Epstein May Have Paid Witnesses for Their Silence, Prosecutors Allege

Jeffrey Epstein wired $350,000 to two possible witnesses against him last year.

US attorney Geoggrey Berman points to a picture of Jeffrey Epstein during a press conference after Epstein's arrest in downtown Manhattan on July 8, 2019. Luiz C. Ribeiro/New York Daily News/TNS via ZUMA

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Federal prosecutors in New York are asking a federal judge to deny bail to Jeffrey Epstein while he awaits trial for sex trafficking and conspiracy charges. Prosecutors warn that not only is Epstein a danger to the community, but also that he may marshal his vast wealth to flee the country and try to manipulate witnesses against him. 

He “has a history of obstruction and manipulation of witnesses,” prosecutors wrote to the judge, Richard Berman, on Friday. This includes wiring $350,000 to two potential witnesses against him late last year, prosecutors warned.

In the letter, prosecutors outline intimidation tactics employed by Epstein going back to a criminal investigation into allegations of sexual abuse against children in Florida more than a decade ago. They allege, based on contemporaneous police reports, that Epstein was involved with efforts to intimidate his accusers. When Epstein faced civil suits in Florida, prosecutors wrote, he attempted to buy victims’ silence. In one police report from the time, cited by prosecutors, one victim “reported having been told: ‘Those who help him will be compensated and those who hurt him will be dealt with.'”

Prosecutors allege that Epstein may have tampered with witnesses in the past several months. Last November, the Miami Herald reported on Epstein’s alleged sex-trafficking, abuse, and the sweetheart deal he got from prosecutors in 2008, which included a non-prosecution agreement (NPA). Days later, Epstein wired $350,000 to two people who would be in a position to testify against him. 

“Just two days later, on or about November 30, 2018, the defendant wired $100,000 from a trust account he controlled to an individual named as a possible co-conspirator in the NPA,” prosecutors wrote. “Just three days after that, on or about December 3, 2018, the defendant wired $250,000 from the same trust account to another individual named as a possible co-conspirator in the NPA and also identified as one of the defendant’s employees in the Indictment.”

Those payments, prosecutors say, show that Epstein was likely “attempting to further influence co-conspirators who might provide information against him in light of the recently re-emerging allegations.”

In an indictment unveiled on Monday, prosecutors charged Epstein, 66, with luring dozens of underage girls to his homes in Manhattan and Palm Beach, where he sexually abused them and also pushed them to recruit new victims. In the letter to the judge on Friday, prosecutors said the case against Epstein, already robust, is growing stronger every day. 

“Just since the Indictment was unsealed, several additional women, in multiple jurisdictions, have identified themselves to the Government as having been victimized by the defendant when they were minors,” the prosecutors said. In the last few days, the government has seized a large volume of photographs of naked women and girls, and that claims that “dozens of individuals have called the Government in recent days to convey information regarding the defendant and the allegations.” 

A bail hearing for Epstein is scheduled for 10 am Monday.

OUR DEADLINE MATH PROBLEM

It’s risky, but also unavoidable: A full one-third of the dollars that we need to pay for the journalism you rely on has to get raised in December. A good December means our newsroom is fully staffed, well-resourced, and on the beat. A bad one portends budget trouble and hard choices.

The December 31 deadline is drawing nearer, and if we’re going to have any chance of making our goal, we need those of you who’ve never pitched in before to join the ranks of MoJo donors.

We simply can’t afford to come up short. There is no cushion in our razor-thin budget—no backup, no alternative sources of revenue to balance our books. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the fierce journalism we do. That’s why we need you to show up for us right now.

payment methods

OUR DEADLINE MATH PROBLEM

It’s risky, but also unavoidable: A full one-third of the dollars that we need to pay for the journalism you rely on has to get raised in December. A good December means our newsroom is fully staffed, well-resourced, and on the beat. A bad one portends budget trouble and hard choices.

The December 31 deadline is drawing nearer, and if we’re going to have any chance of making our goal, we need those of you who’ve never pitched in before to join the ranks of MoJo donors.

We simply can’t afford to come up short. There is no cushion in our razor-thin budget—no backup, no alternative sources of revenue to balance our books. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the fierce journalism we do. That’s why we need you to show up for us right now.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate