Interview with Bill Wasik: Senior Editor of Harper's and Creator of Flash Mobs
Interview with Bill Wasik: Senior editor of Harper's and creator of flash mobs
Mother Jones: What was the evolution of the flash mob?
Bill Wasik: Before there was anything called flash mobs, there were the protests in the Philippines where the participants used text messaging to coordinate. That preceded flash mobs. There are some semantic issues with what exactly flash mobs are. The way that I conceived of them, they were just 10 minutes or less and they were completely absurd. When people ask me "What do you think the political potential of flash mobs to be?" I say, "I don't really think that there is one." That said, using cell phones to coordinate protests has allowed for decentralization, for people to organize.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Whenever I hear talk about using flash mobs for political purposes, my first thought is that that person doesn't really know what they're talking about. The people who understand the technology and the generation that they're talking about know that flash mobs were a little absurdist blip in a whole universe of social networking technologies or phenomena that do have the power to be very revolutionary. You could use flash mob as a metaphor for some of the ways in which the netroots will leverage the power of all of this collaborative energy and all of these people in remote locations and have them come together on a single project. A flash mob is an interesting metaphor and insofar as it's being used as a metaphor I have no problem with that.
MJ: What do you think about the idea that technology is changing the way we do politics?
BW: A lot of techno-utopian types —the kind of people who would crow about Politics 2.0-type stuff —they have a hammer, but they don't really know what their nail is. To me, the innovation of the netroots really has nothing to do with the Internet and has everything to do with the way they're forging an aggressive vision of liberal politics that is rightly confrontational on the war and on economic issues. I think that, yeah, there's a hammer and it's called social networking. It's the way in which the Internet allows people to come together in a virtual way. But it's a platform that anybody can use, and the question is, what are we going to use it for? That brings us right back to Politics 1.0. My feeling about a lot of this stuff is, yeah, it's cool, but it's a sideshow. It's not the main show.
More Interviews << >> Politics 2.0 Index
Comments
In an environmentally conscious Chinese island city called Xiamen, the people used cell phones to emerge in impromptu demonstrations against construction of a huge chemical plant, and they have won an indefinite postponement from the government.
Cell phones are a specific simple extension of human connectedness into the streets and every corner of the establishment and the jungle. It will grow as a form of short term and long term security, and more, for the masses of expoloited persons and groups everywhere in the world over the decades ahead, especially in combination to people's Internet efforts at true story-telling and other educational forms.
LARRY NIVEN invented "Flash Mobs" !!!!!!
I have some questions about
I have some questions about flashmobs.
How do you think technology has made flashmobs easier to organize.
How do you think cops are coping with the use of technology by mobs, and are they using it themselves to stop people from organizing?
Who do you think has the upper hand, cops or protesters and why?
How do you get people to join flashmobs, and how do you know if the request for a mob is legit and not random.
Post new comment
MoJo Comments: Send Us Your Feedback
We changed our spam software to better filter comments. Should you encounter any issues, please let us know.



