«--Previous Post | Blog Index | Next Post--»
Every Good Government Proposal on One Bill
Larry Lessig launched "Change Congress" in the hopes of one day having a Congress filled with lawmakers who support four moves that ensure the purity of the governing process and protect our democracy:
1. Eliminating money from lobbyists and PACs.
2. Ending earmarks.
3. Creating greater transparency in Congress.
4. Ushering in publicly financed campaigns.
Good government groups have always sought broader reforms, however, and have always gone into greater detail. If you want to see what the entire good government platform looks like, check out the Transparency in Government Act 2008. It was created by the Sunlight Foundation and is thoroughly badass.
TGA08 (my nickname) goes beyond Lessig's four goals. It wants to put all FOIA responses online, for example, and has a host of measures to increase transparency in the executive branch. According to John Wonderlich, the Program Director at the Sunlight Foundation, TGA is more focused on information access than on process reform, meaning it doesn't advocate the elimination of earkmarks, as Lessig does, but does support making all information pertaining to earmarks public.
The Sunlight Foundation is inviting everyday folks to comment on the bill and all its many provisions. "We made a conscious decision to turn to the Internet community rather than turning to members of Congress first," says Wonderlich. "We think we'll end up with better legislation if it comes out of a community effort." One of the core ideas of Wonderlich's project is that if you give everyday citizens access to government (and legislation) you get better government (and better legislation).
Wonderlich says The Sunlight Foundation has no immediate plans to use an ally on Capitol Hill to introduce TGA08. Wouldn't it be revolutionary if a presidential candidate made something like this bill a key part of his or her platform, and then implemented even half of it after taking office?
Comments
Well it can't hurt to have another powerhouse like Lessig involved in the reform of government. No offense to Sunlight and the groups that have been working on this for a few years now, but where's the beef? If so much work is being done on this, why is the system not changing? We've had more $ in "pork" and earmarks last year and still bridges collapse, public education is toast and hospitals remain underfunded.
Change Congress also takes into account a grassroots effort. Its not about a small group of people changing the way things work in Washington as much as its about each person taking responsibility for their own member of Congress -- so, a larger group of citizens adopting reform efforts on a national effort
Regardless, the more the merrier I say. Kudos to Lessig for taking on corruption in government along with a host of other dedicated groups!
Here are my suggestions for change, by no means exhaustive. If we are to salvage this country we have to get serious. Fiddling with the political system as it is won't get us anywhere - we have to change the Constitution in significant ways and only the people can do it (no way can we depend on our cowardly congress). I believe that the most important two recommendations that I've listed are Term Limits for Congress and a fair, no exemption military draft. Please consider discussing all of them with friends and promoting those that appeal to you. Most of them would require a change to the doddering, old and justly venerated Constitution:
1. Transparency in government to include (a) declassification of ALL official government records five years after the date of their origin (exact, uncensored and unaltered duplicates might be filed, at the time of their origin, with a special archivist and made readily available to the public after the five year period has expired) and (b) immediate and unrestricted access to all files, records and offices of any federal department (when expressly authorized by the full House) by a standing committee of five House members composed of three from the majority party, two from the minority, all of whom have been sworn not to divulge sensitive information.
2. Elimination of the electoral college allowing presidential elections to be decided directly by a majority of the popular vote.
3. Restriction on the number of times that a person may hold federal elective office. I'd hold it to two terms, period, with one exception permitted - a person who has held federal elective office for two terms could subsequently occupy the office of president for two terms. (I'd prefer, though a single six year term for president, no re-election).
4. Revision of the system for electing Senators so that, in so far as possible or practical, Senators would represent all the people, fairly and equally (each Senator would ideally represent the same number of people), through election by national or regional, rather than state, constituencies. This might prove the most difficult change to bring about, but perhaps the most important. Alternatively, each state might retain its two senators as prescribed by Article V, but Senators would have weighted votes based on their state's population. If all else fails, the Senate could be relieved of all real power.
5. Elimination of the unconscionable (and growing) disparity in the distribution of wealth. This would require an aggressive, vigorous policy of progressive taxation and absolute limitations on inheritance.
6. Elimination of primary elections for national office with candidates to be nominated by their political parties.
7. Supreme Court nominees (maybe candidates for all Federal judgeships) to be proposed by the House, vetted by the President and approved by the Senate. For example, the House might be allowed to propose five candidates, the President to select two of the five, and the Senate to approve one of the two (or to reject both in which case the process would begin again). Both the President and the Senate might be required to act within a certain time frame.
8. Equal television time for all major party candidates for Federal elective office.
9. Elimination of special privileges (perks) and "gifts" for all members of Congress. For example, members would be required to get their health care just as any member of the public or the most humble government employee gets theirs. Also, no special clubs or spas for members, no cut-rate dining rooms, etc.
10. Federal regulation of funding for public education that would insure equitable distribution of funds nationwide based solely on student enrollment.
11. A loop-hole free, hard-nosed and effective campaign finance law. This might require that the Supreme Court overturn its previous free speech ruling ("the Supreme Court's constitutional equation of money with "speech" - the logic that's warped our campaign finance rules since the famous 1976 case of Buckley vs.. Valeo": Mathew Miller), or that congress enact an imaginative law to circumvent its noxious effects.
12. Opportunity for the public to decide directly, perhaps every seven or twelve years, whether or not they would like to convene a constitutional convention for the purpose of revising or amending the constitution. The question might be placed simultaneously on the ballots of each of the states and might require approval by two thirds majority of the national electorate (not the states) to carry.
13. An exemption-free draft for all able-bodied citizens. No exemption for members of congress or White House staff. No exemption for college students (grossly unfair and discriminatory). No exemption, period, except for health or disability.
14. Legalization and strict governmental control of the sale and consumption of drugs.
Sanford Russell
Posted by: Sanford Russell on 04/02/08 at 12:11 PM Respond
As far as I see it, more sunlight is the only thing that is going to counter act the epidemic of self interest in today's politics.
Posted by: R on 04/04/08 at 12:08 PM Respond
ARCHIVE
April 20, 2008 - April 26, 2008
April 13, 2008 - April 19, 2008
April 6, 2008 - April 12, 2008
March 30, 2008 - April 5, 2008
March 23, 2008 - March 29, 2008
March 16, 2008 - March 22, 2008
March 9, 2008 - March 15, 2008
February 24, 2008 - March 1, 2008
February 17, 2008 - February 23, 2008
February 10, 2008 - February 16, 2008
February 3, 2008 - February 9, 2008
January 27, 2008 - February 2, 2008
January 20, 2008 - January 26, 2008
January 13, 2008 - January 19, 2008
January 6, 2008 - January 12, 2008
December 30, 2007 - January 5, 2008
December 23, 2007 - December 29, 2007
December 16, 2007 - December 22, 2007
December 9, 2007 - December 15, 2007
December 2, 2007 - December 8, 2007
November 25, 2007 - December 1, 2007
November 18, 2007 - November 24, 2007
November 11, 2007 - November 17, 2007
November 4, 2007 - November 10, 2007
October 28, 2007 - November 3, 2007
October 21, 2007 - October 27, 2007
October 14, 2007 - October 20, 2007
October 7, 2007 - October 13, 2007
RECENT COMMENTS
John McCain's Top Priorities: Getting Your Vote, Questioning Obama on Iraq, and... Golf? (2)
Sandra Goode wrote:
so what if McCaine is a dbag who
flogs golf gear? better...
[more]
"Three Days in Rome," and Other Details from New Senate Intelligence Phase II Report (2)
Dave wrote:
I am not convinced that the presidency of G.W. Bush has ha...
[more]
John McCain: Family Man? (47)
Jim Carroll internet free press wrote:
WHY DOES JOHN McCAIN BELIEVE THAT IF A BANKER PAY 2% FOR M...
[more]
Desperate in NH: Fibbing About Obama and Iraq? (42)
robertsgt40 wrote:
Do you really think Obama is goig to"change" anything? No...
[more]
Are Whites Taking Over Historically Black Colleges? (37)
Forest Lady wrote:
Joyce from Marin, your boyfriend is doing a good job. Weed...
[more]
Obama at AIPAC (16)
Pete wrote:
Say no to Zionism. Say no to Racism. Obama is just like th...
[more]
McCain Adviser Phil Gramm in the News Again: Did His Bank Help Wealthy Clients Evade Taxes? (2)
Clay wrote:
As the Ship of Fools continues to sink, more and more of t...
[more]
Arab Street Turns Against Uncle Sam (55)
przepisy kulinarne wrote:
This is interesting article, I did not it think that it ye...
[more]
Fox News Isn't Even Trying Anymore (1)
Steven wrote:
This video really made me laugh even though it's really no...
[more]
Clinton Effectively Drops Out (12)
Kathy Giannini wrote:
What does "slated" mean exactly?...
[more]
Movable Type 3.33


Posted by: J on 04/01/08 at 2:53 AM Respond