Can Anyone Stop the Predatory Lenders?
NO ONE TOLD Deanna Walters she was about to lose her home. Not when her mortgage servicing company foreclosed on it, nor when it landed on the county auction block and sold to the highest bidder. She realized what was happening only when a man taped a note to the front door of her well-kept house in a leafy corner of Stockton, California, last January. "My son went out and took it down," recalls the 43-year-old single mother of two, "and that's when he told me it was a 'three-day or quit' notice."
Walters' discovery that her home had been sold out from under her marked the low point of a four-year fiasco that began when Ocwen Loan Servicing became her mortgage servicer in late 2004. Through no fault of her own, Ocwen incorrectly processed or lost dozens of Walters' payments and charged her more than $2,000 in late fees and thousands more in additional charges—all without notifying her. The Florida-based company tried to foreclose on her three times. After she paid more than $10,000, Walters figured things were settled. But Ocwen had other ideas.
Sitting in the storefront office where she runs a tax preparation business next door to the local congressman's office, Walters recounts her ordeal. She riffles through stacks of account statements and correspondence with the state and federal regulators she's complained to. She has managed to stay in her home for now, but with little help from those agencies. "No one will deal with these people," she laments. "Why isn't anyone doing anything?"
Mortgage servicers are the housing industry's middlemen, low-profile companies that handle the day-to-day business of collecting payments, managing paperwork, and initiating foreclosures. Some banks, such as Wells Fargo and Bank of America, have their own mortgage-servicing arms; others contract with companies like Ocwen. Either way, borrowers are largely at their mercy: They have no say in who services their mortgages, and they can't fire their servicer for doing a bad job. "They're set up to be dictators," says Irwin Trauss, a housing attorney at Philadelphia Legal Assistance. "They're set up to say, 'It's my way or the highway.'"
The housing bust may have revealed the shady side of the home loan industry, but unscrupulous mortgage servicers still have little incentive to change. Last year, the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) received nearly 2,500 complaints about servicers, a 379 percent increase over 2007. In the first 10 months of 2009, consumers filed about 1,000 legal complaints against 10 of the largest servicers for illegal foreclosures and other predatory practices. A Florida widow is suing her servicer for allegedly badgering her husband with as many as nine collection calls a day, causing a fatal heart attack.
A federal class-action suit against Ocwen asserts that it has hiked mortgage payments without fair notice, forced borrowers to buy unnecessary insurance, and intentionally processed payments late. Ocwen's general counsel, Paul Koches, says the lawsuit is baseless. He wouldn't comment on Walters' case, but said the company complies with and "takes all federal, state, and local laws seriously."
The Obama administration's Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP) has set aside $75 billion to pay servicers to rewrite mortgages so homeowners can stay in their homes. (See "We're Paying WHOM to Fix Subprime Mortgages?") Beyond that, though, servicers have little incentive to help borrowers, because they can reap lucrative fees from arrears and foreclosures. "Fees have exploded since the meltdown," says Trauss. Testifying before the Senate banking committee last July, Diane Thompson, an attorney with the National Consumer Law Center, explained that servicers have an incentive to "push" homeowners into late payments: "If the loan pays late, the servicer is more likely to profit than if the loan is brought and maintained current." After Ocwen auctioned off Deanna Walters' house, it collected more than $3,500 from 36 different buyers' fees, in a single day.
Oversight of this troubled industry is spotty. "This is a very underregulated part of the system," says Jack Guttentag, an industry expert and professor emeritus of finance at the Wharton School. "It shouldn't be, because it's the part where the consumer has no place to protect themselves." Federal law allows servicers to send borrowers only one account statement a year—even if there are scheduled interest rate increases or new fees added during that time. If a borrower has a problem, HUD encourages her to first file a complaint with the servicer, and if there's no resolution after nearly three months, she can then appeal to the agency—assuming she hasn't been evicted in the meantime. While HUD can step in to fix the problem, it lacks the power to impose tough sanctions on servicers.
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC), Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, and Office of Thrift Supervision also have limited oversight over the mortgage industry. An OTS spokesman could name only one formal action the agency has taken against a servicer—Ocwen, in 2004. An OCC spokesman said his agency has never taken action against servicers.
The FTC has settled three major cases since 2003, resulting in settlements totaling almost $70 million. But even that hasn't kept servicers in check. EMC Mortgage, a JP Morgan Chase subsidiary, settled with the FTC in 2008 for misleading and ripping off borrowers. That settlement, however, didn't help consumers like Tammy Cothran, who says EMC foreclosed on her house outside Pensacola, Florida, even though she wasn't in default. She has appealed to state and federal agencies, and even faxed the White House daily for five weeks. Those efforts left her frustrated: HUD told her it couldn't help because her mortgage isn't insured by the Federal Housing Administration, and the FTC said it was "not in a position to intervene."
Mortgage servicers who have signed up for HAMP funds are prohibited from charging modification fees or foreclosing on participants in the program. However, the toughest penalties for noncompliance are withholding incentive payments or ejection from the program. A Treasury spokeswoman says that officials have reviewed thousands of loan files looking for mistakes or fraud. Yet in October the bailout watchdog SIGTARP cited HAMP's poor oversight, and consumer advocates say there is no clear way to report wrongdoing. "I have yet to identify anyone to contact to say, 'This isn't working right. Do something about it,'" says Trauss. (For resources on dealing with servicers, click here.)
With nowhere else to turn, homeowners can always sue. Deanna Walters has sued Ocwen, and a judge has allowed her to stay in her home, even as the winner of the foreclosure auction is trying to charge her rent. Many who need legal help are those who can least afford it—like Cothran, who lost her job in May. A self-described "spitfire," she is left to do her own legwork—"every day, all day long"—to save her home. "If you could tell me who I need to speak to," she says, "I would be in a van tonight headed to Washington to figure this out."
Comments
Banks want foreclosures to
Banks want foreclosures to sell them again and earn more money with new owners.
Loan Servicing
No. The loan servicing companies love defaults because they have several beneficial effects upon them.
1. Late fees.
2. Penalties.
3. Interest on billions of dollars paid by homeowners but held in "suspense" accounts unapplied to the underlying mortgages.
They love foreclosures because they give:
1. Excessive fees charged for managing foreclosures ($2,500 for title insurance for a $125,00 foreclosure?).
2. Relief from responsibility for a troubled loans. (Pooling and Servicing agreements allow recourse for failure to follow the agreement but not for letting the property go to foreclosure.)
The banks (investers) then eat the loss on the foreclosed property and taxpayers bail the banks, insurers and securitizers out.
lather, rinse, repeat.
City Life helping homeowners fight eviction after foreclosure
Bill Moyer's Journal highlighted a community organization in Boston - City Life/Vida Urbana which is helping the homeowners fight evictions after foreclosure and advising them an supporting them into forcing the the banks to negotiate with the homeowner. It's the 2nd half of the show but quite encouraging and empowering. Here's the link:
http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/12182009/watch2.html
I hope this movement spreads - putting power back into the hands of the people.
I think home ownership is
I think home ownership is overated. The bankers have sold it as the American dream when in fact it's the tie that binds us to corporate machine. The fact that the bankers are getting all the money in the first five years of your mortgage is the bank playing us for suckers.......who would agree to this if there was a choice? In Salt lake city the housing prices are completely out of whack with what people earn......A person making 30-40 k/year has no buisiness buying a 250k house..........unless you want to be a slave to the bank.......I predict that you just begun to see housing prices drop.... look at Detroit
Now you see...
...it's stories like this that make me glad we have a second amendment.
The banks get most of the
The banks get most of the money you make during your working life and then their buddies in health care get the rest at the end.....3-6k per month to live and be ignored in a human kennel.....All hail the reverse mortgage
When the mortgage co's sold
When the mortgage co's sold those bundled products, they split the original note. You must understand that the mortagage is not the same as the note. Mortgage is the service to the NOTE. Many banks such as Chase Citi, Fargo sold and LOST the notes to many buyers as Trust series securities. WHOEVER has the notes has the claim to your House. Your job and the lawyer's job is to ask for the original note. Force the bank to produce said note. It is suggested that in all answers to the summons the following terminology should be included.
" Motion to dismiss summons.
The defendant asserts that the institution no longer has possession of the original note. and therefore has no valid claim. We ask the court to set a trial date, where the original note is demanded as proof. Should the original note fail to appear after 90 days, we ask the court to declare a forfeit of claim."
a lot of your words resemble
a lot of your words resemble the minds at:
http://livinglies.wordpress.com/
Abraham Ben Judea/ Elizabeth Warrens assistant...
Were that it really was this simple.
As the large banks merged,
As the large banks merged, acquired and consolidated, they each became respectively larger percentages of the total legal revenues in those communities where they had branches. Game over. No longer are they 'litigants', they became power-vested tyrants. And BTW: the OCC is the correct agency from which to seek regulatory relief. But years of politically-fixed leadership has resulted in an OCC who does not do its job and prefers to protect predator banks from the natural consequences of their wildly destructive conduct.
The Ocwen guys are
The Ocwen guys are essentially criminals taking advantage of loopholes. They should be shown no mercy.
The absence of regulation is shocking!
Incompetent or fraudulent loan processors
This is shocking! I wasn't aware that, apart from the problems with inevitably underwater houses going into foreclosure because payments are not made (for whatever reason, mostly not for unwillingness surely) there are others where people actually rather OVERpay on their mortgage and still get thrwn out. This should be treated just like other cromes of similar impact like taking hostages at gunpoint, fraud etc.
In the 1960's we (the people)
In the 1960's we (the people) had a single dial telephone per household, which BTW was relatively expensive to use. Most homes had no typewriters, let alone laser-jets or even e-mails. No speed-dials and no faxes either. Yet, when a political issue arose of significant moment, my folks (along with others in our apartment complex and our general neighborhood) networked and motivated. Street marches were not uncommon and even issues seemingly obscure for that day, like anti aerosol-spray activism got people on the non air-conditioned bus to Washington DC for street demonstrations.
The reason I mention this is because the topic being discussed is one where most everyone should be in agreement. Banks should not be allowed to rob people's homes. Today we have amazing networking tools such as internet and so forth. So where are the warm bodies? 1/2 are watching digital TV (250 channels of zombification) and the other half are either afraid of 'big brother' or possibly are so ego driven that they can't involve themselves in any cause to which they are not the founder and chief exec.. We are already paying a horrific price for this complacency. Some day our grandchildren may curse our names for sleeping through this era.
Your Grandchildren
Nice to see you're an optimist, but I don't think your grandchildren will live long enough to have any opinion about your actions.
these guys are scum
I've been dealing with these crooks for three years. My wife and I have been in a battle ... a very public battle with them for nearly a 1 1/2 years. The modification was final after 16 months of fighting, destroying our credit, and still even with a very low interest rate we continue to get screwed.
They are notorious for charging junk fees and fines and have continued to do this with us. In addition they falsely reported charge offs and home values to the IRS.
There is no oversight and no one to complain to and they continue to rape with impunity. Former employees openly discuss their fraud and officials do nothing to change it.
I agree with Trollstein. WE do nothing until they threaten to charge for Facebook. Then we form massive groups on Facebook ironically. But when they threaten to take away our neighbors home we sit and watch
I've written about these criminals here: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/richard-zombeck/loan-modifications-a-4-bi_...
And http://www.huffingtonpost.com/richard-zombeck
Anyone dealing with Ocwen or that has received a mod, I'd love to hear about it.
Creditors Perspective
Since I respect the freedom of speech and I like Mother Jones as a whole, I will simply say that a little fact checking on some of the allegations of this article would've went a long way. If you buy something, you should pay for it. If you can't then it isn't the fault of who lent you the money to buy it. You bought it. Collection calls caused a heart attack? Collection calls don't come if you aren't in collections. Perhaps if their economnic status (employment, funds, savings, etc.) had been in order then he wouldn't have been so stressed. This article is like blaming the cop when the guy gets caught drunk driving because the driver was depressed that he lost his job and drank to much.
The drunk driving was up to the guy, the cop was merely doing his job.
If ther are some real honest to god facts that belong to the article other than whining, I would be interested.
You seriously think that people who stay in a home shouldn't pay rent????!!! Please explain how that works inside your head.
do some research of your own
Stephanie: You should maybe take your own advice and look into what's happening in this country. You may be one of the sanctimonious people who think you did everything right and made all the right choices. Or ,maybe you didn't get that the house was paid off and Ocwen still foreclosed. Or maybe you don't get that it's illegal even for debt collectors to call more than three times a day. Maybe it also eludes you that people were sold bad debts from professionals they were supposed to trust. You can blame the homeowner for listening to the loan officer as much as you can blame me for listening to my cardiologist when I had heart surgery.
My home lost 40% of its value over night. That wasn't poor planning or a bad investment on my part. That was artificially inflated values. Am I a victim? I certainly am. As are nearly 12 million others. The speculators walked away long ago. For you to accuse people of being irresponsible is ridiculously ignorant on your part. When mortgage interest increases to 13% on a 300,000 that's now worth $100,000 you still seem to have this perceived notion of a mythical moral obligation. You can set those high standards for yourself if you want. But for the rest of us it's a business decision. Either lower my interest and principal or take the house. It's a no brainer. They caused this, they should suck it up.
Addressing Stephanie: I have
Addressing Stephanie: I have witnessed way too much. I have witnessed federal judges being mysteriously promoted one week before a bench trial involving one of the giant banks. I have witnessed a federal magistrate judge issuing an injunction--prohibiting a civil litigant in a case against a giant bank from filing any paperwork with any court. I am in possession of a letter from the OCC (and I have seen two other identical letters) saying that the regulatory agency will not intervene in any matter which is the subject of any litigation. My own lawyer told me that when he wanted to refinance his home, his long term banker was insisting that he falsify his listed income--when in fact he qualified for the mortgage (with room to spare) based on his real income. I know people who were foreclosed on owing NOTHING to the alleged lender. I know other people who were receiving 15-20 aggressive phone calls EVERY day INCLUDING WEEKENDS from collection agcys LOOKING FOR OTHER PEOPLE who happened to have addresses in the same building. I know examples where the lenders had NO PERSONAL GUARANTEES on corporate debt but engaged collection efforts anyway and destroyed people's credit extortionately. They don't care. They don't get paid to care. The banking industry has become the Roman Empire and we (you too!) are merely migrant farmers who's nations have been annexed and we are told to pay ever increasing taxes on our own lettuce--or we shall be made examples of, nailed upside-down on crosses and left in the sun to slowly die.
So where are the warm bodies?
Trollstein said: "So where are the warm bodies?"
I submit that you answered your own question. It is not that everyone is lazing away watching reruns of Jersey Shore . It is, that we have become to connected, we have lost the sense of community that you referenced. Now the community is worldwide and digital and we can rant from the comfort of our homes. We are placated, not lazy.
Jersey Shore
Is Jersey Shore in reruns already? Damn, I'm so out of touch.
My View As An Outsider
I have read with interest the comments and as a new kid on the block having just registered with motherjones l have been both enraged and compassionate to peoples comments. The two that are different in their outlook are rzombeck and Trollstien.
Firstly the most important rzombeck l will say that as an outsider in the UK and also not fully conversant with rules and regulations appertaining to the US lending market, but safe to say l am updating very fast as l spent most of my life as a UK broker and lender and l was appalled at the lack of regulation of lenders back in the 1980`s that now have cart`e blanch`e to doing anything and even get government hand-outs.
The problem is that when we allow any large corporate body to self-regulate and sooner or later it would become uncontrollable and banks like Fannie Mac and Fannie Mae are prime examples. In the UK we had self-certification mortgages enabling people to say l earned X when in fact they earned Y and providing it fitted criteria you got the mortgage and it always did.
Then in the US out came lenders with sub-prime for all those people that wanted another mortgage or remortgage and could not confirm their income
but got the loan at a higher rate of interest. So no longer was it can you afford it but we accept your word and can charge more interest as well. Added to this was buy-backs and the ability to securitise your loan under a book debt to anyone willing to pay at a lower percentage of the true value - say 50% of the amount borrowed plus interest accrued and of course you are not told. Or you are advised in an onerous way as to say - do not worry it will not affect the original lender, of course not he has sold the indebtedness to someone else.
But and here is the rub they can do anything as your new terms and conditions of contract enables them to do so - such as increase interest rates, charge fees or send in the people to foreclose. They even have their own team of people providing services linked to each other from lender, selling agent, or anyone able to get your property back and leave you with the debt plus interest.
Hope you get help and guidance rzombeck if not contact me l provide Free debt advice, my details are at bottom of comment.
Finally l totally agree with Trollstein and back in the early 70`s when l started in insurance and graduated to mortgages it was the borrower who got protected now it is the lender that can do anything and they become congratulated by their own government. What a change and not one for the better.
Kindest regards, Ian Draper
http://www.google.com/profiles/idadamchristian96
There are some lenders that
There are some lenders that really act in a bad way, making things more difficult to people who want assistance in the real estate market
Mortgage servicers
Seems like the mortgage servicers can reek a lot of havoc and end up losing your house. And, there is little or nothing you can do about it.
Keep all documents and contact your
state Attorney General's office. That's what they are there for. We had a situation with a bank which also involved flood insurance. I wrote a letter to the bank which I copied to the Insurance Commissioner and the Attorney General. They got involved immediately and the problem was solved.
Keep track of every phone call and document everything.
What state? (because I may
What state? (because I may move there). When the lender involved is federally chartered, the state's banking commission has no jurisdiction. Anton Scalia stunned the legal system a little less then a year ago when he cast the deciding vote permiting state's laws (therefore also the state's atty general) to even apply state consumer protection laws to federally chartered banks. It only took the New York Atty Gen.'s office 6 years to push that through.
I've been at this for 16 months. We called, e-mailed, faxed, called again Martha Coakley, Barney Frank, John Kerry, John Tierney ... not to mention our state Reps and Senators. We got nothing. Uhm, sorry, we got a voice mail in response to 9 pages of what the bank was doing and how were about to lose our home, from Tierney's office saying, "We're not sure you wanted action on this."
There's my tax dollars in action (actually inaction).
Fraudulent Foreclosure Proceedings
Check the real property law in any state and see if a foreclosure action can be commenced without production of the original note AND mortgage.
Also see recent federal cases stating that mortgage servicers cannot commence foreclosure proceedings.
I have been doing mortgage
I have been doing mortgage closings for 20 years and I can tell you from experience that good people do get stuck with bad servicers. The borrower does everything right but the servicer post their payments late or not at all. I have had borrowers refinance to get away from their servicer (OCWEN was definetly one of them). Extreme but necessary. The cost to refinance was cheaper than dealing with the bad servicer. That is not something that would work in todays market because if you are late or miss a payment no bank will touch you. I feel for these people, because you can't choose who services your loan. It doesn't hurt to ask when you are shopping for a mortgage or refinancing to find out who they have service the loans. Your loan can still ultimately be sold but it doesn't hurt to reduce the chances. The mortgage co. that I do my personal business with retains the servicing on most of their loans and that is important to me as a consumer.
Ocwen is just one of many bad servicers. One good thing about the mortgage melt down is that some of them have gone under. I wish these borrowers well.
Illegal foreclosures and evictions
It is amazing how many poor souls who have been screwed by
these filthy predators try to fight their desperate battles alone.
If homeowners would just contact their elected representatives,
they could cut through the red tape a lot faster.
We pay our US Senators and Representatives, so why not use them when we need help? Their offices all employ constituent
staff to deal with problems. They LOVE helping constituents,
because it translates into votes.
I notice that "Puleeze" went that way, but had a bad experience with John Tierney's office, and -- from what P. says -- not much
action from the other officials.
I'd like to hope that this was not the usual experience. In any
case, it doesn't hurt to lean on your paid reps, and could help.
And please don't say that you don't know who your elected reps are. Their name, phone, fax and email should be next to your computer. If you don't know, FIND OUT.
My heartfelt good wishes to the innocents who are being screwed by the system. Let Obama -- the so-called "leader" know that you expect ACTION, not lofty rhetoric!
Hey Stephanie
I know it must be comforting to just lump everyone who has problems with servicers into the "deadbeats who don't pay their bills and have no right to complain" category, so you can continue to sneer at those who are losing their homes.
You can't lump my husband and I in that bogus category.
My husband and I bought our home in August 2006. In hindsight it was a horrible time to buy, but we did. We have an Option ARM.
Our mortgage servicing rights were sold four times in the first year, and they ended up with another predatory servicer, Litton Loans (now owned by Goldman Sachs, by the way).
We have never made a late payment, and never paid anything less than the interest only option -- so we're not adding principal to our mortgage. Money's tight, so any extra we have is going toward paying off other bills.
We have also NEVER been late on any other payments to ANYONE.
For the first 11 months Litton serviced our mortgage, they processed our payment incorrectly TEN times. They put it in a suspense account, then increased our principal balance and charged us more interest. They stuck it in an escrow account (we've never had an escrow, we pay our own taxes and insurance). They argued that our existing homeowner's insurance didn't cover the value of the home, and attempted to force place their own super expensive insurance on us.
This is what they do to people who PAY ON TIME.
The only reason we are not stuck in the hell of late charges and default notices is because I was forewarned, and have been all over them constantly with RESPA letters, sending everything certified mail, basically hounding them.
Why should I have to send three certified letters EVERY MONTH just to get the servicer to properly credit my account?
Our home has declined in value by over 40%. So even though we put 20% down, we're still hugely underwater.
It's very tempting to walk away, especially when the predatory mortgage servicers make PAYING your mortgage such a nightmare. But we haven't, and we don't plan to. We like where we live.
Not because it would be morally wrong to leave, because guess what? Getting a mortgage is a BUSINESS TRANSACTION, not a religious sacrament. Business walk away from commercial mortgages all the time, I think individuals have at least the same rights.
But I'm sure you find no problem with any of the practices of predatory servicers, Stephanie. Because to you, only people with moral failings have problems.
BTW: The FDIC has different
BTW: The FDIC has different criteria for rating loans to public companies then to private ones (and individuals). Since the banks pay their FDIC insurance rates based on the overall 'book-health' of their loans, the deck is stacked against the independent. To add gross insult to profound injury, a public company can loose millions whilst paying their CEO millions more and no personal guarantees exist to support the loan(s). So the banks then refrain from defaulting public companies and they even refrain from breaking Wall Street balls. With a private company, the bank can easily reach a stage where they wish to INDUCE a default---because they see the repay faster and easier from the guarantor then to wait around and risk any depletion of assets. So, you're entirely right--borrowing is a business. The lender is the supplier of credit and is morally no superior to the cable TV company. It is no 'holy sacrament'. The real difference is that the banks use PUBLIC money, both from depositors and from the FED, to heavily amplify their leverage and power. That is the true moral crime.
Can anyone stop predatory
Can anyone stop predatory government?
Why you will never get a loan mod.
Wake up. If it paid to modify your loan, the banks, the servicers, the investors would do it. The truth is almost nobody ever gets a loan mod. Everybody gets foreclosed upon.
It doesn't pay the investor to modify. I'll bet you dollars to donuts, if you can't get a mod (and virtually NOBODY gets one), your loan is backed by mortgage insurance. Either you paid for it, or the lender bought a separate policy behind your back. The lender bundled your loan, good or bad, into a "collateralized debt obligation" as the ink was drying on your note and mortgage. They got Moodys, Standard and Poors, and/or Fitch to rate this worthless paper as AAA. AIG, or some other scumbag insurer, wrote an insurance policy or a risk-management trade on your paper, shifting the risk of loss to someone else (who has now been bailed out by TARP, to pay the obligation on it). YOU don't see a dime. Anyway, your "lender" got repaid years ago when they sold the CDO to the investor. Now the "investor," who is hiding somewhere behind the "servicer" wants to foreclose. The Investor would have bought these notes at an "investor's price" less than 100 cents on the dollar. or today's holder of your note might have bought your worthless "toxic asset" paper from the original investor for fire sale prices, say, five cents, or maybe twenty cents on the dollar. Whoever the "investor" is, if he just forecloses, he will probably get back more than he paid. He might even double his money. If the mortgage insurance is still in place, he might even be reimbursed up to 100 cents on the dollar of the original loan obligation.
The OBAMA PLAN, Hamp, etc, are all FAKE solutions, which no banker, investor, note holder has to comply with. It's all voluntary on their part, and a waste of time on your part, which they only do to get TARP funds. For the most part, any time you accept a "three month trial plan" you are getting skinned - every payment you make is to the servicer, not to whoever holds the note. You are paying the fees the servicer might have not otherwise received. Nice of you, says the servicer, as they will then find a reason to reject your modification after the three months expire... the Jokes on you!
It's all the ongoing coverup of the biggest PONZI Scheme in history - a massive fraud on homeowners and the US Taxpayer.
Post new comment
MoJo Comments: Send Us Your Feedback
We changed our spam software to better filter comments. Should you encounter any issues, please let us know.






