O'Keefe Might Have Been On To Something

| Fri Jan. 29, 2010 1:26 PM PST

James O'Keefe, the conservative activist of ACORN video fame who was arrested this week for his involvement in an alleged hare-brained scheme to tamper with Sen. Mary Landrieu's phone lines, posted a statement today claiming that the real aim of the caper was to prove that Landrieu's office wasn't answering constituents' calls. The explanation for why he, and three accomplices dressed up as phone company workers, allegedly entered a federal building under false pretenses has come off as laughable. Which is too bad. O'Keefe's suspicion about the Louisiana senator is a common one, particularly among Tea Party activists, and not just in Louisiana. Many of them are convinced that members of Congress are ignoring them, largely because the activists have a nearly impossible time getting any live person on the line in their offices.

Last month, I hung out with a group of activists from the Tea Party Patriots who were in DC trying to lobby the Senate against the health care bill. Mark Meckler, one of TPP's national coordinators, told me at the time that he was convinced that his senator, Barbara Boxer from California, had her staff take the phones and fax machine off the hook at night so that people couldn't leave messages or send faxes. He said he'd actually checked several times to see if he could get through to her office at 3 a.m., but says he never had any luck. That was one reason he camped out for hours in her office that day--to see if her staff ever answered the phone. I might chalk this up to conservative paranoia, except that when I tried calling Boxer's DC office just now, I had a pretty similar experience. When I pressed "3" to speak to a staff member, I was put on hold for a minute and then disconnected. Other reporters apparently have the same complaint about Boxer, and I've had similar experiences with other senators, most recently trying to get through the main line of the office of Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-OH). (His press secretary is still ignoring me.)

I suspect that the Tea Partiers are right: These aren't isolated incidents, which makes me wish that O'Keefe hadn't been such a bonehead and had actually, as he said, "used a different approach" to his investigation. A real expose on how little members of the Senate connect with constituents might have forced a few of them to at least staff up the phone lines. As it is, dealing with a Senate office is often worse than trying to get customer service from Comcast. No wonder the Tea Partiers are mad!

Advertisement

Advertisement

Stephanie Mencimer is a staff reporter in Mother Jones' Washington bureau. For more of her stories, click here.

Get Mother Jones by Email - Free. Like what you're reading? Get the best of MoJo three times a week.

Comments

So now someone is actually trying to excuse the crimes

Its very clear that a felony was committed by these scum bags who are an average 6-8 years older than our soldiers dying in afganistan for them , they chose not to serve their country and to instead try to attack it by claiming that thier crimes were journalism run amok, they claim thier listening device was not a listening device, and that the false representations were just them asking about the phones, why then did they try to gain access to the communications system of a federal facility, which had nothing to do with the senators office,?
send them away and let them plead guilty if they have the courage of their espoused convictions to do the time for their crimes, it's not a prank if it draws a FEDERAL CRIMINAL FELONY charge.

Hare-brained is right

He's been on the Left's hit-list ever since he exposed ACORN for the sleazy RICO-worthy racket it is. Now he's delivered himself into their hands, laid his head on the chopping-block, and handed them the axe.

My prayers are with you, James.

good article

I added your story to my article on O'Keefe. No conspiracy here O’Keefe wanted to out Senator Landrieu for not answering phones. Good job

http://www.examiner.com/x-27370-Columbia-Republican-Examiner~y2010m1d29-...

"Staff up" the phone lines?

"Staff up" the phone lines? So... in order to spend their valuable time listening and attempting to respond to unhinged and poorly informed rants about big government when there are lots of important things they could *really* be doing on behalf of their constituency, they should increase the size of their staffs?

Sound like a good idea, actually

Though it may seem that their time is too valuable to be wasted talking to mere constituents (for whom they have contempt akin to yours), it's those lowly constituents who put them into office, under the foolish and naive impression that those politicians would be working for THEM.

What with unemployment being what it is, hiring a few more people to answer the phones -- and making themselves more accessible to the serfs who gave them their cushy jobs -- doesn't seem unreasonable.

Nate, You're right. In fact,

Nate,

You're right. In fact, they know so much, and the signal to noise from their constituents is so great, that goddamn, I can't figure out why they listen to their constituents at all!

I am so glad we are led by these people. We're lucky in fact, and we should be thanking then for not answering our calls, just like you did!

Yet another reason for pubilc financing of campaigns

If campaigns were funded by the government and elected offiicials weren't out two or three days a week drumming up cash, maybe they would have more time to sit and answer phone calls. Phone calls from tax payers...the people providing the funds that would come from government funded campaigns.

Good for you Stephanie. I am

Good for you Stephanie.

I am a proud liberal, but I think this is one of the first MoJo blog posts I've ever read that harkens to MoJo as investigative journalism and not MoJo as more mediocre partisan hackery.

Not even a smile! How could

Not even a smile!

How could any journalist endorse such crackpot tactics! I assume the structural collapse of dinosaur journalism and the recession has prompted this cheering for O'Keefe and his pampered pal. Shades of Dustin Hoffman as Carl Bernstein getting past the secretary, eh? Are you feeling low for not being a spy?

I agree with many here, that this incident goes to the disagreement about what a congressperson is supposed to do: representative, or leader? O'Keefe and his Robin Hood pal are certainly provocateurs. But, they broke the law for nothing. It's a laughingstock, not political theater. It's not going to lead to campaign finance reform, or redistricting. It's not going to force people to think about government. It's a soundbite fit for thimble-witted journalists to fill their quotas and cynical couch potatoes.

The road to hell is paved

The road to hell is paved with good intentions. Looks like they're in real trouble and might end up in a bad place, but we have to see this played out in the courts and the media. For example, they may have been intent on causing damage without planting listening devices. Still a felony but not a really cool James Bond level felony. And I almost feel some sympathy for the idiots because I've often tried to contact politicians for help and I know they ignored my pleas for help. After all, they knew I had no money to donate to them and none to donate to their opponents, either. One of them even demanded I call ahead of time to make an appointment to make an appointment. In that case I had to leave a message on an answering device. It did not improve my opinion of that senator.

I've had phone conversations

I've had phone conversations with my representative before, but never with a senator. But being a person who likes to write instead of speak, I've had success with my senator through the patience of correspondence. I had a resonable complaint and I stuck to that even though I admit I would have liked to rant and rave just for the sake of ranting and raving. There is more than one way to look at this. But, being a cynical coucher, I also have to add this, I think it might have been from Mark Twain: "The best arguement against democracy is a thirty minute conversation with the average voter."

Constituents are from the

Constituents are from the senators' states, not teabaggers from all over the U.S. clogging up the phones with their "Obama is a: (choose one)
1) Socialist
2) Nazi
3) Terrorist
4) All of the above

bull.

Investigative Jounalism????

Puh-leeze. A couple of phone calls to a Senator's office do not investigative journalism make.

I call my Senators' offices weekly and always get through.

O'Keefe, et al., broke the law. Prosecute them to the fullest extent of the law. Period.

Post new comment

Alternately, you may login to or register an account
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <ul> <ol> <li> <blockquote>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

MoJo Comments: Send Us Your Feedback

We changed our spam software to better filter comments. Should you encounter any issues, please let us know.

Photo Essays

The chaos and humanity of war.
What becomes of Janesville, Wisconsin, now that GM's left town?
The other side of Gitmo.
American Holidays