The Louisiana Purchase?

On Saturday, Harry Reid (D-Nev.), the Senate majority leader, finally rounded up the 60 votes he needed to begin the Senate's debate on the health care bill. They didn't come cheap. Ben Nelson (D-Neb.), killed a provision that would have stripped health insurers of their anti-trust exemptions. Mary Landrieu (D-La.) got hundreds of millions of dollars in Medicaid money for her home state. "Staffers on Capitol Hill were calling it the Louisiana Purchase," writes the Washington Post's Dana Milbank.
Landrieu is far from the first Senator to be accused of trading her vote for legislative concessions. But this incident is an interesting illustration of how Washington works. As Reid got closer to the votes he needed, each holdout's vote got more valuable. The majority leader needed to give Landrieu at least $100 million (closer to $300 million, she later claimed) in state handouts to earn her vote to begin debate on the health care bill. That's not all. A provision making anyone who has been in foster care for at least six months presumptively eligible for Medicaid until age 25 was added to the bill before it hit the floor. "The language was added at the Senator's urging," Landrieu's spokesman told Mother Jones in an email. That's not surprising: If Landrieu, who is married to an adoptee and has two adopted children, has a personal pet cause, it's foster care and adoption policies. "This is sort of a special issue for me," she told the Wall Street Journal earlier this month.
Edwin Park, a senior fellow at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, told me that it's hard to tell how much expanding Medicaid's coverage of former foster children might cost because the provision is included in the Congressional Budget Office's score of the cost of the larger expansion of Medicaid. Also, the measure doesn't kick in until 2019. But you can bet that when it does kick in, it'll cost something. None of this is to say that extra Medicaid money for Louisiana or expanded Medicaid coverage for former foster children is a bad idea. But the $100-million plus for Landrieu's priorities was just the cost of starting the debate on the bill. Reid will need 60 votes again before he can hold a vote on the final measure. What will those votes cost?
Advertisement
Advertisement
Comments
The solution was posted in another topic on this site...
Start stripping senators of their committee chairmanships. You like the Small Business Committee, Sen Landrieu? Vote party-line or else. The thugs have been using this effectively for years.
I guess the other way to look at it is that this isn't costing anything because the final bill will never get the 60 votes needed for a straight up and down vote and the bribes can be stripped during reconciliation anyway (that is if Reid has the balls to push through the bill in reconciliation. I'm not getting my hopes up).
Great, just what we need
Great, just what we need another prostitute in Washington. Can't any one of these idiots vote on a bill for its merits alone?
Wake up, please
The proposed Health Care Reform is over 2000 pages of gobbledygook and doublespeak. Why should anyone vote for it? It has opportunities for graft and fraud built into it, that you could fly 747's through. Again, why vote for that, when you can see it coming? Jon Vogel is sending out emails telling people that the Health Care Reform will SAVE $30 Billion---by cutting $30 Billion from Medicare. Excuse me, Dems, how is that saving anything? It's just transferring $30 billion from one massive, failed, government program to another massive and bound-to-fail government program. Keep on doing the same thing and you will get the same results. It's time to quit the same-old-answers-that-don't-work schtick. And if all these savings from "fraud, waste, and abuse" were so easy to come by, why isn't the government already cracking down on the fraud, waste, and abuse that have plagued Medicare since Jimmy Carter first came up with that phrase? Seriously, you folks in the Left need to wake up.
Unfortunately, the voters
Unfortunately, the voters won't remember that Landrieu got bought in 2009. What they will see is only the cash coming in. More people in Louisiana will be beholden to government largess, and they will vote to keep that largess. The cash infusion doesn't really buy Sen. Landrieu, it buys the votes of those that receive the largess. More bought votes by the democrat party, paying for those votes with the tax dollars you and I pay. Shameless no matter how you frame it!
The problem with Ponzi Schemes
The problem with Ponzi Schemes is that in the end, someone always pays big. That's why Ponzi schemes are illegal---unless you are the US government.
The Dems keep sponsoring these giveaway programs to buy votes and taxing everyone else to pay for all this free lunch largess until sooner or later, the pyramid inverts and collapses. And the Republicans keep forcing us into wars.
If the collapse comes, and I honestly don't see how we can avoid a major event, I hate to think of the children who will go hungry and the elderly who will go cold and without, because we did not control our politicians and demand accountability.
Post new comment
MoJo Comments: Send Us Your Feedback
We changed our spam software to better filter comments. Should you encounter any issues, please let us know.



