Climate Summit: China Commits, Obama Not So Much

| Tue Sep. 22, 2009 8:35 PM PDT
barack-obama-un-general-assembly-mother-jones-0.jpg

Minutes after the close of the United Nations summit on climate change on Tuesday, Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon declared the event a success. "The momentum has shifted," he told reporters.

"For the last few months I have been very concerned by the slow pace of the global negotiations," said Ban. "But I listened carefully to the discussions today and I sensed that something that has been missing for the past few months has returned. It is a sense of optimism, urgency, and hope that governments are determined to seal a deal in Copenhagen."

But, if anything, the public-facing side of the summit didn't offer much hope. Barack Obama's speech offered nothing in the way of specific policy directives and did little to put pressure on Congress to deliver him a bill that he can take to Copenhagen. And there were no major breakthroughs on agreements between leaders.

For those determined to find signs of progress, one might have been the speech by Chinese President Hu Jintao. His promise that the country would reduce greenhouse emissions by a "notable margin" below 2005 levels within a decade was hailed as a breakthrough – though he didn't clarify whether that would be a binding goal. Chinese leaders said they are still discussing what the actual target will be.

Hu also pledged that China would work to raise the amount of energy drawn from nuclear and other non-fossil fuels to 15 percent by 2020, and employ other strategies to protect and expand forests and develop a more sustainable economy. Yet he maintained his desire that developing countries – even rapidly modernizing ones like China – not be held to the standards of developed countries. "Developing countries need to strike a balance between economic growth, social development and environmental protection," said Hu.

There were other significant pledges on Tuesday: the European Union reaffirmed its commitment to cuts of 20 percent below 1990 levels by 2020, and 30 percent if other developed nations follow suit. And Japan's new prime minister, Yukio Hatoyama, touted his promise to cut Japan's emissions to 25 percent below 1990 levels by 2020, so long as others consent.

Now, whether these signs of progress are as major as Ban makes them out to be remains to be seen. Other world and UN leaders have recently been downplaying hopes that a final deal will be sealed in Copenhagen, especially in light of delays in the US Senate.

But Ban insisted on a sunnier assessment. "Finally we are seeing a thaw in some of the frozen conditions that have prevented governments from progressing toward a deal in Copenhagen," he said.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Kate Sheppard covers energy and environmental politics in Mother Jones' Washington bureau. For more of her stories, click here. She Tweets here.

Get Mother Jones by Email - Free. Like what you're reading? Get the best of MoJo three times a week.

Comments

Newsflash: WE'RE MELTING

Is it going to take SPF 300 to wake people up?

http://www.thepantaloon.com/

Still drinking the cool aid?

It's great everyone got together and said a few placating things. Face it, we are not going to make drastic changes that will add to the world-wide ecomomic malaise. And...as it turns out, not all are convinced.

Check this out only if you have an open mind.

http://www.realclearmarkets.com/articles/2009/09/23/decades_of_global_co...

The only growth industries right now are Federal Gov't jobs and "climate change" jobs. I doubt all those with vested interests would appreciate one of their former colleagues actually doing science.

Please path the SPF 30. It'll do just fine, thankyou.

Wanna find a military

Wanna find a military partner ????
Here is a very nice place ----------- Kissmilitary.com ---------- .It is the best dating community for seeking single military people. Whether you're a military single or a civilian looking for military dating. You will find what you're looking for.....

China commits to increasing emissions

The notion that China has committed to reductions is wrong. What they have committed to is a decrease in the carbon intensity of their economy, that is, the amount of CO2 equivalent emissions per unit of GDP. As China doesn't appear intent on stabilising or reducing its economy, the only outcome is increased, not decreased, emissions. This seems to be a growing trend; New Zealand's government has tried to do something similar by having no cap in its emissions trading scheme. You can bet that countries will always place the economy, and their global competitiveness, above the environment.

Post new comment

Alternately, you may login to or register an account
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <ul> <ol> <li> <blockquote>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

MoJo Comments: Send Us Your Feedback

We changed our spam software to better filter comments. Should you encounter any issues, please let us know.

Photo Essays

The chaos and humanity of war.
What becomes of Janesville, Wisconsin, now that GM's left town?
The other side of Gitmo.
American Holidays