Who Shredded Our Safety Net?

No Country for Middle-Aged Men

MiddleAge_300x250.jpg

Tom Hazel worked for three decades in a blazing hellhole to get his pension. But the financial geniuses who took over his plant had other ideas.

tom hazel had six months to go. He'd been at his job at the aluminum plant in Longview, Washington, for 29 years and six months. Under his union contract, he was eligible to retire with a full pension—about $1,000 a month, or $37.50 for each year of employment—when he hit his 30th anniversary.

It was a promise that had kept him going for decades in a job that otherwise had little to recommend itself. Temperatures in the foundry soared well past 100 degrees; workers were required to wear respirator masks, into which they tore holes to smoke cigarettes as they lugged massive iron studs and jackhammers. Once, a guy was effectively cut in half when a piece of machinery fell on him; other men were electrocuted, or burned to death by molten metal. Aluminum workers are also at elevated risk of leukemia and a host of lung diseases. "I don't know how many times I thought about quitting," one of Hazel's colleagues admits. "But I thought, 'Boy, I've got too many years invested here. I can't afford to give up those years.'"

The attitude was common: Aluminum offered men with no college a ticket into the middle class, into one of the cozy wooden houses lining the town's side streets, and eventually into a comfortable retirement. Young men were brought into the factory by fathers, uncles, brothers. "They used to call it the mill flunkies. You'd hire in, show up every day, do the job you're supposed to do, and you thought you were going to be taken care of," recalls Hazel's union president, Bill Hannah, who joined the company at age 19. Less than an hour's drive north of Portland, the town of 35,000, originally designed by the Long-Bell Lumber Company as part of the World War I-era City Beautiful movement, retained a close-knit working-class culture; even the restaurants were unionized well into the 1980s.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Hazel spent a lot of time thinking about what he would do once he got that pension at age 50. "I would have maybe worked part time somewhere, moved up to Hood Canal or the coast," he says. "I like clamming and crabbing and getting oysters. You just walk right out on the beach and rake 'em up; take out your boat and drop your crab pots."

Today, the foundry sits shuttered. Tom Hazel's pension plan has been suspended, and the lifetime medical benefits he was promised are gone. Any dreams of crabbing are now just that. He's emptied his savings to support his wife, son, grandson, and two stepchildren; his new job, as a forklift driver at the local timber plant, has very limited benefits, and he counts himself lucky to have it. He'll get a pension eventually, at 62, but right now, with seven years to go, that's not much help.

All over the country, pensions guaranteed by union-negotiated contracts are vanishing into thin air, casualties of bankruptcy, economic upheaval, and flawed legislation. Pensions have turned to dust at airlines (United, Delta), steel companies (Bethlehem), textile makers, and even electronics companies like Polaroid. The Big Three and their suppliers may roll back pension plans that support hundreds of thousands of retirees and their families. Entire towns have seen their economic base disappear; in Kannapolis, North Carolina, home to the textile maker Pillowtex Corporation, 23,000 private pensions were wiped out overnight when the company went bankrupt in 2003.

For workers whose pensions vanish, the only safety net is the federal Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, an insurance fund financed by employer premiums. Today, 1.3 million workers rely on the federal government to pay pensions that their employers no longer can or will pay; the number has more than doubled in the past eight years, and it keeps rising. The pbgc, its investments battered by the stock market crash, is now deep in the red, with a deficit of more than $11 billion instead of the $9.7 billion surplus it had in 2000.

But there is a growing population of workers whom the pbgc can't fully compensate: those in heavy-labor industries, where bodies wear out long before the traditional retirement age, and where retirement typically starts in a worker's mid-50s. When these companies bail on their pensions, the pbgc often offers significantly less. It also doesn't cover health insurance, an essential benefit to workers who don't qualify for Medicare and who often have children still at home.

"It's a frightful societal development," says Bill Brandt, a Chicago-based financial consultant who has served as a trustee during numerous bankruptcy proceedings. Between the disappearing pensions, slim prospects for new jobs, and vanished medical benefits, middle-aged workers like Hazel "will discover it's the beginning of a very sordid story for the rest of their lives."

In Longview, retirement promises were only the last to be broken. In 2000, the world's largest aluminum producer, Alcoa, Inc. (then run by Paul O'Neill, whom George W. Bush would soon appoint as treasury secretary), had bought out the foundry's owner, Reynolds Metals. But Alcoa quickly found itself embroiled in an antitrust battle, which required it to sell part of its stake in Reynolds; it also realized that the Longview plant used obsolete, polluting technology—"we were dinosaurs in the mud," says one ex-worker bitterly—and that the plant was full of men whose pension and health ious were coming due.

The company wanted out, and it turned to Michael Lynch, an eccentric Chicago investor with a habit of buying and bankrupting aluminum companies. In 2000, Lynch offered $150 million for the plant, far more than other bidders were willing to cough up—and far more, it turned out, than he could actually finance. The negotiations dragged on until the Enron-manufactured energy crisis of 2001 hit the West: Suddenly, the plant's enormous electricity contract—aluminum smelters use a stupendous amount of power—was worth a fortune. The local utility, Bonneville Power Administration, offered Alcoa $226 million, almost three times the plant's annual output, to temporarily cease operations in Longview.

Alcoa leapt at the offer—and so did Lynch. The investor, who didn't respond to requests for comment for this article, informed bpa that it couldn't close the deal with Alcoa because he'd already bid on the plant. Desperate for electricity, bpa offered a compromise: Alcoa would sell to Lynch, for whom bpa would in effect finance the deal to the tune of $140 million. The remaining $86 million or so of the electricity buyout would be handed over to Lynch.

It was the deal of a lifetime—except for the workers. Under the terms of the contract, Alcoa would pay for the Longview employees' pensions once they turned 62. But until then, Lynch was responsible, and as long as the company was viable he was also on the hook for the retirees' lifetime medical benefits.

Lynch did "temporarily" close the plant down, as agreed with bpa; for the next two years, he kept assuring the union that he planned to upgrade the equipment and reopen. Then in 2003, Longview Aluminum suddenly declared bankruptcy, owing the county $1.47 million in unpaid taxes and its workers tens of millions in pensions and health care obligations. The day the deal went down, many of the old-timers went down to Grumpy's Tavern and got as drunk as humanly possible. "It pissed you off they'd do that to you that easily," says Tom Hazel. "You're like a check mark in a book. They checked you off, after you helped them make the money they made."

Ken Williams was 51 then, and due to retire in another three months. When I met him he was smartly dressed, tan, with a shaved head—except for his white walrus mustache, he recalled Telly Savalas, circa 1973. Williams is now working as a handyman, earning about a third of what he made at the plant. "It was really a hurtful time. I was just hoping, 'Get me them few more days here, that's all I'm asking,'" he recalls. "You were just kind of stunned, you know? All them years you'd worked toward something and gave yourself to a company. I felt totally shafted. Now I'm renting, probably never will own my own home. A lot of people lost homes and dreams, the dream of putting their children through college, being able to do better for their families."

One of Tom Hazel's colleagues, a pillar of the local church, ended up living out of his Volvo, sleeping in mall parking lots and washing up in the bathroom at Burger King. Another retrained as a pharmacy technician and landed a job at Wal-Mart, where he started with half the wages he used to have and still has virtually no benefits. Other men got divorced or took to drinking; one killed himself; another landed in a mental institution.

Eugene Murphy was 50 when the plant shut down. A feisty guy in jeans and a yellow baseball cap who devours a sausage, egg, and cheese croissant as we talk, he recalls feeling "betrayed by the whole country. There's not hardly a drop of aluminum produced anymore in the Northwest, and we used to be a powerhouse." For a while after the plant shut down, Murphy drove a combine on a pea farm; more recently, he became a security guard, earning half what he used to make. His friend Bill Hannah found low-paid, low-benefits work at the local port. Randy Querin, a spokesman for the regional health care company, PeaceHealth, says the number of Medicaid claimants in Longview has soared, as has the amount of charity care—care, that is, that providers and taxpayers are paying for, instead of Alcoa or Michael Lynch.

Dan Fowler, 53 when I met him, divorced, and suffering from multiple chronic health problems, was getting what medical help he could at Longview's family health clinic. When he needed medication for high blood pressure, high cholesterol, weak lungs, he had to rely on free samples from the clinic. A few years ago he had to have four cancerous lesions removed from his face; he paid for the procedure by cashing in his 401(k). When he had a scare about a possible brain tumor, he barely managed to get the requisite tests because providers demanded cash up front.

"These are not going to be golden years," Fowler told me ruefully. "I have no job. The things that are happening to me now medically, I know the things we did at the beginning take a toll at the end and nobody wants to be responsible for that. I don't want to sell everything I have to just have medical insurance.

"I don't see a good end to it. We put in 28 to 30 years, and we get nothing."

Get Mother Jones by Email - Free. Like what you're reading? Get the best of MoJo three times a week.

Comments

THIS IS A TERRIBLE STORY

The biggest part of this story has been missed: Everything these men did to destroy the livelihood of this town was legal. I hate to sound partisan but Republicans and their policy of giving it all to the rich and waiting until it “trickle downs to us lowly ones was a farce designed to steal just what they stole, our lives. These stories break my heart. As A Black man, a Veteran and a Patriot I saw this coming all the way back in the 80’s. I begged my white friends not to go for this crap, not to support Ronald Reagan and not to fall for this sophisticated con game. They could not see it. It wasn’t that they were necessarily racist. I’m Black and they were real friends. It was pure unadulterated selfishness. Only looking out for themselves and not caring about these policies as long as it did not affect them. If it is one thing I have learned from the past 20 years concerning being my brother’s keeper, it is: I will never stand by and benefit from wrong at the expense of my brother or my sister. If I allow them to be hurt eventually the same bully will come after me!

Slogan Modification

The USSR modified the slogan to something that should suit you much better "From each according to his ability, to each according to his work

Cisco Blog | Trading Systems | UK Recruitment

when I was in high school,

when I was in high school, over 20 years ago now during the dark days of Reagan, my friends and I used to joke about how the United States was going to collapse in 50 years at the rate we were going; our greed would destroy everything previous generations had built as we got fat and lazy and over-entertained and lost our edge in every way imaginable. How wrong we were, to think it would take that long.

Legal stealing by the elite

When are the American sheeple going to come to grips with the fact that the myth they have been sold since infancy that somehow capitalism and democracy are inextricably joined and are inseparable? If Americans can get past the inculcated visceral negative reaction to the words communism and socialism they may be able to see the Truth. Karl Marx had this nailed before the middle of the 19th century. His insight and genius laid bare the true nature of the capitalist model and what it truly means to those of us who work for wages. Property ownership by the masses is a sham designed to keep us clinging to our “little pink houses” while the masters of the country (less than 3%) control nearly all the wealth. It is truly painful when you realize that the top 1% of the U.S. population owns sixty percent of the stock and forty percent of the total wealth and that 10% of the U.S. population owns 81.8 percent of the real estate, 81.2 percent of the stock, and 88 percent of the bonds. These are the same people that already own your representatives, senators and judges (and yes, even the president). The regulatory agencies dance to the tune that these people play and our federal, state and local laws are written by them for their benefit. If you aren’t leaning toward communism you either aren’t paying attention or you are delusional.

Communism?

Only 1 problem with your solution of communism. It didn't work.

Didn't work?

How cliche. . If you are referring to the now extinct Soviet Union you are not being honest with yourself or particularly accurate. The oligarchy that was the government of the USSR and the oligarchy that is the PRC have nothing to do with communism. . Cuba is probably closer to communism but has been a dictatorship for it's entire existence. . As far as I am aware, no truly socialist state has ever existed, but then again neither has any truly capitalist state existed. . What we do know however is that self professed capitalist nations always become extremely inequitable in every aspect whether it is distribution of wealth, access to a fair legal system and suffering under a rigid caste-tainted social system with hampered access to education, etc. . As far as oligarchy goes, have you noticed the similarities between the contemporary U.S. and the former USSR police state? . Do some reading and thinking and I am certain you will see that capitalism is a big lie.

Read Atlas Shrugged and get

Read Atlas Shrugged and get back to me on that, big boy. From each according to his ability to each according to his need produces only needy people. Communism depends on altruism, which is against human nature.

Whereas Capitalism depends

Whereas Capitalism depends on greed, which is the worst part of human nature. From each according to robber barons and to each according to profit margin produces rich corporations and kills the middle class. I read Atlas Shrugged for laughs, but it has nothing to offer from a realistic view of economics. You Go Galt, anon, and the Law of Demand ensures someone will Supply what you thought could only be done by you.

The USSR modified the slogan

The USSR modified the slogan to something that should suit you much better "From each according to his ability, to each according to his work"

Communism/Socialism:

The writer meant socialism since the economic backbone of communism was, at least in the late 19th century, socialist. And to question the benefits of socialism is to question almost all humane legislation of the last hundred years which has made life less brutish, nasty and short. This knee jerk reaction to the word socialism is predictable and is only one more of the wedge issues used to divert attention from the real purpose of this discourse. Outside the United States, these wedges are seen as the tool of the uneducated, the crank, and the corrupted. It's difficult to cope with such abridgement of workers' rights. It would never be allowed in Europe or Asia or any civilised society, and it is disgraceful that it be encouraged in the U.S. But then in every other self-described civilised society, everyone has free universal health care, decent nearly free education, and guaranteed minimum pension rights. This writer lives in Spain where the economic decline caused by American greed has had serious effect, but at least the workers are helped as much as possible, given good universal free health care, and their pension rights are not abused. Were such madness attempted, it would be a legitimate cause for revolution. T

Don't use the word

Don't use the word "sheeple". It makes it hard to take you seriously. Communism does not work and never will. It's got the same faulty machinery at its heart as any other idealistic viewpoint: it assumes people are not self-interested bastards who can and will screw over the next in line for an extra large slice of the pie. Worse, for a system that creates equality, it still requires a few overseers to work and when you get down to it, that's the quickest way to destroy equality: by making positions of power. What we're currently calling "capitalism" shares a similar problem: too few with too much power. The face of the international economic state is beginning to look like a monarchy with money replacing political power. Money isn't flowing between classes like it used to and needs to to ensure domestic tranquility. It's stuck at the top, circulating and recirculating between the same stagnant hoards. As a result, the middle class is shrinking, which is always a sign that things are likely to get bad soon. That isn't capitalism, that's nowhere close. Capitalism is about the market sorting things out on the financial end, ensuring fairness between competitors within certain limitations. Sadly, a lot of the sway that the richest hold carries over into the political sphere, where they can manipulate people into ensuring that they stay on top, even when by all rights, they should have been dethroned a long time ago. We've slipped into a broken alternative to capitalism, one run by nepotism, stagnation and greed. I don't advocate laissez-faire, but we've swung too far to the opposite pole. We need to loosen up controls on large corporations and let them fail when they can't compete. (Banks currently excepted until such time as we can get capitalism back on its feet.) Capitalism isn't about being a corporate welfare state (how's that for a paradoxical idea?) It's about individual strength and improving or dying out. Life support for the giants just cripples everyone. And, lastly, yes capitalism and democracy are intertwined. They are both the freest systems for their respective spheres and that freedom carries between them, strengthening both. They can exist independent of one another, but are both the weaker for it.

Sheeple

I use the term sheeple because it is the "mot jus" for the pathetic state of the American people. If we weren't sheeple the coup d'etat that was the Bush Administration would have been vigorously resisted by more than a handful of people and the Constitution shredding acts that followed 9/11 would have been much more tempered and debated. . As far as I can tell, outside of monarchy and dictatorship there is no system that is not idealistic. The problem that modern societies have is one of scale. The other major problem is greed. The two together pretty much dooms the average citizen to irrelevance. . There has been this delusion that capitalism (free markets, ad nauseum) somehow finds a state of more or less equilibrium. Nothing could be further from the truth. Capitalism is one of the best examples of chaos theory that has ever existed. Even in a heavily regulated condition like most modern nations booms and busts are de rigeur and often referred to as "adjustments" to the system. . As long as the population is tolerant of these constant wild fluctuations that impact their lives so substantially the system that appears designed to act as a slow-motion black hole collecting all the wealth will continue until no wealth exists beyond the event horizon.

You're both about 100 years behind the reality curve.

tagged as: 

Man, that discussion deteriorated into a simple exchange of hackneyed cliche's... Oh right, it started out that way.

You ask me (I know, you didn't...) neither one of you is showing any real thought, let alone any kind of individual thought. Communism is an excellent ideal to strive towards, but it makes a lousy dogma to base a government system on. It quickly leads to abuses when applied dogmatically at a large scale. Capitalism is pretty much morally bankrupt, an anachronism left over from when the feudal age made the shift to the industrial age. Instead of lords and barons, we got monopolists and industrial robber barons. Free markets are enormously useful and quickly adapt to find an optimal solution.

Unfortunately in the search for an optimal solution, it's necessary to construct a cost function. Without doing so explicitly, we as a nation created a capitalist cost-function. By this I mean we applied free markets under capitalist constraints, which led to maximizing wealth concentration. That's a really poor choice, as it leads to all the ills we are seeing now. Our challenge is to create constraints for society which lead to optimizing the results we actually want.

While there is some disagreement among Americans as to what the ideal society is, I gather no-one believe we have arrived there, nor that we are on the right path to it. Our task, as citizens, is to educate ourselves, and make well informed decisions that lead to our personal ideal society. To make these decisions intelligently we have to do away with dogma, and use free markets when appropriate and government regulation when appropriate. We need to stop worrying about whether or not a particular policy change is "right", "left", "communist", "conservative", "socialist", or whatever. Instead, we need to analyze the impact that policies actually have on society, and examine evidence to determine if the policies are having a desired effect.

A difficult challenge to be sure, and the challenge is made more difficult by childish discussions based on ideology.

www.glenstark.net

everything is the opposite of the way it appears...

it is easier to squeeze a camel through the eye of a needle; than for a rich man to get into heaven...

Yeah well, not unexpected. I

Yeah well, not unexpected. I remember the struggle 40 years ago, especially with auto workers, about the need to have unions act politically on progressive issues: health care, workers say in the running of companies, the usual socialistic shit. No, they had these great contracts, pensions and health care up the kazoo. Is it a coincidence that with the fall of the Berlin Wall working conditions in the west have grown steadily worse? Even though Communism had been overwhelmingly rejected in Americaby American Workers and Union members it was a potential alternative just sitting there. Sure their cars really, really suck, but, now having a car culture doesn't seem too cleaver. Now maybe, you know, health care might be a better thing. The only thing this story lacked was a case study of someone actually in a medically extreme situation and how that impacted their life. Unlike the ending of The Magnificent Ambersons, there is a comuppance but now people care. Or do they, really. Enough to make a revolution?

How many of these people...

...Were the Reagan Democrats in the 80s? How many voted for "fiscally-responsible" Republicans who won elections merely by promising tax cut after tax cut after tax cut? They are now getting the rewards of their years of voting for "conservative, small government." How many cheered when Republicans said we should abolish government feeding troughs like Social Security and all those other horrible socialist programs put in place by FDR and LBJ and allow the glorious "private sector" to invest the money? Where are those cries now? I'm listening. I don't feel sorry for these people. They got exactly what they voted for, over and over. Were they too dumb to figure out it was an obvious pyramid scheme, with themselves at the bottom? Oh well, the price of stupidity is steep. Oftentimes it can bring down an entire nation.

Either/Or Americanisms

Funny how Americans have been programmed or propagandized to jump to either / or notions when considering alternatives to the cancer in their democracy, that nasty particular breed of vulture and exploitative capitalism, promoted and supported by the Uber-Rich, and republicans. A well regulated capitalism, balanced by just and fair modifications and limitations by law - the same law that gives a corporation sweeping, or limited rights, is possible! We do not have to jump from a very sick capitalistic system all the goddamn way to absolute and total commie law to find an alternative to what we have! This "Asshvle" notion is a scare tactic to divert honest folk from the truth! We can have capitalism, moderated by fairness laws, then fall to a sort of social democracy, then to socialism, then modified commie law then Stalinist totalitarian systems - Many very gradual steps between, not an On/Off switch! As a Canadian, I experienced as "Downsizing" and lost nothing, because in our "limited capitalism" system, companies and governments get together, and match, tax-free, annual pension donations and accumulations, so that at lay-off time, firings, of company bankruptcies, the employee has in his name but under government trust, a "Portable Pension" - to cash in, or continue adding to at his next employer! No Yankee Doodle Capitalistic exploitation! just fair decent common sense handling of money! but not a communist solution at all! Somehow, the uber-Rich, slave-masters in America have convinced the American proletariat that this is and absolute, black or white situation, in order to continue the status quo - not so - see also, Sweden, Norway and some other social democracies and their fair solutions to a difficult problem! Education, not blind acceptance of the propagandized, popular position is the answer for American workers!

When that

tagged as: 
When that Marxist-pinko-commie Eisenhower was president, the highest income tax bracket was 90%. The US economy was booming. Only one parent needed to work and people saved money each year. Doctors charged $25.00 for house calls and although abortion was yet to become a constitutional right, less people (by far) wanted them because family-raising (under those conditions) was both easier and a more central goal of the population. What we have acquired today is greed-ism and abuse-of-power-ism. Not to be directly confused with ‘capitalism’. Capitalism is the concept that capitol, a.k.a. cash enters the market-place as a pseudo-human with pseudo-human rights and privileges. Investors need not work and through their shrewd investments, can accumulate further wealth. One can be pro-capitalism (with a small “c”) without promoting all the abuse and greed which the economically all-powerful want to inflict on the rest of us. Contrary to the often repeated fortune-cookie, it is not an “a” or “b” choice between which poison we prefer, (Capitalism {large “C”} or communism). Although history has shown us that eventually, the greed-mongers will suck enough blood-plasma out of the society to create fertile grounds for the other abusive system, communism. Our job is to SAVE capitalism and make it safe for mass consumption again. For that we will need a new program--not old bumper-stickers or stale fortune-cookies. Respectfully submitted~

Eisenhower

To call the man a pinko-commie is a slap in the face to all the people who gave their lives to defeat Hitler. America-the "Arsenal of Democracy" was able to pay off the huge debt we ran up winning the war under D.D.E.'s eye by the end of his second term in office AND HE was the one that warned of the power of the millitary/ industrial complex. And they are the ones that we can thank for our current situation. All the shrill out-gassing by those that only think in the terms of the right wing quislings on talk radio are the true problem. Limbaugh et all are doing every thing they can to bring America down. Untill we as a nation stand up for ourselves- read what Thomas Jefferson had to say about this- and recover what has been conived out of the American people by the top 5% that have managed to dupe us out of our hard earned money we'll all be relagated to what Ann Rand called universal shabbyness. So get you head out of the sand and actually start to THINK for your self, not what some voice on the radio tells you.

corporations

tagged as: 
In the 70's, I knew several corporations who forced senior employees into early retirement, and in some cases they were just destroyed by it. The same thing is happening now. I used to beg MY friends not to trust the company. My sister's company went bankrupt and she ended up with a ghost of a pension, my cousins were forced into early retirement. Middle-aged people here are virtually unemployable because the pay is so low, and nearly every job is part time so they don't have to include benefits. I agree with the man who saw the Republicans starting to go down that road again because all of my alarms were going off too. I am praying that Obama can kick some corporate butt and stop this from ever happening again. The answer is NOT just to create more red tape. The answer is ethics! The answer is running business with a conscience. We all have to send this message to corporate America. If we are going to live in a capitalistic society, it must work by the SAME rules we ourselves live by.

Legal theft

Considering how the current administration has bent over backwards to preserve the "contracted bonuses" of the people who brought down the economy, it seems like the government could have used the same tactic on them that they and their ilk have been using on pension holders for years. Company changes owners, all former contracts are null and void. Tough luck. As far as "the best and brightest" not having incentive to fix their mess, as former VP Cheney so eloquently put it: "so?"

re: Read Atlas Shrugged and get

Sorry, I haven't been able to read soap operas for boys since I was a boy. I can't tell one tripe-producing Ann from the other; Rand or Landers.

Balance and goverment oversite: need both Capitalism, Socialism

tagged as: 
Many of you anti-socialists out there fail to understand how much of your world and the United States relies on the social good to maximize the good for the majority of society. You are reaping the results of that socialism every day and many times each day. Each time you get into your socially mandated safe cars and ride on that tax-paid highway and see the fire put out by your government paid fire departments, and protected by your local police. The water you drink out of your faucets, the military that protects you at home and overseas, and the list goes on and on with the socialist policies. Capitalism helps to make that process work from the other direction to help us pay for these required and desired needs. If we share in the support and cost of anything as a society, that is known as "socialism". Note that both capitalism or socialism can be termed as parasites of society if either grows too large or out of control. Neither of them can succeed without the help of the other. You might call it a symbiotic relationship that works best for both when proper balance is achieved. Your government, appropriately sized and with proper checks and balances is part of this whole mechanism that we the people have voted and put into place. This, as stipulated in our Constitution, as much as possible, is "For the people, by the people and of the people". President Obama and his administration is an extension of that mandate by the people that we placed into power via our "Fair" election process to find the appropriate path to overcome the poor balance between these capitalist and socialist policies of our society. Working for the greater good helps us all and not just a few powerful and rich. Be the patriotic American that we all "claim" to be and please convince your corporations that their patriotism is just as important as the individual. I ask, why are corporations not held to the same measurements of patriotism for community and country as each individual American. They screamed for and got single entity status within the U.S. and so why are they not held to "all" of the same standards as you and I. Shipping jobs overseas is not patriotic. Paying less in taxes is not patriotic or socially productive. Too much of this Corporate (upper management) greedy agenda has been hugely responsible for many of the problems we are facing today.

Disposable people?

Yes, this is part of the disposable people syndrome. It's been around us since the colonial days with indentured servitude. It was the reason that slavery was doomed. Slaves were considered human assets much like the land and buildings. They required minimal upkeep by owners. How could they compete with the much cheaper easily abused workers in the North. They could easily be replaced by Irish immigrants and later by Chinese immigrants and/or abducted labor. There was no responsibility by owners of factories to ensure safe working conditions or meet any demands for higher wages. If productivity increased or wages were lower that translated into that much more profit. The only safety valve was a vibrant economy where multiple employers actually had to compete for good labor. All you had to see in the Reagan era was lower taxes enabling the investor class to eliminate the free market with mergers. In my early days if an employer messed with me I could go to his competition and help that guy beat the crap out of him financially. Today there is no competition in my lines of work. What has happened is that employees are disposable. If no one can be found to work at ridiculous low wages in an abusive workplace those jobs can easily be outsourced. That makes for more desperate employees. It also means that one of our biggest industries has become employee training for new careers. We have one of the world's best trained work forces in the world with a surplus of talented workers easily capable of doing a lot of work available - but they import guest workers with lesser training and language skills for lower wages who are grateful for those lower wages. IF we had a free market for employers and employees such an imbalance would right itself. However, government intervention [always on the side of management] has kept that from happening. We send billions elsewhere to keep autocracies afloat along with millions of workers willing to work for less. Isn't government wonderful! May God's will be done on earth and let it begin - and end - with myself. If it happens any other way it's not God's will.

No such thing as human nature

tagged as: 
There's no such thing as human nature. If you think there is, define it. Capitalists are mentally challenged. Their ability to empathise does not develop during their teens. The right wing should never allowed to run for office. Anyone who does not see the benefits of socialism should be shot. For all our sakes. Let's just cull the stupid. Then we'd have a bit more to go around. All the wealth should be redistributed so we can start afresh.

Life unworthy of life

The Nazis had a highly successful program of ridding Europe of undesireable elements of the population. It was called "Life Unworthy of Life". In this country we do not have such a program but unworthy segments of the population are confined to getthos or to prisons. Blue collar workers are experiencing this dreadfull kind of experience now. The corporations who made promises to many people and the bankers on Wall Street who backed them have walked away from the disaster they caused and behave as though they have no moral responsiblity to people they have robbed. Of course the laws of the nation are designed in a manner that they have no legal responsibility. People who have lost their homes are sleeping in tent cities and eating pet food or scavenging food from dumsters. The american people have shown remarkable restraint for a system which breaks then physicially, uses their children to fight and die in wars and offers them no support in their old age. Uncontrolled capitalism has demonstrated that it is incapable of existence without oppressing vast numbers of people. How long are we going to accept, without any resistanc,e a system which is determined that we live in a second world society?

A couple of points on the

A couple of points on the above. Since there is presently no draft, young adults are volunteering their services for battle. We may claim that they are wrongly being misinformed and thus indoctrinated but unlike the last draft war (Vietnam) fighting forces in the Mid East are generally with that program even after they arrive. They mostly believe in their mission, even if others do not. While I tend to agree on the other points raised, I reference the last line: "How long are we going to accept, without any resistance a system which is determined that we live in a second world society?" This I submit is a bit of a misreading of the landscape. People need not "resist" in the sense that it is being suggested. Millions of people voted for Bush-W (twice). Millions of others vote for Congressional reps (on both sides) like McConnell and Dodd, who both clearly suck. Everyone (300-million people) vote with their pocket-books. "Resistance" as such (in its traditional use) is not a requirement of victory. Want rid of the giant banks and their proxies in Congress? Put your money in local banks and credit unions. Want less cancer, stop eating fast-food burgers. Most people I know will only email (forward) jokes and nothing serious and especially nothing political--even if they agree with it. In order for people to begin to even contemplate "resistance" they would first have to stop willingly cooperating, something they are thus far not ready to do. It is our own "tribal" style zombification which has led us to this stage. We can blame the power-structure that has benefited from all this but not entirely. They are our proxies. When's the last time you voted for a candidate who wears jeans and sneakers to the debate? Even Kucinich puts on the standard uniform—to spite the fact that he well knew his chances of winning were nil and continued merely to make his voice heard. We support the all-powerful segment and accept it or not, they work for us. If we (the people) were in agreement on some fairly basic points, our government would have to comply. Respectfully submitted~

I failed to discern in the

I failed to discern in the original article whether these folks were unionized (unless I missed it), or what their hourly pay rates were compared to others in similar jobs across America, working under similarly less-than-ideal conditions. Likely not to have finished high school, they appreciate the security of the job, are willing to work hard, enjoy the wages, tolerate the unsafe or health-damaging aspects of the job, can buy a new vehicle and a few expensive toys, maybe send their kids to college and help pay for their weddings, hopefully stash a chunk away for their retirement, and generally live the quality of life that many others in America would like to live. Without such details, it is difficult to formulate an opinion. I could be wrong, but I suspect this is not an "I owe my soul to the company store" story. Regardless, these folks obviously still got a really raw deal, especially those so close to retirement.

Not too much sympathy

These guys were on a good deal for thirty years - wages well above average, and benefits denied to most. On top of that, retiring at around 50 at an age where a long and active retirement was possible. So now the pension is gone and they were counting on it. Tough but they are still ahead of everyone working at Walmart. Their problem is - they believed in the company. These guys are often the problem, sitting on a sweet deal and grizzling about taxes and health care for the less fortunate. Now they are down there with the working poor.

Sure, It's a sad story. But,

Sure, It's a sad story. But, for fuck sake why didn't they subscribed to Mother Jones instead of Playboy.

Ahh, that is so disgusting!

Ahh, that is so disgusting! 30 years of his life he has spent in serving them, in conditions that is only available in hell itself. It is really disgusting that the new owners have thrown him aside like that! I believe stories like these will get employees in all fields less loyal towards the employers. After all, you got to watch your back first as they will never do that for you.
SEO

Sadly, it's not just the Republicans

dhampton100 in the first post suggests it's all the Republicans' fault. Would that it were so. Democrats are heavily complicit as the party lurched rightward over the last 30 years, and Democratic lawmakers have found themselves extremely well-taken-care-of by corporate campaign largesse and the Capitol Hill - K Street revolving door. And yes, the "Reagan Democrats" share the blame as well.

There's no such thing as

tagged as: 

There's no such thing as human nature. If you think there is, define it. Capitalists are mentally challenged. Their ability to empathise does not develop during their teens. The right wing should never allowed to run for office. Anyone who does not see the benefits of socialism should be shot. For all our sakes. Let's just cull the stupid. Then we'd have a bit more to go around. All the wealth should be redistributed so we can start afresh.

tiffany jewelry

tiffany and co

awful

This is absolutely terrible. Why would people put any faith in a company after hearing these stories? I can't imagine how sickening the feeling must have been the day that he found out he wasn't going to get his retirement. Awful! What happened to company loyalty? Doesn't it go both ways? There should be a huge lawsuit here to get what he deserves.. 30 years is thirty years. I'm appalled that this was allowed to happen. What about the families?

What about jobs?

To call the man a pinko-commie is a slap in the face to all the people who gave their lives to defeat Hitler. America-the "Arsenal of Democracy" was able to pay off the huge debt we ran up winning the war under D.D.E.'s eye by the end of his second term in office AND HE was the one that warned of the power of the millitary/ industrial complex. And they are the ones that we can thank for our current situation. All the shrill out-gassing by those that only think in the terms of the right wing quislings on talk radio are the true problem. Limbaugh et all are doing every thing they can to bring America down. Untill we as a nation stand up for ourselves- read what Thomas Jefferson had to say about this- and recover what has been conived out of the American people by the top 5% that have managed to dupe us out of our hard earned money we'll all be relagated to what Ann Rand called universal shabbyness. So get you head out of the sand and actually start to THINK for your self, not what some voice on the radio tells you.

Cisco Blog | Trading Systems | UK Recruitment

Wow, it sounds like depending

Wow, it sounds like depending on others to take care of you doesn't work out so well. Maybe some of us should consider planning our own retirement pensions. Some people say that government should step up and fill in the gaps, but with that huge deficiet hanging over us, I wouldn't want to bet that they don't default on their promises as well.

Atlas Shrugged is the worst

Atlas Shrugged is the worst piece of prose I've ever struggled through...terrible writing...and a terrible trickle down politics that you could only believe if you were rich......probably the worst book I've ever read.

Frag Michael Lynch

Frag Michael Lynch

links of london

Support by UK shopping links of London earrings was intuitive and nowadays we have matured internationally with stores in 1990.links of londonThe party resulted from a clean exact for her wife, links londonJohn Ayton, founded the jewelry mark,links of london sale Links of London. Relations of London were founded in the UK, Hong Kong, links of london charms USA and Canada.links of london charms Links of London is one of the chief jewelry brands in the United Kingdom

Post new comment

Alternately, you may login to or register an account
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <ul> <ol> <li> <blockquote>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

MoJo Comments: Send Us Your Feedback

We changed our spam software to better filter comments. Should you encounter any issues, please let us know.

Photo Essays

The chaos and humanity of war.
The craftspeople and musicians of Appalachia.
A selection of '70s ads depicting African-Americans.
As climate change melts the permafrost, native villages slip into the sea, taking a way of life with them.