"2nd Tour, Hope I Don't Die"

The chaos and humanity of war.

2006, Baghdad, Iraq

Cpt. Kearns, a nurse in the 10th Combat Support Hospital, takes a moment for himself after the death of a soldier in the Baghdad ER. The hospital staff did their best to objectify their own and their patients' suffering. Their humor was dark and their expressions often flat and distant when they treated patients. The worst casualties were given nicknames. One soldier melted by fire from an IED blast was called "Goo Man." But certain casualties would hit home, especially injured children. Some staff resorted to using painkillers and other drugs.

From Peter van Agtmael's book, 2nd Tour, Hope I Don't Die (2009, Photolucida).

This is how I saw America's wars from January 2006 until December of 2008. I wanted to make pictures that reflected my complex and often contradictory experiences, where the line was continuously blurred between perpetrator and victim, between hero and villain. In time, the labels that had heretofore defined my perceptions of the world became meaningless.

If I found any truth in war, I found that in the end everyone has their own truth.

Peter van Agtmael

 

Magnum photographer Peter van Agtmael followed the conflicts in Afghanistan and Iraq as an embedded photojournalist from 2006 to 2008. Sure, his unflinching work captures the brutality, chaos, and carnage of war. But van Agtmael's photos also deliver the extreme tedium, the moments of tranquility, the humanity, and the utter confusion—in ways that stir those of us here, safely at home.

That's hard to do. The repetition of images from these wars, year after year, has numbed many of us to the story. Our eyes reflexively glaze over when we see photos of people buried under the camo helmets, packs, guns, and sunglasses.

In his book, 2nd Tour, Hope I Don't Die, van Agtmael's photos crack the jaded glaze we've all developed. Part of what mezmerizes are the captions and other written parts of the book. Here, van Agtmael connects the reader to the place before/during/after the shutter closed. What led up to a bloodied boy against a wall scowling at the camera? What happened to the soldier in the ER, staring directly through the camera at you, the viewer? It's this dimension of backstory that makes van Agtmael's work so exceptional. That, and his commitment to to following the story back to the United States, where it continues.

Van Agtmael won the prestigious Photolucida Critical Mass Award in 2008 for this work. 2nd Tour, Hope I Don't Die is the end result of that award.  –Mark Murrmann

Advertisement

Advertisement

Get Mother Jones by Email - Free. Like what you're reading? Get the best of MoJo three times a week.

Comments

The Myth of Peaceful Jesus -

The Myth of Peaceful Jesus - Christianity

HO 13:16 “They shall fall by the sword: their infants shall be dashed in pieces, and their women with child shall be ripped up.

MK 16:17-18 A believer can handle snakes or drink poison and not experience any harm.
(Note: Many unfortunate believers have died as a result of handling snakes and drinking poison. This kind of assertion negates the Bible as a useful guidebook for life.)

JESUS SAID IN LUKE: 19:27 But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me.

JESUS SAID IN MATTHEW:10:34 Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword.

MT 10:21 “… the brother shall deliver up his brother to death, and the father his child, … children shall rise up against their parents, and cause them to be put to death.”

MT 10:35-36 “For I have come to turn a man against his father, a daughter against her mother, a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law a man’s enemies will be the members of his own family.”

Note: In the Bible, words having to do with killing significantly outnumber words having to do with love.

Disingenuous at best

Quoting these passages is disingenuous at best.

Hosea is in the Old Testament, believed to have been written c.720-750 BC. It has nothing to do with Jesus.

Mk 16:17-18 is from the second ending of Mark, tacked on after the book was written; my Bible footnotes it as being "of dubious authority". Besides, if you want to test God, try moving a mountain sometime, it's safer.

Luke 19:27 is a complete non sequitur; it doesn't connect to the passage before or after. It looks like either a scribal insertion or a badly garbled copyist error.

Matthew 10:34 refers to cutting family ties, not bloodshed. Look at the context.

Matthew 10:21 is part of a passage in which Jesus says that his followers should expect persecution from pagans. People will betray their families to the authorities. He's not in favor of it.

Matthew 10:35-36 is a quotation from Micah (Old Testament). Note that it follows MT 10:34 directly. It says that families will be split between those who believe Jesus and those who don't.

You can prove anything by misquoting the Bible. By straining the passages so hard, you disprove your case: That is, if you had proof in the New Testament, you'd simply cite the proof instead of twisting the words.

Disingenuous at best?

There you go again, blaming the Jews. When are you Christianists going to quit cherry picking your own bible?

Regardless, it is a quite frightful mixture of hate and evil, isn't it? How many peaceful people die in the bible? Killed in homage to a vengeful and idiosyncratic god who, all religions considered, is the worst of the lot.

Why you waste what precious little life you have fiddling with this rot is beyond me.

You're quoting

You're quoting fiction...idiot.

Out of Context

Context is SLIGHTLY important in regards to these verses, which you have provided none of. The equivalent of your statements is analogous to listening to Michael Moore or Anne Coulter. Lack of context is the reason why people literally committed suicide during Orson Welles' War of the Worlds radio broadcast -- they didn't know it was fiction.

HO is a book about the end times. MK 16:17-18 is an example of things you can do by faith. The Bible also says you can move mountains by faith. Luke 19:27 is a parable which you took entirely out of context, in which Jesus does not literally mean "slay them in my presence" because it's a parable (you might want to research what a parable is). Mathew 10:34 you have also taken out of context. Jesus was a radical figure, he did not come to bring peace, yet ironically, the only people he ever physically touched in anger were those who were using God's temple as a marketplace, when He drove them out. That verse is absolutely true. Anyone claiming to be the Son of God and doing the things Jesus did, such as performing miracles, healing people, etc, is by nature a radical figure, and surely will stir controversy.

Mathew 10:21 is also out of context as that specific verse is prophecy about events and circumstances which will occur during the end times. In Mathew 10:35-36, "setting a man against his father," etc, does not mean in a violent manner, as you seem to interpret it. A person can be "set" against another person in any number of ways and studying the context, and the original Greek text is where you will find the true meaning.

People take religious texts out of context all the time, including the Quran. I encourage you to take the higher road and not be one of those people.

Awakening The suppression

Awakening

The suppression of truth has long been among the highest priorities for the upper echelons of power and authority. For a minority elite that clings to power by the manipulation of the masses using an omnipresent cocktail of lies, deception, mass-produced ignorance and ingrained propaganda, the destruction of truth is an essential method of control. It is a formula that has worked to unmitigated success for the elite throughout history. Those holding the levers of power and control understand, better than most, that the dissemination of truths to a blind majority could spell the end of their reign.

I do agree that all

I do agree that all institutions become corrupt, sooner or later, and that includes religious hierarchies.

I also agree that there are cases of an institution preferring to keep its followers in ignorance. For instance, when the Bible was available only in Latin, and only priests could read Latin, the priests could cherry-pick passages of the Bible when they were instructing the laity, and even pick bits out of context or lie about the context.

"2nd Tour, Hope I Don't Die"

For all who don't think the USA is the No.1 Christian nation.

Q. 1 . Which country holds the World's record for being bombed the most ? ? ? ? ?

Q. 2 Did America become more Christian after WWII or after all the bombing and killing in Vietnam or is it after Iraq ? ? ?

Answers : Q. 1. The most bombed country in the World since Christianity arrived is Laos but it was a "secret" war.
http://tinyurl.com/57ymzp

Remember ---" The aim of military training is not just to prepare men for battle, but to make them long for it" Louis Simpson.

Onward Christian Soldiers Jesus loves you.

We may be a "Christian

We may be a "Christian Nation" today, but our founding fathers were not Christian nor was it their intent to become one. Our country has been hijacked by this nonsense by help from the Federal Gov't in the way of the NPO's that are tax free to push their outlandish agendas - which by the way is illegal. Let's make the South similar to Israel Zionism, but only for Christians - build a wall to contain them and forget about them.

Founding Fathers not Christian?

Baloney. They certainly were.

Such GREAT journalism....?

I think I'd be a lot more impressed with the quality and content of journalism regarding the war, if it focused more on what seem to be the core driving forces of the war, drugs, and oil.

It's been reported that one of the biggest crops in Afghanistan is...opium poppies. Why grow those? Because you can make heroin out of them. Heroin, which is later sold in Europe, and in the United States.

Iraq, as we know, is a nation that is reputed to be wealthy beyond dreams, basically, due to large proven oil reserves. And, we, as a country, are most definitely a bunch of oil junkies, whether we realize it or not. More to the point, our industries, and our military itself, are oil junkies. The rest of us are more or less along for the ride, but since we're car-dependent, we're oil dependent, and the 'pushers' are people like the domestic oil companies, who are realizing a pretty solid street price for their product, as well as the overseas providers, OPEC, and so forth.

I think rather than shooting up the place, which is sort of exciting, but also kind of counterproductive, we should be looking more at expending our tax revenues in directions that'll basically immunize the United States, and hence, other countries, from the deleterious influence of such types of business. Opium's been around for a long, long time, and China's been dealing with it for about that long, because China's a pretty old country, and they've probably written volumes about it. Time for the reading circle, there. Another thing China's had for a while have been bicycles, which are catching on in popularity here in the US, due to our oil habit, which is something that threatens to just about bankrupt this country. Yes, it's that bad.

In other words, conservation, education, synfuels and medical research are sort of the marching orders for the day, as well as good oversight of all aspects of our military abroad, to ensure we aren't just sort of emulating the British empire there.

That's another good topic, for another piece, empire-building. We've got domestic empire builders, with ambitions overseas, and no reservations about closing down US companies, boxing them up in shipping containers, and carting them off to the middle east. Laws tend to be somewhat different in asian countries, and more and more people are moving in that general direction, apparently. This isn't necessarily bad, but it is a trend worthy of note, because modernization also tends to carry with it the foundation for education, and knowledge is power in dealing with various forms of evil, including drugs, both production and distribution, as well as dependency, and reliance on outmoded forms of energy that results in monies being deposited into the hands of bad actors around the world.

So, the fight isn't limited to 'joe' in the trenches, so to speak. The larger fight is against the fall of night, so to speak, against the capacity of entities 'round the world to perpetrate various nefarious and underhanded forms of commerce with intentions unclear, but likely related to some type of criminal activity, and government is sort of a nasty fact of life that's been with us for centuries, and isn't really likely to go away anytime soon, and right now, our government is trying to bring civilization to remote parts of the world at great peril and expense. With any luck at all, it won't all be in vain, and there'll be some tangible benefit from it to the peoples of those countries, as well as here at home. But, like the man said, the road to the Hot Place is paved with good intentions, and if we aren't careful, we could end up in the poorhouse or worse, and by all accounts, we've got one foot in the door as it is. Sooo...stay tuned for the next exciting chapter...
Klaatu marachas necktie

The people of these United

The people of these United States are being greatly wronged. They have been driven from their employments. They have been dispossessed from their homes. They have been evicted from their rented quarters. They have lost their children. They have been left to suffer and die for lack of shelter, food, clothing and medicine.

http://www.zcommunications.org/zspace/noamchomsky

What the USA is doing in

What the USA is doing in Iraq and Afg. is not a "war" in the traditional sense, since there is nothing to be won. We are desperatly trying to project military police power to influence local politics. No different then the UN should be doing if it were not poorly constructed. The United States has decided both WW1 and WW2. It can not so easily escape being a super-power and the only VIABLE police in the world. The possible solutions are all very imperfect. Before the readrs misunderstand, I do not agree that our military power has been properly utilized. These actions haver become for-profit ventures by powerful defense suppliers. We therefore are olny slightly more functional then the UN. Very,very tragic.
But its not so simple just to say that "war is bad". Tyranny is also bad. The image that sticks in my mind is a video of Saddam speaking before a group of Baath party loyalists. While he is speaking, goon squads are grabbing inner-party members, dragging them outside and then unmistakable gunshots are herd. What is bersek about the scene is that one after the other, the people being selected for death continue applauding Saddam WHILE THEY ARE BING DRAGGED OUTSIDE TO DIE.
As for the poster who made the point that Christianity is not peaceful:
It is peaceful if strictly observed, which almost no Christains actually do. The few quotes provided are insufficient to overwhelm the whaterfall of quotes not listed, which depict the faith as generally forgiving, tolerant and docile. Plus, the few quotes listed are outr of context. For example, to the Jews of the first century-CE (including Jesus) the "Kingdom of God" had a specific meaning. They believed that God's power would project on earth (like in Moses' day) to rid the world of evil. Thus, the supernatural would do the battle and the early "Christians" needed not lift a sword. Only a spiritual one was required and that is what is being referenced.
Plus,what has survived as N.T. is a Roman sanitized version of the original Aramaic scripts. Given the emmense brutality of the Romans, it is miraculous that the N.T. is not 1000 times more war-mongering.

The NT was written in

The NT was written in Greek... not Aramaic, or Latin, or anything Roman Sanitized...

Endless War

Buddy
Let's see: The Revolutionary War, The War of 1812, The French and Indian War, The Civil War, The Mexican War, The Genocidal War Against Native Indians, The Spanish American War, The Filipino War of Independence, WW1, WW2, The Korean War (Orwelian New Speak 'Police Action'), The Vietnam War, Somalia, Bosnia, Lebenan, Grenada, The Cold War, The War on Terror, The First Gulf War, The Second Gulf War, The War in Afganistan, There's no doubt a few I might have missed, but the list makes its own point.
I, for one, will never believe our vast military presence in The Middle East has anything to do with terrorism, nation building, Al Quida or quaint ideas about democracy. It is all about the OIL, The Whole OIL and NOTHING but the OIL!
Someone mentioned to me several months ago that even BEFORE the First Gulf War the money that we were spending to maintain a huge military presence in the Gulf Region exceeds the net value of the OIL we import from that region.
The 9/11 murderers were from Saudi Arabia. They learned their astonishing hatred for the west from Saudi Mullas preaching hate in the Mosques of that country. So, we invade Iraq. Sounds logical to me: why incinerate Saudia Arabia before we squeeze the last drop of OIL from there.
Even George W., whether you like him or not, told the nation during an address before both houses that America is dangerously dependant on foreign OIL well duh.
Americans have been dining on ridiculously under-priced gas for many decades. European countries, along with Canada and a few others, have been paying prices more commensurate with the true value of the commodity.
In my opinion the LAST thing we need here in America is more OIL. Quadrupling the fed tax on gas would instantaneously drive green energy investment here at home. Political Suicide, but we're running out of time and money to finance the wars we're fighting to enforce our gluttony for a substance that is killing the planet and everyone on it. We are at a momentous turning point in our OIL-DRIVEN culture. It's just flat out not working.
Another thing, the wars I opened this post with gave me pause; it seems to me that every single generation of our youth have had their very own war to fight and die in.
America, I'm told, spends nearly as much money on the military than nearly EVERY OTHER NATION ON EARTH COMBINED. Think about that for a moment and see if it gives you a similar disquieting feeling.
Is Israel our 51st. state now? Perhaps some of you agree with me that we need to STOP our foreign adventurisms. No wonder a Billion Muslims hate us. Maybe we Americans would feel the same way if our country was occupied by invaders to help us figure out how to run our country. Meanwhile the aerial drones are raining down Hellfire missiles indiscriminately on combatants and civilians alike; people who want nothing more than to live in peace.
For the budget busting trillions of dollars we've poured down the toilet trying to kill people we could have given every Muslim on Earth a million dollars, or spent these gargantuan sums of money on us, the ordinary American who mainly wants what most people want: nutricious food, safety, universal health care, education and a better life for our kids.
It appears to me that our country is continually either fighting a war (or 2 or3) or making preparations for the next war our youth will be fighting in.
Sad Actually

You're quoting

You're quoting fiction...idiot.

Post new comment

Alternately, you may login to or register an account
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <ul> <ol> <li> <blockquote>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

MoJo Comments: Send Us Your Feedback

We changed our spam software to better filter comments. Should you encounter any issues, please let us know.

Photo Essays

The chaos and humanity of war.
The craftspeople and musicians of Appalachia.
A selection of '70s ads depicting African-Americans.
As climate change melts the permafrost, native villages slip into the sea, taking a way of life with them.