Sotomayor Slips Up

The prospective justice forgets a key 'Perry Mason' episode. Plus: highlights from day three of the confirmation hearings.
MoJo D.C. bureau Legal Affairs reporter Stephanie Mencimer is reporting live from inside the Sotomayor confirmation hearings this week. This is the wrap-up of Wednesday's action. If you missed Monday or Tuesday, check out the wrap-ups: Pride and Prejudice and Where Did Sotomayor's Empathy Go? For the latest analysis, watch our video and live blog here, or follow Stephanie's and David Corn's coverage on Twitter.
After three days of Senate confirmation hearings, we've learned a lot of things—none of them, of course, about Sonia Sotomayor. Instead, the hearings have clarified a great deal about what the two political parties really care about when it comes to the Supreme Court, which can be boiled down to this:
Republicans care about:
* Guns
* Foreigners
* The supremacy of old white guys
* The unborn
* Guns
Democrats care about:
* Presidential power
* John Roberts
* Strip searches of 13-year-old girls
* Baseball
Republicans also devoted a lot of time to grilling Sotomayor on the relationship between Court and Congress. That is, they tried to get her to promise to keep her hands off their legislation even if it's crazy. Yesterday, Sen. Lindsay Graham informed Sotomayor that the best way to "change society" was through the polling booth, not by judicial fiat. But should people at the voting booth decide they want to, for instance, ban handguns in the District of Columbia, those same senators want to ensure Sotomayor will overturn the will of the people or get out of the way so the rest of the court can do it.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Over and over, the GOP senators tried to get Sotomayor to recuse herself from the many gun cases headed for the Supreme Court next term. Those cases will give the court the opportunity to decide whether its decision in the Heller case—that the 2nd Amendment guarantees an individual right to bear arms in the District of Columbia—should also apply to the states. So far, the lower courts have said that the 2nd Amendment doesn't apply—including Sotomayor’s Second Circuit. As with virtually every other question she’s been asked, Sotomayor refused to commit one way or another. Which means we’re going to have to listen to more of this stuff tomorrow.
None of the rehash has provided any particularly new revelations about the nominee. If she revealed any prejudices or biases under questioning, it wasn't for Latinos or women, but for prosecutors and cops. (MoJo's James Ridgeway has more on her prosecution-friendly record here.) No one seemed particularly concerned by her comments suggesting that it was okay for cops to violate people’s constitutional rights so long as a judge signs off on it. Democrats actually wielded a study showing that as a district court judge, Sotomayor convicted criminal defendants at a higher rate and gave them longer sentences than most of her colleagues. This is a very odd selling point coming from a party proposing a major overhaul of the criminal justice system.
Sotomayor seemed to hit her stride today, exhibiting more confidence and pushing back a little against her antagonists. She also politely endured questioning by Sen. Tom Coburn, who told her, in an apparent reference to the Hispanic character on I Love Lucy, "You have lots of 'splainin' to do." (See the video clip here.) Coburn spent much of his time quizzing the nominee about the intricacies of fetal viability and whether the states had the right to define "death." Sotomayor looked slightly perplexed, but she deflected the weirdness with a cheerful smile.
The day's highlight came courtesy of Sen. Al Franken, who, as John Dickerson of Slate observed, finally cracked his first joke since running for office. (Watch the video below.) Franken grilled Sotomayor on how she could have been inspired to be a prosecutor by Perry Mason when the prosecutor on the show always loses. Later, Franken asked Sotomayor if she knew the one episode in which Mason loses a case. She didn't, causing Franken to exclaim, "Didn't the White House brief you?" And of course, everyone laughed, including the nominee, who looked like she was finally enjoying herself.
Click here for Stephanie Mencimer's live coverage of the confirmation hearings.
Comments
Sotomayor hearings
Screw all this, I wanna hear more about what Jefferson Beauregard Sessions thinks of "prejudices". Oh, and has anyone heard this rumor going around, according to which, (get this), Sonia Sotomayor once said something about a "wise latina"? I hope some brave Senator brings it up and gets to the bottom of it.
Censored information about Judge Sotomayor
Did you know that she is involved with the Bohemian Grove? If not, see http://dailycensored.com/2009/06/22/the-dialogue-on-belizian-and-bohemia...
Did you know that there are some questions about whether she disclosed all of her assets, whether she covered up judicial misconduct, and whether she covered up bankruptcy fraud? If not, see http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/
Buffoon
I' surprised that the buffoon, Franken, didn't tell her that she was "smart enough, good enough and by golly, people like her" to be a member of the court.
Minnesota must be so proud.
In reality, judges merely
In reality, judges merely rationalize their wishes into legal opinions. Were that not so, very few legal issues would be heavily debated. For example, if you were a city council member and wanted a "pooper-scooper" law in town, the required English would be very standard. "Pet owners are required to pick up solid waste left by their pets on all property except their own private property". Simple, right? It takes a scholarly judge to point out that the above statute does not say " . . .ABSOLUTELY required . . . "
And this tendency to place power above honesty or equity is, has been and will continue to be the downfall of the human race.
Regarding guns. There are some 25-million handguns already in circulation in the USA. (Not counting undocumented firearms). Contemplating their ultimate legality is a complete waste of time
cheap nike dunks
I think it's a good topic: cheap nike dunks,cheap jordan shoes,nike sb
Over and over, the GOP
Over and over, the GOP senators tried to get Sotomayor to recuse herself from the many gun cases headed for the Supreme Court next term. estetik ameliyatlar Those cases will give the court the opportunity to decide whether its decision in the Heller case—that the 2nd Amendment guarantees an individual right to bear arms in the District of Columbia—should also apply to the states. burun estetiği ameliyatları So far, the lower courts have said that the 2nd Amendment doesn't apply—including Sotomayor’s Second Circuit. göğüs büyütme ameliyatları As with virtually every other question she’s been asked, Sotomayor refused to commit one way or another. göğüs estetiği Which means we’re going to have to listen to more of this stuff tomorrow. göğüs küçültme ameliyatları None of the rehash has provided any particularly new revelations about the nominee. karın germe estetiği If she revealed any prejudices or biases under questioning, it wasn't for Latinos or women, but for prosecutors and cops vajina estetiği. (MoJo's James Ridgeway has more on her prosecution-friendly record here. lazer epilasyon) No one seemed particularly concerned by her comments suggesting that it was okay for cops to violate people’s constitutional rights so long as a judge signs off on it. karın estetiği ameliyatlarıDemocrats actually wielded a study showing that as a district court judge, Sotomayor convicted criminal defendants at a higher rate and gave them longer sentences than most of her colleagues. estetik cerrahi This is a very odd selling point coming from a party proposing a major overhaul of the criminal justice system. saç ekimi Sotomayor seemed to hit her stride today, exhibiting more confidence and pushing back a little against her antagonists. göğüs büyütme estetiği She also politely endured questioning by Sen. göğüs toparlama estetiği Tom Coburn, who told her, in an apparent reference to the Hispanic character on I Love Lucy, "You have lots of 'splainin' to do.göğüs küçültme estetiği " (See the video clip.jinekomasti ) Coburn spent much of his time quizzing the nominee about the intricacies of fetal viability and whether the states had the right to define "death. nazmi bayçın" Sotomayor looked slightly perplexed, but she deflected the weirdness with a cheerful smile. nazmi bayçın The day's highlight came courtesy of Sen. Al Franken, who, as John Dickerson of Slate observed, finally cracked his first joke since running for office nazmi bayçın. (Watch the video . nazmi bayçın) Franken grilled Sotomayor on how she could have been inspired to be a prosecutor by Perry Mason when the prosecutor on the show always loses. nazmi bayçın Later, Franken asked Sotomayor if she knew the one episode in which Mason loses a case. nazmi bayçın She didn't, causing Franken to exclaim, "Didn't the White House brief you? nazmi bayçın" And of course, everyone laughed, including the nominee, who looked like she was finally enjoying herself. nazmi bayçın, nazmi bayçın
my opinion
Nice airtical, i would like to tell all of my friends about it. By the way, i would like to introduce everyone of you a very nice website, it offers cheap air max trainers for men and women. Such as Air max 1, air max 2, air max 90, nike air max 2009+, air max 2010 new, nike air max TN, nike air ltd trainers, air max 95. Dunk SB shoes, nike shox shoes. You can find almost all the nike series there, in huge collection and varies colorways. They have Latest style and classic style. Though their price are low, don't worry about it's quality. They are realll ones!!! I have bought from them for so many times, and very satisfied with the their goods and service. Come on, you'll love it.
politics
This is quite ironic, to be frank what the politicians really care about is not the interest of the public.
Post new comment
MoJo Comments: Send Us Your Feedback
We changed our spam software to better filter comments. Should you encounter any issues, please let us know.



