MOTHER JONES BY E-MAIL

McCain's Spiritual Guide: Destroy Islam

Washington Dispatch: Televangelist Rod Parsley, a key McCain ally in Ohio, has called for eradicating the "false religion." Will the GOP presidential candidate renounce him?

March 12, 2008


TOOLS

EmailE-mail article
PrintPrint article




BACKTALK

E-mail the editor





Google


Senator John McCain hailed as a spiritual adviser an Ohio megachurch pastor who has called upon Christians to wage a "war" against the "false religion" of Islam with the aim of destroying it.

On February 26, McCain appeared at a campaign rally in Cincinnati with the Reverend Rod Parsley of the World Harvest Church of Columbus, a supersize Pentecostal institution that features a 5,200-seat sanctuary, a television studio (where Parsley tapes a weekly show), and a 122,000-square-foot Ministry Activity Center. That day, a week before the Ohio primary, Parsley praised the Republican presidential front-runner as a "strong, true, consistent conservative." The endorsement was important for McCain, who at the time was trying to put an end to the lingering challenge from former Arkansas governor Mike Huckabee, a favorite among Christian evangelicals. A politically influential figure in Ohio, Parsley could also play a key role in McCain's effort to win this bellwether state in the general election. McCain, with Parsley by his side at the Cincinnati rally, called the evangelical minister a "spiritual guide."

The leader of a 12,000-member congregation, Parsley has written several books outlining his fundamentalist religious outlook, including the 2005 Silent No More. In this work, Parsley decries the "spiritual desperation" of the United States, and he blasts away at the usual suspects: activist judges, civil libertarians who advocate the separation of church and state, the homosexual "culture" ("homosexuals are anything but happy and carefree"), the "abortion industry," and the crass and profane entertainment industry. And Parsley targets another profound threat to the United States: the religion of Islam.

In a chapter titled "Islam: The Deception of Allah," Parsley warns there is a "war between Islam and Christian civilization." He continues:

I cannot tell you how important it is that we understand the true nature of Islam, that we see it for what it really is. In fact, I will tell you this: I do not believe our country can truly fulfill its divine purpose until we understand our historical conflict with Islam. I know that this statement sounds extreme, but I do not shrink from its implications. The fact is that America was founded, in part, with the intention of seeing this false religion destroyed, and I believe September 11, 2001, was a generational call to arms that we can no longer ignore.

Parsley is not shy about his desire to obliterate Islam. In Silent No More, he notes—approvingly—that Christopher Columbus shared the same goal: "It was to defeat Islam, among other dreams, that Christopher Columbus sailed to the New World in 1492…Columbus dreamed of defeating the armies of Islam with the armies of Europe made mighty by the wealth of the New World. It was this dream that, in part, began America." He urges his readers to realize that a confrontation between Christianity and Islam is unavoidable: "We find now we have no choice. The time has come." And he has bad news: "We may already be losing the battle. As I scan the world, I find that Islam is responsible for more pain, more bloodshed, and more devastation than nearly any other force on earth at this moment."

Parsley claims that Islam is an "anti-Christ religion" predicated on "deception." The Muslim prophet Muhammad, he writes, "received revelations from demons and not from the true God." And he emphasizes this point: "Allah was a demon spirit." Parsley does not differentiate between violent Islamic extremists and other followers of the religion:

There are some, of course, who will say that the violence I cite is the exception and not the rule. I beg to differ. I will counter, respectfully, that what some call "extremists" are instead mainstream believers who are drawing from the well at the very heart of Islam.

The spirit of Islam, he maintains, is one of hostility. He asserts that the religion "inspired" the 9/11 attacks. He bemoans the fact that in the years after 9/11, 34,000 Americans "have become Muslim" and that there are "some 1,209 mosques" in America. Islam, he declares, is a "faith that fully intends to conquer the world" through violence. The United States, he insists, "has historically understood herself as a bastion against Islam," but "history is crashing in upon us."

At the end of his chapter on Islam, Parsley asks, "Are we a Christian nation? I say yes." Without specifying what actions should be taken to eradicate the religion, he essentially calls for a new crusade.

Parsley, who refers to himself as a "Christocrat," is no stranger to controversy. In 2007, the grassroots organization he founded, the Center for Moral Clarity, called for prosecuting people who commit adultery. In January, he compared Planned Parenthood to Nazis. In the past Parsley's church has been accused of engaging in pro-Republican partisan activities in violation of its tax-exempt status.

Why would McCain court Parsley? He has long had trouble figuring out how to deal with Christian fundamentalists, an important bloc for the Republican Party. During his 2000 presidential bid, he referred to Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell as "agents of intolerance." But six years later, as he readied himself for another White House run, McCain repudiated that remark. More recently, his campaign hit a rough patch when he accepted the endorsement of the Reverend John Hagee, a Texas televangelist who has called the Catholic Church "the great whore" and a "false cult system." After the Catholic League protested and called on McCain to renounce Hagee's support, the presumptive Republican presidential nominee praised Hagee's spiritual leadership and support of Israel and said that "when [Hagee] endorses me, it does not mean that I embrace everything that he stands for or believes in." After being further criticized for his Hagee connection, McCain backed off slightly, saying, "I repudiate any comments that are made, including Pastor Hagee's, if they are anti-Catholic or offensive to Catholics." But McCain did not renounce Hagee's endorsement.

McCain's relationship with Parsley is politically significant. In 2004, Parsley's church was credited with driving Christian fundamentalist voters to the polls for George W. Bush. With Ohio expected to again be a decisive state in the presidential contest, Parsley's World Harvest Church and an affiliated entity called Reformation Ohio, which registers voters, could be important players within this battleground state. Considering that the Ohio Republican Party has been decimated by various political scandals and that a popular Democrat, Ted Strickland, is now the state's governor, McCain and the Republicans will need all the help they can get in the Buckeye State this fall. It's a real question: Can McCain win the presidency without Parsley?

The McCain campaign did not respond to a request for comment regarding Parsley and his anti-Islam writings. Parsley did not return a call seeking comment.

"The last thing I want to be is another screaming voice moving people to extremes and provoking them to folly in the name of patriotism," Parsley writes in Silent No More. Provoking people to holy war is another matter. About that, McCain so far is silent.

David Corn is Mother Jones' Washington, D.C. bureau chief.



 

Post a Comment

Your Name: 

Your Comment: 
 
Please press "Submit" only once to avoid double-posting.
All HTML formatting is removed from comments.
Read the Mother Jones community rules here.

Comments:

Suprise, suprise,suprise this fol is on Mc ains side. Hitler could run for president and fools like him would back him.
Posted by:Fred _53_99@yahoo.comMarch 12, 2008 12:11:59 PMRespond ^
I hope the endoresments of people just like the one in this article keep coming in for McCain. It provides great fodder for the upcoming GE and seriously brings up topics for which most Americans would find themsleves adverse. If they keep coming this way the movement that started in 2000 against GWB, union busting, pro-corporate, anti-tolerance, anti-GLBT and anti-intellectual which has only gotten stronger since has the baility to be a full fledged movement with serious merits. It is amazing that this pastor does not see the hypocrisy in his statemnts against Islam as the same extreme that he is preaching against. However it is not surprising that he has found ears for this type of talk as many people feel lost in our current culture.
Posted by:joshquasimotoMarch 12, 2008 12:24:35 PMRespond ^
As an honorable person, I think he should renounce & reject.
Posted by:Kwame KilpatrickMarch 12, 2008 12:33:35 PMRespond ^
whether McCain rejects the man publicly is irrelevant. A McCain presidency will legitimize and encourage these extremist views, regardless of what is said publicly against any single extremist.
Posted by:HaroldMarch 12, 2008 12:36:59 PMRespond ^
I'll give Sen. McCain some spiritual advice, you'd better be ready to empty out your pockets and find Jesus in a big flippin' hurry, because if I'm right about you being a war profiteer, and I DO get George's job, and you don't come clean about whatever associations or affilations you have with the whole mismanaged, over-budget, misbegotten nightmare debt generator-thing calling itself 'defense' these days, you'd better be in your car driving like a mad dog to NASA headquarters(either behind or riding in a state cop car,I'd fully support THAT tax dollar expenditure, I'll even chip in for gas out of my own pocket) so they can help you build a rocket ship to Mars, because Planet Earth will suddenly feel cramped, crowded, and somehow confining...
Posted by:BertMarch 12, 2008 12:58:58 PMRespond ^
Once I would have said that Parsley was just your run-of-the-mill Christian used-car salesman, but his sleazy chicanery seems to be eclipsing the rest of his snake oil brethren.

As we all know, it's hard to argue with a nut, but perhaps someone will tell Mr. Parsnips that the first treaty the new United States signed was with Muslim Tripoli. The treaty read, in part, "The government of the United States is not in any sense founded on the Christian religion." I fail to see how that qualifies as working to destroy the "false religion."

Do the people who listen (and believe) this crap ever read? Do they know how to read? The joke used to be that Methodists were Baptists that could read. What does that make Pentecostals, Neanderthals?
Posted by:George HensonMarch 12, 2008 1:38:30 PMRespond ^
Watch this preacher on TV for five minutes and then ask why would anyone in public life want his endorsement. Be sure you watch the humpin' and heavin' parts of his sermons.
Posted by:playeraMarch 12, 2008 1:59:03 PMRespond ^
im a Muslim and i just simply feel sorry for this guy! what people like me get comfort from is the knowledge that im sat here not worried about much while some like this fool are stressing ad being scared of us! we dont follow an evil religion and we couldnt care less what some idiot in Ohio thinks of it! goodday everyone.
Posted by:hamedMarch 12, 2008 2:07:48 PMRespond ^
Sounds like they both believe in the same power - the God of War - just for different reasons. McCain wants the same foriegn policy agenda of Bush/ Cheney in order to continue the corporatization of the middle east. Parsley just sounds like a paranoid schitzophrenic who wants to shape the world according to his insane dellusion.
Posted by:DavidMarch 12, 2008 2:08:20 PMRespond ^
I frankly am so tired of these so called religious men who lack any connection to heart or to a true higher wisdom. These people are simply egos gone mad just like the sad inadequate man in the White House.
I say it is time to evolve past such ignorance, time to be and act wisely and consciously.

Joseph www.explorelifeblog.com and www.peace-together.com
Posted by:Joseph BernardMarch 12, 2008 2:14:48 PMRespond ^
Parsley has something of a point. If you study the history of Islam, you must eventually come to the conclusion that Muhammad was a very violent man--more like Osama bin Laden than Islam's moderate apologists would have you believe.

While there are many good people in the world who follow the teachings of Muhammad, there is no getting around the fact that the founder of the religion was not a man of peace. He was a man of war.

If the root is bad, how can the fruit be any good?
Posted by:Mark FMarch 12, 2008 2:35:59 PMRespond ^
There are many in this country who believe Islam is a false religion. There are many in this country who believe Catholicism is a false denomination of the Christian religion (I'm an ex-Catholic and am no fan of the Catholic Church). There are many who believe Christianity is a false religion. There are many who believe all religions are false and hatefully call the vast majority of Americans who do practice their faith all kinds of vile names (don't deny it; it's true). You know what they call this? Protected speech under the 1st Amendment.

And by the way, the U.S. first battled the Islamist extremists who led the Barbary pirates, and crushed them. Where do you think the line "the shores of Tripoli" in the Marine hymn came from?
Posted by:SteveILMarch 12, 2008 2:42:35 PMRespond ^
One other thing. The difference between Parsley and Hagee and the Obama supporter Farrakhan is that Farrakhan is an abject racist and his religion preaches racism. Neither one who is a Catholic or a Muslim is part of a different race because of their religious beliefs; the Nation of Islam states that all white people are "the Skunks of the Planet Earth."
Posted by:SteveILMarch 12, 2008 2:46:44 PMRespond ^
And why doesn'y yhe hood Reverend son some armor, pick up his sword, incite his followers to join him and get over to Iraq or Afghanistan and 'kill those Moslems'?

What Gospel of Jesus Christ does he use to justify his blood lust for Arabs and other Middle-Easterners and Asians?

C. Davie
Posted by:C. DavieMarch 12, 2008 2:51:45 PMRespond ^
RE previous post: Oops! 'yhe = the' and 'son = don'. sorry for the typos.
Posted by:C. DavieMarch 12, 2008 2:55:37 PMRespond ^
Steve...Just because a moron like you believes something, it doesn't mean "many people in this country" believe it. Judging from the Nation Of Islams broad appeal including republicans like Jack Kemp who called Farrakhan's philosophy "wonderful" and John Ashcroft who sat down for dinner with the man, I can safely say that maybe many people in this country think White people are "The Skunk of the Earth"

You know what they call this? Protected Speech under the 1st amendment.
Posted by:Ehud BARAK ObamaMarch 12, 2008 3:00:21 PMRespond ^
I live 15 minutes from Parsley's "meg-church". I have a hard time listening to the advice of a man who considers bedwetting a sign of "possession" (told to me by a visitor to a "service")and is chauffered in a limo to and from his mansion!
Posted by:PamMarch 12, 2008 3:16:08 PMRespond ^
Mark F, you obvious use the same dubious sources on your information on Islam. The Prophet of Islam was not a violent man, he fought when he had to in self defense both for himself and his followers. Pick up a history book, fool.
Parsley on the other hand belongs to a satanic sect of Protestant Christianity which eagerly awaits Armageddon. They're terrorists, pure and simple.
Posted by:JoeyMarch 12, 2008 3:26:14 PMRespond ^
Rod should actually read the Qur'an first. He'd probably find the surah "Maryam" quite interesting... and familiar as well because it's all about Jesus. Guess that's just a bunch of the demon lies, huh?

Sadly, hatred of Islam and Muslim bashing will probably get McCain more votes rather than less.
Posted by:umsamiMarch 12, 2008 3:49:38 PMRespond ^
There was a direct correlation between church attendance and desire for war and torture. In a way, I'm glad America had 8 years of GWB. It blew the cover off the pro-life movement as the biggest fraud ever perpetrated onto the american public. I considered GWB the ying that's going to lead to the yang.
Posted by:kellamdMarch 12, 2008 4:08:23 PMRespond ^
This man is a charlatan through and
through. Another money changer in
the temple. That this fool has any
influence at all speaks to our
sad condition.Do unto others...?
Posted by:midwestMarch 12, 2008 4:31:07 PMRespond ^
Holy.... is he trying to start a global jihad? Wow. WOW.
Posted by:Brian A. BucherMarch 12, 2008 4:41:05 PMRespond ^
I pray many of you will take the time to read and contrast the Holy Bible with the Holy Qur'an. When you do, you will find we believe the same things except for the trinity. Muslim believe in the oneness of God - Allah (which is the arabic name). Furthermore, when you study the history of the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) you will find that a Christin King gave the prophet and his followers refuge in his kingdom. Muslims and Christins have lived harmoniously for centuries. True believers should not allow people like Parsley, Farahakan and others devide us. Islam is about peace. Anyone that speaks otherwise is NOT a Muslim nor a Christian. You are a not Christian or Muslim if you promote violence.
Peace and Blessings!
Posted by:ASMMarch 12, 2008 4:46:07 PMRespond ^
The dude looks like he was a regular on the old t v show HE---HAW
Posted by:CHE2March 12, 2008 4:57:38 PMRespond ^
Parsley wants to destroy Islam, seem he has the same mentality as he claims Islam does only his theology is different. Ask yourself if he ha d been born In Saudi Arabia he would quite likely be one of the extremist types. I think Parsley and his ilk are mentally ill.
Posted by:regular guyMarch 12, 2008 5:24:23 PMRespond ^
Parsley and McCain have one thing in common: Hunger for war, destruction and discrimination.
Hillary unfortunately is using the same strategy to gain her presidency.
Posted by:almaMarch 12, 2008 5:27:33 PMRespond ^
Just what an unstable world needs a real "false religion. Let's face the facts. There is a whole world of people out there who believed that churches like Parsley's World Harvest Church are the trouble makers who want to overrun the world with there mindless screaming to a God that they know damn well they'll never get close to.
Hooking up with John McCain only shows your true colors.
Posted by:drasMarch 12, 2008 6:01:54 PMRespond ^
Someone should ask John McCain if he is as committed to refighting the Crusades as is his supporter. Why just go back to the 19th century when you can go all the way?
Posted by:Robert PaehlkeMarch 12, 2008 6:05:34 PMRespond ^
With "Christian" philosophies such as Rev. Parsley's, Americans are going to find themselves friendless in a world of rising diversity with us becoming a country of waning diversity and narrow views. History shows that such a phenomenon leads to the rapid downfall of great powers. Examples: Rome, Spain, Islamic Empire (circa 1000 AD).
Posted by:PaulMarch 12, 2008 6:19:57 PMRespond ^
Let the war between the imaginary friends begin
Posted by:Great.....March 12, 2008 6:28:39 PMRespond ^
Parsley is not a christian! He is just using christianity as a front for his extremist ideas. A christian is suppose to represent Christ in the truest sense of the word. They have to love their enemies. Can you imagine Christ speaking the way Parsley does? I can't. Whatever happen to compassion, peace, love, gentleness, kindness, and humbleness? This guy lacks humility and behaves as though his words are God's words. Wrong! He appears to a hate monger and there is no room in christianity for such individuals. Parsley does not speak for christian. He need the conversion he tells other about.
Posted by:Eustace SheppardMarch 12, 2008 6:37:18 PMRespond ^
Mark F, you charge Muhammed with being a 'violent' man....but, you do not address the violence associated with the crucifixion of Christ nor the riots that dogged the Gentiles' apostle, Paul, everywhere he went.

Most 'religions' experience violence of one degree or another during their formative periods, e.g. the persecution of Mormons in the 19th century.

I hate to be nasty, but your singling out Muhammed as a violent man is plain ignorance on display.
Posted by:C. DavieMarch 12, 2008 6:40:29 PMRespond ^
Well said, ASM! God bless you!
Posted by:PaulMarch 12, 2008 6:52:30 PMRespond ^
I would have to contest that. What active religion has not had turmoil or bloodshed. Christianity is based on blood and riches. There was and has been more corruption in the christian religion becuase the church has profited by placing the "son of god" on a pedestal. And to continue the practice, how many wars have been waged?
Posted by:LWhitjr93March 12, 2008 6:55:47 PMRespond ^
The fact that the man may be a religious fundamentalist, a supporter of the right, a Republican, does not make him wrong about Islam. Islam is not the religion of peace that liberal stooges would portray it as. The History is there to read as well as the theology. Islam is a religion of conquest and war, a religion of intolerance, not to mention the oppression of women. Investive will not chnage these facts. Christianity and Judaism are dhimmi to the Muslim, and other religions even lower. Please wise up before you speak of Islam as being OK. Unless your being a slave is OK.
Posted by:TyRight47March 12, 2008 6:57:33 PMRespond ^
Arguments like this have all the intelligence of the old playground line: "My dad can beat up your dad." The only difference is that this argument is far more dangerous, with lasting effects.
Posted by:TimMarch 12, 2008 6:58:01 PMRespond ^
TyRight47: Your argument is pretty baseless, if you replace the word Islam with Christianity. There are examples (the Crusades, Salem Witch Trials, the Inquisition, Christopher Columbus...) that fit right in with the tenets of Christianity, or at least those who practice it.

All religions preach intolerance on some level. All religions are pernicious. As are generalizations.
Posted by:TimMarch 12, 2008 7:02:49 PMRespond ^
You are wrong, TYRIGHT47. Christians and Jews in the Quran are respected as "People of the Book" and the status of women was upgraded significantly, e.g., right to inherit property, right to a divorce.
Posted by:PaulMarch 12, 2008 7:22:09 PMRespond ^
Is not Islams creed, join us or we kill you?
Posted by:dairyairMarch 12, 2008 7:27:30 PMRespond ^
The good preacher seems to have solidly flunked the three basic admonitions of the New Testament: Love thy neighbor. Do unto others. And particularly, judge not.He is not alone in his failure, however, as most so-called Christians have the same problem.
Posted by:Bill DavisMarch 12, 2008 7:37:15 PMRespond ^
I feel sorry for the man (& McCain). He has just earned himself a spot inhell-fire.
Posted by:HafizurMarch 12, 2008 7:44:22 PMRespond ^
Muslims should not apologize for 9/11. 9/11 was a Zionist job. Go to www.iamthewitness.com to get an education.
Posted by:Jerry BakkerMarch 12, 2008 7:46:58 PMRespond ^
its too bad such an ignorant fool is running for the presidency of the US.
Posted by:michelleMarch 12, 2008 7:54:04 PMRespond ^
"We may already be losing the battle. As I scan the world, I find that Islam is responsible for more pain, more bloodshed, and more devastation than nearly any other force on earth at this moment."

Without accepting the validity of the statistics behind that statement, does that mean that Christians would be winning if they were the ones causing the most pain, bloodshed, and devastation?
Posted by:Columbus Discovered CubaMarch 12, 2008 8:00:33 PMRespond ^
People who claim a religious motive for campaigns of hatred and violence are liars and frauds. They have political, economic or sociopathic agendas which they couch in religionist jargon to deceive others. People like Jerry Falwell, Osama bin Laden, Ronald Reagan, Erik Prince, the state of Israel, and this guy, Parsley.

McCain doesn't understand the Christianists any better than he does the Islamists - they all seem like "wackos" to him - but he knows that Parsley represents money and votes, and that Islam happens in the countries where he plans to wage war for oil.

So McCain will do the Machiavellian thing (just like Reagan and the Bushes) and suck up to every cheesy televangelist with a following of 10 or more, while rattling his sabre and glaring darkly at anyone or anything remotely related to Islam.

Understanding of complex issues is difficult to attain; prejudice, on the other hand, provides the ready answers and absolute certainty needed to mount a Crusade.

Posted by:mgloraineMarch 12, 2008 8:00:34 PMRespond ^
Sounds like a medieval Pope calling for one of the original crusades.
You would think that Christians would have learned a valuable lesson from that experience.
I don't think it is the purpose of world religions to slaughter each other into oblivion; but to bring peace, understanding and love to the world.
Posted by:AquinasMarch 12, 2008 8:13:24 PMRespond ^
Pure fascistic drivel. For the edification of Parsley: "Allah," i.e., "God" in Arabic, is derived from "Allaha" which also means "God" in the ancient Aramaic language as spoken by Jesus. In other words, Jesus referred to God as "Allaha" or "Allah." Parsley also seems to be unaware that of the three Abrahamic faiths (i.e. Judaism, Christianity and Islam), only Islam recognizes and reveres the prophets of the other two.
I never cease to be amazed and depressed by the gross ignorance of the likes of Parsley and apparently, McCane, he of the nineteenth century mind set, who will grovel before any scoundrel/con artist/hatemonger to gain political support, money and influence.
Posted by:DavidMarch 12, 2008 8:16:52 PMRespond ^
It is a western Myth that Islam is synonymous with wars. Please do some reading http://www.islamtomorrow.com/.
Posted by:muslimMarch 12, 2008 8:17:12 PMRespond ^
All religion seems to want everyone to follow their one and only right one. A free thinker may have problems accepting any religion, it is the self righteous who demand you believe. Ignorance is the foundation of religion, does that mean one needs religion?
Posted by:LeefellerMarch 12, 2008 8:24:16 PMRespond ^
Parsley is a crackpot - and so is McCain!
Posted by:Fil MunasMarch 12, 2008 8:37:51 PMRespond ^
"false religion"?

There's really no call for this sort of redundancy.
Posted by:turboniumMarch 12, 2008 9:00:04 PMRespond ^
I love how people want to cut Mccain down on here.I actually saw nothing in the article that was false.But its okay for Obamas church to embrace Farrekan,somebody I would compare a notch below Hitler!
Posted by:KyleMarch 12, 2008 9:10:01 PMRespond ^
Ehud BARAK Obama said, "Steve...Just because a moron like you believes something, it doesn't mean "many people in this country" believe it." Actually, my statements weren't about what I believed, because I never said what I believed; therefore, there is no way for you to know what I believe. Which means, what I said was absolutely true.

Kemp's association with Farrakhan didn't do him any good, did it? And I don't know where you found that Ashcroft had dinner with him. That broad appeal, isn't so broad. And Farrakhan is a racist.

By the way, all those who believe how horrible Christianity and Islam and so on have been on the world, forget one thing. Nearly 100,000,000 were murdered, in the last century alone, under Communist rule than in under any other -ist or -ism (Nazism, which, by the way is socialism, came in second).
Posted by:SteveILMarch 12, 2008 9:25:37 PMRespond ^
Read the Quran and read what it says about the beloved prophet Jesus(Peace Be Upon Him). One of the mightiest messengers of Allah. A muslim is not a muslim if he doesn't recognize the birth of Jesus.
As for the anti-christ, they say they proudly killed Jesus (PBUH) and he is boiling in semen, do your research and find out what "religion" states this.
Posted by:MotherJonesReaderMarch 12, 2008 9:36:56 PMRespond ^
Thank you so much for giving this story wider circulation! I've been trying to shine a light on Parsley for almost three years and when I reported on this last week in my paper, the Cleveland Free Times, I was afraid it would die there, even though Parsley's ties with McCain have more potential impact than his ties with 2006 Ohio gubernatorial candidaye Ken Blackwell. Parsley is a power-mad hater and it infuriated me to learn that he had been campaigning at McCain's elbow the same day that Obama was being harassed by Tim Russert to repudiate Louis Farrakhan, a man with whom he had no connection.

This story needs to be broadcast far and wide!
Posted by:Anastasia PMarch 12, 2008 9:51:10 PMRespond ^
Panama John

Since Senator John McCain was not born "in the United States" he is not a natural born Citizen of the United States and therefore is not eligible to the Office of President.

It's really quite simple, and only needs further explanation because the general consensus of politicians and the media has been to duck the issue. All evidence supports the conclusion seen in the topic sentence. Sources that support this conclusion include the U.S. Constitution which is the supreme law of the land, The Naturalization Act of 1790, The Naturalization Act of 1795, and the Hay-Bunau-Varilla Treaty ratified for the construction and operation of the Panama Canal Zone.

John McCain was born on the sovereign territory of the Republic of Panama to U.S. citizen parents. McCain is a United States citizen due to parentage, not naturally by reason of birth on U.S. soil which is a basic constitutional requirement.

The ineligibility of John McCain to serve as president may not prevent his run for the office. However, he cannot hold the office. If he were elected president, legal challenges would be inevitable.

Without an amendment to the U.S. Constitution, it is unlikely the Supreme Court of the United States could rule in McCain's favor except by legislating from the bench. The more conservative side of the Republican party has typically represented the case for separation of powers with a louder voice than the more liberal side of the Democrat party. Have conservatives been gagged?

The sidestepping of this critical issue in the media, by the politicians, and the political parties is alarming and may lead to a national crisis in the event of a McCain win in the general election.

The Naturalization Act of 1790 that changed the definition for natural born citizen to include parentage was repealed by the Naturalization Act of 1795. Since then the constitutional requirement has not again been broadened to include parentage in the definition of natural born Citizen.

See more detail at http://idacres.com/politics/mccain/natural_born_Citizen.html
Posted by:scottwwwMarch 12, 2008 9:54:06 PMRespond ^
What are you talking about? Muhammad was a warrior! He promoted violence nearly his entire adult life. Read about the battles of Islam. Muhammad was not a peaceful man.
Posted by:Mark FMarch 12, 2008 10:03:06 PMRespond ^
What is the difference between a violent man and a man who fights? You claim it was in self defense, but you are wrong. Jesus was a man of peace who taught peace and lived peace. Gotama Buddha was a man of peace who taught peace and lived peace. Muhammad was a man of war who taught revenge and lived revenge.
Posted by:Mark FMarch 12, 2008 10:08:52 PMRespond ^
Christ was the founder of the Christian religion. He never crucified a single man. He was a man of peace.
Posted by:Mark FMarch 12, 2008 10:11:26 PMRespond ^
Obviously none of you know the History of Islam, none of you understand the difference between the various faiths and what they espouse and none of you understand history For a START go to Surah 5, http://www.islamicity.com/mosque/QURAN/5.htm Then for an education read and understand that the crusades were a response to Islamic invasion of the west and Christian countries, and not a single one of you under stands what Dhimmi is, because you are obviously Dhimmi dummies. It would tale you 5 minutes of googling to find that I am correct and you are full of slogans without knowledge, but of course none of you would like your pathetic comments and rantings to be disturbed by one fact, nor would you want to start thinking in terms of looking at the facts, rather than looking at the fairy tales you learned in some liberal school, teaching a history based on the quaint notion that all civilizations are equal, all beliefs are equal, and all religions are the same. Pity that they give out diplomas in boxes of Crackerjacks nowadays.

Oh, yes I am supporting Obama as the only intelligent politician in the running, certainly the only one with the discipline to study facts and actually change his mind when he finds the facts support a different understanding. Most of you are voting for him because you can dimly understand that, but unfortunately, very dimly. As for Islam? It’s the religion that needs to conquer, that’s not a matter of debate, that’s a matter of fact. Facts ladies and gentlemen, but don’t let them ruin your opinions, it’s too late to learn, or learn to think. Unlike Rev Parsley (where are Rosemary and Sage?) I do understand that there is no defeating 1.2 billion people who follow a totalitarian religion, but we could separate from them. totally. Christianity is not the terrorist, as you could understand if you speak to the Chinese this week, Islam is, and it is all over the world. It’s based on war and terrorism, and subjection of conquered peoples, that’s it’s History and it’s theology. I am not a Christian, but I well understand that the Christian Jesus and the Muslim Mohammed are not even faintly comparable, Jesus did not take 9 year olds as wives, slaughter Jewish Tribes who would not accept his new religion, nor did Jesus fight wars. Judaism doesn’t need the world to be Jewish, all nations have a part of the world to come, as do all righteous. It’s only Islam that must conquer, by it’s theology and it’s History.

It’s just so useless to try and communicate with the dim witted who will not even check their facts.
Posted by:Ty RightMarch 12, 2008 10:15:09 PMRespond ^
"McCain so far is silent".. Silence no more; he already has advocated a 100 years war in Iraq.
Posted by:EsKayEsMarch 12, 2008 10:22:38 PMRespond ^
As an Obama supporter, I am troubled by this story. This is a brilliant move on McCain's part. This will win him the election. This exactly the kind of red meat the will bring republicans to the polls. Right out of Rove's play book and I am afraid it will work. I just hope the democrats can play this type of hard ball
Posted by:jomamaMarch 12, 2008 10:27:17 PMRespond ^
Both parties have been taken over by their fringes. The only logical thing is to sit on your hands. This will be the first election I have not voted in my entire 67 year life. The system has failed. REH
Posted by:Ray Evans HarrellMarch 12, 2008 10:35:31 PMRespond ^
Jomama. The reason to support Obama is precisely to get away from this "HardBall" Karl Rovian way. If thats what you want you needn't support MCCain as Hillary is the Biggest Rovian, and Rove himnself is a customer of Penn. Aren't you just tired of this crappy way of doing dirty business? Why do you support Obama if your wish is to continue with"politics as Usual"? Weird... Anyway, this is neither "Brilliant" Nor "Red Meat" nor an election winner. Parsley people were never going to vote for Hillary or Obama... As much as they will depsise McCain as a "Liberal" they will suport any Republican before Hillary, who to them is the anti-Christ (I quite agree , she takes over from GW as the New Anti-Christ, as Bush needed the nasty genius of Cheney and Rove, whereas Hillary is all that nastiness in one one tight bunch). Democrats and patriots will vote for Obama. (That's real patriots, not people who wrap themselves in the flag with IQs in the lower double digits) and real democrats (not people who imagine that voting for the Domcratic party means being a democrat). Obama is the first real chance for change in my life time since JFK's assasination, (I'm 61 years, 4 Continents,7 Universities and 3 citizenships) but unfortunately nothing good ever happenms, the American people always elect the biggest idiot or the biggest [deleted], so that means that the few sane people living here will be denied an Obama presidency... which doesn't matter so much anymore to people my age as to my grandchildren and yours... If you want a world with any chance at all, you will at least try to work for Barack Obama. It took only 8 years for one American president to do damage that may take generations to repair at best, and at worst may never be repaired. That's what Hillary and McCain promise, more damage.
Posted by:Ty RightMarch 12, 2008 10:50:23 PMRespond ^
I've got a new slogan for the McCain campaign: Officially endorsed by Rod Parsley, the man who takes the Christ out of Christian.
Posted by:David Hart DykeMarch 12, 2008 10:59:47 PMRespond ^
Anyone who chooses to follow one of these ignorance-peddling, kool-aid-drinking, populist-pandering, war-mongreling, non-profit-whoring, tax-evading, prophet-profiting, rapture-rapping, give-me-your-money-and-I'll-solve-all-your-problems clowns - deserves EVERYTHING they get.....NOTHING! (Is there such a thing as run-on participles???)

All said individuals (up to, and including, the Republican nominee for president) will inherit are worms and dust! GET A LIFE PEOPLE, it's the only one you'll get (unless, of course, you also believe in reincarnation).
Posted by:Paul BMarch 12, 2008 11:15:58 PMRespond ^
Tim writes (pity that you can construct a sentence and not marshall a single fact, Tim)
"if you replace the word Islam with Christianity. There are examples (the Crusades, Salem Witch Trials, the Inquisition, Christopher Columbus...) that fit right in with the tenets of Christianity, or at least those who practice it. "

Actually if you bother to read the Gospels or Paul, Tim, you would find that you have no case at all. Islam is in it's very structure a religion of expansion at any cost(Sort of like the George Bush Regime). But you have read neither the Qu'ran nor the New Testament, Have you Tim? The Salem Witch trials, were very unchristian, and were regretted within the life times of the those involved. The Crusades were a response to the Muslim invasion by force of the Christian world and the forces of islam were finally turned away at the gates of Vienna in 1669, but don't let the facts of History confuse you Tim... You obviously know nothing of the Tenets of Christianity which is very sad for someone whose name is Tim.
Your final piece of foolishness:
"All religions preach intolerance on some level. All religions are pernicious. As are generalizations."

All Religions are pernicious as are all generalizations ? Really Tim is that why you flunked remedial Logic 101? All religions teach intolerance? Hopefully there was no institution anywhere which awarded you a degree Tim, as you should not have even passed Junior High History. The intolerance I see is your intolerance for facts, possibly because you have yet to read anything but fiction and the funnies, certainly you know nothing of any religion. Hopefully you will not have children that you can pass your deleterious genetic load to.
Posted by:TyRightMarch 12, 2008 11:20:22 PMRespond ^
JUST IMAGINE IF GOD FORBID MCCAIN WINS THE ELECTIONS HOW MANY MORE MORONS LIKE PARSLEY WE WILL HAVE?? PARSLEY IS TALKING LIKE A TERRORIST, SHOULDNT HE BE PUT IN JAIL?? IF THAT WAS A MUSLIM SAYING THAT OUR GOVERNMENT WOULD PUT HIM IN JAIL FOREVER. JUST IMAGINE WHAT WOULD HAPPEN IF GOD FORBID MCCAIN WINS THE ELECTIONS...WORLD WAR 3??? WE ARE OVERDUE TO A DEMOCRATIC PRESIDENT SO LETS PRAY THAT WE WILL HAVE A DEMOCRAT AS OUR FUTURE PRESIDENT THIS YEAR...
Posted by:if mccain wins we will...March 12, 2008 11:27:06 PMRespond ^
Islamo-fascism is the enemy of civilization.
Posted by:MistrXMarch 12, 2008 11:31:52 PMRespond ^
Civilization is the enemy of facism - islamo OR christian!
Posted by:Paul BMarch 12, 2008 11:46:04 PMRespond ^
Is not Islams creed, join us or we kill you?
I wish instead of educating yourself through exposing yourself to propaganda, you read original creed of Islam in Quran where it states:"No compulsion in Religion"Quran:2:256
Posted by:ShawMarch 12, 2008 11:48:34 PMRespond ^
Christianity had the reformation where most of the bad bits were shelved.

Christianity is now safe to ignore (for the most part at least).

The Quran and associated books are too open to interpretation because they are written in Arabic, and Arabic words have many translations.

This ambiguity and the lack of a centralised semi-controlled hierachy of religious leaders will continue to create "fanatical" followers.

I don't know if there is anything that can really be done about this.

Posted by:honestMarch 12, 2008 11:52:54 PMRespond ^
McCain and Clinton both have something in common with Richard Nixon and Hubert Humphrey: they seek and accept support from any corner, regardless of the danger to our nation that is inherent in granting acceptance to radical, hate-filled, ignorance-peddling extremists like Parsley. The scariest part is that God only knows (pun intended) which one of these nutball, anti-science, anti-progress, anti-human war mongers McCain might choose to lend his ear to if he gets into the White House.
Posted by:Stan McCauleyMarch 13, 2008 12:35:37 AMRespond ^
Mr. Parsley says,the year after 9/11,34,000 Americans "have become Muslims"Iam wonder,How many tanks did we see in the streets of America ?and what kind of weapons did they use to force the 34,000 Americans
to become Muslims ?
little that he know that we believe in Christianity as a great religion,we also believe in Judaism as a great religion & both Christians & Jews are the people of the Book.
If you take this Man's speech and replace both word Islam & Muslims with
your own faith,How would you feel and what would you do ?
Thanks & Allah Bless America.
Posted by:massimoMarch 13, 2008 12:47:00 AMRespond ^
If ridiculous people like Mr. Parsley truly want McCain to win, it makes more logical sense for them to endorse a Democrat - be it Clinton or Obama. Ive been a Democratic voter for 8 years, but it would sure make me stop and reconsider my choice for president if I found myself supporting the same candidate as Mr Parsley.
Posted by:Kaja BMarch 13, 2008 12:56:25 AMRespond ^
McCain wants to wage war on Islam...

He is mad, the God of Islam is the God of Abraham and Moses, does he think he is going to make people forsake the instruction in The Koran, to defend, and to battle on with their wealth and their lives.
Posted by:ScaramoucheMarch 13, 2008 1:03:47 AMRespond ^
One Last Chance


When Albert Einstein first introduced his Theory of Special Relativity with it's equation E=mc^2, it shook the science world with great intensity. It kindled many a brilliant minds to test the equation which eventually lead to the making of the most powerful and destructive device man has ever made, the Atomic Bomb.

Although this theory was first introduced a hundred years ago in 1905, many of this world's population still have no idea what that equation really means. To describe it simply, E in the equation means energy, m is for mass or matter and c signifies the word constant which in this particular equation has a value equal to the speed of light which is 300,000,000 m/sec.

This equation interest many scientists because it says that mass or matter can be turned into energy. Since man has been doing this kind of stuff turning matter (firewood) into energy (flame), one could not help but ask, what's amazing about that?

What makes that formula amazing is that it also means that the process is reversible and therefore, instead of the usual matter to energy conversion, it's the other way around -- energy can become matter. For the sake of illustration, it's like turning fire into firewood. Energy which is invisible can become visible by transforming itself into matter. Now, isn't that really amazing ?

That's exactly how those scientists received the formula or equation when they first saw it. It's like seeing magic without the inherent trick -- unreal but real. Before that formula was introduced, nobody had thought that something can be created "from nothing". With recent experiments using particle accelerators, it's been confirmed that energy can become matter.

Another amazing thing about this formula is that the constant is so big. Three hundred million multiplied to itself means 9 is followed by 18 zeros or 9 quintillion. If we don't know what that means, it simply says that every speck of matter even how light it is, packs or contains a very large amount of energy.

If a petal of a rose flower weighs 1 gram, it simply means that that petal contains energy equal to 90 trillion joules or equivalent to an explosive force of 21.5 kilotons of TNT. To give us a glimpse of how powerful that is, the atomic bomb which was dropped in Hiroshima, Japan has an equivalent explosive power of only 12.5 kilotons of TNT. It means that just a little over than half a gram of matter was really expended in that explosion. Yes, just over half of a gram of matter, converted into pure energy, had caused that city to be flattened. A single rose petal, if converted into pure energy, can destroy a big city. Can we imagine that? It seems unrealistic, but it's true.

At first glance, everything that has been said seems very impossible and that is why until today some "scientists" are still doubtful about this formula although based on many experiments, this equation never floundered but instead constantly agrees with all experimental results that has been done for the past 100 years.

The facts presented, although proven correct, seem to be unbelievable because our senses and frame of mind just can't fathom the idea that such a delicate and lovely petal or any object as light as that can contain such a gargantuan force.

If a mere gram of petal or matter contains such a huge amount of energy, how much more the whole universe? The amount of energy needed to form this universe is simply unimaginable and mindboggling. The real question is where did that infinitesimal amount of energy came from and what or who contained it before it took shape into a visible form which we now call universe?

In a more distant future, that question will be answered when in time, its Maker will take it back again. Everyone will know Him coz when He comes back to reclaim it, it would take the same amount of energy to take back what it took to form it.

The energy involved would simply be Immeasurable and Awesome !

So awesome that no mass or matter would be able to withstand it. They would simply explode all at the same time into nothingness and it's not going to be quiet coz they will create the loudest noise or the Biggest Bang! this whole universe can blurt out. It would be somewhat like a "universal" praise, by which all matter or elements seem to shout in unison, and exclaim, "HAIL TO THE KING !!" and at the same time a call to all the people of all generations of the earth, dead or living, saying "AWAKE !!! , FOR THE BRIDEGROOM IS COMING !!!".


It will be a time when all the people born in this world would realize the true meaning of the word, ALMIGHTY !!!.


********


" And I saw a great white throne, and Him that sat on it, from whose face the earth and the heaven (universe) fled away; and there was found no place for them."


"And I saw the dead, small and great, stand before God ..."


"And whosoever was not found written in the book of life was cast into the lake of fire."


"...and shall be tormented day and night for ever and ever. "


Revelation 20 :10 -12 & 15


********


I feel sorry for those who believe that man is a "developed" monkey which simply implies that man has no soul and therefore is not answerable to any spiritual God. I feel sorry for atheists who can't see God in little creations like that of a lovely rose petal and clueless of the fact how it could transform into a terrible wrath capable of crushing a big city. They never know that the God of Love can become a God of Wrath and that hell could be a place 9 quintillion times hotter than what one can bear.

I also feel sorry for people (owners, models and production staff) who uses sensual ads or gimmicks just to sell their wares not knowing that the money they gain is so cheap in exchange for their souls to be burned forever.

If we think that God is not capable of burning souls forever, He gave us that illustration of the rose petal that we might think of His words not only once or twice but more than 9 quintillion times.

Albert Einstein once said that, "God does not play dice". That statement is true as shown in his brilliant equation E=mc^2 But many people missed the real point and that is "God is not kidding".

"Alas, alas, that great city, ... for in one hour is she made desolate". Revelation 18:19

How can a big city be destroyed and made lifeless in one hour? The answer is in Einstein's equation but the Bible stated its forthcoming use two thousand years earlier.

"...Their flesh shall consume away while they stand upon their feet, and their eyes shall consume away in their holes, and their tonque shall consume away in their mouth". Zechariah 14:12

God did not lack in warning the world. His warnings were written thousands of years beforehand. He's not requiring us to climb the highest mountain or swim the deepest sea to be saved. He just wants us to listen.

But not to false religions in which some of them tell their flock to eat "holy" biscuits to take away their sins; or kill "infidels" to be rewarded with 72 virgins in heaven; or teach that cows are sacred but consider other people as outcasts or "untouchables"; or teaching evolution that man came from monkeys or is it the other way around?; or teach that there is no God or Maker and that their eyes or brains just pop up in there just because there's a hole or cavity in their head.

So foolish and yet billions of people believe in them. I just can't help but recall Jose Rizal's words when, in frustration, he said "Oh, what blindness, what lack of understanding !" and the words of God when He said "...thou hast tried (or tested) them who say they are apostles, but are not, and hast found them liars. " (Revelation 2:2). (Both statements refer to Catholicism but they could also be applied to all false religions and beliefs coz they are all blind and liars.)

Einstein's equation when used as a weapon may be so terrifying because of its destructiveness but it's just a foretaste of what God is really capable of coz once His final Judgment to unbelievers is rendered, there will be no words to describe it but the word, unbearable.

What's frightening about a swift destruction is that God is denying all these people a chance to say the simple words, "I'm sorry" before they die. It means that the Lord has given up on them and deny them that one last chance for salvation. Bang! and it's all over.

But God is really not that unmerciful. This gospel would be preached around the world one last time and much louder before that appointed hour of desolation will come.

Let us not wait for that last minute and deny all those people the chance to say those simple words. Help ring aloud the warning bells before its too late.

This may be their one last chance. Pass it on.
Posted by:Spiderman2March 13, 2008 1:23:38 AMRespond ^
All I can say is this Parsley is no sage and if Rosemary knew she would give him no thyme.

I am a Muslim but truly love anyone who upholds Christ's teaching 'do unto other.. etc. Or Mohammed's teaching "Love for others what you love for yourself." This man has given fear mongering another name. Why can't he preach Christ's love? Is he really a Christian? He should join the army, Fallon has fallen and Bush needs a replacement. Endless wars and forced occupation. Thank God we still have hope for America reading from the posts here. Let true America stand up PLEASE. We all belong to human race.
Posted by:Ahmed AsgherMarch 13, 2008 1:34:43 AMRespond ^
He would have been burned as a heretic by Columbus.
Posted by:JackMarch 13, 2008 1:56:40 AMRespond ^
Another right wing lunatic gas bag with a video tape machine. That's all we need. We have become a nation of frightened wimps that will follow anyone who appears to be some kind of tough guy. Our fears will over come us eventually and we'll be looking for our own little hitler to protect us. I hope we find a way to see beyond this or else we are doomed.
Posted by:G SmithMarch 13, 2008 2:21:32 AMRespond ^
Have you studied Christianity? The Crusades? The Spanish Inquisition? Etc. etc.?

Now which Religion has an history of violence again??

Read your bible recently?? Saw the violence practised by Jesus, Son of Joseph??

Say again???

Posted by:Peter PolsteinMarch 13, 2008 2:35:52 AMRespond ^
"Now which Religion has an history of violence again??"

Communism.
Posted by:SteveILMarch 13, 2008 2:41:33 AMRespond ^
Hello Mark F.

I beg to differ from your opinion. If you would take the time to read his life history he was far from a warmonger. He was a man of peace; please read his life history. Yes he did engage in battle but only when the fight came to him.
With this statement, what you are saying is that the 34,000 people who converted to Islam since Sept 11 are war mongers. Please get your facts straight.
Posted by:MustafaMarch 13, 2008 2:44:24 AMRespond ^
The spiritual vacuum created by the pathological dissociation (not the healthy progressive DIFFERENTIATION) of science, religion, art, and politics in the 17th century European enlightenment has left people with the choice between materialism and regression to mythic-membership religion. The only progressive religion prevalent in the U.S. today is yoga, which is up the evolutionary spiral because it invites the practitioner to go INSIDE to find the Divine. Thank God people are practicing yoga more and more. If they stick with it, they will discover a spirituality that is wedded to a progressive vision of our interdependence, (all is one; one is all) (Love is the be-all, end-all), not dog-eat-dog competition, and certainly not the medieval us-vs-them (ours is the only way) regressive reaction of the religious right.
Posted by:racetoinfinityMarch 13, 2008 2:46:40 AMRespond ^
I'm a Muslim and I want to know if McCain has any daughters so I can sleep with them. I would also like to bed his wife while he's on the campaign trail (I can tell she likes a little Mohammed in her.)
Posted by:MatimaMarch 13, 2008 3:02:02 AMRespond ^
McCain has less to denounce than Obama's very close relationship to Rev. Wright.

We see on a daily basis how peacful the Islams are. Killing more innocents than combatants. Many of which are fellow Islamists. Just ask Salman Rushdie how forgiving and peaceful they are. He was forced into hiding for his life just for writing a book.
Posted by:TarmanganiMarch 13, 2008 3:26:04 AMRespond ^
parsley.....the stupid

What do you know about Islam.
Stupid like you can never feel anything than gathering people in front of you.
Forgot who won in the crusade.you want one more crusade may the god give you age to see that.

Posted by:heirdyMarch 13, 2008 3:40:06 AMRespond ^
this sort of rhetoric certainly is protected by the 1st amendment. And that's great. But nobody is saying he can't say what he did, only that the content of it sheds a very grim light on the realities of John McCain and the way his religion shapes his mind. IF this man is his "spiritual guide", then it's hard to make the case that McCain doesn't believe pretty much exactly how this jerk does. Protected speech? yes, definitely! Ignorant and telling? More so!!!!
Posted by:pt447March 13, 2008 3:50:21 AMRespond ^
leave hypocrisy taramgani,
I want you to make a correction Islam against harming people.
Muslims are portrayed as extremists only because of following the true path from the only god.
Will you be quite when you are outraged from your home and homeland.
Or will you be quite when your sisters are being raped killed by this [deleted]ing.........
Posted by:heirdyMarch 13, 2008 3:51:20 AMRespond ^
Thanks for making my point, Heirdy.

All you can think about is raping and killing. You are a less than a dog.
Posted by:TarmanganiMarch 13, 2008 4:04:42 AMRespond ^
While Parsley's position my be harmful to McCain's campaign and his delivery to direct for most, what he says is very accurate. You do not have to be a scholar to read historical accounts of Muhammeds life to realize he was an opium addicted pedophile that spent time in the desert while high and supposedly saw some visions and wrote a book to compete with the Bible. The man was a loon.

As to which religion is more violent. At least the Christians realized the error of their ways and no longer call for the death of "infidels."
Posted by:Tahoe ManMarch 13, 2008 4:35:35 AMRespond ^
I love to be kept updated
Posted by:IbrahimMarch 13, 2008 4:50:18 AMRespond ^
Nothing new about this Christian stance. Anyone who has read history, or read the bible knows that Christianity has a horrendous history of murder, torture, stealing, and every other crime you can think of, all in the name of god. I just cannot understand how anyone can read the bible, take it for truth, and come away feeling good, but of course if you have had this drummed into your head from birth, it is no wonder their minds are conditioned to believe without proof.
Posted by:SchrodMarch 13, 2008 4:52:50 AMRespond ^
Oh yawn... I've been listening to that kind of rhetoric,literally, for decades. I was born to immigrants in SE Utah coal mining town and the Mormons were always preaching about "false religions" (Catholics, Greek Orthodox...you name it). They did a good job of pounding it into their kid's heads, as well, because they pounded the hell out of me all the time because I wasn't a Mormon.
Posted by:koolaidSFMarch 13, 2008 4:56:26 AMRespond ^
Obama supporters Farrakhan and Wright are racists. McCain supporters Hagee and Parsley are vehemently against certain religions or denominations of Christianity. The two are not equal whatsoever, regardless of how David Corn tries to write this up.

Matthew Yglesias (and others) tried to say Hagee was a racist anti-Semite because Hagee had said that (and I'm paraphrasing) Jews have brought their troubles, including the Holocaust, on to themselves because they didn't follow the laws God provided. Where would Hagee determine that? If one actually reads the Old Testament, it consists of mostly an admonishment of Jews and their punishment by God for not following the laws God provided. One has to conclude then that the Old Testament, written in the Hebrew language by Jews, is racist. I think not. Nor does it make Hagee a racist. Hagee's opinions about the travails of the Jewish people isn't a view I share, but he is in no way a racist. And neither is Parsley.

Again, Obama supporters Farrakhan and Wright are racists.
Posted by:SteveILMarch 13, 2008 4:57:55 AMRespond ^
I am niether a Muslim nor a Christian. While I strongly diasagree with some of the comments, others are just facts - in modern times, people of islamic religion have been responsible for much bloodshed and brutality in this world from the partition of India where millions of Hindus were murdered in Bangladesh in the name of Islam to the World Trade Center. The basic tenet of the Islamic religion is that those who are not Muslim are "Kafers", i.e., dirty people and have to be converetd to Islam by the sword or they must die. All religions have strong belief about themselves and do not like other religions, but Islam is unique in that it recommends violence to deal with other religions.
Posted by:nofuzzydreamsMarch 13, 2008 5:04:03 AMRespond ^
he's right
Posted by:paulMarch 13, 2008 5:04:11 AMRespond ^
Why am I not shocked to see that this site attracts people who try so hard to be politically correct. I am not a Muslim or a Christian and I would not care about what people like this guys are saying. My ancestors were refugees who had to leave their homes and flee because of Islamic terror. America has friends in the 2.5 billion people in India and China who are busy working hard to raise their standard of living. It is only the tiny minority of very lazy people in the middle east and their sympathesizers that worry about these. The only reason they have so much voice is oil. It is therefore imperative that the world get off middle east oil as soon as possible, render them poor and put them back on their camels so they cannot funds the terrorists in Pakistan.
Posted by:nofuzzydreamsMarch 13, 2008 5:16:10 AMRespond ^
Mr. Parsley (I find no reason to call him "reverend") is a very frightening individual. His statements are divisive and destructive. Mr. McCain should absolutely denounce Mr. Parsley's stance on Islam and distance himself immediately from the minister. This type of hate is unwelcome in America. He is inflammatory and simply put, wrong. There is nothing "christian" about this man.
Posted by:DecafPleaseMarch 13, 2008 5:20:27 AMRespond ^
I couldn't agree more.
Posted by:DecafPleaseMarch 13, 2008 5:21:05 AMRespond ^
I thought you get your 72 virgins only after you go to heaven after a suicide bombing!! How dare you make this kind of statement. McCain in fact has an adopted daughter from Bangladesh for which he had to lose a whisper campaign from Bush in 2000. Have you shown even one-hundreth of his generosity!!
Posted by:nofuzzydreamsMarch 13, 2008 5:22:45 AMRespond ^
John McCain is old. That is not s bad thing, for many of us will reach that point.

But one does have to wonder about his judgment, about whom he links with.

Posted by:PhiloMarch 13, 2008 5:26:05 AMRespond ^
Parsley's history is little off.
Excerpt:

Christopher Columbus
by
Thomas C. Tirado, Ph.D.
Professor History
Millersville University

Granada:
The next event that influenced greatly the life of Christopher Columbus was the fall of Granada in 1491-92. For Christian Spain, the conquest of Granada was the most important event in the 15th century. After nearly eight centuries of fighting, the Christian Iberians finally defeated the Muslim Iberians. On the 2nd of January, 1492, King Ferdinand and Queen Isabella rode into Granada as conquerors. At their side sat a disconsolate Columbus. While others who had accompanied the Catholic monarchs were rejoicing as they watched the symbols of sovereignty pass to the Christians, Columbus sat dejected. Shortly after the ceremony he rode off to La Rábida monastery nearby to nurse his bruised ego. What had happened a few days earlier in the royal military camp during the final assault on Granada, was that a committee of experts had rejected Columbus’ pleas to secure royal backing for his “Enterprise of the Indies.” After years of waiting, Columbus had grown impatient for an endorsement. Yet, it would only be now, after this long endeavor to rid the country of Muslim invaders, that the king and queen could begin to think about affairs other than the war and give Columbus the attention he craved.

Just google it.

Posted by:Scott PotterMarch 13, 2008 5:27:50 AMRespond ^
This kind of stuff is very scary. I personally don't believe that god exists. Logically it's highly unlikely that there is some supreme being out there watching over us. These types of extremist views are scary. Religion has been responsible for and used as justification for the killing of so many people throughout history. I think it's about time people started coming to grips with the fact that God does not exist. Maybe then all of these charlatans and will be exposed for what they truly are.
Posted by:Jean62NYMarch 13, 2008 5:30:02 AMRespond ^
Parsley, how man kids did he abused in his mansion, sales drugs and pros.. and now talks religion...

its matter of time when the victims show up and face their predator

Posted by:AhmedMarch 13, 2008 5:31:45 AMRespond ^
Parsley is a money sucking scammer. His TV studio that pretends to be a church regularly advertises for Christian cameramen.

Keep in mind, Parsley was a HUGE supporter of Ken Blackwell, the extreme righty that was the repug pick for Ohio governor. The good news: Blackwell got one of the worst political beatings in the state's history.
Posted by:Big Rod BroccoliMarch 13, 2008 5:37:03 AMRespond ^
I might ask, exactly whose version of history are you reading?
Posted by:GeraldMarch 13, 2008 5:41:44 AMRespond ^
Just this morning I saw Fox News do a hatchet job on the minister of a Black church who is fervently, and sometimes hystaerically, praising Obama. They emphasized that the church could legally lose its tax exempt statement and played up the minister's emphasis that Obama is the Black people's candidate.

But will they do a profile of this guy? Or Hagee? No more than they have exposed Baptist, Evangelical, Catholic, or Mormon churches that have actively and publicly campaigned for Republicans.
Posted by:wmforrMarch 13, 2008 5:43:52 AMRespond ^
If you study this man Jesus, you will find he was a loving, turn-the-cheek kind of guy, unlike the rabid warmonger many of his "apologists" would have you believe.
Posted by:wmforrMarch 13, 2008 5:48:11 AMRespond ^
From your speech I can tell you are a Jew. Moses was not the founder of Judiaism. Judiaism is named after the first son of Jacob Christianity was not found by Juses but by Saint Poul.
Muhammed (PBH)left Mecca for Medina because of oppression. in Medina he was
asked by Allah to fight does who fight against him and the new faith he brought.He fought the Jews because they join paggans of Arabia to root him and his fellowers
Posted by:seilenceMarch 13, 2008 5:51:26 AMRespond ^
BITE ME. You go ahead and give that a try. Becase no matter what you think, do or say, YOU LOSE IN A HOLY WAR. Period. Especially when you are are the aggressor.
By the way: if this guy is your spiritual advisor, you might jst as well flsh yourself down a toilet now.
Posted by:will robinsonMarch 13, 2008 5:53:06 AMRespond ^
Silly Christian. Myths are for kids!
Posted by:GopNeverAgainMarch 13, 2008 5:55:24 AMRespond ^
"ome idiot in Ohio..." You got that right
Posted by:BiLLyMarch 13, 2008 6:07:44 AMRespond ^
Look, even the Pope isn't demanding that we eradicate Islam. He merely invites Islam to a rational dialogue (in his Regensburg address).

Unfortunately, many evangelicals consider rational discussion to be the "tool of the devil" because it might mislead people who believe in the Bible.

Pastor Hagee, McCain's strong supporter, for instance,calls the Catholic Church the "great whore" and blames it for the Holocaust of the Jews under Hitler.

So the Pope invites WESTERNERS -- including atheists and evangelicals and yes, Moslems, to rational discussion.

Not eradication. Leave that to God.
Posted by:Chris InwienMarch 13, 2008 6:14:29 AMRespond ^
If this demonic hate campaign is done by Muslim, he will surely end up in Guantanamo.
Posted by:KemalMarch 13, 2008 6:19:24 AMRespond ^
After witnessing what has happened around the world, especially since 9/11, anybody who has not yet realized that Islam is inherently anti-democratic, mysogynic, and is the one religion where homosexuals are trully persecuted, as in hanging, deserve to be under it. Get it through your extremely thick ideologically-fogbound heads folks - Islam is not just a religion, it is a political ideology that is the closest thing to Nazism that our generation has ever faced.
Posted by:BrackmanMarch 13, 2008 6:26:03 AMRespond ^

If you substitute the word "christian" or "America" into his speech about "Islam" and "Muslims" -- you have word for word -- a speech that could have been written by an al Quaeda spokesman on a video.

It is often said that extremists in one camp help reinforce extremists in the opposite camp. The two are mirror images of one another.

regards.
S
Posted by:Sam SmithMarch 13, 2008 6:36:54 AMRespond ^
And other than campaign rhetoric about the pastor being a spiritual guide in general - which is true by his profession, regardless of whether he is a good one or bad one, the evidence that he is McCain's spiritual advisor is what, exactly?
Posted by:Assistant Village IdiotMarch 13, 2008 6:40:12 AMRespond ^
How long before we see a story about Rev. Parsley being busted in a public men's room? Give it time, it will happen. His name is a combination of country singer and gay porn star.
Posted by:m2mswvaMarch 13, 2008 6:43:28 AMRespond ^
Considering that Parsley is a bad person it would seem improbable that his endorsement should mean much. Locally he is well known as a foul mouthed ass who has a penchant for harrassing females to the point of distraction or so I've heard. He is the quintessentail christian leader. All mouth, massive greed and even less brain than GW Bush. (Well, at least he can speak English extemporaneously which Bush should master in about 50 more years.)
Posted by:KalMarch 13, 2008 6:51:57 AMRespond ^
If it is so obvious that this church and this voodoo pastor are politically involved and apparantly, selectively involved (pro-repulsican, McCainenites), then WHY isn't the IRS getting involved in revoking the church's tax exempt status?? This coven needs to be destroyed, along with all the other snake charmer religions. They hold no constructive place in this society.
Posted by:JAGMarch 13, 2008 6:56:54 AMRespond ^
I had the same thought when I read this.... I am highly doubtful that they will do a similar piece, as we all know where Fox news 'lie'....
Posted by:nerakamiMarch 13, 2008 7:00:25 AMRespond ^
http://www.islam.tc/prophecies/jesus.html
Posted by:Proud MuslimMarch 13, 2008 7:03:03 AMRespond ^
The only thing that really needs to be said is that David Corn, as are many "liberals", is trying to redefine racism using false comparisons in order to make Obama's supporters look better than they should. It's obvious and it stinks.
Posted by:SteveILMarch 13, 2008 7:10:14 AMRespond ^
McCain is seeking the endorsement of the right wing evangelicals to help him win the election in November. This is nothing new. Bush did it in 2000. Especially that it seems to be okay for everybody to hate and insult Islam and Muslims. What a shame.
Posted by:LagardereMarch 13, 2008 7:11:42 AMRespond ^
"Are they waiting for anything except the Hour, to come to them suddenly? But its Signs have already come!" (Al-Qur’an, Surah Muhammad)

Past

1. Splitting of the Moon.

2. Death of the Prophet Muhammad, may Allah bless him and grant him peace.

3. A form of death which will kill thousands of Muslims. (Understood to refer to the plague of Amwas during the
caliphate of ‘Umar ibn al-Khattab.)

4. A major fighting in Madinah (understood to refer to the battle of al-Harrah during the caliphate of Yazid, 63 AH).

5. The Muslim conquest of Jerusalem.

6. The Muslim conquest of Constantinople.

7. Two large groups of Muslims will fight in war.

8. A war between the Muslims and a reddish people with small eyes, wearing sandals made of hair (understood to refer to
the Mongol Tatar invasion of the Islamic lands.)

9. A peace agreement between the Muslims and non-Muslims from the yellow race (Chinese, Mongols, etc.)

10. Thirty impostors (dajjal) will appear, each thinking he is a prophet.

Present?

11. Naked, destitute, barefoot shepherds will compete in building tall buildings.

12. The slave-woman will give birth to her master or mistress.

13. A trial (fitnah) which will enter every Arab household.

14. Knowledge will be taken away (by the death of people of knowledge), and ignorance will prevail.

15. Wine (intoxicants, alcohol) will be drunk in great quantities.

16. Illegal sexual intercourse will become widespread.

17. Earthquakes will increase.

18. Time will pass more quickly.

19. Tribulations (fitan) will prevail.

20. Bloodshed will increase.

21. A man will pass by the grave of another and wish he was in the latter’s place.

22. Trustworthiness will be lost, i.e. when authority is given to those who do not deserve it.

23. People will gather for prayer, but will be unable to find an imam to lead them.

Future

24. The number of men will decrease, whilst the number of women will increase, until for every man there are 50 women.

25. The Euphrates will reveal a treasure of gold, and many will die fighting over it, each one hoping to be the one who gains
the treasure.

26. The Romans (Europeans) will come to a place called A’maq or Wabiq, and an army of the best people will go forth from Madinah to face them.

27. The Muslim conquest of Rome.

28. The Mahdi (guided one) will appear, and be the Imam of the Muslims.

29. Jesus Christ will descend in Damascus, and pray behind the Mahdi.

30. Jesus will break the cross and kill the swine, i.e. destroy the false christianity.

31. The Antichrist (al-masih al-dajjal, the false christ) will appear, with all his tools of deception, and be an immense trial. He will be followed by 70,000 Jews from Isfahan (present-day Iran).

32. The appearance of Ya’juj and Ma’juj (Gog and Magog), and the associated tribulations.

33. The emergence of the Beast from the Earth, carrying the Staff of Moses and the Seal of Solomon, who will speak to the people, telling them they did not believe with certainty in the Divine Signs.

34. A major war between the Muslims (including Jews and Christians who truly believe in Jesus after his return) led by the Imam Mahdi, and the Jews plus other non-Muslims led by the Antichrist.

35. Jesus will kill the Antichrist at the gate of Ludd (Lod in present-day Israel, site of an airport and a major Israeli military base).

36. A time of great peace and serenity during and after the remaining lifetime of Jesus.

37. Wealth will come so abundant that it will become difficult to find someone to accept charity.

38. Arabia will become a land of gardens and rivers.

39. Society will then decay.

40. The buttocks of the women of the tribe of Daws will again sway in circumambulation (tawaf) around the idol Dhul-Khulsah.

41. A great fire in the Hijaz, seen by the inhabitants of Busra.

42. Three major armies will sink into the earth: one in the east, one in the west, one in Arabia.

43. An Abyssinian leader with thin shins will destroy the Ka’bah.

44. The huge cloud of smoke.

45. The sun will rise from the west (its place of setting).

46. A gentle wind which will take the souls of the believers.

47. There is no-one left on the earth saying, "Allah, Allah" or "There is no god except Allah."

48. Eventually the Day of Judgment is established upon the worst of the people, who copulate like donkeys in public.

49. The blowing in the Trumpet by the Angel Israfil, upon which everyone will faint except as Allah wills.

50. The second blowing in the Trumpet, upon which everyone will be resurrected.


Million of you will read this some will agree some will not although its the truth. These war will happen billion will will try to destroy Islam billion will die.Yet they are being told the truth. They yes with their mouths and no in their heart and they shall burn in the fire of hell for eternity.No one can be force to become a muslim unless they want to knw the truth.People Islam is about peace and love why they hate it because they are afraid of the truth. Yet the say Jesus is there God but do They live like lived
Even lucifer himself came on earth to destroy Islam he is still struggling and trying now some humans fool want to try it. Well i wish them good luck and hope to see them soon ;-)
Posted by:ShakeelMarch 13, 2008 7:12:16 AMRespond ^
Arab Muslims have a use and that is they are tasked to destroy the secularist/atheist parts of America.

God's plan is to let idiots destroy each other so the remaining righteous ones like Parsley could rule this earth.

Islamic Arab countries which ban Christianity in their places are dangerous. And so are other countries which fully believe in evolution like Europe and communist countries like Russia and China.

If you don't believe it now, you'll believe it soon coz it's coming. 911 is just a sample and it ain't over yet.
Posted by:Spiderman2March 13, 2008 7:14:43 AMRespond ^
excerpts from googling the "islamic messiah Mahdi" :

Shiite Muslims believe the Mahdi, a descendent of the Prophet Mohammed, vanished in the middle of the 9th century.

Cantrell told us, "The 12th Imam disappeared, around the age of 9, with a promise that he would return and he would bring Islam to its total fruition as the WORLD'S LAST STANDING RELIGION"

Enter Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. Since becoming the president of Iran in August 2005, Ahmadinejad has emerged as the Mahdi's most influential follower.

Cantrell said, "He [Ahmadinejad] has stated that his mandate is to pave the way for the coming of this Islamic ‘messiah’."

In almost all his speeches, Ahmadinejad begs Allah to hasten the return of the Mahdi. At a recent military parade attended by CBN News in Tehran, Ahmadinejad said, "Oh, Allah, please facilitate Imam Mahdi's early return and make us one of his supporters."

*******
Posted by:Spiderman2March 13, 2008 7:22:17 AMRespond ^
Hey, America, Let's vote in another whack-job-for-Jesus. Alas, poor Jesus, we hardly knew ye.
Posted by:AnnArkyMarch 13, 2008 7:44:43 AMRespond ^
Although this call for a new crusade is stupid and dangerous talk, it is clear that Muhammed was the false prophet coming out of the desert fortold by Jesus. The violence of that religion is in line with Jesus' comment that "by his followers you will know him." If there ever was an Anti-Christ, it was Muhammed.
Posted by:LthrgreyMarch 13, 2008 7:44:58 AMRespond ^
Spiderman, you are an ignorant fool. If your make-believe god is so much better than "their" make-believe god, how do you explain away the Christofacist eagerness to bring about the battle of armageddon?
Maybe you should start believing in things that are real, not fairy tales you have been indoctrinated to believe.
Posted by:GopNeverAgainMarch 13, 2008 7:45:14 AMRespond ^
please don`t say that christianity was based on war and blood. it was the exploiters who hijacked christianity and disguised themselves as christians and did all the evil. Jesus Christ (pbuh) would never condone to such deeds. the same goes with Islam, too. It is the theory what makes a religion what it is, not how it is practiced by individuals. I believe in a day of payback for all wrongdoers and especially those who attempt to deface the one true god`s messengers and their teachings.
Posted by:ALMarch 13, 2008 7:52:19 AMRespond ^
</