MOTHER JONES BY E-MAIL

The Fate of the Ocean

News: Our oceans are under attack, and approaching a point of no return. Can we survive if the seas go silent?

March/April 2006 Issue


TOOLS

EmailE-mail article
PrintPrint article




BACKTALK

E-mail the editor





Google


RELATED ARTICLES

WE’RE IN FOR A WILD RIDE, say Oceanus’ 13-person crew, salts old and young, most of them Cape Codders with lifelong careers on the water. Consequently, many of the 12 members of the scientific team—oceanographers, science technicians, and graduate students, along with this observer—scatter across the ship’s three decks in the moments before we sail, seeking privacy for our last cell phone calls home, backs turned to the rain, shouting against the wind. At 177 feet and more than 1,000 tons, R/V (research vessel) Oceanus is the smallest ship in the long-range fleet of the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution on Cape Cod, Massachusetts, and I suspect there’s not one of us aboard this morning who doesn’t wish we were sailing on one of the larger vessels.

Bad weather at sea is exponentially worse than bad weather ashore. The liquid world reacts in a pyrotechnical way to blowing air, exploding into the marine equivalent of a firestorm at winds that onshore might only make you button your coat. We’re headed into a Force 9 (strong gale) on the 12-point Beaufort scale. Before we make landfall, one week hence, we’ll have dabbled in Force 10 (storm) and skirted Force 11 (violent storm) conditions. Force 12 is a hurricane.

Outside of Buzzards Bay, we’re slammed with 20-foot seas ripped white by wind and careening unpredictably on the shallow waters of the continental shelf. The swell is abeam of us, and Oceanus wallows with the corkscrew motion sailors despise. One by one, those of us not on watch disappear below to set the storm rails on our bunks, wedge our life jackets under the edges of our mattresses, climb in, wait, and hope for intestinal fortitude and good seamanship from Captain Lawrence Bearse’s crew on the bridge. The only way to avoid being flung from our bunks by the violent motion is to hold on and hug the wall, which is essentially the outer skin of the vessel. It’s a strangely intimate experience, below waterline, feeling the ship bowing and flexing against our backs, and absorbing into our bones the deafening thunder of steel as the largest waves drive Oceanus nearly to a shuddering stop before her single propeller fights back with the power of 3,000 horses. I’m torn between staying awake and worried in a fascinated kind of way, or falling into oblivious sleep.

A cold front from the north, fueled by the remnants of Tropical Storm Tammy, and Subtropical Depression 22 are merging and birthing a midlatitude cyclonic monster destined to grow 1,100 miles in diameter. Twenty inches of rain have already fallen over parts of New England, the region’s weightiest rain event since 1999’s Hurricane Floyd. A day earlier, en route to Woods Hole and stuck in Chicago by weather so bad it closed down Boston’s Logan Airport, I called Ruth Curry, the expedition’s chief scientist, to ask what she made of the forecast. “Science doesn’t stop for the weather,” was her cheery reply.

Concerns about weather are part of what’s sending us to sea in the first place. By studying the ocean’s chemistry, which affects currents and, in turn, weather, Curry hopes to better understand how we humans might be affecting the critical elements of our own life-support system. Data from physical oceanography, marine biology, meteorology, fisheries science, glaciology, and other disciplines reveal that the ocean, for which our planet should be named, is changing in every parameter, in all dimensions, in every way we know how to measure it.

The 25 years I’ve spent at sea filming nature documentaries have provided a brief yet definitive window into these changes. Oceanic problems once encountered on a local scale have gone pandemic, and these pandemics now merge to birth new monsters. Tinkering with the atmosphere, we change the ocean’s chemistry radically enough to threaten life on earth as we know it. Making tens of thousands of chemical compounds each year, we poison marine creatures who sponge up plastics and PCBs, becoming toxic waste dumps in the process. Carrying everything from nuclear waste to running shoes across the world ocean, shipping fleets spew as much greenhouse gases into the atmosphere as the entire profligate United States. Protecting strawberry farmers and their pesticide methyl bromide, we guarantee that the ozone hole will persist at least until 2065, threatening the larval life of the sea. Fishing harder, faster, and more ruthlessly than ever before, we drive large predatory fish toward global extinction, even though fish is the primary source of protein for one in six people on earth. Filling, dredging, and polluting the coastal nurseries of the sea, we decimate coral reefs and kelp forests, while fostering dead zones.

I’m alarmed by what I’m seeing. Although we carry the ocean within ourselves, in our blood and in our eyes, so that we essentially see through seawater, we appear blind to its fate. Many scientists speak only to each other and studiously avoid educating the press. The media seems unwilling to report environmental news, and caters to a public stalled by sloth, fear, or greed and generally confused by science. Overall, we seem unable to recognize that the proofs so many politicians demand already exist in the form of hindsight. Written into the long history of our planet, in one form or another, is the record of what is coming our way.



 

Post a Comment

Your Name: 

Your Comment: 
 
Please press "Submit" only once to avoid double-posting.
All HTML formatting is removed from comments.
Read the Mother Jones community rules here.

Comments:

How long do you it'll take before were at a point of no return?
Posted by:Melissa AlvarezJune 5, 2007 1:36:21 PMRespond ^
Thank you Julia Whitty for this very deep look into the Ocean, and the not so kind relationship we humans are so profoundly having on it. Your words are filled with wisdom to which we should all pay close attention to before it is to late.
Posted by:SashaJuly 17, 2007 5:40:33 PMRespond ^
What could be the last signs before life ends within Mother Sea ? What are the signs to watch for us who live and work ashore, especiallyfor us deep inside any continents? Life may well survive the Homo sapiens sapiens species. Yet I «pray» for a genetic mutation affecting the whole species, a miracle to have us learn not to polute and kill our only spaceship/home and all life that is connected and that is sustained by Grand Mother Earth, Grand father Sun, Mother Sea and Father Air . A miracle to have us be gardeners instead of suicidal abusers of our host, Grand mother Earth. Was'nt the Homo sapiens species a social animal, (like ants, thermites and bees) Yet survival of the strongest and /or the fittest seems to always bring the Homo sapiens and his developed mind, to use that tool more to eat up or ABUSE at hi$ profit the weakest link of the social chain than to support and reenforce it. Yet I believe we could think of our social chain of life as extending to all living beings ! We are not there yet Another thousand years ?...
Posted by:C C DUBUCAugust 11, 2007 5:08:17 PMRespond ^
Is this required reading for all our politicians and policy makers?
Posted by:Leslie ChristensenAugust 12, 2007 7:51:50 AMRespond ^
I'm sure that the fishing industry and its lobbyists can find experts that will dispute everything in this article.I'm afraid the only way humanity can learn any lessons will be the very hard way.
Posted by:Scott ParsonsAugust 12, 2007 3:42:04 PMRespond ^
How long do you it'll take before were at a point of no return? Posted by:Melissa Alvarez onJune 5, 2007 1:36:21 PM Mellisa, the answer to you question is simple. We're already there. Matt
Posted by:MattAugust 26, 2007 4:08:52 AMRespond ^
Unless the global energy consumption is reduced rapidly—by mid 2006—to levels below 60 exajoules (6E+19 joules) annually (this level is about 12.4 percent of global energy consumption in 2005), our studies show that the runaway positive feedback loops that are destroying Earth’s ecosystems including ozone holes, global heating, extreme climatic events, toxic pollution, resources depletion, war, unethical behavior, and disease pandemics would reach the point of no return and overwhelm our life support systems rendering most of our cities uninhabitable by as early as 2015, possibly earlier. Failure to rein back the global energy consumption to the levels below 60 exajoules annually by June 2006 would render the concept of sustainable management redundant (it seems highly unlikely that post industrial civilization would voluntarily sacrifice its perceived privileges and values in favor of sustaining life on Earth). MSRB is replacing its current program with a disaster rescue operation. http://msrb.wordpress.com/stop-burning-earth/
Posted by:MSRBSeptember 7, 2007 10:39:02 PMRespond ^
The MSRB Index of Human Impact on Nature (HIoN) currently stands at a terminally high level of 171.40 that is 71.4 percent higher than the planet could cope with resulting in the collapse of the population centers by as early as 2015, possibly earlier. http://msrb.wordpress.com/its-1100pm/
Posted by:MSRB -2September 7, 2007 10:41:32 PMRespond ^
Time for us all to think of all life on our planet as one being - LIFE - and for us to realize that we all live together, essentially in one house - one habitat - inter-related, interdependent, and that we all need to : stop breeding, since human overpopulation is the sole reason for the loss of quailty of life on Earth and for the massive and growing pollution (greening a few things won't help at all unles we all go vegan) and also - go vegan - the more people going vegan, the more chance we have for life to continue with any quality at all. Read this: http://environment.newscientis t.com/channel/earth/mg18825304 .800-its-better-to-green-your-diet-than-your-car.html
Posted by:Jake MooreSeptember 10, 2007 2:19:07 PMRespond ^
Great informative & heartfelt program by Julia Whitty. Along with the stark reality of the downfall of nature & our environment here are two thoughts that could be brought into the equation of saving our planet (of course there are many others also!) There are two vital changes for mankind to begin to address these huge problems. One is reduce our population. The second is to convert to vegan, vegetarian diet. I am vegan & know that it is a challenge, but the benefits & increased health are worth the perceived sacrifice. It is the ethic of "ahimsa" or non-violence toward all creatures that share our beautiful planet. It is good for us, the dear creatures & our environment. Thank you all for presenting this vital information. larryskanda@yahoo.com
Posted by:Larry GibsonOctober 31, 2007 9:12:36 AMRespond ^
Thank you for expanding my horizons on the wonderful oceans and what damage has been done by irresponibility, may we all wake up and smell the salty air before it is too late.
Posted by:Paul GrinderJanuary 3, 2008 3:16:39 PMRespond ^
Science has shown the success of no fish zones. These zones repopulate the rest of the ocean. Also, large fish need to be thrown back. They have healthier roe and produce exponentially more roe. By throwing these large healthy fish back we preserve a superior gene pool, produce more fish, and avoid the more polluted older fish as is seen from the contamination of the large and old blue fin tuna. The younger fish also taste better.
Posted by:skarpknutJanuary 27, 2008 11:03:38 PMRespond ^
I had a little casa on the Baja just south of San Felipe Mexico. In the early '80s The brilliant Government of Mexico, for unknown monies, let the Japanese come into these pristine waters with processing ships and trawlers, and within six months you couldn't catch a decent mess of fish. The local Mexican fisherman would go out in their boats to their fishing grounds they had fished for generations and return with only a minuscule remnant of what they had been harvesting for decades. World focus on the endangered oceans is desperately needed but it will be a monumental task to get all the parties in agreement
Posted by:Gary HansonJanuary 29, 2008 2:49:38 PMRespond ^
Oceans need to be stop being polluted!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by:Breanna HauseFebruary 6, 2008 8:04:37 AMRespond ^
why are we not doingany thing to help our oceans
Posted by:kassiApril 25, 2008 10:16:46 AMRespond ^
we aren't doing anything because our goverment sucks
Posted by:loriApril 25, 2008 10:18:04 AMRespond ^
it's time to make a deal! since nonbiodegradable plastic trash has done thousands of times more damage to ocean life than drilling ever has allow oil drilling in exchange for a nonbiodegradeable plastics ban.all consumer disposables, razors,cutlery, grocery bags should be SERIOUSLY biodegradeable. corn based "biocompatable" plastics would be a much better way to to buy the farm vote than ethanol.
Posted by:Gburnett23@aol.comJuly 27, 2008 2:10:11 PMRespond ^

Jail.org - Inmate Search
Criminal records, instant public records & people search & current court records. www.jail.org

U.S. Public Records Search
Search County & State Court Records, Criminal records, Vital and Adoption Records www.PublicRecordsInfo.com

Records.com - People Search
Public Records and Background Checks. Instantly Search Criminal Records, Addresses and Court Records www.Records.com

Court Records & County Records
Find Instant Public Records, Criminal Records as Well as County Property Records Search. www.PublicRecordsIndex.com

















bookIN PRINT

CLICK HERE
for more great reading

headphones IN TUNE
New music every issue

CLICK TO LISTEN


This article has been made possible by the Foundation for National Progress, the Investigative Fund of Mother Jones, and gifts from generous readers like you.

© 2006 The Foundation for National Progress

About Us   Support Us   Advertise   Ad Policy   Privacy Policy   Contact Us   Subscribe   RSS