State Department Responds to ArmorGroup Allegations
| Tue Sep. 1, 2009 1:08 PM PDT
When State Department spokesman Ian Kelly woke up this morning, he may have been anticipating some tough queries from reporters. But he probably wasn't expecting to field questions about US embassy guards in Kabul engaging in what the Project on Government Oversight has described as "deviant hazing and humiliation," acts that allegedly included "peeing on people, eating potato chips out of ass cracks, vodka shots out of ass cracks."
"These are very serious allegations and we are treating them that way," Kelly told reporters at a briefing this afternoon, after POGO sent a letter to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton detailing a host of charges relating to ArmorGroup's $189 million contract to provide security for the US embassy in Kabul. Kelly said Clinton had been informed of the allegations and noted that the matter had been referred to the State Department's Inspector General. Kelly added that the State Department has "zero tolerance for the type of conduct that is alleged in these documents."
Advertisement
Advertisement
Yet the State Department seems to have had quite a bit of tolerance for ArmorGroup's lapses. As one reporter pointed out at the briefing, internal State Department documents, dating back to 2007, have raised serious concerns about ArmorGroup's handling of the embassy contract. In July 2007, the State Department alerted the company that it had found "defincies" in its work that "endanger performance of the contract to such a degree that the security of the U.S. Embassy in Kabul is in jeopardy." In September 2008, the agency threatened to terminate the contract outright because the company had provided too few guards.
Despite ArmorGroup's track record, deputy assistant secretary of state for logistics management William Moser told a Senate panel in June that "at no time was the security of American personnel at the US embassy compromised." He claimed that "we worked with Armor Group" to correct the problems that had been identified. And he maintained that "the performance on the ground by ArmorGroup, North America has been and is sound."
There's surely nothing sound about the allegations POGO's investigation turned up. And it's not as if the watchdog group is relying on the claims of a few disgruntled employees, either. According to POGO, nearly a tenth of the company's embassy 450-person security force individually contacted the group with a host of serious concerns.
So why did Moser go out of his way to defend AmorGroup to Congress? "I'll have to ask Mr. Moser," Kelly told reporters. "I'm not exactly sure what he was basing his determination on." I'm looking forward to finding out. I bet Secretary Clinton is too.
UPDATE: Here are the jaw-dropping photos. NSFW.
Follow Daniel Schulman on Twitter.
Comments
State Department Responds to ArmorGroup Allegations
Submitted by Dredd (not verified) on Tue Sep. 1, 2009 3:25 PM PDT.
Wow. This gives new meaning to "Culture Club" doesn't it?
When are we going to figure out that war is our greatest enemy, and big corporations want war for profits?
The rest of the story is of little consequence to them.
war is great. war provides
Submitted by whoever (not verified) on Tue Sep. 1, 2009 8:59 PM PDT.
war is great. war provides jobs, is a great environment for releasing pent up rage, and culls the population. privately funded wars are even better.
war is great. war
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed Sep. 2, 2009 2:11 PM PDT.
war is great. war provides
Submitted by whoever (not verified) on September 1, 2009 - 9:59pm.
war is great. war provides jobs, is a great environment for releasing pent up rage, and culls the population. privately funded wars are even better./blockquote>A commonly held misconception. Do just a little research on basic economic principles and you will see why war is not good for the economy.
What angers me is not the
Submitted by tony the tiger (not verified) on Wed Sep. 2, 2009 9:31 PM PDT.
What angers me is not the lewd behaviour but the fact that the lives of countless Americans and Afghans working at the U.S. embassy is compromised.
What makes me furious though is that our government let this happen. I can't believe there are absolutely no checks and balances preventing this kind of thing.
This looks more like a gay bathhouse than a security detail
guards
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sun Sep. 6, 2009 7:22 PM PDT.
nothing hear seems to be illegal. i am not concerned about guards excercising their liberty, i am concerned about prisoners being deprived of their liberty.
an illegal search by someone of the opposite sex is what is humiliating under the law.
Post new comment
MoJo Comments: Send Us Your Feedback
We changed our spam software to better filter comments. Should you encounter any issues, please let us know.
