A Washington Power Shift

climate-protest-400x300.jpg

Twelve thousand activists hit the capital to demand action on climate change.

Mon Mar. 2, 2009 7:01 AM PST

Every once in a while, this activism stuff is easy—you gear yourself up to push hard on a door, and the door turns out to be unlocked.

For months we’ve been gathering people from around the country for a big protest Monday—the first mass civil disobedience action about global warming in the nation’s history. Thousands are headed to Washington, to block the streets around the coal-fired power plant owned by the US Congress that powers Capitol Hill. It’s the perfect symbol of how dirty coal is: for those who have to breathe the DC air, for those who have to live by the scalped mountains of West Virginia and Kentucky, and for those who happen to live on a rapidly heating planet.

And now it’s the symbol of something else: how easy it would be to change.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Late last week, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid released a letter to the Architect of the Capitol, which is what they call the guy who runs the physical plant. It told him to figure out how to switch the plant over to natural gas. Just like that.

It wasn’t just the demonstration they feared--it was also the 12,000 young people now flooding in to Washington for Powershift ’09. (I’m writing this from the city’s convention center, surrounded by college kids busy networking, sign-making, and otherwise demonstrating what a movement looks like). Pelosi had promised to speak to the throng, and she was smart enough to figure out one thing that would be on their minds--she’ll get a well-deserved cheer when she appears. (UPDATE: Due to weather conditions in Washington, Pelosi canceled her appearance at the Monday rally.)

And not just for closing down the power plant, but for energizing the anti-coal movement with a quick and sweet victory. We’ll still be out there on Monday risking arrest, but it will be partly a victory bash. And partly a reminder that when you push on doors they swing open--sometimes even before you push.

It’s not usually this simple. But we’ll take it. (On Sunday, The Washington Post did report that the Architect of the Capitol has estimated that converting the power plant will cost $7.78 million and that this office did not know how quickly it could be done; congressional Republicans are asking the architect to determine if the plant could continue to burn coal but more cleanly.)

Meanwhile, we’ve had an interesting weekend here in DC. The cable news channels have been focused on covering CPAC, the conservative political action conference at the Shoreham Hotel. And sure, it’s kind of fun—the retreat of the dominant political ideology for the last three decades back into its cave, with the puffy figure of Rush Limbaugh still bellowing. But it’s also the past. The future—largely uncovered, but endlessly more exciting—was just a few blocks away, in and around Washington’s convention center. It’s been an activist heaven the last three days—a collection of incredibly talented people, most of them young, busy figuring out how to make the next few decades actually work.

Twelve thousand is a large number—I don’t know the last time in America that 12,000 activists gathered for anything. Much less anything as well-organized and determined as this. Panel after panel has covered everything from the efforts by 1sky.org to find a precinct captain for climate change in every corner of America to our campaign at 350.org to make October 24 the biggest single day of global protest ever. At night the big name entertainment (Santigold!) has mixed with the big name speakers: Van Jones, new EPA head Lisa Jackson, Interior Secretary Ken Salazar. It is—I can testify personally—something of a trip to talk to 12,000 people at a time.

Powershift was big when it started in 2007—6,000 kids gathered at the University of Maryland—but its doubling in size reflects the fact that the Obama campaign was no fluke. Young people really are ready to lead the way, which is a good thing since we have to clear so much wreckage from the last few decades. Jessy Tolkan and Billy Parish—and a crew of dozens and dozens of other young activists—have orchestrated this growing wave for years now, and managed to keep it simultaneously tough and yet open to reality. These kids are not devoted to cultural revolution—they’re busy figuring out how to use Twitter and Facebook to carry out the very real tasks of accelerating the switch in our energy system.

But everyone’s pretty brave, too. Across the street from the Convention Center, in a warren of converted warehouses, people were busy preparing for Monday’s protest. Many of the young people here are facing a tough job market—and so they listened soberly as an incredibly level-headed Greenpeace lawyer explains the ins and outs of being arrested. No one knows what the police will do, so it’s hard to gauge the exact risk. But suffice it to say, in the winter of 2009 it takes courage to risk an arrest record.

To keep that courage flowing, teams of artists next door were busy knocking out signs and banners—and also neckties, because the organizers have made it clear from the start that they hope protesters will turn out “dressed to impress.” Not just because they’ll seem “respectable.” But because it will remind anyone who’s looking on that the real radicals are those determined to keep pouring carbon into the atmosphere. The real radicals have been at the Shoreham cheering Rush Limbaugh. It’s odd to think of people collecting bail money and painting placards as the responsible middle, but as we move into the new post-Reagan world that’s how it works.

Bill McKibben, a contributing writer to Mother Jones and a scholar-in-residence at Middlebury College, is the co-founder of 350.org. His forthcoming book is called Eaarth: Making a Life in a Tough New World. For more of his stories, click here.

Get Mother Jones by Email - Free. Like what you're reading? Get the best of MoJo three times a week.

Comments

12 thousand?

"can't remember the last time 12,000 activists gathered for anything" every year since the war broke out, every major city has had large demonstrations against the occupation of iraq. i've personally been to six or seven anti-war and anti-capitalist protests in DC that's been in the several hundred thousan ranged. the RNC in NYC had a million people, a MILLION. the March for Woman's Lives also had millions. So if you're just now getting involved, great, we need to do everything we can to shut down this technological industrialist nightmare of an economic system. But petty liberals campaigning for Obama ain't gonna be doing nothing. We gotta take direct action

What a disservice.....

Global average temperatures going down since 1998. Mann's "hockey stick" curve PROVEN fraudulent. Al Gore removing it from his presentations now that it's been proven a fraud. EU Kyoto signatories failing to meet their CO2 emissions reduction targets - and covered emissions actually increasing among those signatories. More legitimate climate/atmospheric scientists signed the Oregon Petition than real scientists concur with the IPCC - by more than an order of magnitude. Global economies in free fall. After 25 years of intense subsidies, renewables make up 1% of our energy supply. Ethanol turns out to have no real net CO2 savings, takes as much energy to create as it saves, wastes huge volumes of water, and drove up the price of wheat and corn drastically in '07 & '08, sparking food riots in the developing world. I'm glad these "young activitsts" are "leading the way", but they know not what they do, what the real science says on this issue, and the realities of energy supply and demand and the technological limitations of alternatives. Those of you who voted for PBO, and who advocate for CO2 emissions reductions, Kyoto (and its progeny), and who thus further wreck our economy will be held accountable. Carbonicus and hundreds of thousands of pragmatic environmentalists who understand the science and the cost/benefit analysis around these "young activists" preferred alternatives will make sure that you watermelons (green on the outside and socialist red on the inside) are called out as having supported this b.s. To all "young activists": has anyone explained to you that if every nation on earth ratified and implemented Kyoto (and whatever its progeny turns out to be in Copenhagen this December), that it would make a difference in global averaged surface temperature in the year 2100 of approx. .15 -.20 degrees Celsius, at a cost of 2-4% of GDP (which turns out to be hundreds of billions ANNUALLY through about 2025, then tens of trillions ANNUALLY thereafter)? I say, take these "young activists" and require them to live free of ALL fossil fuels for one year. During this time, expose them to the scientific views of Lindzen, Christy, Spencer, Singer, Seitz, Soon, Baliunas, etal and to the economic analysis of Nordhaus and Tol, and to the analysis of Lomborg relative to misallocation of economic resources toward a pseudo-problem at the expense of real, pressing environmental problems. And if they don't get it after this year, use them all as biofuels.

Good Article

Hey, it was good to hear of the activism going on. I am tired of Beavis & Butthead type of environmental discourse. Keep up the good work! Sorry I couldn't make it this time. http://blogdredd.blogspot.com/2009/02/inhofe-beavis-butthead-need-waders...

"350 OR BUST" IS NOT LOOKING GOOD AT ALL

Bill, I greatly respect your activism and thank you for your efforts to “Fight Like Hell For The Living” in the spirit of Mother Jones. But the biggest problem is our scientific establishment that hasn’t come up with any feasible long-term clean energy solutions after over half a century of R&D. So the hideous consequence that we are now experiencing is that we are in a race to prevent exceeding tipping points while nothing significant, relative to orders of magnitude required, has been done to produce practical stabilization wedges to get the job done as we zoom past your “350 Or Bust” goal. The fact is that unless President Obama can balance the equation, as suggested in your National Geographic essay “Carbon’s New Math” while we are an economic depression mode it will take a miracle to overcome the current exponential increases in CO2 emissions before Busting. And it doesn’t help that one of the poster boys for scientific failure is Secretary Chu who comes from a welfare culture that has failed for far too long. His latest ongoing failure is his LLNL National Ignition Facility which is still not doing anything in spite of exceeding $3.5 Billion, more than triple the original budget, plus seven years overdue after 12 years of construction and counting, proving they still have no sense of urgency to “Fight Like Hell For The Living.” No wonder evolutionary biologists like UGA’s Mike Arnold say things like “We’re in the middle of an enormous mass extinction” that is “human mediated” and while “some kind of life will persist, adapt, evolve --- It just might not be us.”

Activism - or just fear of the inevibable end of the piss-ant

Are all these people nuts? What arrogance....the thought that a piss-ant species like man can change a planet. And it's typical of the faith-based belief crowd....memorize the sound bites and ignore any credible evidence. Al Gore is just another profiteer trying to convince to part with our money so he can leap up to the billionaire floor his followers, who aren't waiting for Jesus anymore cuz Al is here, just follow him around like little ignorant puppies, drooling all over the sidewalk, hoping that he might pat them on the head for being nice little obedient servants. Face it......the earth is going to go it's own way regardless of man's input. Even if the Global Warmng "crisis" was real, you couldn't do anything about anyway. We're all going to be compost soon, so relax.

"Global Warming" demonstrators frozen out

A cold winter storm dampened the warming message. Only 2500 showed up. I wonder if all these smart people were being sent a message today... large snowstorm and cold snap hit the East Coast. In addition, one of the chief politicians who is preying on these peoples' passion, Nancy Pelosi, was unable to attend the festivities due her flight being cancelled. The flight in a fossil fuel burning jet. "House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who called on the architect of the Capitol to stop burning coal at the power plant last week, cancelled her appearance at the rally because her flight to Washington was cancelled." http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/03/02/shiver-global-warming-protest... Can we just call it what it is... hypocrisy on the part of those that create a boogey man and then live a life-style that contradicts what they say, Al Gore included. Can we just admit that all these feel-good demonstrations only forestall real progress on non-polluting sources of electricity, sources that are proven and ready to provide 24/7 power.

are trolls amusing or annoying

Are the willfully ignorant trolls hanging out here annoying or amusing? You have to laugh at someone who thinks they'll refute science by posting links to articles on Fox News. I suppose it goes with thinking a snowy day refutes climate change. When we're don laughing though, we have to wonder at people who refuse to learn anything. http://www.ravensblog.net

Response to Eric

Eric I am not a troll hanging out… my name is clearly identified and I comment here in MJ often on matters of energy and public policy. Feel free to address me by name in the future. Regarding your response…if you re-read my comments you will see I was pointing out the irony of a late winter snow-storm freezing out a “global warming” organization’s demonstration. Did I say that “global warming” was not a concern? Did I say that coal-fired plants were not a source of air pollution? No, I did not. Regarding sources, Fox News was until today, the only outlet I could find covering the event… Will you accept USA Today’s report on this rally? http://www.usatoday.com/tech/science/environment/2009-03-02-global-warmi... And this was my other point… McKibbens, like many green movement paid activists, exaggerates to the point of lying and must be called out. There were not 12,000 people, but 2000 to 2500 as both news accounts I have referenced state. The fact is, environmentalism is creating a real growth industry for non-profits and their officers/directors. This is where the real “green job market” is. I should have invested (if that were legally possible) in several of them including 1Sky and Carbonfund.org. Check out their balance sheets. Carbonfund.org, recently touted here in the electronic pages of MJ, started in a couple’s living room in 2003. In 2006 they declared an income of $750K. In 2007, their income was $4.8M, with a “profit” of $3.1M. Where does this money come from? Sadly, many of the well-meaning people who gathered in Washington this week give these non-profits “donations.” Check out where and how they spend that money by examining their Form 990s, the IRS required tax form like our 1040s. They are available for viewing at guidestar.com. McKibbens and others must create a boogeyman that becomes a figure of hate and motivation for followers. At that point, they stand back and watch the money role in. Do away with the boogeyman and the money shuts off. Just remember the old adage: Follow the money.

Ok, so I was there. Just to

Ok, so I was there. Just to clear up, there were 12,000 people at the Powershift youth climate conference and about 3,000 at the direct action. The direct action was a very small part of the weekend. The focus of the conference itself was disseminating the skills to return to our communities and work for tangible change - for jobs, for health, for justice, for the environment - on both a local and national level. Because we are willing to work. And we will win.

The Green Movement is missing a lot of brown

I think it's important to note that the young people in attendance were mostly composed of white college students from privileged affluent backgrounds. The green movement itself, while including marginalized communities in its talking points, seems to exhibit a large deficit in People of Color participants. It seems as if the Environmental Justice movement of the 90s that brought attention to the disparities in access to environmentally healthy/safe neighborhoods has been lost in the current green movement. While I applaud the accomplishments of Green for all in engaging thousands of college students, I am weary of any movement that requires a conference and is sponsored by Bank of America, a former investor in Mountaintop Removal.

Why we need Powershift (response to

Environmental justice is an ENORMOUS part of the conversation. You're an outsider in the youth environmental movement if the bulk of you work doesn't have an eye on human rights. The color of the environmental movement is changing dramatically. If you ask a young person who is leading this movement, they'll tell you Van Jones and Majora Carter and if you don't know those names, then you can't speak to the kind of movement Powershift represents. Organizations like Sustainable South Brox and indigenous youth groups didnt just come to Powershift, they're essentially set the tone and agenda. Check out some student interviews in the DemocracyNow! coverage: http://www.democracynow.org/2009/2/26/power_shift_youth_climate_activist... Weary of conferences? Where are all those young organizers going to get the skills to lobby, to organize, to engage people - from public speaking to fundraising, if we're going to make headway, those are necessary. I brought 40 people from my college. Only myself and 5 others were seriously involved in lobbying. On the return trip all anyone could talk about was how excited we all were to get involved in the upcoming congressional special election and how we would engage our new rep on climate and mining legislation. THAT's why there's conferences like Powershift. We need the workshops, the organizing, the networking, but we also need the energy and to see the face of our own movement again. Its tenacity, humor, intelligence and, oh yeah, DIVERSITY. And here's the list of sponsers, BoA free (the conference had some pretty heavy anti-BoA rhetoric and last year's Powershift had an unofficial protest of hundreds of people about mining outside Citibank headquarters, comprised largely of students and other members of the communities affected by mining) http://www.powershift09.org/about/supporters

sorry for the typos in the

sorry for the typos in the above post, i wrote it in a bit of a hurry.

Cut pollution ....

Cut pollution .... Yes! Carbon Dioxide .... maybe.

Hi

The white house categorically denies presence at the USA of plans of drawing within the next few days blow across Iran, about what some Russian and foreign mass-media

A study last yearnike tn,

A study last yearnike tn, the author in the essay read NIKE , a reporter at the Shanghai headquarters in an interview, nike chaussuressee a pr in high school to read a league plans, employees interviewed told reporters in Beijing's streets, they children to interview, the children said, "truly understand them." tn chaussures These words, if the author touches product function, brand spirit and culture is to become part of the consumer of two basic methods

There are spyder jackets 10

There are spyder jackets 10 pcs of excellent Ralph Lauren multi-colored stripe big pony cheap columbia jackets. These products are more soft and comfortable for being made of breathable and durable mesh cotton .cheap polo shirtsthere are lots of colors and sizes for your choice, just pick up one you like ,it is absolutely value for money.

Lacoste Polo Shirts, ralph

Lacoste Polo Shirts, ralph Lauren polo shirts , Burberry Polo Shirts.wholesale Lacoste polo shirts and polo ralph laurenwith great price. clothingol.com offers lot of 10 lacoste polo shirts and lot of 20 cheap polo shirts. clothingol.com offers classic fit polo shirts. polo clothing

Does Green for All really just mean money for THEMSELVES

Green for all, despite Van Jones, is basically white. Look at Ryan Dexter. He is more of a 21st century Pinkerton than any kind of peace activist. Green for All touts that they can be compared to the depression era "WPA", but fail to acknowledge that the WPA was during peacetime. They receive funding from Tides, known for concealing the identitity of its corporate donators, likely because the donators don't really know or want to know where the money goes, as they are too often suspicious enterprises. This ranges from weird so called "grass roots" media operations, to weird so called "grass roots" disarming the local black (or otherwise) community with anti-gun crusades, to weird so called "grass roots" so called "green" (nuclear) energy media.
In the end you gotta ask yourself if the so called "green energy" they want to create with the superlaser is actually to nuke people.
Anyone know if Van Jones protests the superlaser for its high military potential?
What a load.

Post new comment

Alternately, you may login to or register an account
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <ul> <ol> <li> <blockquote>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

MoJo Comments: Send Us Your Feedback

We changed our spam software to better filter comments. Should you encounter any issues, please let us know.

Photo Essays

The chaos and humanity of war.
The craftspeople and musicians of Appalachia.
A selection of '70s ads depicting African-Americans.
As climate change melts the permafrost, native villages slip into the sea, taking a way of life with them.