indefinitely, creating opportunities for research." Funding research that depended on those existing lines while saying nyet to research utilizing new lines, he maintained, "allows us to explore the promise and potential of stem cell research without crossing a fundamental moral line."

Bush was trying to have his cake and eat it, too. He was protecting blastocysts everywhere (and endearing himself to the Catholic Church and the anti-abortion movement), while maintaining that his administration would be supporting research that could find cures for all sorts of terrible diseases. Yet at the core of his argument was a serious misstatement of fact. There were not 60 lines available for vigorous research. By the estimates of expert scientists, between 10 and 30 lines existed, and not all of them were suitable for the best research. Many could not be regenerated indefinitely. And most were tainted by mouse DNA and not useful for the most advanced and promising sort of research related to finding cures and treatments for human diseases. The scientific community's consensus was unequivocal: The existing lines did not allow researchers to explore fully or effectively the promise and potential of stem cell research. Bush had greatly misled the public on this.

Why recall this now? Because of the news that President Obama will sign an executive order on Monday lifting Bush's restrictions on embryonic stem cell research. This will mark yet another move in the effort to undo the damage done by Bush's war on science.

For almost eight years, Bush's based-on-a-lie policy prevented research that could help scientists develop cures for serious diseases. There's probably no way to quantify the number of people who were negatively affected by this Bush decision--those who have suffered with Parkinson's, diabetes or other ailments--but there's no doubt that eight years is a long time when it comes to applying the brakes on promising research. On Monday, Obama will free federally-funded scientists from Bush's restrictions, and he will free the country from one of Bush's more consequential falsehoods.

Advertisement

Advertisement

David Corn is Mother Jones' Washington bureau chief. For more of his stories, click here. He's also on Twitter.

Get Mother Jones by Email - Free. Like what you're reading? Get the best of MoJo three times a week.

Comments

The largest stem cell

tagged as: 
The largest stem cell breakthrough on Monday is going to be more with Advanced Cell Technology than with any other more recognized company, in terms of price jump, as they own 400 of the key patents and for example license patents to GERON. Actc.pk has products in the clinical stages I and II for retina repair, diabetes/pancreas repair, and repair of heart tissue after heart attacks. Truly Stephen Fox, Editor, New Mexico Sun News Santa Fe, New Mexico

You might want to get a fact checker AND a science advisor!

For starters, "President Obama will sign an executive order on Monday lifting Bush's restrictions on embryonic stem cell research" Bush NEVER restricted ESC research, ONLY the federal funding of it. All for the better, since there have been ZERO cases of success, and MANY (a new one last week) cases of tragic horrific deaths. In the meantime, ESC LIKE cells were developed last year (IPS cells), which eliminated the need for ESC work. Breakthroughs in treatment are numerous, however only the scientific journals report them. The MSM won't because it would vindicate Bush. So now Obama is taking us all backwards into outdated technology. Go figure!

Corn Porn

The fact is, Corn’s article contains “misstatements” and pure fabrications. His distaste for Bush (or some other personal agenda) makes lowers his credibility and effectiveness as an opinion shaper. Corn: “Why recall this now? Because of the news that President Obama will sign an executive order on Monday lifting Bush's restrictions on embryonic stem cell research. For a good summary of the stem cell research story check out this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stem_cell_controversy Corn: “For almost eight years, Bush's based-on-a-lie policy prevented research that could help scientists develop cures for serious diseases. Bush never banned stem cell research. Hundreds of millions of dollars were invested by private and public sources on stem cell research during the Bush administration. Why are you deliberately using half-truths and appealing to people’s emotions? Repeat a lie often enough and people will assume it is truth? In fact, regardless of the research value of the embryonic cells Corn mentions, Bush was the first president to authorize federal funds be spent on stem cell research. Clinton signed a bill in 1996 banning federal funding. Where is your criticism of Clinton?

Exactly!

Comments from "Anonymous" and "Barry" above are right on target. The only real LIE involved here is the one about there ever having been a ban on stem cell research in the first place. Apparently the fact that it's a lie doesn't prevent some "Smart, Fearless Journalists" from repeating it over and over and over.

ESC Research Ban

Another instance of smart, fearless journalism being clouded by personal bias. As others have pointed out, Bush did not ban stem cell research, nor did he ban embryonic stem cell research. His policy denied funding to new ESC lines. What type of journalism do you practice when you cite "expert scientists" and assume the dullard reader will just go along with it? I wonder what happened to the smart, fearless journalist that wasn't afraid to write the truth, regardless of his personal beliefs, because that's what the public deserved. When you, Mr. Corn, put editorial comments into what is supposed to to be reporting, I have to question the motive of your article--specifically, are you trying to get across an accurate report or are you rather trying to further your cause? Bottom line: Bush is not president any longer. Obama is. Let it rest.

Monday is going to be more

Monday is going to be more with Advanced Cell Technology than with any other more recognized company, in terms of price jump, as they own 400 of the key patents

Post new comment

Alternately, you may login to or register an account
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <ul> <ol> <li> <blockquote>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

MoJo Comments: Send Us Your Feedback

We changed our spam software to better filter comments. Should you encounter any issues, please let us know.

Photo Essays

The chaos and humanity of war.
What becomes of Janesville, Wisconsin, now that GM's left town?
The other side of Gitmo.
American Holidays