The Insurance Industry Can't Lose
The health insurance industry’s double cross of Obama has created a storm of controversy. But it probably won’t amount to much. There's been a lot of talk about punishing the industry for its actions: through a barely conceivable threat to remove the industry’s antitrust exemption or by resurrecting the public option. Neither seems very likely.
Historically, with solid support in Congress—especially from the Dodd family (father Thomas and son Christopher) the insurance industry has evaded federal regulation. Instead, it's regulated by the states, which—lacking sufficient money and political nerve—have been a pushover. Under Obama, there's little likelihood of this changing.
The public option itself is fraught with weak points that ought to reassure the industry. Even if it passes, they may make more money, not less. That's because a public option won’t create a new federal insurance program but rather a contract apparatus whereby the government would in effect buy policies from private companies and let existing insurance entities—Blue Cross-Blue Shield, for example—run the public option system. In fact, the entire concept would resemble an outsourcing scheme more than anything truly "public." Similarly, the newly fashionable co-op proposal would most likely involve a local health insurance co-op contracting out the insurance function to private companies or systems like Blue Cross-Blue Shield.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Drs. David Himmelstein and Steffie Woolhandler of Physicians for a National Health Plan point out [pdf] that the public option won’t fix the health care system because:
It foregoes at least 84 percent of the administrative savings available through single payer. The public plan option would do nothing to streamline the administrative tasks (and costs) of hospitals, physicians offices, and nursing homes. They would still contend with multiple payers, and hence still need the complex cost tracking and billing apparatus that drives administrative costs. These unnecessary provider administrative costs account for the vast majority of bureaucratic waste. Hence, even if 95 percent of Americans who are currently privately insured were to join a public plan (and it had overhead costs at current Medicare levels), the savings on insurance overhead would amount to only 16 percent of the roughly $400 billion annually achievable through single payer.
Those who think a public option might provide beneficial competition should consider what has happened to the Medicare Part D drug insurance program. I am a participant. I don’t buy drugs from the government or even at prices set by the government. I must buy my drugs through a private insurance company—in my case AARP—which then negotiates the price with pharmaceutical companies. This arrangement is one of the reasons why Medicare is so expensive. It is not because old farts are stealing from the young. It’s because old farts are being yanked around by the insurance and pharmaceutical industries who have free reign within the Medicare system.
Finally, those who worry insurance companies are getting a raw deal might want to consider just how these big companies work. Dr. Jeoffry B. Gordon provided this excellent description of the United Health Group, first published in Daily Kos:
First, let me dwell on the track record of an individual insurance company, specifically United Health Plans. United Health Group is America’s largest health insurance company. According to their 2008 annual report United has 75,000 employees, insures 29.1 million Americans directly and covers up to 78 million people, contracts with 650,000 doctors and 5200 hospitals. Their insurance programs include: a government subsidized Medicare Advantage program called Secure Horizons, a Medicare Part D prescription program called Prescription Solutions, and they have an exclusive arrangement with AARP to offer a Medicare supplement.
In 2008 United Health had total revenues of approximately $81.2 billion…and their 2008 net revenue was $5.2 billion from health insurance. (This profit was in essence moneys diverted from health insurance premiums paid by government, individuals and employees to obtain medical care even after the company’s huge administrative costs are deducted.)… According to SEC filings, during our current economic and health care crisis their 2009 first quarter total revenue went up 8 percent to $22 billion and their net profit was $984 million. According to the company’s own report they have a medical loss ratio of about 80 per cent—that is, of collected premiums they spend only about 80 percent on actual medical care…we lose 20 per cent of the money we pay them to their overhead and profit.
Comments
kukjkhg@gmail.com
Is there any security now? The health care seems to be burden for many. What would be the next? Part of the legacy of the Underground Railroad is that people find tunnels beneath their houses or apartment buildings they didn't know were there - and sometimes it's discovered when century old floors give way. Either that or it ends up as a wine cellar and someone just didn't know what they were looking at. (You have to hide the good stuff somewhere – you don't want a beautifully aging pinot noir in reach of the undeserving.) If your house was a stop on the Underground Railroad or other historic landmark, it's worth a quick payday loan or two to preserve it.
coops.Exchanges don't work
A look at Massachusetts and Washington THE FACTS BEHIND THE NEWS
Trudy Lieberman, a contributing editor to the Columbia Journalism Review, has done a stellar job of reporting on the Massachusetts initiative She found that the Connector (MA exchange) had failed to create affordable insurance OPTIONS for the people in Massachusetts. Using a hypothetical family from Pittsfield in western Mass, Lieberman went shopping on the Connector website. She found that coverage for a 44-year-old couple with an income of $66,150, slightly over the eligibility limit for a state insurance subsidy, “All but three of the fourteen Connector policies cost at least $1,000 a month, or $12,000 a year—eighteen percent of their income.” The cheapest policy, at $820 a month, was no bargain. Yet according to the state’s own guidelines, a Pittsfield family with kids could only afford $364 in monthly premiums. Others point out that Mass has about 97% coverage but at high cost. Costs have not been contained.
Like many ideas a health insurance exchange looks better on paper than in practice. When Massachusetts launched its health reform experiment in 2006, it relied heavily on Heritage Foundation policy recommendations. Under then-Governor Mitt Romney, Massachusetts created a voluntary insurance exchange similar to the one Obama often promotes. Massachusetts outlines some basic requirements for plans that participate but it doesn’t set rates or reimbursement levels. And far from revolutionizing health care, the exchange—known in Massachusetts as the Connector—is demonstrating the limitations of relying solely on the market to solve the nation’s health care woes and rein in skyrocketing medical costs.
Prices vary by age. Lieberman found that if she changed the age of her Pittsfield family to 54, the premiums jumped significantly. Lieberman reports that it’s not just consumers who are complaining. Insurance companies have failed to get the promised deluge of new customers, who’ve been deterred by the high prices.
In the reform bills currently pending in Congress, Democrats have modified the Connector model by introducing a public plan that would compete in the exchange to help keep costs down.
In WA State, which has one of the two regulated Co-Ops in the nation,
“Rates for me and my husband and daughter, which would include prescriptions, would be $614 a month or more, up to over $800 a month for a $500 deductible. At the $614/mo rate the deductible for the family would be $4,500.year. There is a 30% co- insurance after deductible, so I would be responsible for anything after the insurance paid 70%, plus the Rxs are paid at 30%-50% only. I would have to pay the balance. For my husband's asthma medication, which is non-generic, that would be over $100/month, every month, on top of the costs above. This plan does not include dental.
I could get catastrophic coverage for a lot less for the family, but there would be no Rx
coverage and really high deductibles.”
Health Care That Isn't Public Isn't Health Care
Health Care That Isn’t
It always amazes me that Americans mistake Health Care for Health Insurance. The two are poles apart. Health Care is the delivery of actual medical care. Health Insurance is nothing more than a lottery; you are not paying for the delivery of a service but instead purchasing the possibility that the insurance company (after taking a substantial profit, of course) might pay for some of your medical bills. One is a service, the other is a profit-taking corporation who certainly doesn’t have the interest of the patient as its bottom line. Seems pretty hard to confuse the two. Yet in his attempt to reform America’s Health Care system, that’s exactly what President Obama has done.
Obama has not only let the insurance corporations set the terms of the debate, he’s invited them to the table. And not unpredictably, the result is a Health Care Reform bill that does not serve the interests of the American people or their health. The bill that has currently escaped the Senate Finance Committee is worse than useless. It takes a discussion of America’s health care needs and turns it into a wrangle over corporate monopoly. It is a sop to the insurance companies and a burden to those it was meant to help. And without the “public” plan option, the Health Care Reform bill is meaningless, because it simply doesn’t address what’s actually broken in the American Health Care System: for decades, decisions about the health of Americans have been at the mercy of out of control profit-taking corporations.
What’s broken about the American Health Care System is that American does not have a not-for-profit system that delivers medical services to all its citizens, and that is responsible to those citizens, not to a board of investors whose sole motivation is corporate greed. What’s broken about the American Health Care System is that it doesn’t have one. What America has is a number of companies that prey on its citizens in their hour of desperate need, and Obama’s current Health Care Reform Bill doesn’t change that.
In the film, “The American President”, there is a telling exchange between two of the characters over a crime bill the Chief Executive has just sent to the floor:
President: “Government is choosing, government is prioritizing; I made no secret of the fact the Crime Bill was my top priority.”
Sydney: “Well then, congratulations! It’s only taken you three years to put together crime prevention legislation that has no hope of preventing crime!”
President: “Sid, please, I don’t wanna lose you over this.”
Sydney: “Mr. President, you got bigger problems than losing me. You just lost my
vote.”
Congratulations, President Obama. You have just put together Health Care Reform legislation that has no hope of delivering Health Care to the American people. And, Mr. President, you’ve just lost my vote.
Health Care That Isn't Public Isn't Health Care
Health Care That Isn’t
It always amazes me that Americans mistake Health Care for Health Insurance. The two are poles apart. Health Care is the delivery of actual medical care. Health Insurance is nothing more than a lottery; you are not paying for the delivery of a service but instead purchasing the possibility that the insurance company (after taking a substantial profit, of course) might pay for some of your medical bills. One is a service, the other is a profit-taking corporation who certainly doesn’t have the interest of the patient as its bottom line. Seems pretty hard to confuse the two. Yet in his attempt to reform America’s Health Care system, that’s exactly what President Obama has done.
Obama has not only let the insurance corporations set the terms of the debate, he’s invited them to the table. And not unpredictably, the result is a Health Care Reform bill that does not serve the interests of the American people or their health. The bill that has currently escaped the Senate Finance Committee is worse than useless. It takes a discussion of America’s health care needs and turns it into a wrangle over corporate monopoly. It is a sop to the insurance companies and a burden to those it was meant to help. And without the “public” plan option, the Health Care Reform bill is meaningless, because it simply doesn’t address what’s actually broken in the American Health Care System: for decades, decisions about the health of Americans have been at the mercy of out of control profit-taking corporations.
What’s broken about the American Health Care System is that American does not have a not-for-profit system that delivers medical services to all its citizens, and that is responsible to those citizens, not to a board of investors whose sole motivation is corporate greed. What’s broken about the American Health Care System is that it doesn’t have one. What America has is a number of companies that prey on its citizens in their hour of desperate need, and Obama’s current Health Care Reform Bill doesn’t change that.
In the film, “The American President”, there is a telling exchange between two of the characters over a crime bill the Chief Executive has just sent to the floor:
President: “Government is choosing, government is prioritizing; I made no secret of the fact the Crime Bill was my top priority.”
Sydney: “Well then, congratulations! It’s only taken you three years to put together crime prevention legislation that has no hope of preventing crime!”
President: “Sid, please, I don’t wanna lose you over this.”
Sydney: “Mr. President, you got bigger problems than losing me. You just lost my
vote.”
Congratulations, President Obama. You have just put together Health Care Reform legislation that has no hope of delivering Health Care to the American people. And, Mr. President, you’ve just lost my vote.
oops-please delete my second
oops-please delete my second duplicate comment-hadn't realized first one had actually posted as I lost the window thingy.
UGG Classic Cardy boots ugg
UGG Classic Cardy boots
ugg classic cardy cream
UGG Classic Cardy black
UGG Classic Cardy sale
ugg cardy
ugg classic cardy
ugg classic cardy oatmeal
ugg classic cardy boots
classic cardy boots
cardy boots sale
Ugg cardy boots sale
UGG Classic Cardy grey
bailey button
ugg bailey boots
ugg button boots
ugg bailey boots
Ugg Bailey Button sand
ugg bailey black
UGG Classic Cardy boots ugg
UGG Classic Cardy boots
ugg classic cardy cream
UGG Classic Cardy black
UGG Classic Cardy sale
ugg cardy
ugg classic cardy
ugg classic cardy oatmeal
ugg classic cardy boots
classic cardy boots
cardy boots sale
Ugg cardy boots sale
UGG Classic Cardy grey
bailey button
ugg bailey boots
ugg button boots
ugg bailey boots
Ugg Bailey Button sand
ugg bailey black
Ugg Bailey bailey button
Ugg Bailey
bailey button boots
bailey button boot
Ugg Bailey Button Boots
Ugg Bailey Button Chocolate
Ugg Bailey Button black
Accidentally come here , I am incomparable to enjoy myself when i appreciate your beautiful article from my deep heart!Ugg Boots
Everything dynamic and very positively!Ugg Boot
I think I will try to recommend this post to my friends and family, cuz it’s really helpful.Ugg Boots Sale
Just wanted to say great job with the blog, today is my first visit here and I’ve enjoyed reading your posts so farUggs
Thanks for article. Everytime like to read you.cheap ugg boots
Thanks for article. Everytime like to read you.uggs on sale
Only One word to characterize such a great post “WOW” that was a very interesting readugg boots uk
Post new comment
MoJo Comments: Send Us Your Feedback
We changed our spam software to better filter comments. Should you encounter any issues, please let us know.


